PDA

View Full Version : Spec. Charles Graner Wins the Hearts & Minds of Iraqis



Nickdfresh
01-12-2005, 03:12 PM
January 12, 2005

THE NATION
Guard Was 'Primary Torturer,' Prisoner Says
Videotaped testimony portrays Spc. Charles Graner as 'sick-minded,' while the defense depicts a soldier struggling in a dangerous atmosphere.

By Richard A. Serrano, Times Staff Writer

FT. HOOD, Texas — The videotaped image of a foreign fighter captured in Iraq shone from a screen in a military courtroom here Tuesday and pronounced Army Spc. Charles A. Graner Jr., the accused ringleader of rogue soldiers who systematically abused prisoners, as the "true face of the United States."

The testimony of Ameen Said Sheikh hinted at the damage done to the American image in the Arab world by the scandal at Abu Ghraib prison. But as a Syrian captured with a cache of weapons, he also represented an enemy bent on killing U.S. troops such as Graner.


The defense in Graner's court-martial on charges of abusing prisoners sought to portray the situation in that light: with Graner as an American soldier working in a highly dangerous environment whose alleged rough treatment of prisoners was understandable. "The last time I saw him, he threatened to kill me," Graner said after Sheikh's testimony.

But Sheikh — one of two Abu Ghraib prisoners to testify against Graner — identified him as "the primary torturer," gleefully beating and humiliating inmates, encouraging other soldiers to join in, all the while, he said, insulting the Islamic faith.

A second prisoner, Hussein Mutar, testified that soldiers who worked under Graner forced him to strip, masturbate and climb atop a pyramid of other naked detainees. A digital photograph depicting the pyramid was among the images of Abu Ghraib transmitted around the world.

Mutar said his head was covered in a sandbag at times but that he noticed one soldier with a tattoo and wearing prescription glasses, possibly a description of Graner. "All I could hear," Mutar said, "was their laughing."

Jurors in Graner's court-martial will decide whether to accept the claim by the former Pennsylvania prison guard that he and other American soldiers were only following orders to "soften up" prisoners as they roamed the infamous prison compound outside Iraq. Four soldiers have pleaded guilty and two more are awaiting trial.

Prosecutors rested their case Tuesday after calling 14 witnesses in two days. The defense also plans to call 14 witnesses beginning today, possibly including Graner.

Testifying largely through interpreters in separate depositions videotaped last month in Iraq, the two men — who remain incarcerated — appeared nervous and soft-spoken. They often bowed their heads, sometimes struggling to express themselves with hand gestures. They criticized the United States and voiced skepticism that American military justice would hold Graner or other accused soldiers accountable.

Mutar, an Iraqi, appeared near tears.

"I couldn't imagine in the beginning that this would happen," he said, his head turned away. "I wished that I could kill myself because no one over there would stop what was going on."

Sheikh, who testified that he entered Iraq from Syria heavily armed and on a religious jihad to fight Americans, said Graner represented "people who are sick-minded."

"That Graner guy is a man that hurt his country, hurt his people," Sheikh said. "I think he should receive punishment, God bless."

Guy Womack, Graner's civilian attorney, predicted outside the courtroom that testimony by prisoners like Sheikh would actually boomerang and drive home for jurors the hazards of guard duty in Iraq.

"That was very helpful testimony," Womack said. "It would offend the jury. It's the face of the enemy and it's very clear he hates America."

Sheikh testified that he persuaded an Iraqi guard at Abu Ghraib to smuggle a handgun for him, an incident that has been spelled out in Army investigations of Abu Ghraib. When guards found the gun, a firefight erupted. A U.S. soldier was slightly injured, and Sheikh said he was shot in both legs.

Sheikh testified that he wanted the gun in order to break out of prison to escape the beatings.

Graner, 36, said before Tuesday's testimony that he thought the case was going "fantastic, fantastic."

The jury of four officers and six enlisted men were shown copies of eight e-mails Graner wrote in December 2003, at the height of the alleged abuse, and that included some photographs of injured prisoners, including one whom Graner was said to have stitched up after hitting him in the head.

The e-mails were not made public. Capt. Chuck Neill of the staff judge advocate's office at Ft. Hood, who reviewed the messages, said Graner sent them from Baghdad to his then-wife, a son, and other relatives and friends.

The government provided the e-mails to the jury to "show what his state of mind was then," Neill said. He added that "nothing in these suggests he was following orders at the time."

Another official closely involved in the case, who declined to be identified, said the eight e-mails were only a smattering of those Graner sent. In other ones, he said, Graner bragged about hitting one inmate "so hard my hand hurt," and that "I got a full body workout" in another attack on a prisoner.

The jurors also were shown a notebook and a copy of Graner's Army Code of Conduct manual. He took notes in the manual, an indication he knew it was illegal to abuse prisoners, Neill said.

In the notebook, the source said, Graner jotted down notes on "how to hit someone and not leave a mark."

The videotaped testimony from the two detainees took up most of the day in court.

Sheikh said he left his wife and children in Syria and traveled to Iraq in the summer of 2003 to fight the U.S. military as part of his "religious duty." He said he then believed America had "spoiled" Iraq and the Islamic world.

He was arrested carrying several AK-47 firearms, grenades, and bomb-making material. At first he was held in a prison camp near Abu Ghraib, where a riot erupted when an inmate was assaulted. He and other prisoners were transferred to Abu Ghraib, where he said military interrogators repeatedly threatened him and guards abused him.

"It was Graner and his torturers," he said. "Graner and people who worked on the night shift. But Graner was the primary torturer."

Sheikh said Graner laughed when another guard urinated on him. He said Graner made a Yemeni prisoner "eat from the toilet." Under Graner's direction, Sheikh said, guards ganged up on him.

"They took off my clothes. They said certain things about my wife, my religion," he said. "They hit me in the back, my head. They took me into the bathroom and made me take a shower, and one told me he was going to rape me." Graner, he said, "was laughing. He laughed. He was whistling. He was singing."

Then, Sheikh said, "Graner hit me and he made me say something against my religion. He made me say like, 'Thank Jesus because he gave you life.' But in my religion, only Allah gave me life. Not Jesus."

LA Times (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-graner12jan12.story)

Sarge's Little Helper
01-12-2005, 03:12 PM
January 12, 2005

THE NATION
Guard Was 'Primary Torturer,' Prisoner Says
Videotaped testimony portrays Spc. Charles Graner as 'sick-minded,' while the defense depicts a soldier struggling in a dangerous atmosphere.

By Richard A. Serrano, Times Staff Writer

FT. HOOD, Texas — The videotaped image of a foreign fighter captured in Iraq shone from a screen in a military courtroom here Tuesday and pronounced Army Spc. Charles A. Graner Jr., the accused ringleader of rogue soldiers who systematically abused prisoners, as the "true face of the United States."

The testimony of Ameen Said Sheikh hinted at the damage done to the American image in the Arab world by the scandal at Abu Ghraib prison. But as a Syrian captured with a cache of weapons, he also represented an enemy bent on killing U.S. troops such as Graner.


The defense in Graner's court-martial on charges of abusing prisoners sought to portray the situation in that light: with Graner as an American soldier working in a highly dangerous environment whose alleged rough treatment of prisoners was understandable. "The last time I saw him, he threatened to kill me," Graner said after Sheikh's testimony.

But Sheikh — one of two Abu Ghraib prisoners to testify against Graner — identified him as "the primary torturer," gleefully beating and humiliating inmates, encouraging other soldiers to join in, all the while, he said, insulting the Islamic faith.

A second prisoner, Hussein Mutar, testified that soldiers who worked under Graner forced him to strip, masturbate and climb atop a pyramid of other naked detainees. A digital photograph depicting the pyramid was among the images of Abu Ghraib transmitted around the world.

Mutar said his head was covered in a sandbag at times but that he noticed one soldier with a tattoo and wearing prescription glasses, possibly a description of Graner. "All I could hear," Mutar said, "was their laughing."

Jurors in Graner's court-martial will decide whether to accept the claim by the former Pennsylvania prison guard that he and other American soldiers were only following orders to "soften up" prisoners as they roamed the infamous prison compound outside Iraq. Four soldiers have pleaded guilty and two more are awaiting trial.

Prosecutors rested their case Tuesday after calling 14 witnesses in two days. The defense also plans to call 14 witnesses beginning today, possibly including Graner.

Testifying largely through interpreters in separate depositions videotaped last month in Iraq, the two men — who remain incarcerated — appeared nervous and soft-spoken. They often bowed their heads, sometimes struggling to express themselves with hand gestures. They criticized the United States and voiced skepticism that American military justice would hold Graner or other accused soldiers accountable.

Mutar, an Iraqi, appeared near tears.

"I couldn't imagine in the beginning that this would happen," he said, his head turned away. "I wished that I could kill myself because no one over there would stop what was going on."

Sheikh, who testified that he entered Iraq from Syria heavily armed and on a religious jihad to fight Americans, said Graner represented "people who are sick-minded."

"That Graner guy is a man that hurt his country, hurt his people," Sheikh said. "I think he should receive punishment, God bless."

Guy Womack, Graner's civilian attorney, predicted outside the courtroom that testimony by prisoners like Sheikh would actually boomerang and drive home for jurors the hazards of guard duty in Iraq.

"That was very helpful testimony," Womack said. "It would offend the jury. It's the face of the enemy and it's very clear he hates America."

Sheikh testified that he persuaded an Iraqi guard at Abu Ghraib to smuggle a handgun for him, an incident that has been spelled out in Army investigations of Abu Ghraib. When guards found the gun, a firefight erupted. A U.S. soldier was slightly injured, and Sheikh said he was shot in both legs.

Sheikh testified that he wanted the gun in order to break out of prison to escape the beatings.

Graner, 36, said before Tuesday's testimony that he thought the case was going "fantastic, fantastic."

The jury of four officers and six enlisted men were shown copies of eight e-mails Graner wrote in December 2003, at the height of the alleged abuse, and that included some photographs of injured prisoners, including one whom Graner was said to have stitched up after hitting him in the head.

The e-mails were not made public. Capt. Chuck Neill of the staff judge advocate's office at Ft. Hood, who reviewed the messages, said Graner sent them from Baghdad to his then-wife, a son, and other relatives and friends.

The government provided the e-mails to the jury to "show what his state of mind was then," Neill said. He added that "nothing in these suggests he was following orders at the time."

Another official closely involved in the case, who declined to be identified, said the eight e-mails were only a smattering of those Graner sent. In other ones, he said, Graner bragged about hitting one inmate "so hard my hand hurt," and that "I got a full body workout" in another attack on a prisoner.

The jurors also were shown a notebook and a copy of Graner's Army Code of Conduct manual. He took notes in the manual, an indication he knew it was illegal to abuse prisoners, Neill said.

In the notebook, the source said, Graner jotted down notes on "how to hit someone and not leave a mark."

The videotaped testimony from the two detainees took up most of the day in court.

Sheikh said he left his wife and children in Syria and traveled to Iraq in the summer of 2003 to fight the U.S. military as part of his "religious duty." He said he then believed America had "spoiled" Iraq and the Islamic world.

He was arrested carrying several AK-47 firearms, grenades, and bomb-making material. At first he was held in a prison camp near Abu Ghraib, where a riot erupted when an inmate was assaulted. He and other prisoners were transferred to Abu Ghraib, where he said military interrogators repeatedly threatened him and guards abused him.

"It was Graner and his torturers," he said. "Graner and people who worked on the night shift. But Graner was the primary torturer."

Sheikh said Graner laughed when another guard urinated on him. He said Graner made a Yemeni prisoner "eat from the toilet." Under Graner's direction, Sheikh said, guards ganged up on him.

"They took off my clothes. They said certain things about my wife, my religion," he said. "They hit me in the back, my head. They took me into the bathroom and made me take a shower, and one told me he was going to rape me." Graner, he said, "was laughing. He laughed. He was whistling. He was singing."

Then, Sheikh said, "Graner hit me and he made me say something against my religion. He made me say like, 'Thank Jesus because he gave you life.' But in my religion, only Allah gave me life. Not Jesus."

LA Times (http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-graner12jan12.story)

Oops. I wasn't paying attention. Tell me again what is going on.

Spc. Graner
01-12-2005, 05:01 PM
Hey! That's me!

I love to stick stuff in Iraqi buttholes. Punching them is fun too. It makes me laugh. It also makes me feel good to know that I am keeping America safe from these fucking terrorists!

I hope after I am found innocent, I can go back for another tour. I'd like to make some Iraqi terrorists suck my balls!

Look at Lindy take her terrorist for a walk!

Nickdfresh
01-12-2005, 05:49 PM
You bastard! How dare you! How dare you cheat on your wife with that little trollish slut England?! Why you are not a moral person for cheating on YOUR WIFE!! Oh the scandal! The Shame! Why it's adulterous, licentious, homewreckers like you that ruin the Army for everyone!

--The Preceding Message brought to you by the Christian Coalition.

AND ALL THAT GAY PORNOGRAPHY YOU MADE!

ODShowtime
01-12-2005, 08:48 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh

The testimony of Ameen Said Sheikh hinted at the damage done to the American image in the Arab world by the scandal at Abu Ghraib prison. But as a Syrian captured with a cache of weapons, he also represented an enemy bent on killing U.S. troops such as Graner.

What a great witness. He has no reason to lie about anything.

Nickdfresh
01-12-2005, 09:33 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
What a great witness. He has no reason to lie about anything.

If he was a Syrian Foreign Fighter, he should never have been there anyways. He should have been taken to a more 'exclusive' resort. The crying fucking shame here is that 90% of those people put through this shit were run of the mill Iraqis picked up on minor offenses,

ODShowtime
01-12-2005, 09:46 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
If he was a Syrian Foreign Fighter, he should never have been there anyways. He should have been taken to a more 'exclusive' resort. The crying fucking shame here is that 90% of those people put through this shit were run of the mill Iraqis picked up on minor offenses,


Agreed. This intelligence extraction initiative was completely mismanaged to disastrous effect. No one here can disagree.

Nickdfresh
01-12-2005, 09:56 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
Agreed. This intelligence extraction initiative was completely mismanaged to disastrous effect. No one here can disagree.

I can't imagine why...

Nickdfresh
01-14-2005, 03:21 PM
Graner is a scum bag. But he is clearly taking the fall for higher-ups that advocated torture! Another Neo Con ABORTION of truth and Justice!

Nickdfresh
01-14-2005, 09:46 PM
Graner Convicted of Prisoner Abuse

By T.R. Reid
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, January 14, 2005; 7:27 PM

FORT HOOD, Tex., Jan. 14 -- In the first full-scale court-martial stemming from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, a military jury Friday convicted Army Reserve Spec. Charles A. Graner Jr. on five counts of assault, maltreatment and conspiracy in connection with the beating and humiliation of Iraqi detainees.

The 10-member jury of both officers and enlisted men spent less than five hours deliberating and rejected Graner's defense that he was just following orders. Graner had been charged with smashing inmates with a steel rod and forcing naked men to simulate sexual acts. Photographs of the abuse were published by news organizations, triggering anti-American fury around the world.

Graner stood at attention and looked straight ahead, showing no emotion, as the guilty verdicts were announced. His parents, Irma Graner and Charles Graner Sr., hugged each other tightly on the spectator bench of the austere military courtroom.

The 36-year-old prison guard from Uniontown, Pa., also was acquitted of some of the specific allegations within the charges and now faces up to 15 years in a military prison. A sentencing hearing began Friday night.

The defense maintained that Graner, who was a corporal and has since been demoted, and the other low-ranking enlisted soldiers indicted in the case were scapegoats set up by the Army to deflect blame from senior officers in charge of the prison. No officer at Abu Ghraib, and no one higher in the chain of command, has faced criminal charges to date.

That discrepancy became the core defense argument at the court martial. Defense lawyer Guy Womack reiterated the point in closing arguments Friday. "The government is asking a corporal to take the hit for them," Womack said.

"The chain of command says, 'We didn't know anything about this stuff,' " Womack continued. "You know that is a lie."

The abuses described in Graner's weeklong trial took place in the fall of 2003 and the winter of 2003-04 at Abu Ghraib, a crumbling prison near Baghdad that U.S. forces took over after the fall of Saddam Hussein's government for lack of a better detention facility.

Between 80 and 100 of the toughest prisoners, including insurgents arrested for attacking Americans, were held in a cellblock called "Tier One-Alpha." Graner, who had been a corrections officer in Pennsylvania, was in charge of the night shift on that block, with one other reservist on hand to assist. Testimony showed that prisoners there were kept naked much of the time, with hoods over their heads, often chained to the bars in painful "stress positions."

Inmates and U.S. soldiers testified that Army guards regularly beat the prisoners with fists or iron rods, forced them to eat food from a toilet, confronted them with unmuzzled police dogs, and made them wallow naked in the mud outside in near-freezing temperatures.

Sexual humiliation was another common practice on One-Alpha, witnesses said. Naked men were required to masturbate and to simulate homosexual sex, while female American soldiers were instructed by officers to take pictures and shout abuse. One of the specific charges of "maltreatment" brought against Graner involved an inmate nicknamed "Gus." When he was causing trouble for the guards, prosecutors said, Graner tied a leash around his neck and made him crawl like a dog.

The abuses were photographed by the guards. The pictures were posted on the walls and on the "Desktop" screen of the office computer.

Graner and other guards e-mailed the photos to family and friends, a practice that drew conflicting explanations at the trial. The prosecutor, Capt. Chris Graveline, said that displaying the photos showed just how "cold" the enlisted soldiers had been. Womack, the defense lawyer, responded that Graner's sending the photos to friends proved "he was sure he was doing exactly what the chain of command wanted him to do."

When those photos were passed to CBS News, the New Yorker magazine and The Washington Post in the spring of 2004, Abu Ghraib became a media phenomenon around the world. Muslim extremists used the chilling prison pictures to recruit anti-American fighters. "Abu Ghraib is a shot in the arm for the extremists," said Farooq Sobhan, former foreign secretary and U.N. ambassador of the South Asian Muslim nation of Bangladesh.

A militant group in Iraq specifically cited Abu Ghraib in May when it beheaded Nicholas Berg, a Pennsylvania businessman who was captured by insurgents. "The dignity of Muslim men and women in Abu Ghraib . . . is not redeemed except by blood," the militants said.

The angry global reaction embarrassed the White House. President Bush summoned Arabic reporters to assure them that Abu Ghraib "is a stain on our country's honor." Bush and Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld have said that the abuses were strictly the fault of a small group of "rogue" soldiers at the prison.

But testimony at Graner's trial -- the first full court martial to probe the prison scandal -- suggested that numerous officers were aware of the goings-on in cellblock One-Alpha. On Nov. 16, 2003, after most of the specific abuses for which Graner was tried, a superior officer informed Graner in writing that, "You are doing a fine job. . . . You have received many accolades from the chain of command and particularly from Lt. Col. Jordan." Lt. Col. Steven Jordan was the chief intelligence officer at the prison and during this week's court-martial the Army said he is under investigation in connection with the scandal.

In a court martial, "obedience to orders" is a defense to a charge of misconduct, as long as the soldier reasonably believed the order to be lawful. But Graner's attempt to exploit that defense at trial was largely stifled by the judge, Army Col. James L. Pohl. Pohl refused to allow witnesses to discuss which officers were aware of events in cellblock Alpha One, or what orders they had given. He said any testimony about what the officers knew or said would be inadmissible hearsay evidence.

In Womack's final argument to the jury Friday, the lawyer blasted the government for "hiding" the role of superior officers. "Not one witness from the chain of command came to this proceeding," he said. "Do you think the prosecutors just forgot to call those officers?"