PDA

View Full Version : Intravenous Vitamin C Shown by NIH Researchers to Kill Cancer!



Hardrock69
09-16-2005, 09:34 AM
Recall how hydrogen peroxide is poured on wounds to kill germs. Well now researchers clearly show high-dose vitamin C, when administered intravenously, can increase hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels within cancer cells and kills them. I.V. vitamin C was also demonstrated to kill germs and may be an effective therapy for infectious disease.

With a growing body of evidence mounting, National Institutes of Health (NIH) researchers conceded today that intravenous vitamin C may be an effective treatment for cancer. Last year the same researchers reported a similar study but the news media failed to publish it.

The latest study, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, confirms the work of Nobel-Prize winner Dr. Linus Pauling who conducted cancer research in the 1970s with vitamin C. Dr. Pauling's studies were discredited at the time by poorly conducted research studies at the Mayo Clinic.

Unlike cancer drugs, I.V. vitamin C selectively killed cancer cells, but not healthy cells, and showed no toxicity. The ability of intravenous vitamin C to kill lymphoma cells was remarkable almost 100% at easily achievable blood serum concentrations.

For inexplicable reasons, NIH researchers continue to maintain high-dose oral vitamin C can produce a limited increase in serum vitamin C concentrations. However, their earlier study published in 2004 clearly showed oral-dose vitamin C can achieve three times greater blood concentration than previously thought possible, a fact which negates the current Recommended Dietary Allowance for vitamin C. [Annals Internal Medicine 140:5337, 2004] NIH researchers refuse to issue a retraction of their earlier flawed research which mistakenly claimed humans cannot benefit from high-dose oral vitamin C supplements.

The NIH also offered no explanation why it has taken 35 years to confirm the work of Dr. Linus Pauling.


http://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/report.asp?story=Intravenous%20Vitamin%20C%20Kills %20Cancer%20Cells

EbDawson
09-16-2005, 02:50 PM
Originally posted by Hardrock69
Unlike cancer drugs, I.V. vitamin C selectively killed cancer cells, but not healthy cells, and showed no toxicity.

The NIH also offered no explanation why it has taken 35 years to confirm the work of Dr. Linus Pauling.

http://www.knowledgeofhealth.com/report.asp?story=Intravenous%20Vitamin%20C%20Kills %20Cancer%20Cells

Thanks for the thread Hardrock,

Dr. Pauling hasn't been given his due because the too many people in the medical industry would go broke if the truth about Vitamin C was well known. Not to mention that it can prevent colds/flus and is a great hangover preventative. If everyone took 1500-2000 mgs of vitamin C a day (the RDA is about 80, set by the FDA) half the doctors in this country would be out of work.

A good site is: www.vitamincfoundation.org

FORD
09-16-2005, 02:52 PM
The pharmaceutical criminals can't patent citrus fruit. It's as simple as that.

EbDawson
09-16-2005, 03:05 PM
Originally posted by FORD
The pharmaceutical criminals can't patent citrus fruit. It's as simple as that.

"Criminals" is right!

ThrillsNSpills
09-16-2005, 03:11 PM
The interests of these monopolies are protected which would be conflict of interest in any other context.
People don't want to believe it because it goes against all that's taught to them. The good news is I think people are waking up to a lot of the BS that comes down the pike about pharmaceuticals and traditional health care. Years ago nobody would question it.

Hardrock69
09-16-2005, 07:57 PM
I have said it before, but there is much on this Earth people do not know, simply because they are taught not to believe it, or else are too lazy to bother looking...

ELVIS
09-16-2005, 11:58 PM
Ask Alex Jones...:rolleyes:

FORD
09-17-2005, 07:36 PM
Originally posted by ELVIS
Ask Alex Jones...:rolleyes:

Elvis, wouldn't it benfit you, as both a Christian, and a health care professional, to be open minded to the possibility that God has provided us with the natural means to cure serious diseases without doing further damage to our bodies?

Hardrock69
09-17-2005, 10:32 PM
Ya know, you would think health care professionals would actually comprehend the Hippocratic Oath, and would have as their goal the care and well-being of the people they are treating, but unfortunately that is just wishing upon a star.

They would rather not bother with something that will actually CURE somebody, because then the person would no longer be ill, and they could not make the cash from the insurance companies, nor could the hospitals hire bill collection agencies to harrass patients who cannot afford to pay their bills.

IT is all about MAKING THA KASH!
NOT about providing "health care".
:rolleyes: