PDA

View Full Version : Goss Sworn In as CIA Chief



lucky wilbury
09-25-2004, 05:56 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,133442,00.html

Goss Sworn In as CIA Chief
Friday, September 24, 2004

WASHINGTON — Porter Goss was sworn in Friday as the new CIA chief, overseer of a U.S. intelligence community that has been intensely criticized for its failures concerning the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and the Iraq war.

In an Oval Office ceremony, Goss, accompanied by his wife, Mariel, was sworn by White House chief of staff Andy Card as President Bush stood nearby.

Goss succeeds George Tenet (search), who caught many by surprise in June when he resigned after seven years, having serving two administrations.

In addition to serving as CIA director, Goss will have another role as head of a loose confederation of the 14 other agencies that complete the U.S. intelligence community, including the FBI and National Security Agency (search).

Goss, 65, moved to the CIA from Congress, having represented southwestern Florida in the House since 1989. The Republican lawmaker served as chairman of the House Intelligence Committee (search) for most of the last eight years.

The Senate approved his nomination on a 77-17 vote Wednesday, over protests from some Democrats who said he had too many Republican ties for a job that requires independence.

"Porter Goss's confirmation ... represents perhaps the most important changing of the guard for our intelligence community since 1947," when Congress created the CIA, Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Pat Roberts, R-Kans., said during Goss's nomination hearing Thursday. "He will be the first director of central intelligence in a new, and hopefully better, intelligence community."

A CIA and Army intelligence officer during the 1960s, Goss is only the second congressman to lead the CIA, following former House member and future president George H.W. Bush.

Should Democrat John Kerry be elected president, he would be expected to pick a different CIA director. Neither Kerry nor his running mate, Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., voted on the confirmation.

In its scathing report of the nation's intelligence apparatus, the commission investigating the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks faulted the performance not only of the nation's intelligence agencies, but also of the congressional committees overseeing them.

Congress is likely to pass legislation before year's end establishing a national intelligence director, which leaves Goss's position up in the air. It's uncertain who would oversee all 15 of the country's spy agencies and roughly 15 percent of their budgets.

Bush has not yet said whether Goss would fill that position once it is created. The president has, however, signed executive orders granting the new director of central intelligence broader powers in the interim.

FORD
09-25-2004, 06:34 PM
Old school BCE/CIA - hardly a surprise that he was nominated, and while the confirmation vote disgusts me, it's not really that uncommon in an election year, especially when the appointee is one of their own (i.e. Asscrotch being confirmed as AG)

So what's the general mood around the office about your new boss, LW?

ODShowtime
09-25-2004, 07:45 PM
When he was getting grilled by the Dems in the SIC he looked like he was just saying what they wanted to hear. That's probably what he told bush&friends too. I hope he's not just a yes man.

lucky wilbury
09-25-2004, 08:04 PM
he'll bring back old school ass kickings.

ODShowtime
09-25-2004, 08:06 PM
that sounds intriguing. can you elaborate? do you mean he'll go even farther down the road of "personal intelligence extraction"?

lucky wilbury
09-25-2004, 08:18 PM
no i mean black ops stuff. he's old school. former officer himself. if we have to set some one up just to sell them down the river to get good info and leave them out to dry so be it. no more restriction on who the cia can work with either i bet. pc bullshit out the window. here's an example of what i'm talking about: lets say on 9-10-01 al zawhari came forward and said to either cia agent or case officer that there would be an attack on 9-11 and gave a list of flights and highjackers names times etc etc it would be ILLEGAL for that officer to even hear that info let alone pass it along. it would be illegal because of the source and because the source has a criminal background. those rules clinton era restrictions now i bet go out the window even more so now. people with shady back grounds are the best bet for info. so what if someones a murder but if the infos solid run with it.

ODShowtime
09-25-2004, 08:24 PM
Yeah, the policy of not dealing with criminals was foolish and I'm glad it's going away.

You're right that he was a field officer, that's not in dispute. I'll agree that he has good experience and shit. I just don't like his R/FL affiliation.

wraytw
09-25-2004, 08:27 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
I just don't like his R/FL affiliation.

Would you be happy with any Republican filling the spot?

ODShowtime
09-25-2004, 08:32 PM
A post like DIA I would have to take a person at a time. It's a very important position. Frankly, anyone appointed by bush&friends is shady and mostly corrupt.

This guy has credentials though. I can't deny that.