PDA

View Full Version : CIA's Final Report: No WMD Found in Iraq



DLR'sCock
04-26-2005, 06:12 PM
CIA's Final Report: No WMD Found in Iraq
The Associated Press

Tuesday 25 April 2005

Recommends freeing detainees held for weapons knowledge.
Washington - In his final word, the CIA's top weapons inspector in Iraq said Monday that the hunt for weapons of mass destruction has "gone as far as feasible" and has found nothing, closing an investigation into the purported programs of Saddam Hussein that were used to justify the 2003 invasion.

"After more than 18 months, the WMD investigation and debriefing of the WMD-related detainees has been exhausted," wrote Charles Duelfer, head of the Iraq Survey Group, in an addendum to the final report he issued last fall.

"As matters now stand, the WMD investigation has gone as far as feasible."

In 92 pages posted online Monday evening, Duelfer provides a final look at an investigation that occupied over 1,000 military and civilian translators, weapons specialists and other experts at its peak. His latest addenda conclude a roughly 1,500-page report released last fall.

On Monday, Duelfer said there is no purpose in keeping many of the detainees who are in custody because of their knowledge on Iraq's weapons, although he did not provide any details about the current number. A U.S. official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the ultimate decision on their release will be made by the Iraqi authorities.

Warnings about Saddam's experts The survey group also provided warnings.

The addenda conclude that Saddam's programs created a pool of experts now available to develop and produce weapons and many will be seeking work. While most will probably turn to the "benign civil sector," the danger remains that "hostile foreign governments, terrorists or insurgents may seek Iraqi expertise."

"Because a single individual can advance certain WMD activities, it remains an important concern," one addendum said.

Another addendum also noted that military forces in Iraq may continue to find small numbers of degraded chemical weapons - most likely misplaced or improperly destroyed before the 1991 Gulf War. In an insurgent's hands, "the use of a single even ineffectual chemical weapon would likely cause more terror than deadlier conventional explosives," another addendum said.

And still another said the survey group found some potential nuclear-related equipment was "missing from heavily damaged and looted sites." Yet, because of the deteriorating security situation in Iraq, the survey group was unable to determine what happened to the equipment, which also had alternate civilian uses.

"Some of it probably has been sold for its scrap value. Other pieces might have been disassembled" and converted into motors or condensers, an addendum said. "Still others could have been taken intact to preserve their function."

Small team still in place Leaving the door to the investigation open just a crack, the U.S. official said a small team still operates under the U.S.-led multinational force in Iraq, although the survey group officially disbanded earlier this month. Those staying on continue to examine documents and follow up on any reports of weapons of mass destruction.

In a statement accompanying the final installment, Duelfer said a surprise discovery would most likely be in the biological weapons area because clues, such as the size of the facilities used to develop them, would be comparatively small.

Among unanswered questions, Duelfer said a group formed to investigate whether WMD-related material was shipped out of Iraq before the invasion wasn't able to reach firm conclusions because the security situation limited and later halted their work. Investigators were focusing on transfers from Iraq to Syria.

No information gleaned from questioning Iraqis supported the possibility, one addendum said. The Iraq Survey Group believes "it was unlikely that an official transfer of WMD material from Iraq to Syria took place. However, ISG was unable to rule out unofficial movement of limited WMD-related materials."

-------

DLR'sCock
04-26-2005, 06:14 PM
So is agent Zimmerman never going to post here ever again now?

Unchainme
04-26-2005, 08:30 PM
Just To play Devil's Advocate How Do we know Saddam didn't move The WMD's over to Sryia before the War began. Just A Thought.

FORD
04-26-2005, 08:34 PM
Originally posted by Unchainme
Just To play Devil's Advocate How Do we know Saddam didn't move The WMD's over to Sryia before the War began. Just A Thought.

Guess you didn't see this thread. (http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showthread.php?s=&threadid=20354)

4moreyears
04-26-2005, 08:43 PM
Who cares. Saddam ignored numerous UN resolutions, and was warned by President Bush 3 times. He decided to ignore the warnings and still not let inspectors in. If he had nothing to hide, why did he not let them in? I am not saying they were there, but if he had let inspectors in like he agreed this war could have been avoided that way as well. The world is better off with him behind bars and his azzhole sons dead. The death count from this war is irrealevant because history has shown he and his monstor sons would have killed and tourtered this many people anyway.

FORD
04-26-2005, 08:44 PM
HOW is the world better off?

Explain yourself. And for God's sake, don't quote any Freeper chain e mails.

Nickdfresh
04-26-2005, 08:49 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Who cares. Saddam ignored numerous UN resolutions, and was warned by President Bush 3 times. He decided to ignore the warnings and still not let inspectors in. If he had nothing to hide, why did he not let them in? I am not saying they were there, but if he had let inspectors in like he agreed this war could have been avoided that way as well. The world is better off with him behind bars and his azzhole sons dead. The death count from this war is irrealevant because history has shown he and his monstor sons would have killed and tourtered this many people anyway.

Um, he did let the inspectors in actually, and they found nothing. We of course assumed the Iraqis were really good hiders.

Unchainme
04-26-2005, 09:00 PM
I just saw the thread. Truthfully being honest though th U.N. is not exactly the most trustworty thing in the world (Oil For Food Comes To Mind.)

DrMaddVibe
04-26-2005, 09:22 PM
Ahhhhhh...the oil-for-food program...yesssssssssss!

FORD
04-26-2005, 09:39 PM
Originally posted by Unchainme
I just saw the thread. Truthfully being honest though th U.N. is not exactly the most trustworty thing in the world

And the BCE is?

BigBadBrian
04-26-2005, 09:46 PM
That's funny. ;)

This same organization is the same one who said it was a "slam dunk" that Saddam had WMD's just three years ago.

Will they ever make up their minds? :D

DrMaddVibe
04-26-2005, 09:51 PM
How much money we talkin' here? - Kofi Annan

knuckleboner
04-27-2005, 04:55 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
if he had let inspectors in like he agreed this war could have been avoided that way as well.


so we didn't invade iraq to liberate the iraqi people?

i guess naming it "operation iraqi freedom" was just spin, then...;)

FORD
04-27-2005, 05:49 PM
Originally posted by knuckleboner
so we didn't invade iraq to liberate the iraqi people?

i guess naming it "operation iraqi freedom" was just spin, then...;)

Originally it was "Operation Iraqi Liberation", but it turns out the acronym was too honest, so they had to change it.

4moreyears
04-27-2005, 06:37 PM
Originally posted by knuckleboner
so we didn't invade iraq to liberate the iraqi people?

i guess naming it "operation iraqi freedom" was just spin, then...;)

Well I think that is what ultimatly happened.

scorpioboy33
04-27-2005, 08:30 PM
so in other words wether or not Bush was right about the WMD it doesn't matter. It's that whole american right or wrong thing :(

Nitro Express
04-27-2005, 08:52 PM
So when do we get some of that cheap Iraqi oil?

Nickdfresh
04-27-2005, 08:58 PM
It's currently "on fire."

knuckleboner
04-28-2005, 10:08 AM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Well I think that is what ultimatly happened.

oh, i agree, dude. that IS what happened.

my only problem was that the argument the administration made originally for going to war was WMD and then they switched it to an, "oh, we're also freeing the iraqis."

those opposed to the war were often asked whether or not the iraqis deserved to be free.

(um...but that wasn't our original intent.)