PDA

View Full Version : Bin Laden Handing Baton To Mystery Lieutenants?



Viking
11-07-2004, 01:16 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GEOSTRATEGY-DIRECT INTELLIGENCE BRIEF
Bin Laden handing baton to mystery lieutenants?
Analysts believe he lacked means to carry out election-eve attack

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted: November 6, 2004
1:00 a.m. Eastern

Editor's note: WorldNetDaily brings readers exclusive, up-to-the-minute global intelligence news and analysis from Geostrategy-Direct, a new online newsletter edited by veteran journalist Robert Morton and featuring the "Backgrounder" column compiled by Bill Gertz. Geostrategy-Direct is a subscription-based service produced by the publishers of WorldTribune.com, a free news service frequently linked by the editors of WorldNetDaily.

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

Osama bin Laden might not have had the means to carry out a mass casualty attack on the United States on the eve of the elections, reports Geostrategy-Direct, the global intelligence news service.

U.S. intelligence analysts believe this was the reason why bin Laden released a videotape to discuss al-Qaida and the American presidential elections. They said bin Laden, in his first video appearance in three years, wanted to bolster the morale of his followers who have been waiting for such a strike.

Over the last two months, the CIA has lowered the prospect of a major al-Qaida attack. Intelligence sources said information that was relayed to the U.S. intelligence community of a specific attack this summer has been discredited.

They said the U.S.-Pakistani operation in Waziristan in August rounded up several senior al-Qaida operatives along the Afghan border and in Britain and damaged the organization's communications network.

But there is another videotape released by al-Qaida that has U.S. intelligence worried. And that is a 75-minute tape by a U.S. national termed "Azzam the American." Azzam claims to be an al-Qaida member and warns that the streets of America will "run with blood."

The U.S. intelligence community believes that Azzam, whose face was shrouded, could be the key to al-Qaida's real intention. Some analysts believe Azzam is really Adam Gadahn, also known as Adam Pearlemen, an American Muslim from Orange County, California. The FBI has assessed that Gadahn joined al-Qaida in the late 1990s and has been missing since 2000.

A second individual was heard on the Azzam tape. He is off-camera but asked Gadahn several questions. The assessment is that he is Adnan El Shukrijumah, a former Florida resident and an al-Qaida operative sought by the United States for more than a year.

The big question: Are Gadahn and El Shukrijumah in the United States and planning al-Qaida's encore to 9/11?

On the sidelines

Intelligence analysts are raising the scenario that bin Laden will have little or nothing to do with any future mass-casualty attack in the United States. He will sit on the sidelines and play statesman while others plan and even finance the attack.

The analysts say bin Laden has invested his hopes in Abu Mussib Al Zarqawi, regarded as the most lethal insurgent in Iraq. Al Zarqawi has hurt the United States more than bin Laden could imagine, and the two appear to have formed an alliance. This means Gulf Arab princes might be diverting their money to Al Zarqawi.

The Al Battar Camp, an online biweekly magazine published by Saudi followers of bin Laden, has hailed the purported bin Laden-Zarqawi alliance.

The 21st issue of this influential publication has expressed enthusiasm over Al Zarqawi's pledge of loyalty to bin Laden and regards this as a significant development.

With U.S. officials not ruling out that Al Zarqawi has obtained chemical weapons, such a move could be the start of a joint operation against the United States.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41322

Nickdfresh
11-07-2004, 04:40 PM
Took them this long to figure that out? Good intelligence brief!


Douchebag:monekyl: Osama

Cathedral
11-07-2004, 04:50 PM
Yeah, Bin Laden can't attack us, why is that?

Maybe it's because the Bush Administration has been kicking his ass royally?
Maybe you should start writing your apologies to our Commander and Chief and let him know that his war on terror is actually doing some good.

Just think, you could be grieving the loss of a loved one right now. But you aren't, and haven't had to since Sept. 12th 2001.

Do the math, then fuck off!

diamond den™
11-07-2004, 04:53 PM
Originally posted by Cathedral
Yeah, Bin Laden can't attack us, why is that?

Maybe it's because the Bush Administration has been kicking his ass royally?
Maybe you should start writing your apologies to our Commander and Chief and let him know that his war on terror is actually doing some good.

Just think, you could be grieving the loss of a loved one right now. But you aren't, and haven't had to since Sept. 12th 2001.

Do the math, then fuck off!

The Bush Admininistration haven't caught Osama Bin Laden either and they are exactly winning in Iraq either are they????

:)

FORD
11-07-2004, 04:55 PM
Do this math...

Bill Gertz + World Tribune = Moonies.

Moonies + World Net Daily = Lie R²

Viking
11-07-2004, 06:12 PM
FORD, your tinfoil hat has a hole in it. :D

Nickdfresh
11-07-2004, 07:41 PM
Originally posted by Cathedral
Yeah, Bin Laden can't attack us, why is that?

Maybe it's because the Bush Administration has been kicking his ass royally?
Maybe you should start writing your apologies to our Commander and Chief and let him know that his war on terror is actually doing some good.

Just think, you could be grieving the loss of a loved one right now. But you aren't, and haven't had to since Sept. 12th 2001.

Do the math, then fuck off!

Gee, according to tricky Dick Cheney we could all be killed in a bright flash and mushroom cloud in seconds.

I like how the Republican spinners like to have it both ways. No major domestic attacks means the Admin. is on the case.

But if we had had a terrorist attack, then we would have been wimps had we had voted Junior out of office and caving into the terrorist threat.

By that logic, then Gore should be president because we didn't have any major domestic terrorist incidents during the (my) administration. I kept us all safe and cozy. Sure the terrorist cocksuckers blew up an embassy or two and mostly killed (Muslim) Kenyans. And they put a hole in a Ship and killed some Airman and sailors, but overall the skyscrapers stayed aloft with me as president.