CNN media whore Jamie McIntyre caught in a lie regarding Pentagon coverup!!

[FORD]

NEWS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

NEW PENTAGON FOOTAGE REVEALS ANOTHER COVER-UP
CNN’S JAMIE MCINTIRE CONTRADICTS ORIGINAL REPORT

May 18, 2006

Dave vonKleist May 18, 2006
P.O. Box 85
Versailles, MO 65084
(573) 378-6049, (573)378-5998 FAX

The release of new video footage of the 9/11 attack on the Pentagon has spurred yet another controversy. In anticipation of the release, CNN’s Kyra Phillips was interviewing Jamie McIntyre Tuesday afternoon, and asked him what happened at the Pentagon on 9/11, as he was reporting live from the scene that day.

Referring to the idea that something other than a 757 hit the Pentagon, McIntyre stated, “Having been there on September 11th, having seen the plane wreckage and photographed it myself personally, I can tell you that’s nonsense...…Click here for sound clip (http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_5_16_2.wav)

I had a camera with me, I took pictures of some of the wreckage, some of the parts of the fuselage of …a part of the cockpit, until they told us we had to move back away from the scene…” Click here for sound clip (http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_5_16_1.wav)

However, McIntyre’s comments are in direct contradiction to his original report on 9/11, when he stated, “ …from my close up inspection, there’s no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only site is the actual… side of the building that’s crashed in and as I said, the only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you can pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, a fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon.” Click Here for sound clip (http://www.thepowerhour.com/audio_files/jamie_mcintire_%209_11.wav)

As a senior veteran reporter for the network, McIntyre sets the standard for accurate reporting and the network depends on reporters of his stature to accurately relay information. McIntyre’s blatant reversal of reported “facts” now brings into question the integrity of not just his reporting, but the credibility of the entire CNN network.


link (http://www.thepowerhour.com/press_release/press16.htm)

[frets5150]

WHAT FUCKIN HORESHIT!!!

Two possabilities here
1. He was told to take back what he said.
2. That he is such a Dumb Fuck that now he remembers 4 years and 8 months later that he photographed it personally.

I'll go with # 1
Here is the video of him saying it which I have posted quite a few times

http://www.thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/index.html

Funny how none of the SHEEP have anything to say about this.

:rolleyes:

[frets5150]

ED ASNER JOINS THE GROWING RANK OF
CELEBRITIES WHO CHALLENGE THE OFFICIAL
STORY OF 911!

April 14, 2006
Ed Asner, award winning actor and former national President of the Screen Actors Guild announced this week on “The Power Hour” radio program, “It’s time we stop accepting that 911 Commission Report”. “Too much information is coming out to show how our present situation has been brought about by a bunch of fanatics. Not only on the other side… I would say that those fanatics on the other side were used by the fanatics on this side.”


With regard to other celebrities like Charlie Sheen who came forward to challenge the “official story” of 9/11, Asner exclaimed, “Unfortunately, it can never be sufficient because the intimidation factor is very great and I admire him enormously.”

When asked if the questions raised in the video “911 In Plane Site” were legitimized, Asner agreed, “They were absolutely legitimate and they’re quite restrained compared to what can be asked out there… It’s time we stop accepting that 911 Commission Report”.




AHH Good ole ED ASNER The Sheep Killer


:D

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a83/FRETS5150/Untitledtttt.jpg

[DLR'sCock]

crazy assed biatches....

[Nitro Express]

My brother in law who is a very experienced commercial piolet said he was amazed they even could hit the Pentagon the way they did. Big commercial jets are heavy and have time lags to the controls. He said hitting that small sliver of the side of the building while making last minute manuvres is pretty damn hard to do.

Interesting that the FBI confiscated all the survalence cameras in the area.

Interesting that the Bin Laddan family and Bush family have done business together for decades. Osama Bin Laddens older brother was the first major investor in George W. Bushes oil company he founded in Texas.

I think what has people second guessing 9/11 is how fast Haliburton got contracts in Iraq, how there was no evidence to justify invading Iraq, and how knowlegable people are questioning what happened on 9/11 compared to other mutual exclusive events.

We just seem to love to rush into the middle east when there is a Bush and a Chenney in the govt. don't we?

[frets5150]

Another story teller

Explosives Planted In Towers, N.M. Tech Expert Says
By Olivier Uyttebrouck
Journal Staff Writer

Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday. The collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology. "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.
Romero is a former director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at Tech, which studies explosive materials and the effects of explosions on buildings, aircraft and other structures.
Romero said he based his opinion on video aired on national television broadcasts. Romero said the collapse of the structures resembled those of controlled implosions used to demolish old structures. "It would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event like that," Romero said in a phone interview from Washington, D.C. Romero said he and another Tech administrator were on a Washington-area subway when an airplane struck the Pentagon. He said he and Denny Peterson, vice president for administration and finance, were en route to an office building near the Pentagon to discuss defense-funded research programs at Tech.
If explosions did cause the towers to collapse, the detonations could have been caused by a small amount of explosive, he said. "It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in strategic points," Romero said.
The explosives likely would have been put in more than two points in each of the towers, he said. The detonation of bombs within the towers is consistent with a common terrorist strategy, Romero said. "One of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack and secondary device," Romero said. Attackers detonate an initial, diversionary explosion that attracts emergency personnel to the scene, then detonate a second explosion, he said.
Romero said that if his scenario is correct, the diversionary attack would have been the collision of the planes into the towers. Tech President Dan Lopez said Tuesday that Tech had not been asked to take part in the investigation into the attacks. Tech often assists in forensic investigations into terrorist attacks, often by setting off similar explosions and studying the effects.

© 2001, Albuquerque Journal
Reprinted for Fair Use Only






Fire, Not Extra Explosives, Doomed Buildings, Expert Says
By John Fleck
Journal Staff Writer

A New Mexico explosives expert says he now believes there were no explosives in the World Trade Center towers, contrary to comments he made the day of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack.
"Certainly the fire is what caused the building to fail," said Van Romero, a vice president at the New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology.
The day of the attack, Romero told the Journal the towers' collapse, as seen in news videotapes, looked as though it had been triggered by carefully placed explosives.
Subsequent conversations with structural engineers and more detailed looks at the tape have led Romero to a different conclusion.
Romero supports other experts, who have said the intense heat of the jet fuel fires weakened the skyscrapers' steel structural beams to the point that they gave way under the weight of the floors above. That set off a chain reaction, as upper floors pancaked onto lower ones.
Romero said he believes still it is possible that the final collapse of each building was triggered by a sudden pressure pulse caused when the fire reached an electrical transformer or other source of combustion within the building.
But he said he now believes explosives would not have been needed to create the collapse seen in video images.
Conspiracy theorists have seized on Romero's comments as evidence for their argument that someone else, possibly the U.S. government, was behind the attack on the Trade Center.
Romero said he has been bombarded with electronic mail from the conspiracy theorists.
"I'm very upset about that," he said. "I'm not trying to say anything did or didn't happen."

© 2001, Albuquerque Journal

http://www.maebrussell.com/Articles%20and%20Notes/WTC%20Explosives.html



Must of done more research on the matter right? I mean he must of looked closer into the facts and then concluded these findings right? Or was bought and paid for with your tax dollars? Nah the government couldn't do that.