PDA

View Full Version : **BREAKING NEWS** - KKKarl Rove tells the BCE he will be indicted!!!



FORD
05-12-2006, 07:05 PM
Just now coming over the wire - details as they come in.

Anybody wanna guess how far Junior's numbers drop next week? 25%? 23%? How about 19% so he's even with Dick?

Then Chimpeach both of em :cool:

FORD
05-12-2006, 07:11 PM
Rove Informs White House He Will Be Indicted
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Friday 12 May 2006

Within the last week, Karl Rove told President Bush and Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, as well as a few other high level administration officials, that he will be indicted in the CIA leak case and will immediately resign his White House job when the special counsel publicly announces the charges against him, according to sources.

Details of Rove's discussions with the president and Bolten have spread through the corridors of the White House where low-level staffers and senior officials were trying to determine how the indictment would impact an administration that has been mired in a number of high-profile political scandals for nearly a year, said a half-dozen White House aides and two senior officials who work at the Republican National Committee.

Speaking on condition of anonymity, sources confirmed Rove's indictment is imminent. These individuals requested anonymity saying they were not authorized to speak publicly about Rove's situation. A spokesman in the White House press office said they would not comment on "wildly speculative rumors."

Rove's attorney, Robert Luskin, did not return a call for comment Friday.

Rove's announcement to President Bush and Bolten comes more than a month after he alerted the new chief of staff to a meeting his attorney had with Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in which Fitzgerald told Luskin that his case against Rove would soon be coming to a close and that he was leaning toward charging Rove with perjury, obstruction of justice and lying to investigators, according to sources close to the investigation.

A few weeks after he spoke with Fitzgerald, Luskin arranged for Rove to return to the grand jury for a fifth time to testify in hopes of fending off an indictment related to Rove's role in the CIA leak, sources said.

That meeting was followed almost immediately by an announcement by newly-appointed White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten of changes in the responsibilities of some White House officials, including Rove, who was stripped of his policy duties and would no longer hold the title of deputy White House chief of staff.

The White House said Rove would focus on the November elections and his change in status in no way reflected his fifth appearance before the grand jury or the possibility of an indictment.

But since Rove testified two weeks ago, the White House has been coordinating a response to what is sure to be the biggest political scandal it has faced thus far: the loss of a key political operative who has been instrumental in shaping White House policy on a wide range of domestic issues.

Late Thursday afternoon and early Friday morning, several White House officials were bracing for the possibility that Fitzgerald would call a news conference and announce a Rove indictment today following the prosecutor's meeting with the grand jury this morning. However, sources close to the probe said that is unlikely to happen, despite the fact that Fitzgerald has already presented the grand jury with a list of charges against Rove. If an indictment is returned by the grand jury, it will be filed under seal.

Rove is said to have told Bolten that he will be charged with perjury regarding when he was asked how and when he discovered that covert CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson worked for the agency, and whether he discussed her job with reporters.

Rove testified that he first found out about Plame Wilson from reading a newspaper report in July 2003 and only after the story was published did he share damaging information about her CIA status with other reporters.

However, evidence has surfaced during the course of the two-year-old investigation that shows Rove spoke with at least two reporters about Plame Wilson prior to the publication of the column.

The explanation Rove provided to the grand jury - that he was dealing with more urgent White House matters and therefore forgot - has not convinced Fitzgerald that Rove has been entirely truthful in his testimony.

Sources close to the case said there is a strong chance Rove will also face an additional charge of obstruction of justice, adding that Fitzgerald has been working meticulously over the past few months to build an obstruction case against Rove because it "carries more weight" in a jury trial and is considered a more serious crime.

Some White House staffers said it's the uncertainty of Rove's status in the leak case that has made it difficult for the administration's domestic policy agenda and the announcement of an indictment and Rove's subsequent resignation, while serious, would allow the administration to move forward on a wide range of issues.

"We need to start fresh and we can't do that with the uncertainty of Karl's case hanging over our heads," said one White House aide. "There's no doubt that it will be front page news if and when (an indictment) happens. But eventually it will become old news quickly. The key issue here is that the president or Mr. Bolten respond to the charges immediately, make a statement and then move on to other important policy issues and keep that as the main focus going forward."

Jason Leopold spent two years covering California's electricity crisis as Los Angeles bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires. Jason has spent the last year cultivating sources close to the CIA leak investigation, and is a regular contributor to t r u t h o u t. He is the author of the new book NEWS JUNKIE. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview.

DLR'sCock
05-12-2006, 08:28 PM
About time....

4moreyears
05-12-2006, 10:27 PM
Originally posted by DLR'sCock
Need a Mortgage?? Need to refinance or buying a home??? Need to clear your debt????


Low credit scores, any credit score, stated income, no doc loans, commercial loans, first time home buyers, refinance to clear your debt, investment properties, rehab loans. If you are looking to buy or refinance give me a call.


Nationwide in 48 states!!!!

Over 150 lenders and thousands of programs designed for you!!!

$100 referral incentive, when/if the loan closes then you get paid $100 for referring said client to me!


Thomas Murphy
Sr. Mortgage Specialist

tel: 212-643-8535 x202
Toll Free: 1-877-473-3658
thmurphy@greentechmortgage.com

Like I would really want to do business with someone who goes by the name DLR's Cock. You are pathetic.

BITEYOASS
05-12-2006, 10:30 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Like I would really want to do business with someone who goes by the name DLR's Cock. You are pathetic.

I see we're getting a little defensive asswipe! :D

4moreyears
05-12-2006, 10:35 PM
Originally posted by BITEYOASS
I see we're getting a little defensive asswipre! :D

Defensive??? WTF are you talking about.

BITEYOASS
05-12-2006, 10:42 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Defensive??? WTF are you talking about.

Well starting shit over other peoples business and diverting away from the subject, just because they disagree with their views would be one! You gonna act like that when your part of the 1% that think the president is doing an excellent job 6 months from now?

FORD
05-12-2006, 11:24 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Like I would really want to do business with someone who goes by the name 4morequeers. You are pathetic.

FORD
05-12-2006, 11:27 PM
Originally posted by BITEYOASS
Well starting shit over other peoples business and diverting away from the subject, just because they disagree with their views would be one! You gonna act like that when your part of the 1% that think the president is doing an excellent job 6 months from now?

No shit. I mean if you want to talk about unfortunate usernames....

"4moreyears"..... seriously, think about that.

Millions of people who were somehow braindead in November 2004 have woken up since, and they're now as pissed as the rest of us have been for a while now. It's been 1 and 1/2 of those 4 more years..... how's your Chimp doing? ;)

4moreyears
05-13-2006, 09:36 AM
Originally posted by BITEYOASS
Well starting shit over other peoples business and diverting away from the subject, just because they disagree with their views would be one! You gonna act like that when your part of the 1% that think the president is doing an excellent job 6 months from now?

First of all the Ford conspiracy theory stuff carries little weight with any American who has any reasonable level of intelligence.
Second I think it is tacky and of poor taste to turn this place into an advertising forum. To me it is ironic for someone to put a professional looking ad under an identity of “DLR’s Cock”. I try to hide my real identity because quite frankly I do not want to real identity to be known here or any other forum I participate at, of course that is just personal. This has nothing to do with the main topic of this thread, I just happened to see it in this thread first.

4moreyears
05-13-2006, 09:38 AM
Originally posted by FORD


I bet you really miss your editing tools in this forum eh dumb ass???

4moreyears
05-13-2006, 09:56 AM
Originally posted by FORD
No shit. I mean if you want to talk about unfortunate usernames....

"4moreyears"..... seriously, think about that.

Millions of people who were somehow braindead in November 2004 have woken up since, and they're now as pissed as the rest of us have been for a while now. It's been 1 and 1/2 of those 4 more years..... how's your Chimp doing? ;)


The real reason is that as every day goes by the global community is becoming more of a reality. With commutations and transit improving and bridging the distance, business can be done overseas that could not have been done 25 years ago, hence outsourcing. I ultimately feel there will be one global power in the world that makes rules for everybody. That is just my opinion, with the global community coming closer together over time and possibly 100 years or more there will be one voice for the world. I think the extremist from the middle east see that as well, and I would much rather the world be able to enjoy the lifestyle of freedom and shot at posterity then a life of oppression and living by extremist idealism. So I would rather see our Gov’t be proactive in keeping a lid on these situations that to see these people fester and be allowed to plot another 9-11. Keep in mind I am not being specific about Iraq, I am just talking about philosophy. That being said the president is taking an agressive aproach, and I like that. I do not blame him or any other president for and market driven problems. I think the oil companies should be able to make as much money as the market place will allow. I see many people complain it is the presidents fault on gas prices. Jack Daniels cost more than gas per gallon and costs less and uses less in technology to make and I do not see people bitching about that. People that complain about any president republican or democrat for economic reasons need to look in the mirror, because you can always find someone becoming wealthy during any economic condition.

ODShowtime
05-13-2006, 10:38 AM
Originally posted by 4moreyears

Second I think it is tacky and of poor taste to turn this place into an advertising forum.

I think it's tacky to have such a retarded user name. I think it's tacky to sit here and try to support the worst president in history.

And I think it's in really poor taste to sit here and try to defend these shit bags, when the WHOLE GODDAMN WORLD knows we are killing or complicit in the killing of tens of thousands in innocent Iraqis over a bullshit war so gw&friends could get paid. And I'm paying for it! Go fuck yourself you moron! You and your kind don't have a leg to stand on!

FORD
05-13-2006, 01:16 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Jack Daniels cost more than gas per gallon and costs less and uses less in technology to make and I do not see people bitching about that.

Ridiculous analogy. Nobody has to drink Jack Daniels because there are thousands of other beverages available. The entire economy is not dependent on Jack Daniels prices, because every shipping method on the planet doesn't require Jack Daniels to operate.

Furthermore, the Jack Daniels industry hasn't been in the White House for 35 of the last 50 years deliberately suppressing any attempt to manufacture alternative beverages.

DrMaddVibe
05-13-2006, 01:32 PM
Don't you think its odd that CNN, FOXNews, ABC, NBC and CBS aren't running this story?

FORD
05-13-2006, 01:37 PM
Originally posted by DrMaddVibe
Don't you think its odd that CNN, FOXNews, ABC, NBC and CBS aren't running this story?

Not at all. It's been the pattern of the corporate whore media to IGNORE the real news as long as they can. The White House press whore corps know this is going down. They just ain't going to mention it until they have to. None of these Bush blowing whores wants to be the one who sends Chimpy's numbers under 25% ;)

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-13-2006, 02:00 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Not at all. It's been the pattern of the corporate whore media to IGNORE the real news as long as they can.

Oh, come on FORD, the only reason this hasn't been reported yet is b/c at this point its merely speculation and rumor. And Rove DOES have a wicked sense of humor. he may have said it in jest as he walked down the hall.

Nickdfresh
05-13-2006, 02:37 PM
Remember friends, just like the "illegal" aliens that cross our borders, Rove is "breaking the law." No double standards kiddies....;)

DLR'sCock
05-13-2006, 04:49 PM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Like I would really want to do business with someone who goes by the name DLR's Cock. You are pathetic.

name calling...

name calling...

tsk tsk

DLR'sCock
05-13-2006, 05:00 PM
Originally posted by ODShowtime
I think it's tacky to have such a retarded user name. I think it's tacky to sit here and try to support the worst president in history.

And I think it's in really poor taste to sit here and try to defend these shit bags, when the WHOLE GODDAMN WORLD knows we are killing or complicit in the killing of tens of thousands in innocent Iraqis over a bullshit war so gw&friends could get paid. And I'm paying for it! Go fuck yourself you moron! You and your kind don't have a leg to stand on!



100,000+ dead and wounded, no big whoop, as long as it's not me, right?

You gotta love the nerve of some people, what a hoot!

Dr. Love
05-14-2006, 02:17 AM
Originally posted by FORD
Like I would really want to do business with someone who goes by the name 4morequeers. You are pathetic.


FORD, if you really wanted to edit the thread that bad you shoulda told me. I'd've done it for you, just once, for old times sake.

LoungeMachine
05-14-2006, 11:37 AM
Originally posted by 4moreyears
Like I would really want to do business with someone who goes by the name DLR's Cock. You are pathetic.

Something tells me you won't be buying a house anytime soon anyway.......:rolleyes:

LoungeMachine
05-14-2006, 11:41 AM
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
Oh, come on FORD, the only reason this hasn't been reported yet is b/c at this point its merely speculation and rumor. And Rove DOES have a wicked sense of humor. he may have said it in jest as he walked down the hall.

Walked down the hall to meet Jimmy/Jeff Gannon/Guckert you mean.......


BTW, isn't there something academically punkish about his posting style? ;)

Hmmm:cool:

Warham
05-14-2006, 01:59 PM
That's old news.

AP, why don't you just use your old name?

FORD
05-14-2006, 02:05 PM
Originally posted by Warham
That's old news.

AP, why don't you just use your old name?

Have you seen his new alias over at Links yet? ;)

Warham
05-14-2006, 02:15 PM
No, what's he go by over there?

FORD
05-14-2006, 02:37 PM
Originally posted by Warham
No, what's he go by over there?

"vanhagar4life" If it ain't him, it's his twin brother.

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-14-2006, 02:45 PM
Originally posted by FORD
"vanhagar4life" If it ain't him, it's his twin brother.

I have never logged in at the links under this name or any other. Ever.

And to be accused of claiming that I would stoop so far down to actually even pretend to be a hagar fan....I MEAN, IT'S MORE FORGIVEABLE AND ACCEPTABLE TO BE A BUSH SUPPORTER.

NOW I'M P-I-S-S-E-D!!!

FORD
05-14-2006, 07:19 PM
Not to get back on topic or anything, but..........

Karl Rove Indicted on Charges of Perjury, Lying to Investigators

By Jason Leopold

05/13/06 "t r u t h o u t" -- -- Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald spent more than half a day Friday at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm representing Karl Rove.

During the course of that meeting, Fitzgerald served attorneys for former Deputy White House Chief of Staff Karl Rove with an indictment charging the embattled White House official with perjury and lying to investigators related to his role in the CIA leak case, and instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 hours to get his affairs in order, high level sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said Saturday morning.

Robert Luskin, Rove's attorney, did not return a call for comment. Sources said Fitzgerald was in Washington, DC, Friday and met with Luskin for about 15 hours to go over the charges against Rove, which include perjury and lying to investigators about how and when Rove discovered that Valerie Plame Wilson was a covert CIA operative and whether he shared that information with reporters, sources with direct knowledge of the meeting said.

It was still unknown Saturday whether Fitzgerald charged Rove with a more serious obstruction of justice charge. Sources close to the case said Friday that it appeared very likely that an obstruction charge against Rove would be included with charges of perjury and lying to investigators.

An announcement by Fitzgerald is expected to come this week, sources close to the case said. However, the day and time is unknown. Randall Samborn, a spokesman for the special prosecutor was unavailable for comment. In the past, Samborn said he could not comment on the case.

The grand jury hearing evidence in the Plame Wilson case met Friday on other matters while Fitzgerald spent the entire day at Luskin's office. The meeting was a closely guarded secret and seems to have taken place without the knowledge of the media.

As TruthOut reported Friday evening, Rove told President Bush and Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten, as well as a few other high level administration officials, that he will be indicted in the CIA leak case and will immediately resign his White House job when the special counsel publicly announces the charges against him, according to sources.

Details of Rove's discussions with the president and Bolten have spread through the corridors of the White House, where low-level staffers and senior officials were trying to determine how the indictment would impact an administration that has been mired in a number of high-profile political scandals for nearly a year, said a half-dozen White House aides and two senior officials who work at the Republican National Committee.

Speaking on condition of anonymity Friday night, sources confirmed Rove's indictment was imminent. These individuals requested anonymity saying they were not authorized to speak publicly about Rove's situation. A spokesman in the White House press office said they would not comment on "wildly speculative rumors."

Rove's announcement to President Bush and Bolten comes more than a month after he alerted the new chief of staff to a meeting his attorney had with Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald in which Fitzgerald told Luskin that his case against Rove would soon be coming to a close and that he was leaning toward charging Rove with perjury, obstruction of justice and lying to investigators, according to sources close to the investigation.

A few weeks after he spoke with Fitzgerald, Luskin arranged for Rove to return to the grand jury for a fifth time to testify in hopes of fending off an indictment related to Rove's role in the CIA leak, sources said.

That meeting was followed almost immediately by an announcement by newly-appointed White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten of changes in the responsibilities of some White House officials, including Rove, who was stripped of his policy duties and would no longer hold the title of deputy White House chief of staff.

The White House said Rove would focus on the November elections and his change in status in no way reflected his fifth appearance before the grand jury or the possibility of an indictment.

But since Rove testified two weeks ago, the White House has been coordinating a response to what is sure to be the biggest political scandal it has faced thus far: the loss of a key political operative who has been instrumental in shaping White House policy on a wide range of domestic issues.

Rove testified that he first found out about Plame Wilson from reading a newspaper report in July 2003 and only after the story was published did he share damaging information about her CIA status with other reporters.

However, evidence has surfaced during the course of the two-year-old investigation that shows Rove spoke with at least two reporters about Plame Wilson prior to the publication of the column.

The explanation Rove provided to the grand jury - that he was dealing with more urgent White House matters and therefore forgot - has not convinced Fitzgerald that Rove has been entirely truthful in his testimony and resulted in the indictment.

Some White House staffers said it's the uncertainty of Rove's status in the leak case that has made it difficult for the administration's domestic policy agenda and that the announcement of an indictment and Rove's subsequent resignation, while serious, would allow the administration to move forward on a wide range of issues.

"We need to start fresh and we can't do that with the uncertainty of Karl's case hanging over our heads," said one White House aide. "There's no doubt that it will be front page news if and when (an indictment) happens. But eventually it will become old news quickly. The key issue here is that the president or Mr. Bolten respond to the charges immediately, make a statement and then move on to other important policy issues and keep that as the main focus going forward."

Jason Leopold spent two years covering California's electricity crisis as Los Angeles bureau chief of Dow Jones Newswires. Jason has spent the last year cultivating sources close to the CIA leak investigation, and is a regular contributor to t r u t h o u t. He is the author of the new book NEWS JUNKIE. Visit www.newsjunkiebook.com for a preview.

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-14-2006, 08:59 PM
FORD, I demand an apology.

FORD
05-15-2006, 04:25 AM
http://www.apfn.org/LEAK-GATE/arrestedRove.jpg

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-18-2006, 12:58 PM
Any updates on this??? Was it all a sham??? Were the liberal bloggers and FORD fooled into believing somehting they wanted so badly that they reported erroneous information?

FORD
05-18-2006, 05:24 PM
TruthOut is standing by their sources. I would guess that Fitz might want to make sure every "t" is crossed and all the "i"s are dotted before proceeding with this one. Meanwhile Rove himself could very well be behind the disinformation campaign that is fueling the wars at Democratic Underground, Daily Kos, and other blogs. I've read a bit of it over at DU and it seems to be the usual DLC interns leading the flaming, and those assholes take their marching orders right from Al From, who takes his from Rove.

diamondD
05-18-2006, 05:36 PM
None of those meetings took place according to both sides. You wanted to believe this so bad you fell for one of those "reliable" sources that you chastise others for not believing over standard news sources.


I guess if you keep starting a Rove is about to be indicted thread every other week, you might eventually get it right.

DrMaddVibe
05-18-2006, 07:35 PM
LoL!!!!!!!!!

FORD
05-18-2006, 09:03 PM
Update on the Rove Indictment Story

By Marc Ash,

Thu May 18th, 2006 at 01:57:53 PM EDT :: Fitzgerald Investigation

For the past few days, we have endured non-stop attacks on our credibility, and we have fought hard to defend our reputation. In addition, we have worked around the clock to provide additional information to our readership. People want to know more about this, and our job is to keep them informed. We take that responsibility seriously.

Here's what we now know: I spoke personally yesterday with both Rove's spokesman Mark Corallo and Rove's attorney Robert Luskin. Both men categorically denied all key points of our recent reporting on this issue. Both said, "Rove is not a target," "Rove did not inform the White House late last week that he would be indicted," and "Rove has not been indicted." Further, both Corallo and Luskin denied Leopold's account of events at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm that represents Karl Rove. They specifically stated again that no such meeting ever occurred, that Fitzgerald was not there, that Rove was not there, and that a major meeting did not take place. Both men were unequivocal on that point.

We can now report, however, that we have additional, independent sources that refute those denials by Corallo and Luskin. While we had only our own sources to work with in the beginning, additional sources have now come forward and offered corroboration to us.

We have been contacted by at least three reporters from mainstream media - network level organizations - who shared with us off-the-record confirmation and moral support. When we asked why they were not going public with this information, in each case they expressed frustration with superiors who would not allow it.


We also learned the following: The events at the office building that houses the law firm of Patton Boggs were not in fact a very well-guarded secret. Despite denials by Corallo and Luskin, there was intense activity at the office building. In fact, the building was staked out by at least two major network news crews. Further, although Corallo and Luskin are not prepared to talk about what happened in the offices of Patton Boggs, others emerging from the building were, both on background and off-the-record. There were a lot of talkers, and they confirmed our accounts. We do have more information, but want additional confirmation before going public with it.

THE 24 HOUR THING

We reported that Patrick Fitzgerald had, "instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 business hours to get his affairs in order...." That does not mean that at the end of that 24-hour period, Fitzgerald is obliged to hold a press conference and make an announcement. It just means that he has given Rove a 24-hour formal notification. Fitzgerald is not obliged to make an announcement at any point; he does so at his own discretion, and not if it compromises his case. So we're all stuck waiting here. Grab some coffee.

DrMaddVibe
05-19-2006, 06:31 AM
Grab a dose of reality too!

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-24-2006, 03:10 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Update on the Rove Indictment Story

By Marc Ash,

Thu May 18th, 2006 at 01:57:53 PM EDT :: Fitzgerald Investigation

For the past few days, we have endured non-stop attacks on our credibility, and we have fought hard to defend our reputation. In addition, we have worked around the clock to provide additional information to our readership. People want to know more about this, and our job is to keep them informed. We take that responsibility seriously.

Here's what we now know: I spoke personally yesterday with both Rove's spokesman Mark Corallo and Rove's attorney Robert Luskin. Both men categorically denied all key points of our recent reporting on this issue. Both said, "Rove is not a target," "Rove did not inform the White House late last week that he would be indicted," and "Rove has not been indicted." Further, both Corallo and Luskin denied Leopold's account of events at the offices of Patton Boggs, the law firm that represents Karl Rove. They specifically stated again that no such meeting ever occurred, that Fitzgerald was not there, that Rove was not there, and that a major meeting did not take place. Both men were unequivocal on that point.

We can now report, however, that we have additional, independent sources that refute those denials by Corallo and Luskin. While we had only our own sources to work with in the beginning, additional sources have now come forward and offered corroboration to us.

We have been contacted by at least three reporters from mainstream media - network level organizations - who shared with us off-the-record confirmation and moral support. When we asked why they were not going public with this information, in each case they expressed frustration with superiors who would not allow it.


We also learned the following: The events at the office building that houses the law firm of Patton Boggs were not in fact a very well-guarded secret. Despite denials by Corallo and Luskin, there was intense activity at the office building. In fact, the building was staked out by at least two major network news crews. Further, although Corallo and Luskin are not prepared to talk about what happened in the offices of Patton Boggs, others emerging from the building were, both on background and off-the-record. There were a lot of talkers, and they confirmed our accounts. We do have more information, but want additional confirmation before going public with it.

THE 24 HOUR THING

We reported that Patrick Fitzgerald had, "instructed one of the attorneys to tell Rove that he has 24 business hours to get his affairs in order...." That does not mean that at the end of that 24-hour period, Fitzgerald is obliged to hold a press conference and make an announcement. It just means that he has given Rove a 24-hour formal notification. Fitzgerald is not obliged to make an announcement at any point; he does so at his own discretion, and not if it compromises his case. So we're all stuck waiting here. Grab some coffee.

All of this is for naught. If someone is arrested and has charges filed against them, it's a matter of public record, press conference or not.

Fess up, F. You got it wrong.

DrMaddVibe
06-13-2006, 07:51 AM
How are those charges?

BAH-HAHAHAHAHAHA!

Told ya!!!!!

No hit, no run and no error!

Sgt Schultz
06-13-2006, 09:15 AM
Rove won't be charged in CIA leak case
http://fireproof.bravehost.com/myPictures/ha+ha+suckers.jpg

Guitar Shark
06-13-2006, 10:42 AM
I wonder if TruthOut is still standing behind its story?

lol...

Sgt Schultz
06-13-2006, 12:09 PM
http://cache.wonkette.com/haha%20blow%20up%20reporters%20ha.jpg

FORD
06-13-2006, 01:41 PM
If Speedy Gonzales sealed the indictment, how would you ever know one way or the other.

DrMaddVibe
06-14-2006, 05:44 PM
Shows how wrong one can be!

If when you're faced with the facts foLIARrd, you stand by the lying article you posted.

matt19
06-14-2006, 07:12 PM
What a fucking joke, he wasn't indited, there is no doubt now, and still there is conspiracy. Give me a fucking break.

ODShowtime
06-14-2006, 07:13 PM
Rove's still a bum. Anyone who supports him supports ripping this country apart with hatred.

matt19
06-14-2006, 07:23 PM
Oh, he is an ass, there is no disputing that, runs a kick ass campaign though. That said, FORD was wrong and his sources are BS on this story, yet it is always someone else's fault.

ODShowtime
06-14-2006, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by matt19
Oh, he is an ass, there is no disputing that, runs a kick ass campaign though. That said, FORD was wrong and his sources are BS on this story, yet it is always someone else's fault.


Yeah, but that's like saying US commander who orders a whole town to be carpet bombed and then claims that he wiped out all the enemy. yeah you did, but it caused more harm than good.


And yeah that source was poop, and it was wrong...

4moreyears
06-15-2006, 09:05 AM
Originally posted by FORD
If Speedy Gonzales sealed the indictment, how would you ever know one way or the other.

Then how can this shit be posted as an indictment. It is nothing more than you of your bullshit conspiracy theory.

Warham
06-16-2006, 04:23 PM
All you libs here need a tissue?

:)

4moreyears
06-17-2006, 04:04 PM
Originally posted by Warham
All you libs here need a tissue?

:)

Ford I will send you some Kleenex.

Warham
06-17-2006, 04:06 PM
Like most other things, the libs are completely wrong when it comes to predicting anything that exists outside their warped sense of reality.

LoungeMachine
06-18-2006, 12:33 AM
Originally posted by Warham
Like most other things, the libs are completely wrong when it comes to predicting anything that exists outside their warped sense of reality.

Much like you Cons with Cynthia McKinney :D


It goes both ways*









*much like KKKarl himself;)

Warham
06-18-2006, 01:55 PM
Republicans haven't had McKinney in their nightmares the last six years.

Nickdfresh
06-18-2006, 08:25 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Like most other things, the libs are completely wrong when it comes to predicting anything that exists outside their warped sense of reality.

Except when it comes to matters of actual policy, like the Iraq War...

EAT MY ASSHOLE
06-18-2006, 08:30 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Except when it comes to matters of actual policy, like the Iraq War...

The insurgency is in its last throes, okay??? Now go see a movie.

Nickdfresh
06-18-2006, 08:38 PM
http://mysite.verizon.net/vze1xa8h/quirked/images/baghdad_dick.jpg

It's duck season!

LoungeMachine
06-18-2006, 11:33 PM
It's Wabbit season.

Warham
06-19-2006, 07:47 AM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Except when it comes to matters of actual policy, like the Iraq War... '

No, they haven't been right about that either.

I remember about a year and a half ago, some libs said Iraq would never have a constitution or a working government.

I'd say they are batting below the Mendoza line.

LoungeMachine
06-19-2006, 09:58 AM
But above the Harriet Meiers Line.

:rolleyes:

Howard Dean
06-19-2006, 01:14 PM
I SAID HE'S GUILTY DAMNIT! JUST LIKE TOM DELAY! THROW THE RAT BASTARD IN JAIL NOW!

http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/7/8/j/dean-osama-delay.jpe

FORD
06-19-2006, 04:14 PM
**Requesting IP check on the latest alias. Who the fuck is this??**

Warham
06-19-2006, 04:42 PM
Originally posted by LoungeMachine
But above the Harriet Meiers Line.

:rolleyes:

Is that the worst thing you can bring up?

Warham
06-19-2006, 04:42 PM
Originally posted by FORD
**Requesting IP check on the latest alias. Who the fuck is this??**

Howard Dean, who else?

Howard Dean
06-19-2006, 05:08 PM
**Requesting IP check on the latest alias. Who the fuck is this??**


MAYBE YOU SHOULD ASK JESUS I THINK YOU THINK YOU CAN SPEAK FOR HIM.


http://z.about.com/d/politicalhumor/1/0/y/i/dean_jesus.jpg


MY IP MR FORD? YOU JUST WORRY ABOUT GETTING ON BOARD WITH ME BECOME THE DIM-WIT YOU CAN BE TOGETHER WE CAN TAKE ON THE BCE SINGLE HANDED

Roy Munson
06-19-2006, 05:17 PM
I love this thread.

Great job, FORD!!!

jcook11
06-20-2006, 04:20 PM
Tick tock Tick tock Tick tock.....and still no indictment....Any moment now........***********crickets chirping***********

jcook11
07-10-2006, 06:46 PM
Tick tock Tick tock Tick Tock Tick Tock.........................

Nickdfresh
07-10-2006, 06:50 PM
Okay, we get the point. Stop bumping this shit...

FORD
07-10-2006, 07:08 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Okay, we get the point. Stop bumping this shit...

Only YOU (and Lounge) can prevent necroposting flamers....

Lock this bitch down.......


(And I still say KKKarl's name was on the SEALED indictment that was "coincidentally" issued the same week this story broke)

Guitar Shark
07-10-2006, 07:10 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Only YOU (and Lounge) can prevent necroposting flamers....

Lock this bitch down.......


Why did you pick those two? There are two other mods in this forum.

FORD
07-10-2006, 07:13 PM
Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Why did you pick those two? There are two other mods in this forum.

Because I believe Warhamster's bumped this thread a few times himself, or cheered on those who did. And Doc's not around all that much.

Nickdfresh
07-10-2006, 07:16 PM
I'll lock, or preferably dump, this bitch when I feel it's time to do so...

I detest the locking of threads. I think it deprives late comers that have a valid point a voice. And I hate when this goes on at the Links...

But at the same time, people bumping dated shit with nothing to say but "ha ha! Fat ass got away with it!" is pretty pointless...

jcook11
07-10-2006, 07:19 PM
ALL ABOARD! THE INDICTMENT TRAIN IS NOW LEAVING ALL ABOARD!

Tick tock Tick tock Tick tock.................

Nickdfresh
07-10-2006, 08:21 PM
You are a retard Jcock, seriously, did your wife actually let you back in?

Fuck off and talk to Airelle, oh wait, she's also your intellectual superior... Try hitting her, that always works.

LoungeMachine
07-10-2006, 11:44 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Only YOU (and Lounge) can prevent necroposting flamers....

Lock this bitch down.......


(And I still say KKKarl's name was on the SEALED indictment that was "coincidentally" issued the same week this story broke)



For the record, this is the first time FORD has ever even referred to me by name. [for those of you who think we're too aligned]


And KKKarl is/was guilty as sin.


Necroposting Flamers.

I think I have my next band's name:cool:

Warham
07-11-2006, 06:08 PM
Originally posted by LoungeMachine
And KKKarl is/was guilty as sin.

Suuuuure he was.

:D

THE END.