Bush White House Implants "Reporter"

[LoungeMachine]

February 9, 2005 · A reporter for the conservative news site TalonNews.com resigns. The reporter, who went by the pseudonym Jeff Gannon, drew critical attention at President Bush's Jan. 26 press conference when he referred in question to Democrats "who seem to have divorced themselves from reality" on the issue of retooling Social Security.

Liberal bloggers have disclosed that Gannon, who has little previous journalism experience, was easily granted a coveted White House press pass -- even though he did not work for a traditional or established news organization. He also routinely asked "softball" questions at press conferences. There are also allegations that Gannon is linked to Web sites with homoerotic themes.

Gannon spoke with NPR's David Folkenflik the day before he resigned. He says he is open about his conservative point of view, but that he is just as valid a journalist as other reporters in the White House press corps.





ONE OF 2 THINGS HAD TO OCCUR

1- THE WHITE HOUSE KNEW THIS GUYS REAL NAME

OR

2- SECURITY WITHIN THE WHITE HOUSE PRESS CORP SUCKS ASS


Notice this guy has links to "homoerotic web sites"



Bottom Line?

The Bush Adminitration will not only PAY "journalists" to shill for them, they'll even implant them whenever the Shrub is told he needs to hold a press conference. [ twice a year? ]

[LoungeMachine]

Jeff Gannon • Scott McClellan • Talon News



Latest Items
Hannity on Gannon: "a terrific Washington bureau chief and White House correspondent for Talon News"
Wednesday February 9, 2005

"Go ahead, Jeff": Talon News "reporter" Jeff Gannon is McClellan's lifeline during briefings

Talon News "reporter" Jeff Gannon's softball questions often steer White House press secretary Scott McClellan away from more difficult inquiries raised during White House press briefings; on several occasions, McClellan has turned to Gannon for his questions after other press corps members have asked pointed questions on controversial topics. In reviewing White House press conferences from the past year, Media Matters for America has noted numerous instances in which Gannon's lobs -- leading questions that often include false assumptions favorable to the Bush administration -- have allowed McClellan to move to friendlier turf, away from having to answer questions on such issues as the proposed Federal Marriage Amendment; the Bush administration's relationship with former Iraqi National Congress leader Ahmad Chalabi; the growing trade deficit with China; and President Bush's Texas Air National Guard record. Some examples:

"Is this another piece of evidence showing the direct terror ties between Iraq and Al Qaeda?"

During the August 9, 2004, White House press briefing, a reporter repeatedly asked McClellan whether American forces had killed any innocent people in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. The next reporter questioned McClellan on the president's opinion of Ahmad Chalabi (the Bush administration initially supported Chalabi as a candidate to head Iraq's interim government, but rescinded that support after Iraqi forces issued warrants for his arrest on counterfeiting charges, and after he was accused of giving classified U.S. intelligence to Iran and providing incorrect reports about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, according to an August 9, 2004, New York Times article reprinted in the Houston Chronicle). After responding, McClellan turned to Gannon for two questions:

From the White House website's transcript of the August 9, 2004, briefing:

MR. McCLELLAN: Go ahead, Jeff.

Q: Thank you. The imam [Yassin M. Aref] that was arrested in [Albany] New York last week was discovered because his name appeared in a Rolodex in a terrorist training camp in Iraq before the war. The book was found after, by U.S. troops, but he was in Iraq before the war. Is this another piece of evidence showing the direct terror ties between Iraq and al Qaeda?

MR. McCLELLAN: One, that's an ongoing investigation. I think the questions related to those particular individuals are best directed to the Department of Justice. And so that's -- I would refer any questions about that investigation to the Department of Justice. We are continuing to wage the war on terrorism on many fronts, both abroad and at home. And I think you're seeing that through the actions that we are taking.

Q: Let me follow up with a second question. How damaging was the revelation of the deepest mole that we've ever had in al Qaeda? The publication of that man's name by The New York Times -- how damaging is that to our war on terror?

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm sorry -- which specific instance are you referring to?

Q: The New York Times published the name of Muhammad Naeem Noor Khan, who was described by intelligence officials as the only deep mole we've ever had within al Qaeda.

MR. McCLELLAN: I'm not sure where it was published, first. Obviously, it was published recently -- the capture of this individual. It is important that we recognize that sometimes there are ongoing operations underway. And as we move forward on capturing or bringing to justice al Qaeda members, we need to keep that in mind. And sometimes we aren't able to go into as much detail we would like to because of those ongoing operations. And I think everybody has a responsibility to keep that in mind.

"Doesn't [former Ambassador] Joe Wilson owe the President and America an apology?"

During a July 15, 2004, press conference, McClellan again turned to Gannon following questions from reporters about the president's position on the Federal Marriage Amendment; the president's opinion of fundraising consultant Mike Rogers's campaign (detailed in a Washington Post article) to disclose the sexual orientation of gay staffers working for senators and representatives who supported the amendment; and whether Lynne Cheney's opposition to the amendment constituted the first time a vice president's wife had ever publicly opposed the president's policies. After responding, McClellan accepted questions from Gannon, who promptly shifted the focus.

From the White House transcript:

MR. McCLELLAN: Two questions a day. Go ahead, Jeff.

[...]

Q: Last Friday, the Senate Intelligence Committee released a report that shows that Ambassador Joe Wilson lied when he said his wife didn't put him up for the mission to Niger. The British inquiry into their own prewar intelligence yesterday concluded that the President's 16 words ["The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa"] were "well-founded." Doesn't Joe Wilson owe the President and America an apology for his deception and his own intelligence failure?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, one, let me point out that I think those reports speak for themselves on that issue. And I think if you have questions about that, you can direct that to Mr. Wilson.

Contrary to Gannon's assertion, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report contained no conclusions regarding Wilson's truthfulness about his wife's purported involvement in his appointment to the Niger mission. As for Gannon's citation of the "British inquiry" regarding the "President's 16 words" in the 2003 State of the Union address, and Gannon's claim of an "intelligence failure" on Wilson's part, then-director of central intelligence George J. Tenet stated in a press release that "[t]hese 16 words should never have been included in the text written for the President."

As Media Matters previously noted, when the federal grand jury investigating the leak of the identity of CIA covert operative Valerie Plame subpoenaed White House records on contacts with journalists, Gannon was reportedly among them. WashingtonPost.com "White House Briefing" columnist Dan Froomkin explained in his March 10, 2004, column that "the reason Gannon is on the list is most likely an attempt to find out who gave him a secret memo that he mentioned in an interview he had with Plame's husband, former ambassador and administration critic Joseph Wilson."

"[D]oesn't that, combined with the now proven Al Qaeda link between Iraq ... unequivocally make the case for going to war in Iraq?"

On June 15, 2004, after reporters asked McClellan a series of questions about the United States' growing trade deficit with China, reports of strained American relations with Egypt, and American forces' interrogation of Saddam Hussein and his top officials, McClellan again turned to Gannon:

From the White House press briefing transcript:

MR. McCLELLAN: Go ahead, Jeff. You had one.

Q: Thanks. Why hasn't the administration made more of the U.N. inspectors' report that says Saddam Hussein was dismantling his missile and WMD [weapons of mass destruction] sites before and during the war? And doesn't that, combined with the now-proven al Qaeda link between Iraq -- between Saddam Hussein and the terrorist organization -- unequivocally make the case for going to war in Iraq?

MR. McCLELLAN: Well, I think in terms of Iraq and ties to terrorism, Secretary Powell outlined the former regime's support for and ties to terrorists when he went before the United Nations. Director Tenet has testified in open session before Congress about what we know about those ties. You heard the President talk about some of those ties earlier today in the Rose Garden when he was asked a question. So I think those ties are well known, and we have talked about them previously. Certainly, when you look at someone like al Zarqawi, he was an individual who was in Iraq prior to the decision to go to war, and he is someone who remains in Iraq. And he is a senior al Qaeda associate.

"I'd like to comment on the angry mob that surrounded [senior Bush adviser] Karl Rove's house."

On April 1, 2004, reporters asked McClellan to offer the president's stance on claims that the Unborn Victims of Violence Act was an attempt to "chip away at Roe v. Wade" and explain what the president would say to mollify those who held that concern. After answering, McClellan acknowledged Gannon, who shifted the focus of the questions -- without actually asking a question:

From the White House press briefing transcript:

MR. McCLELLAN: Go ahead, Jeff.

Q: I'd like to comment on the angry mob that surrounded [senior Bush adviser] Karl Rove's house on Sunday. They chanted and pounded on the windows until the D.C. police and Secret Service were called in. The protest was organized by the National People's Action Coalition, whose members receive taxpayer funds, as well as financial support from groups including Theresa [sic] Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation.

MR. McCLELLAN: I would just say that, one, we appreciate and understand concerns that people may have. I would certainly hope that people would respect the families of White House staff.

Gannon's description of Teresa Heinz Kerry's financial relationship to the Tides Foundation echoed similar distortions from other conservative media figures. As Media Matters for America documented, a Tides Foundation statement maintained that "by legally binding contract, every penny of Heinz's support to Tides has been explicitly directed to specific projects in Pennsylvania."

"Did he make speeches alongside Jane Fonda?"

During a February 10, 2004, press conference, McClellan fielded a long series of questions about gaps in Bush's Texas Air National Guard record, before acknowledging Gannon, who shifted the subject of the questions by attacking and distorting Senator John Kerry's war record through the following question.

From the White House transcript of the press conference:

Q: Are you ready to take questions on a different subject?

MR. McCLELLAN: We're still on this topic, right?

Q: Since there have been so many questions about what the President was doing over 30 years ago, what is it that he did after his honorable discharge from the National Guard? Did he make speeches alongside [actress and anti-Vietnam War activist] Jane Fonda, denouncing America's racist war in Vietnam? Did he testify before Congress that American troops committed war crimes in Vietnam? And did he throw somebody else's medals at the White House to protest a war America was still fighting? What was he doing after he was honorably discharged?

MR. McCLELLAN: We've already commented on some of his [Bush's] views relating back to that period the other day. And, obviously, this was a time period also when he was going to get his MBA at Harvard. But the President was certainly proud to serve in the National Guard.

Q: And would the White House consider those actions by Senator Kerry, that Jeff mentions fair game in the political season?

Media Matters for America documented the oft-used conservative smear tactic of attempting to link Senator Kerry to Jane Fonda, despite the fact the two had very little contact during the anti-Vietnam War movement.

[LoungeMachine]

2/9/2005
Congresswoman calls for investigation into White House ‘reporter’ linked to escort sites

Rep. Slaughter Calls on President Bush to Explain Emerging White House Briefing Room Scandal

Washington, DC - Rep. Louise M. Slaughter (NY-28), long time champion of media reform and Ranking Member of the House Committee on Rules, sent a letter to President George W. Bush today asking him to explain how discredited “reporter” Jeff Gannon was credentialed as a member of the legitimate media by the White House.

The letter follows

Wednesday, February 9, 2005

The Honorable George W. Bush
President of the United States
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

In light of the mounting evidence that your Administration has, on several occasions, paid members of the media to advocate in favor of Administration policies, I feel compelled to ask you to address a matter brought to my attention by the Niagara Falls Reporter (article attached), a local newspaper in my district, regarding James “JD” Guckert (AKA Jeff Gannon) of Talon News.

According to several credible reports, “Mr. Gannon” has been repeatedly credentialed as a member of the White House press corps by your office and has been regularly called upon in White House press briefings by your Press Secretary Scott McClellan, despite the fact evidence shows that “Mr. Gannon” is a Republican political operative, uses a false name, has phony or questionable journalistic credentials, is known for plagiarizing much of the “news” he reports, and according to several web reports, may have ties to the promotion of the prostitution of military personnel.

Several weeks ago when it was revealed that radio/TV host Armstrong Williams had received payment from your Administration in exchange for his vocal support of the ‘No Child Left Behind’ initiative, I was stunned. For years now I have been leading the fight in Congress for fairness and accountability in the media; the Williams revelation only underscored the need for a media that has integrity, is balanced and expresses the local interests and concerns of its consumers.

Since that time, two more members of the media have been found to have received money from your Administration in exchange for their vocal, yet undisclosed support of Administration policies.

And just this morning we have learned that “Mr. Gannon” has resigned his post at the, so called, Talon News amid growing concerns over his controversial background and falsified qualifications. In fact, it appears that “Mr. Gannon’s” presence in the White House press corps was merely as a tool of propaganda for your Administration.

Mr. President, I am sure we both agree the White House press corps is an honored institution in America that should be beyond the scope of partisan meddling, and that a free and independent media is the cornerstone of our success as a democracy. Likewise, I am sure we can both agree the American people have the right to expect that journalists who question their President everyday are experienced, independent, and perhaps most importantly, unbiased in their approach.

I was already concerned about what appears to be an organized campaign to mask partisan propaganda as legitimate news by your Administration. That we have now learned this same type of deception is occurring inside the White House briefing room itself is even more disturbing.

That is why I am asking you to please explain to the Congress and to the American people how and why the individual known as “Mr. Gannon” was repeatedly cleared by your staff to join the legitimate White House press corps?

Mr. President, your Administration has driven the so-called “values” debate in this country. But the most important value for those of us in public service should always be honesty and integrity, particularly when considering the manner in which we conduct our affairs of state.

I would appreciate your prompt response on this matter.

Respectfully,

/LMS

Louise M. Slaughter

Ranking Member, House Committee on Rules

[Little_Skittles]

oh my my my lets just slap him on the hand shall we?

[FORD]

This is a serious fuckup!

These fucking bastards claim they have made the country safer, yet they can't even keep a LIAR WITH A FAKE PRESS BADGE away from the so-called pResident?!?

What if "Gannon" had been a terrorist, instead of a closet fag with gay porn sites?

http://members.aol.com/jdg17/myhomepage/usmc-07.jpg

Hotmilitarystud.com
Militaryescorts.com
Militaryescortsm4m.com

Not that I'd mourn Junior for a half second, but it kinda sheds a whole new light on their claims of keeping the country safe, doesn't it.

Not to mention proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that Junior's "press conferences" are nothing more than staged FRAUDS.

Wonder if Mr James Dale Guckert a.k.a. "Gannon" has visited Junior at the Pig Ranch for "private interviews".

Now we know what the padded flight suit was really all about....:spank:

[academic punk]

FORD!!! You know you shouldn't post pics of shirtless military studs on here! ELVIS may get himself an erection!!!

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by FORD
This is a serious fuckup!

These fucking bastards claim they have made the country safer, yet they can't even keep a LIAR WITH A FAKE PRESS BADGE away from the so-called pResident?!?

What if "Gannon" had been a terrorist, instead of a closet fag with gay porn sites?

http://members.aol.com/jdg17/myhomepage/usmc-07.jpg

Hotmilitarystud.com
Militaryescorts.com
Militaryescortsm4m.com

Not that I'd mourn Junior for a half second, but it kinda sheds a whole new light on their claims of keeping the country safe, doesn't it.

Not to mention proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that Junior's "press conferences" are nothing more than staged FRAUDS.

Wonder if Mr James Dale Guckert a.k.a. "Gannon" has visited Junior at the Pig Ranch for "private interviews".

Now we know what the padded flight suit was really all about....:spank:
I think we know what it's all about now.

We've reached a point of no return.

A point of no returning to the "old world order" of sovereign nation states, with strong national enterprises, a strong middle class, and a strong economy that generates tax revenues for local schools, and a just society for all.

The only way back is the same way that got us here.

You know how we got here.

There was no "America" for our ancestors to come to. It got here by the musket. And that's the only way back.

We had a nation made here for us by brave men and all we have to do is keep it and not lose it to a one world government that's planned and is on the march big time.

And "they" know it.

It's sad to know this and to see half of the country unawares of it. The other half that knows it are too cowardly to stand up to it.

And the world and the UN to let the U.S. run all over that town Fallujah.

The world's nations are cowards, too.

The 1st Marine Division better have a good reason for following "these" orders.

Fallujah is the 1st Marine Division's Waco.

Reeling in the New World Order.

Fallujah had no nuclear powered submarines.

Fallujah had no tanks.

Fallujah had no air force with smart bombs

Fallujah had no bunker busters.

Fallujah had no techology, no night vision to fight the invaders of THEIR country.

Fallujah had no nuclear weapons.

Fallujah had no... well, enough of that.

A puppet regime had to set up by January 31st.

Fallujah's mother's, father's, son's, daughters, grandmothers, grandfather's, butchers, bakers, teachers, doctors, all had to die for this White House deadline for the puppet regime to be created.

By the way, FTAA was shoved down our throats Jan. 1st, 2005.

This country is being dismantled by plan and design and we have crossed the point of no return.

Let's see what the U.S. 1st Marine Division had behind it...

Yep.

It's later than you think.


P

[lms2]

Originally posted by academic punk
FORD!!! You know you shouldn't post pics of shirtless military studs on here! ELVIS may get himself an erection!!!

or women may take over the thread!

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by lms2
or women may take over the thread!
Women like gay guys?:rolleyes:

Happy Valentine's Day, lms2.

I figured you need it considering you're considering looking at a page of gay guys.


:spank:

[lms2]

Originally posted by Phil theStalker
Women like gay guys?:rolleyes:

Happy Valentine's Day, lms2.

I figured you need it considering you're considering looking at a page of gay guys.


:spank:

Its not the first time I have looked at a man that was not interested in me... and I am not ashamed to admit it.

Thanks Phil... but its not Valentines day yet!

So you take that as a sign of desperation? Sue me. And you ARE cranky. Serves you right for spending so much time discussing politics. :D

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by lms2
Its not the first time I have looked at a man that was not interested in me... and I am not ashamed to admit it.

Thanks Phil... but its not Valentines day yet!

So you take that as a sign of desperation? Sue me. And you ARE cranky. Serves you right for spending so much time discussing politics. :D
I'm not cranky.

I'm very charming.

I'm just a vampire having a hard time trying to fit into normal society.

Wait a minute.

How long's tit bean?

1, 2, 3, 4... 13, 14...21...

It's your period again.

Well, at least at 39 you're not going through the change of life yet.

lms2, when you go through the change aff life wot do you want t2o change int2o?


:spank:

[lms2]

Discussions about my menstrual cycle do not belong on the frontline... thats just gross. But, since you brought it up, I am NOT on my period and I am not the one who is cranky!

Don't worry sweetness... I will never change. ;)

But if I did, I think I would like to be a bird.

[Phil theStalker]

Originally posted by lms2
Discussions about my menstrual cycle do not belong on the frontline... thats just gross. But, since you brought it up, I am NOT on my period and I am not the one who is cranky!

Don't worry sweetness... I will never change. ;)

But if I did, I think I would like to be a bird.
I love playing that song.

The slide lead.

The whole thing.

Free As A Bird

It's the next best thing to be


:spank:

[Nickdfresh]

This thread would be hysterical if it weren't so fucking scary! Why don't we just create a The Department of Information and drop all pretenses of a free press.
http://www.airpower.at/news03/0813_luftkrieg_ostmark/goebbels-joseph.jpg
http://photos1.blogger.com/img/28/1448/640/202b906c0.jpg

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by FORD
This is a serious fuckup!

These fucking bastards claim they have made the country safer, yet they can't even keep a LIAR WITH A FAKE PRESS BADGE away from the so-called pResident?!?

What if "Gannon" had been a terrorist, instead of a closet fag with gay porn sites?

http://members.aol.com/jdg17/myhomepage/usmc-07.jpg

Hotmilitarystud.com
Militaryescorts.com
Militaryescortsm4m.com

Not that I'd mourn Junior for a half second, but it kinda sheds a whole new light on their claims of keeping the country safe, doesn't it.

Not to mention proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that Junior's "press conferences" are nothing more than staged FRAUDS.

Wonder if Mr James Dale Guckert a.k.a. "Gannon" has visited Junior at the Pig Ranch for "private interviews".

Now we know what the padded flight suit was really all about....:spank:

I'll bet Hannity will go to "bat" for him...Muhuhawhawhahwhawhawhawhaw

[LoungeMachine]

Loose 'Gannon': WH's McClellan Weighs In

Published: February 10, 2005 2:35 PM ET

NEW YORK To the surprise of no one, the saga of former White House correspondent James D. Guckert, also known as Jeff Gannon, took center stage at briefing conducted by White House spokesman Scott McClellan today.

Gannon/Guckert quit his post at an obscure Web site, Talon News, Tuesday night after bloggers exposed the fact that he had been working under an alias and had possible links to sex-oriented Web sites. Questions have emerged about how and why the White House allowed the reporter to attend briefings and even ask President Bush a very friendly question at his recent press conference.
From the transcript of today’s briefing:

Q: Jeff Gannon. How did he get a White House pass, or what kind of credentials did he have?

McClellan: Just like anyone else who comes to the White House.

Q: Hard pass?

McClellan: No, he had never applied for a hard pass. He had a daily pass. I think he's been coming for --

Q: Was he coming for --

McClellan: Hang on. I think he's been coming for more than two years now.

Q: Under what name?

McClellan: Sorry?

Q: Under what name?

McClellan: Well, you have to get cleared. You have to -- just like anybody else that comes to the White House, you have to have your full name, your Social Security number, and your birth date. So you have to be cleared just like anybody else.

Q: So he was being cleared under James Guckert, or whatever his name is?

McClellan: My understanding, yes.

Q: OK, and how did he get picked to get a question asked at the last news conference?

McClellan: He didn't. The president didn't have a list. The president didn't -- he was in the briefing room. There are assigned seats in the briefing room. We didn't do any assigning of seats, and the president worked his way through the rows, and called on people as he came to them. He doesn't know who he is.

Q: Were you aware that he had another name?

McClellan: Was I aware? I had heard that. I had heard that, yes, recently.

Q: But did you know during all this time that he really wasn't Jeff Gannon?

McClellan: I heard at some point, yes -- previously.

Q: As Press Secretary, what do you think about this whole --

McClellan: Well, like I said -- what do I think about it? Well, let me explain a few things. First, as the press secretary, I don't think it's the role of the press secretary to get into picking or choosing who gets press credentials. Also, I don't think it's the role of the press secretary to get into being a media critic, and I think there are very good reasons for that. I've never inserted myself into the process. He, like anyone else, showed that he was representing a news organization that published regularly, and so he was cleared two years ago to receive daily passes, just like many others are. The issue comes up -- it becomes, in this day and age, when you have a changing media, it's not an easy issue to decide or try to pick and choose who is a journalist. And there -- it gets into the issue of advocacy journalism. Where do you draw the line? There are a number of people who cross that line in the briefing room.

And, as far as I'm concerned, I would welcome the White House Correspondents Association, if they have any concerns or issues that they want to bring to my attention, they know my door is open and I'll be glad to discuss these issues with them. I have an open dialogue with the Correspondents Association. No one's ever brought such an issue to my attention, in my -- during my time as being press secretary. And you all cover the briefing room on a regular basis. You know that there are a number of people in that room that express their points of view, and there are people in that room that represent traditional media, they represent talk radio, they represent -- they're columnists, and they represent online news organizations.

Q: Was the White House aware at all -- was the White House aware -- was the White House aware at all about the online Web sites that he was linked to?

McClellan: No. This has only come to my attention through the news reports, just a few reporters calling in.

My understanding was, when he started coming to the White House about two years ago, the staff asked to see that it -- that he represented a news organization that published regularly. And they showed that, so he was cleared and has been cleared ever since based on that time.

And this is just now something that's come to my attention more recently because it's been an issue raised in some media reports.

[LoungeMachine]

bump / padding post count

[FORD]

Pathetic answers, Scotty.

And if the White House press secretary doesn't issue press credentials, then who exactly the fuck does? :confused:

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by FORD
Pathetic answers, Scotty.

And if the White House press secretary doesn't issue press

credentials, then who exactly the fuck does? :confused:

Plausible Deniability :rolleyes:

Scotty is a worm. Obvioulsy he's content to throw his staffers under the bus on this one. S.O.P. for the Bushies anyway.

What I hope brings the weasel down are photos sure to crop up with him and his buddy "gannon the cannon"

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by FORD
This is a serious fuckup!

These fucking bastards claim they have made the country safer, yet they can't even keep a LIAR WITH A FAKE PRESS BADGE away from the so-called pResident?!?

What if "Gannon" had been a terrorist, instead of a closet fag with gay porn sites?

http://members.aol.com/jdg17/myhomepage/usmc-07.jpg

Hotmilitarystud.com
Militaryescorts.com
Militaryescortsm4m.com

Not that I'd mourn Junior for a half second, but it kinda sheds a whole new light on their claims of keeping the country safe, doesn't it.

Not to mention proving beyond the shadow of a doubt that Junior's "press conferences" are nothing more than staged FRAUDS.

Wonder if Mr James Dale Guckert a.k.a. "Gannon" has visited Junior at the Pig Ranch for "private interviews".

Now we know what the padded flight suit was really all about....:spank:


:rolleyes: Only a fucking homo like you could come to a faggotty assed conclusion like that. Fag. :gulp:

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
:rolleyes: Only a fucking homo like you could come to a faggotty assed conclusion like that. Fag. :gulp:

Done drooling now? Need a tissue?

Ford must've hit a nerve with old BBB:D

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Done drooling now? Need a tissue?

Ford must've hit a nerve with old BBB:D

Quit using my "need a tissue" line. Get your own stuff. :D

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Quit using my "need a tissue" line. Get your own stuff. :D


But I enjoy throwing your posts back at ya;)

[ODShowtime]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
:rolleyes: Only a fucking homo like you could come to a faggotty assed conclusion like that. Fag. :gulp:


Shut up. Your fucking president is a fascist and it's the fault of people like you!

Here's more indisputable proof.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by ODShowtime
Shut up. Your fucking president is a fascist and it's the fault of people like you!

Here's more indisputable proof.


Don't expect BigBLINDBrian to acknowledge the many frauds this administration has foisted on the American people.

Remember, this is the guy who keeps a box of kleenex and a photo of Sean Hannity next to his bed:D

[ODShowtime]

This is one of the worst allegation I've ever heard regarding gw. If anyone cared, we'd be discussing impeachment now.

He has no credibility left.

He said there's WMD in Iraq. There wasn't.

He said Iraq had ties to Al Qeada. They were enemies.

He said he'd track down Bin Laden "Dead or Alive" and then said isn't worried about him

He pays supposedly independent commentators to endorse his policies

He plants reporters to lob loaded, soft questions during press conferences

let's not even get into Blackwell in Ohio

How deep does the rabbit hole go? When will American start to give a shit that they are being totally lied to? We are sick nation and we are going to get HIT HARD.

[LoungeMachine]

Couldn't agree more.

How can you NOT fire your Press Secretary for this????????


Shit, he'll probably be promoted

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by ODShowtime
Shut up. Your fucking president is a fascist and it's the fault of people like

FAG.

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Couldn't agree more.



Fag.

[ODShowtime]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
FAG.

Badbreathbrian, how can we continue to discuss these important issues when you keep handing us all these facts to refute our arguements? I mean, you've complete shut us down. Because of you, every point I've made has been shown to be false!

It's now time for me to completely re-elevaluate my life and join the Republican party. I'm going to buy a dog too.

[ODShowtime]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Couldn't agree more.

How can you NOT fire your Press Secretary for this????????


Shit, he'll probably be promoted

I bet you the reason Ari Felcher (:)) resigned is because he didn't want to be involved in this type of deception.

I've asked before, does anyone know what the official reason was for his resignation?

[FORD]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
FAG.

You're right. Junior is a FAG fascist. Why do you think he sent Victor Ashe to Poland. Gotta keep his long time boyfriend out of the spotlight, ya know.

Frankly I could care less if Junior's a butt pirate. Except that he's a butt pirate who pinned his "re-election" campaign on 11 red states worth of ignorant homophobes wanting a constitutional ammendment to discriminate against queers. It's the hypocrisy, stupid!

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
FAG.

Fucking Classic:D

Leave it to a brainless neocon shit bag to resort to the FAG callout, IN A THREAD EXPOSING A REPUBLICANT BUSH PLANT / MALE ESCORT SERVICE PLANT IN HE WHITE HOUSE !!!!


Oh, the irony.


It's Official

You have finally run out of any defense of this "administration"

Too good to be true:D

[academic punk]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Fucking Classic:D

Leave it to a brainless neocon shit bag to resort to the FAG callout

Now, be fair. I've been calling ELVIS a queer for some time now.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by academic punk
Now, be fair. I've been calling ELVIS a queer for some time now.


yeah, but you got the polaroids to prove it:D

[academic punk]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
yeah, but you got the polaroids to prove it:D



noooooooooooo, i fucking don't.

please don't ever imbue me with the image of e touching himself (and SINNING) to pics of bill o'reilly shoving his dildos up his bunghole again.

[ODShowtime]

Let's not lose sight of the fact that gw&friends actually plant fake reporters.

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by ODShowtime
Let's not lose sight of the fact that gw&friends actually plant fake reporters.

duh.

I started the f-ing thread. And I was shocked it wasnt getting the play I thought it deserved.

Seems the momentum is gaining though. Even rumblings f "special prosecuter" to look in to it.

Williams, Gannon, the Plame outing...........

Shit....meet fan

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by ODShowtime
Let's not lose sight of the fact that gw&friends actually plant fake reporters.

Of course OD's right.

But having the chance to get under the skin of ELVIS, BBB, and all the other right wing closet pillow biters is too hard to resist.

we shall watch it, od;)

[academic punk]

Originally posted by ODShowtime
Let's not lose sight of the fact that gw&friends actually plant fake reporters.


Well, it's a hard world to saty on topic in. With everything going on, what was the NY POST and DAILY NEWS headlines today? Giambi, Conseco, and baseball steroids.

Real news has been marginalized. If the media - and this goes right back to implanting reporters at the white house - can't do it, how are the unwashed public to be expected to do any better?

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by academic punk


Real news has been marginalized. If the media - and this goes right back to implanting reporters at the white house - can't do it, how are the unwashed public to be expected to do any better?

The Age of the Blog

:D

WE have become the "media"

Certainly not by choice......

Where are the Woodward and Bernsteins of today??????

[FORD]

Originally posted by academic punk
Well, it's a hard world to saty on topic in. With everything going on, what was the NY POST and DAILY NEWS headlines today? Giambi, Conseco, and baseball steroids.

Real news has been marginalized. If the media - and this goes right back to implanting reporters at the white house - can't do it, how are the unwashed public to be expected to do any better?

When was the NY Post ever "real news"? It was tabloid trash even before Murdoch owned it.

[academic punk]

yeah, but at least in the past they had the world's best writer for their front page. Remember these classics?

"How Now, Moscow?" (When Andropov died)

"Borgasm!!!" (When Bjon Borg won the triple way back when)

"Headless Man Found In Topless Bar" (when a decapitated body was found in the men's room of Billy's Topless)

oh, and then you had the headlines in the initial days of the US attacks on Afghanistan...

"Tali-BAM!!!"

"see ya later, Al Qaeda!"

yeah, they were much better in the 80s and 90s...

[ODShowtime]

this shit pisses me off man