Republicans May Clear Way for DeLay Probe

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • worldbefree
    Roadie
    • Apr 2004
    • 110

    Republicans May Clear Way for DeLay Probe

    As Axl Rose once eloquently sang. Nothin but a bunch of fucking pussies LOL.

    Republicans May Clear Way for DeLay Probe


    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - House of Representatives Speaker Dennis Hastert urged fellow Republicans on Wednesday to retreat in a battle with Democrats over ethics rules, which would clear the way for a probe of one of their own -- Majority Leader Tom DeLay, lawmakers said.

    The full House may soon vote on whether to reverse at least some of the new ethics rules pushed through in January by majority Republicans over Democratic objections, lawmakers and leadership aides said.

    However, the timetable and specifics remained uncertain after Wednesday's meeting, and a tentative target date of a Thursday vote was in doubt, aides said.

    "I'm willing to step back," Hastert told reporters as he emerged from a closed-door meeting of House Republicans. "There issues out there that need to be discussed."

    "I think there is a member, especially on our side, that needs to have the process move forward so he can clear his name," Hastert, an Illinois Republican, said, without naming DeLay.

    DeLay, a conservative Texas Republican, exited the meeting by a back door, and refused to talk to reporters, saying, "Where's security?"

    Admonished by the House ethics committee last year on three separate matters, DeLay has faced new questions in the past month on ties to lobbyists and foreign trips funded by outside groups.

    DeLay, who denies any wrongdoing, has said he would welcome the opportunity to discuss the various questions with the ethics committee.

    But a stalemate over the new rules -- Democrats have refused to agree to them, saying they would make it more difficult to conduct or begin a probe -- has essentially shutdown the bipartisan committee this year.

    The flap has put Republicans on the defensive, particularly in their home districts, while Democrats vow to make DeLay a top target in next year's congressional elections.

    A senior aide said the rule change most likely to be scrapped was one that would require a complaint to be dismissed after 45 days if the 10-member ethics -- five Democrats and five Republicans -- deadlocked. In the past, it would automatically go to an investigative subcommittee.

    Hastert defended that rule changes on Wednesday, saying they were designed to make the process fairer for all members, Democrats and Republicans.

    Hastert noted that in the nation's courts, if there is a tie vote, "the proceedings do not go forward."

    The speaker said he would send a letter "expanding on this" later on Wednesday to House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi of California.

    While most House Republicans have publicly supported DeLay, at least two have suggested that he step aside as leader, at least until the ethics questions are resolved.

    An ABC News/Washington Post poll released this week found that 41 percent of those surveyed thought DeLay he should step down as majority leader while 32 percent said he should remain in the job. Among those who were closely following the ethics issues, 63 percent said he should quit.
  • Nickdfresh
    SUPER MODERATOR

    • Oct 2004
    • 49125

    #2
    The Republicans would be wise to throw DeLay to the dogs.

    Comment

    • Warham
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Mar 2004
      • 14587

      #3
      In exchange, the Democrats would not filibuster any more of Bush's nominees the remaining three years of his term.

      I think it's a fair exchange.

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49125

        #4
        Nope! The Republicans will be able to get milage out of Democrats own ethics problems.

        The filibuster may never happen. It will be scary if it does.

        Comment

        • Warham
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Mar 2004
          • 14587

          #5
          There's been more debate in Bush's term than in all the other terms of all the other Presidents combined, methinks.

          It all boils down to Rowe vs. Wade.

          Comment

          • Nickdfresh
            SUPER MODERATOR

            • Oct 2004
            • 49125

            #6
            I think you mean "Roe" vs. Wade.

            Comment

            • Warham
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Mar 2004
              • 14587

              #7
              Yeah, sorry.

              I just found out I've got to have a cavity refilled, so my heart ain't into it all the way.

              Comment

              • FORD
                ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                • Jan 2004
                • 58754

                #8
                It's not just about Roe vs Wade. It's about dominionist fascist judges being able to declare laws valid or not based on their personal interpretation of what GOD wants. And that is theocracy.

                Why is the BCE wasting hundreds of billions of dollars supposedly preventing a right wing theocracy in Iraq while at the same time trying to start one here?
                Eat Us And Smile

                Cenk For America 2024!!

                Justice Democrats


                "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                Comment

                Working...