PDA

View Full Version : Iran atomic bomb by 2009



4moreyears
01-13-2006, 09:23 PM
Iran could have an atomic bomb as early as 2009 and could eventually manufacture 25 to 30 weapons a year based on its past research efforts, two US arms experts say.

David Albright and Corey Hinderstein, both analysts, wrote in a report issued on Friday by a Washington-based think-tank: "Given another year to make enough HEU (highly enriched uranium) for a nuclear weapon and a few more months to convert the uranium into weapon components, Iran could have its first nuclear weapons in 2009."

The findings, based on the results of UN inspections showing the pace of Iran's nuclear activities, were tentative and it remained unclear how long it would take Tehran to master uranium enrichment, the report from the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) said.

The report said: "This result reflects a worst case assessment, and thus is highly uncertain."

Forecasts for when Iran might secure a nuclear arsenal have differed widely. A recent US intelligence review reported by the Washington Post revised earlier assessments, saying Tehran would probably not have the bomb until 2015.

Western condemnation

Amid mounting concern about the nature of Iran's nuclear programme, the EU and the US have condemned Iran's decision to resume uranium enrichment research and are pushing for the issue to be referred to the Security Council.

Both the EU and the US want to
refer Iran to the Security Council

Iran
insists its programme is purely peaceful and has threatened to cut off co-operation with international inspectors if the matter is taken up by the UN Security Council.

The timetable of a possible weapons programme depends on how quickly Iran could build large numbers of centrifuges and then refine the operation of the centrifuges for the enrichment of weapons-grade uranium, according to the report.

Iran currently has a small cascade of centrifuges, some of which broke or crashed in previous tests. But the report said once Iran mastered the operation of the small cascade, it could expand quickly towards large-scale operations for a possible weapons project.

Technical hurdle

The report said: "Once Iran overcomes the last technical hurdle of operating its test cascade, it can duplicate it and create larger cascades.

"Iran would then be ready to build a centrifuge plant able to produce significant amounts of enriched uranium either for peaceful purposes or for nuclear weapons."

When completed, a planned nuclear fuel enrichment facility could be used to produce enough highly enriched uranium to produce 25 to 30 nuclear weapons a year, it said.

David Albright, one of the report's authors, served as a UN inspector of Iraq's weapons programmes in the 1990s.

Link (http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/A98D10AC-0017-4097-9E24-A1E86531A001.htm)

Cathedral
01-13-2006, 09:26 PM
"Iran becomes dust cloud" -Coming Mid '06.....

Nickdfresh
01-13-2006, 09:26 PM
I think we have a thread on this already...

4moreyears
01-13-2006, 09:28 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
I think we have a thread on this already...

Feel Free to move it if you can.

Hardrock69
01-16-2006, 09:19 AM
More Lies about Iran

By Mike Whitney

01/15/06


There’s been a lot of rubbish written about Iran’s “removing the seals” from its uranium enrichment equipment.

The fear-mongering western media have exploited the expression for all its worth. Even those who are normally skeptical of the Bush-propaganda machine are taken aback by this ominous-sounding phrase.

What gibberish!

How else does one make nuclear fuel for electric power plants if the fuel-producing mechanism is under lock and key?

The fear-engendering description provided in the news would have the reader believe that “diabolical” Iranians are ripping off the seals with crowbars so they can quickly assemble their secret nuclear stockpile to bomb Tel Aviv.

This is the worse type of demagoguery.

The fuel that is produced from these uranium enrichment reactors DOES NOT PRODUCE WEAPONS-GRADE MATERIAL. That requires thousands of centrifuges which Iran does not have.

At the same time, the nuclear watchdog agency, the IAEA, has on-site inspectors and cameras monitoring the entire process.

Everything is under constant observation.

Additionally, as nuclear weapons physicist, Gordon Prather states, “After almost three years of go-anywhere see-anything interview-anyone inspections, IAEA inspectors have yet to find any indication that Iran has―or ever had―a nuclear weapons program”.

Get it???

No nukes! Not now…not ever!

The public has been duped again by the intentionally misleading rhetoric and blatant lies of the MSM and the Bush administration to build the case for war with Iran. What could be more clear?

The public does have a choice, however; either they can accept the credible statements from the Nobel Prize-winning Mohammed Elbaradei, chief of the IAEA, or the spurious allegations of the Liar-and-Chief.

Which will it be?

"Removing the Seals?"

So, why were the seals put on the Iranian conversion equipment?

Was Iran being punished for violations to the NPT (Non Proliferation Treaty) for secretly developing nuclear weapons?

No, but this seems to be the conclusion of most people who haven’t followed the issue closely.

The seals were put in place because the Iranian negotiators foolishly fell into a trap that was set by the EU-3. (England, France and Germany) Iran agreed to “confidence-building” measures that would placate the United States, which included “additional protocols” that were not demanded under the terms of the treaty or required by the IAEA. As it turns out, the EU used the extra concessions to make it look like Iran was violating the NPT after negotiations had ended.

The EU strategy was a clever ploy that worked like a charm, but that doesn’t change the facts:

IRAN HAS NOT VIOLATED ITS TREATY OBLIGATIONS, AND THE AGREEMENT WITH THE EU-3 WAS NEITHER BINDING NOR DESIGNED TO BE PERMANENT.

Iran has never given up its “inalienable right” (language of the NPT) to enrich uranium for peaceful purposes.

Was Iran foolish to trust the EU-3? (not suspecting that Washington was orchestrating a media-coup behind the scenes)

Yes, they were… but that is not a violation of the treaty; that’s simply being deceived by some very brainy neocons.

Iran has completely cooperated with the IAEA to ensure that it stays within the rules and does not develop highly-enriched, weapons grade material.

Presently, Iran poses no threat to either its neighbors or the United States.

The Bush administration does not accept the internationally-recognized treaty rights of Iran because it believes that all law flows from Washington; a fact that is tragically evident in its torturing of prisoners, spying on American citizens, and its vast destruction of Iraq.

As long as the Bush-media, which serves as an annex to the political establish, can continue to hoodwink the American people with its alarmist misinformation; there’s little chance that a war with Iran will be avoided.

(For those who really want to understand the truth about Iran’s nuclear programs and the many fictions created in the press, there’s no better place to start than the articles of nuclear physicist, Dr. Gordon Prather on www.antiwar.com.)

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11572.htm

Dr. Love
01-16-2006, 07:32 PM
I don't care if they have nukes or not, I just don't like their president.


REGIME CHANGE!!!!

Dr. Love
01-16-2006, 07:33 PM
Well, I care if they have nukes, but I don't care if they don't.

BigBadBrian
01-16-2006, 07:37 PM
Originally posted by Hardrock69


What gibberish!



Yeah, no shit!

Don't you fucking no how to edit your Cut-n-paste jobs, lazy-ass?

:gulp:

Nickdfresh
01-16-2006, 07:56 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Yeah, no shit!

Don't you fucking no how to edit your Cut-n-paste jobs, lazy-ass?

:gulp:

I think you mean "know" there panty-waste. As in you don't KNOW much...:)

Hardrock69
01-17-2006, 12:11 PM
Anything Triple-B does not understand is gibberish.

That is how he keeps his Bush Blinders on...as anything that could possibly be construed as negative info about Chimpy is "gibberish".

LOL!
:D

ELVIS
01-17-2006, 12:23 PM
Originally posted by Cathedral
"Iran becomes dust cloud" -Coming Mid '06.....

Dat's rite !!


:elvis:

Seshmeister
01-17-2006, 01:14 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Iran could have an atomic bomb as early as 2009 and could eventually manufacture 25 to 30 weapons a year based on its past research efforts, two US arms experts say.


These are the guys that told us Saddam had one already?

jhale667
01-17-2006, 06:49 PM
Originally posted by Seshmeister
These are the guys that told us Saddam had one already?


LMAO :D

Hardrock69
01-17-2006, 11:25 PM
Yeah, they go from claiming there ARE WMDs to saying there MIGHT BE some WMDs in the FUTURE.

But only IF we DON'T bomb them.

America is getting tired of Chimpy and his criminal empire.

IF Chimpy decides he is going to attack Iran, then Revolution will be in the air.....