The Diamond David Lee Roth Army - View Single Post - Birth control could help combat climate change

**Kristy** · 09-18-2009, 06:27 PM

1.

"If those women had access to free condoms or other birth control methods, that could slow rates of population growth, possibly easing the pressure on the environment, the editors say."

Fuck you, you bunch of sexist racist hippies

and...

2.

"There is now an emerging debate and interest about the links between population dynamics, sexual and reproductive health and rights, and climate change," the commentary says."

Oh, so it's the woman responsible for climate change according to this unfounded, researched stupid-as-shit sexist story, is it!?! In that case, why have condoms when you can depopulate a certain gender in its place? And as for this "emerging debate" who, exactly, are these emerging debaters? Horny males with small penises who want to drive their Hummers on private land? Hey, I have an idea - instead of condoms we just castrate 60% of the male population from birth? Why I'm sure the same of idiots who wrote this shit must also believe the testosterone is responsible for so much of the aggression in the world, right? And how is cutting down on meat intake supposed to help the planet when it takes just about as much carbon emissions to pull corn from the ground or vegetables from the vine?

Also

3. According to the report, each $7 spent on basic family planning would slash global carbon dioxide emissions by more than 1 ton.

People in developing counties populate because they suffer form a lack of proper education, dietary heath and environmental safety. Many don't have 1/1000th of penny to their name much less $7 to plan anything for the future. They fuck out of boredom as well as survival. Hardly a "lifestyle issue" when one considers the population growth in the poorest of the poor places on earth expounds out of necessity and not personal luxury. A true "lifestyle issue" is buying a lawnmower, a 2-stroke jet ski, outside bar-b-que with friends or burning wood to keep your sorry ass warm on cold winter nights which does have some founded scientific basis in climate change than a inefficient supply of condoms. As for condoms reducing the spread of AIDS (oh, and let's face it, this story is also cloaked in racism) in places such as Africa or the lower 1/3 of Asia is also a myth when you factor in the unsanitary conditions of these places; many recycle if you get my drift even to the point of using their own feces as fertilizer to grow food they can barely eat. Just how many of the estimated 9 billion will live past the age of 10?

Whenever I read shit like this draped in a veneer of lame unfounded scientific methods and sexist innuendoes it all comes down the haves and have nots with the haves feeling threatened by the latter.

09-18-2009, 06:27 PM	#2 (permalink)
Kristy A Mistress To Magicians Commando Join Date: Aug 2004 Member Number: 7609 Location: Denver, Colo Posts: 1,344 Thanks: 164 Thanked 324 Times in 197 Posts Groans: 29 Groaned at 29 Times in 24 Posts Rep Power: 10 Last Online: Yesterday 07:51 PM	1. "If those women had access to free condoms or other birth control methods, that could slow rates of population growth, possibly easing the pressure on the environment, the editors say." Fuck you, you bunch of sexist racist hippies and... 2. "There is now an emerging debate and interest about the links between population dynamics, sexual and reproductive health and rights, and climate change," the commentary says." Oh, so it's the woman responsible for climate change according to this unfounded, researched stupid-as-shit sexist story, is it!?! In that case, why have condoms when you can depopulate a certain gender in its place? And as for this "emerging debate" who, exactly, are these emerging debaters? Horny males with small penises who want to drive their Hummers on private land? Hey, I have an idea - instead of condoms we just castrate 60% of the male population from birth? Why I'm sure the same of idiots who wrote this shit must also believe the testosterone is responsible for so much of the aggression in the world, right? And how is cutting down on meat intake supposed to help the planet when it takes just about as much carbon emissions to pull corn from the ground or vegetables from the vine? Also 3. According to the report, each $7 spent on basic family planning would slash global carbon dioxide emissions by more than 1 ton. People in developing counties populate because they suffer form a lack of proper education, dietary heath and environmental safety. Many don't have 1/1000th of penny to their name much less $7 to plan anything for the future. They fuck out of boredom as well as survival. Hardly a "lifestyle issue" when one considers the population growth in the poorest of the poor places on earth expounds out of necessity and not personal luxury. A true "lifestyle issue" is buying a lawnmower, a 2-stroke jet ski, outside bar-b-que with friends or burning wood to keep your sorry ass warm on cold winter nights which does have some founded scientific basis in climate change than a inefficient supply of condoms. As for condoms reducing the spread of AIDS (oh, and let's face it, this story is also cloaked in racism) in places such as Africa or the lower 1/3 of Asia is also a myth when you factor in the unsanitary conditions of these places; many recycle if you get my drift even to the point of using their own feces as fertilizer to grow food they can barely eat. Just how many of the estimated 9 billion will live past the age of 10? Whenever I read shit like this draped in a veneer of lame unfounded scientific methods and sexist innuendoes it all comes down the haves and have nots with the haves feeling threatened by the latter. Last edited by Kristy; 09-18-2009 at 06:36 PM.