Einstein Is Wrong, Says Scientist

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hardrock69
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Feb 2005
    • 21834

    Einstein Is Wrong, Says Scientist

    One is possibly the greatest scientist who ever lived, and the other is a maverick physicist from Adelaide.

    But Reg Cahill says he can prove Albert Einstein and his hundred-year-old theories of relativity are wrong.

    The problem for Professor Cahill is that many of his contemporaries line up with Einstein.

    "I've been treated with utter contempt and hostility," he told The Australian. "This is pretty shocking stuff - but it's what you'd expect."

    In 2002, Professor Cahill started to question what he thought were anomalies in Einstein's theory that time and space are relative.

    "They all agreed with one another and they were all indicating a huge speed difference in different directions," he said. "When you find out the speed of light differs, the whole Einstein theory starts collapsing."

    "We know now the speed of light at approximately 300,000km per second is relative to space itself - before it was always relative to the observer."

    Professor Cahill said that debunking the Einstein theories would lead to new discoveries in physics and greater understanding of phenomena that could not yet be fully explained.

    "There are some incredible discoveries being made," he said. "We're discovering some properties about space that are awesome."

    Those discoveries include the speed at which the solar system is travelling through space and the detection of gravitational waves.

    "The rotation of galaxies has always been a problem - we now understand how they work," Professor Cahill said.

    "The outer part of spiral galaxies go around about 10 times faster than Einstein's theory permits, so people invented dark matter to account for extra gravitational pull.

    "They've spent years and millions of dollars looking for it - but it doesn't exist."

    Over the past 100 years, physicists have conducted experiments to test if the speed of light is constant.

    Professor Cahill says they obtained definitive results but ignored them because they feared they would be shouted down for questioning Einstein.

    "It's staggering that the concept of physics has been built on a mathematical illusion."

    But physicist Paul Davies of Macquarie University and the Australian Centre for Astrobiology said Einstein's theories of relativity had been tested, and there was no evidence to suggest they were wrong.

    "Just as Einstein's theories surpassed Newton's, one day we might expect someone to surpass Einstein's theories," Professor Davies said. "But at this stage there's nothing to suggest that."

    University of Adelaide physicist Derek Leinweber agrees.

    "I'm not aware of any experimental evidence that suggests Einstein is wrong," Mr Leinweber said. "Every experimental measurement I'm aware of is in accordance with Einstein's premise that the speed of light is the same in all frames."

    But support for Professor Cahill is growing. The Australian Research Council gave a $60,000 grant for his research, and the world's largest particle physics laboratory - CERN in Switzerland - has donated $100,000 worth of optical fibres.



    Last edited by Hardrock69; 11-08-2005, 11:18 AM.
  • Matt White
    • Jun 2004
    • 20446

    #2
    Say it ain't so!!!

    Comment

    • Soul Reaper
      ROTH ARMY SUPREME
      • Jan 2005
      • 8314

      #3
      oh really....

      ROTH ARMY YOUTUBE CHANNEL:

      http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=RothArmyVideos

      "May your shit come to life and kiss you on the face." - Frank Zappa to Tipper Gore

      Comment

      • scamper
        Commando
        • May 2005
        • 1073

        #4
        Wait till I see my college physics professor, who's the idiot now?

        Comment

        • ELVIS
          Banned
          • Dec 2003
          • 44120

          #5
          You're gonna challenge your professor with an article from rense.com ??

          I doubt you even read it...

          Comment

          • Hardrock69
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Feb 2005
            • 21834

            #6
            Goober, it was not "an article from rense.com" that made these discoveries.

            The article is just a bunch of digital data floating around in cyberspace, and visible to humans as a bunch of words and sentences.

            Since when did words or webpages actually have sentience of their own?


            He is planning on challenging his professor with information from Professor Reg Cahill.


            Though of course, whether Reg Cahill is right or wrong, if he wants to pass his class, it might not be wise to argue with the professor!

            Comment

            • scamper
              Commando
              • May 2005
              • 1073

              #7
              Originally posted by ELVIS
              You're gonna challenge your professor with an article from rense.com ??

              I doubt you even read it...
              I was a joke, obviously not funny.

              Comment

              • Jérôme Frenchise
                ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                • Nov 2004
                • 7173

                #8
                Very interesting article, HR. The relativity of science itself...
                As far as knowledge, man is condemned to roll the big rock up the slope again and again like Sysyphus, forever. Truth is out of reach.

                If mankind is still alive in 5,000 years (and avoids intellectual decline), both Newton and Einstein will probably be regarded as Aristotle and Eucledes are in our time: stages in the history of Sciences... but it shouldn't lessen their status of giants.
                Last edited by Jérôme Frenchise; 11-09-2005, 08:28 AM.
                posted by Ellyllions Men say, "I'll never understand women." That's a very lonely place to be if you're a woman because we don't understand half of what we do either.
                posted by ALinChainz Katy, Pipe down, pump off, and fly back to your cave you old bat.

                Comment

                • Hardrock69
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Feb 2005
                  • 21834

                  #9
                  Wow...cool reference to Sysyphus.

                  I was reading Greek mythology when I was in the 3rd Grade.

                  Found it much more entertaining that yer standard kids fare..

                  Einsteing opened the door for science to get to the next level regarding quantum physics.

                  It is all just a gradual evolution of science.

                  If we survive...think what technology will be like in 5,000 years?

                  Comment

                  • Jérôme Frenchise
                    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                    • Nov 2004
                    • 7173

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Hardrock69
                    Wow...cool reference to Sysyphus.

                    I was reading Greek mythology when I was in the 3rd Grade.

                    Found it much more entertaining that yer standard kids fare..

                    Einsteing opened the door for science to get to the next level regarding quantum physics.

                    It is all just a gradual evolution of science.

                    If we survive...think what technology will be like in 5,000 years?
                    In 5,000 years... For us it's a fantasy (for me even the next 5 years in my own life are like science fiction), but right now the question is ENERGY. We'll soon (history scale) have to find something else than oil...
                    No doubt that this will be solved by human inventiveness. Anyway, if man is still here in 5,000 years, that will first mean that we have improved as human beings. Technological progress has been awesome over the last two centuries; meanwhile, man's improvement as a human being was close to naught, if it hasn't declined.

                    I'm glad there still are scientists like Aussie R. Cahill who deal with wide, global views of science. Mainly because of Descartes who claimed that man had to become the master and owner of nature, an "s" was put to science, which shrank most scientists's views as they have more and more had to specialize in such or such branch, until today: all is fragmented, as technologies are mistaken for science. A global approach of the universe has been missing; major thinkers like Plato, Spinoza and Kant brought absolutely nothing to man's everyday life, but they brought infinitely more to mankind than cell phone inventors... It's all about what you consider is peculiar to man...
                    No matter if this objection to Einstein's theories are "a straw fire" or not, for the moment I dig the guts he has in shaking the well-established building, pointing at fundamental principles.
                    posted by Ellyllions Men say, "I'll never understand women." That's a very lonely place to be if you're a woman because we don't understand half of what we do either.
                    posted by ALinChainz Katy, Pipe down, pump off, and fly back to your cave you old bat.

                    Comment

                    Working...