PDA

View Full Version : al-Qaida Readying Nuclear Strike?



Nickdfresh
11-12-2004, 10:11 PM
Al Qaida May Be Preparing for Nuclear Strike


Posted by: phreak_of_nature
On: Fri November, 12 2004 @ 08:22 GMT
Recently several signs are pointing to Al Qaida preparing for a strike on America. Most likely this strike will come in the form of a nuclear bomb. One source has Al Qaida completing the construction of such a bomb, and the other has Al Qaida receiving the blessing to use such a weapon. The blessing from an Islamic cleric in Saudi Arabia allows them to use it as a measure of reciprocity.


original news source:

www.drudgereport.com
Osama bin Laden now has religious approval to use a nuclear device against Americans, says the former head of the CIA unit charged with tracking down the Saudi terrorist. The former agent, Michael Scheuer, speaks to Steve Kroft in his first television interview without disguise to be broadcast on 60 MINUTES Sunday, Nov. 14 (7:00-8:00 PM, ET/PT) on the CBS Television Network.

Scheuer was until recently known as the "anonymous" author of two books critical of the West's response to bin Laden and al Qaeda, the most recent of which is titled Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror. No one in the West knows more about the Qaeda leader than Scheuer, who has tracked him since the mid-1980s. The CIA allowed him to write the books provided he remain anonymous, but now is allowing him to reveal himself for the first time on Sunday's broadcast; he formally leaves the Agency today (12).

Even if bin Laden had a nuclear weapon, he probably wouldn't have used it for a lack of proper religious authority - authority he has now. "[Bin Laden] secured from a Saudi sheik...a rather long treatise on the possibility of using nuclear weapons against the Americans," says Scheuer. "[The treatise] found that he was perfectly within his rights to use them. Muslims argue that the United States is responsible for millions of dead Muslims around the world, so reciprocity would mean you could kill millions of Americans," Scheuer tells Kroft.


Please visit the link provided for the complete story.



original news source:

www.adnki.com
Dubai, (AKI) - The ability to produce and enrich uranium to make nuclear bombs is no longer the prerogative of the world's "tyrannical crusaders", a statement signed by the the al-Qaeda terror network and published on a new Islamic 'Jihad Lion's Den Forum' website claimed this week. "Our attempts to make small nuclear bombs with great potential for destruction have succeeded", said the statement, which its authors said was targeted at the American people. "Al-Qaeda will respond harshly to your refusal to heed sheikh Osama bin Laden's warning not to re-elect the foolish Bush in the presidential elections. We tell you that this refusal will bring Allah's divine wrath upon you. He will make you the the prime target of an attack that will strike at the heart of America", the statement continued.

The message begins with the 60th verse from the 'Al-Anfal' ['The Spoils of War] chapter of the Koran: "And prepare for them you Muslims all you can recruit of strength: armed forces and mounted troops to strike terror into the hearts and minds of Allah's enemy who is your enemy, and into the hearts and minds of others whom you do not know but Allah knows them. And remember that whatever you spend in divine service you shall be reimbursed and never shall you be wronged."


Please visit the link provided for the complete story.


Analysts believe that the tape released by bin Laden at the end of October is the warning to America that we will be struck if we continue to pursue the War on Terror. This would have been one of the requirements from the Sheik to proceed with the plan. The only thing left would be to acquire such a weapon.

Al Qaida has many possible sources to acquire a nuclear bomb, from the former soviet states, to rogue Pakistani nuclear scientists, to even North Korea. The second article provides evidence that Al Qaida recently has become nuclear capable.

While I don't like to be an alarmist, I do like to connect the dots. This particular puzzle is starting to look like a mushroom cloud to me.

http://www.atsnn.com/story/96858.html

Cathedral
11-12-2004, 11:04 PM
And it will be...The end times are upon us my friend, and it doesn't make one bit of difference who would have won the White House.

We are seperated by politics, but will be united in death.

Nickdfresh
11-13-2004, 10:32 AM
Originally posted by Cathedral
And it will be...The end times are upon us my friend, and it doesn't make one bit of difference who would have won the White House.

We are seperated by politics, but will be united in death.

This is a very disturbing story indeed. But recently some European officials said that the threat of terrorist WMD's had been highly overrated.

The most feasible nuclear device for al-Qaida to smuggle in the U.S. would be a suitcase sized ex-Soviet Nuclear Device designed to be used by Soviet Spetsnaz commandos. However, these devices had a built in code feature that would prevent their use and they are also probably 20 years old now and of questionable reliability.

lms2
11-13-2004, 10:39 AM
Originally posted by Cathedral
We are seperated by politics, but will be united in death.

Thats an eerie thought!

FORD
11-13-2004, 10:58 AM
I think this is a fear campaign designed to let the BCE get away with wasting billions of dollars on that non functioning "missile defense shield". The main argument against it. logically, has always been "how the Hell does this fight terrorism, and if it doesn't then why is it neccessary?"

And the answer, logically, is that it doesn't. But it keeps money flowing to the defense contractors, and allows the BCE to skim billions off the artificially high budgets that they can divert to other things, which they can't have on the books.

Like funding Al Qaeda, maybe?

But of course, if you can convince the sheeple that big bad Harvey Bin Laden the 6 foot invisible terra-bunny has nukes, then the entire argument for the defense shield magically becomes relevant. Never mind that the goddamn thing doesn't work, just like it didn't work in the 80's, the last time they pulled this scam.

Nickdfresh
11-13-2004, 11:05 AM
Originally posted by FORD
I think this is a fear campaign designed to let the BCE get away with wasting billions of dollars on that non functioning "missile defense shield". The main argument against it. logically, has always been "how the Hell does this fight terrorism, and if it doesn't then why is it neccessary?"

And the answer, logically, is that it doesn't. But it keeps money flowing to the defense contractors, and allows the BCE to skim billions off the artificially high budgets that they can divert to other things, which they can't have on the books.

Like funding Al Qaeda, maybe?

But of course, if you can convince the sheeple that big bad Harvey Bin Laden the 6 foot invisible terra-bunny has nukes, then the entire argument for the defense shield magically becomes relevant. Never mind that the goddamn thing doesn't work, just like it didn't work in the 80's, the last time they pulled this scam.

Actually, this highlights your point since we are far more likely to get nuked by terrorists bringing small weapons over the porus, incompetently screened borders and ports, than by a rogue state firing a missile using largely 1950' or early 60's era Soviet technology..

lms2
11-13-2004, 11:05 AM
Besides, if it happens, it happens. Right!

DEMON CUNT
11-13-2004, 01:16 PM
GOOD IS FEAR!