PDA

View Full Version : Study: Saddam tortured nearly ˝ of Shiite Iraqis



John Ashcroft
03-24-2004, 12:33 PM
Nearly half of all Iraqis living in the southern part of the nation suffered killings, torture and other human-rights abuses at the hands of Saddam Hussein's regime in the 12 years prior to his ouster, a survey of residents has found.

Boston-based Physicians for Human Rights conducted the research, which included questioning 1,991 Iraqi men and women in three southern cities. The respondents were nearly all Shiite Muslims, a group of people who were routinely abused by Hussein's Baathist regime.

"Overall, 47 percent of those interviewed reported one or more of the following abuses among themselves and household members since 1991: torture, killings, disappearance, forced [military service], beating, gunshot wounds, kidnappings, being held hostage, and ear amputation, among others," lead researcher Dr. Lynn Amowitz wrote in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"Seventy percent of abuses were reputed to have occurred in homes. Baath Party regime-affiliated groups were identified most often (95 percent) as the perpetrators of the abuses."

The survey found more than half of the abuse happened between 1991 and 1993, the time of a Shiite uprising. Another 30 percent took place between the 2000 and the first six months of 2003.

And yet you "human rights" type on the left are taking Saddam's side. Interesting political position you on the left have put yourself in...

The survey also delved into the area of medical abuse and fraud. It found almost half of all Iraqi physicians in the surveyed cities said they knew of other doctors who were involved in amputating ears as punishment and falsifying medical documents and death certificates to cover up torture and abuse.

"The mental health burden will be huge," wrote Amomwitz. "Almost every other household was subjected to some type of horror. The fact that many of the events happened inside the household means that the rest of the family was victimized as well."

The research suggested many doctors involved in abuse were coerced into participating by Saddam's regime.

"This is something that is not uncommon," Amowitz said. "Physicians are often co-opted and coerced by regimes into doing something against their ethics."

The study found the domestic violence rate was almost seven times that of the U.S. rate. Half of the men and women surveyed felt a man has the right to beat his wife if she disobeys him.

Link: here (http://http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=37716)

steve
03-24-2004, 01:31 PM
http://www.greenparty.org/rumsfeld.jpg

steve
03-24-2004, 01:38 PM
COVER STORY: How he US armed Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons
BY NORM DIXON

On August 18, the New York Times carried a front-page story headlined, “Officers say U.S. aided Iraq despite the use of gas”. Quoting anonymous US “senior military officers”, the NYT “revealed” that in the 1980s, the administration of US President Ronald Reagan covertly provided “critical battle planning assistance at a time when American intelligence knew that Iraqi commanders would employ chemical weapons in waging the decisive battles of the Iran-Iraq war”. The story made a brief splash in the international media, then died.

While the August 18 NYT article added new details about the extent of US military collaboration with Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein during Iraq's 1980-88 war with Iran, it omitted the most outrageous aspect of the scandal: not only did Washington turn a blind-eye to the Hussein regime's repeated use of chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers and Iraq's Kurdish minority, but the US helped Iraq develop its chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.

Nor did the NYT dwell on the extreme cynicism and hypocrisy of the current US administration's citing of those same terrible atrocities — which were disregarded at the time by Washington — and those same weapons programs — which no longer exist, having been dismantled and destroyed in the decade following the 1991 Gulf War — to justify a massive new war against the people of Iraq.

A reader of the NYT article (or the tens of thousands of other articles written after the latest war drive against Iraq began in earnest soon after September 11) would have looked in vain for the fact that many of the US politicians and ruling class pundits demanding war against Hussein today — in particular, the most bellicose of the Bush administration's “hawks”, defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld — were up to their ears in Washington's efforts to cultivate, promote and excuse Hussein in the past. ...

http://www.greenleft.org.au/back/2002/506/506p12.htm


There will NEVER be a public trial of Saddam. Bush Sr., Cheney, and Rumsfeld won't have it. Saddam's whole defense will be one of taking them all down with him in the anals of history.

On a similar note, there will never be an investigation into the prison "suicide" of that Enron exec. either.

John Ashcroft
03-24-2004, 01:46 PM
Man I love that pic Steve! You should put it in your sig.

FORD
03-24-2004, 01:48 PM
12 years prior??

Like when Poppy was President, you mean? ;)

steve
03-24-2004, 02:11 PM
Originally posted by John Ashcroft
Man I love that pic Steve! You should put it in your sig.

Yes, I know the pic is a lil' bit cliche' in a liberal sort of way, but f it - so is posting articles saying Saddam was a murderer akin to a super-sized mob boss. Everyone knowS it already.

We're at the point where only about 1/3 of the votings publics' minds can be changed on anything.

GW could skull fuck a live, burning Rowandan orphan on Constituion Ave. in broad daylight and the staunch Republicans would still vote for him.

Ralph Nader could chant Kumbaya in the streets while our country was being bombed to smithereens and some libs would still support him.

What to do, what to do?