Blame The Media, Stupid.

[LoungeMachine]

I'm seeing a pattern emerge here.

Let's review, shall we?




If your administration is caught circumventing The Constitution........

Blame The Media



If your administration doesn't plan for securing the peace for a long occupation.............

Blame The Media.



If you leak the name of a CIA NOC and her cover company tracking WMD throughout the world, and are exposed for lying about it.........

Blame The Media.


If you're caught ignoring the FISA Court, and lying to the American people about always obtaining a warrant prior to wire taps.........

Blame The Media.


If you tell the world that your plan is to cut off the funding for terrorist organizations by hitting their banking transactions, and then are exposed spying on your own citizens............

Blame The Media.



If your own poll numbers are some of the lowest in modern history........

Blame The Media.



If you fail to plan for a Cat5 hurricane that even The Weather Channel knew was coming..............

Blame The Media.







You too can play.

Don't worry. Nothing is your fault. It's The Evil Media.


Some other things to blame on The Media:

The break up of Van Halen.

Adam Sandler Movies.

Tofu.

Lite Beer.

Artificial Turf.




The Media.......

It's the New Clinton;)

[Warham]

Hey, I don't blame the media for Adam Sandler movies. Those are his fault, except the Wedding Singer, which I find entertaining for some reason. :)

[thome]

Originally posted by Warham
Hey, I don't blame the media for Adam Sandler movies. Those are his fault, except the Wedding Singer, which I find entertaining for some reason. :)

Up until this point you were my hero, now i am lost.....

The Humanity!

[jcook11]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
I'm seeing a pattern emerge here.

Let's review, shall we?




If your administration is caught circumventing The Constitution........

Blame The Media



If your administration doesn't plan for securing the peace for a long occupation.............

Blame The Media.



If you leak the name of a CIA NOC and her cover company tracking WMD throughout the world, and are exposed for lying about it.........

Blame The Media.


If you're caught ignoring the FISA Court, and lying to the American people about always obtaining a warrant prior to wire taps.........

Blame The Media.


If you tell the world that your plan is to cut off the funding for terrorist organizations by hitting their banking transactions, and then are exposed spying on your own citizens............

Blame The Media.



If your own poll numbers are some of the lowest in modern history........

Blame The Media.



If you fail to plan for a Cat5 hurricane that even The Weather Channel knew was coming..............

Blame The Media.







You too can play.

Don't worry. Nothing is your fault. It's The Evil Media.


Some other things to blame on The Media:

The break up of Van Halen.

Adam Sandler Movies.

Tofu.

Lite Beer.

Artificial Turf.




The Media.......

It's the New Clinton;)

Clinton blamed te media too?...Next you'll tell us that Bush 41,Carter, FORD(the president) Reagan ,Nixon, LBJ and JFK blamed the media also.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by jcook11
Clinton blamed te media too?...Next you'll tell us that Bush 41,Carter, FORD(the president) Reagan ,Nixon, LBJ and JFK blamed the media also.

B-b-b-but Clinton...but Clinton! Silly jkook! Neocon Dummy Extraordinaire!

Neocons fear taking responsibility for anything that could be perceived as a failure or mistake. That is why they keep many scapegoats (NYT, Clinton, etc.) handy to cover for their many failures and fuck-ups.

[Warham]

Originally posted by thome
Up until this point you were my hero, now i am lost.....

The Humanity!

;)

[Warham]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
B-b-b-but Clinton...but Clinton! Silly jkook! Neocon Dummy Extraordinaire!

Neocons fear taking responsibility for anything that could be perceived as a failure or mistake. That is why they keep many scapegoats (NYT, Clinton, etc.) handy to cover for their many failures and fuck-ups.

No, we don't use Clinton as a scapegoat. We just make you liberal kooks realize that many things you think Bush has done wrong were also done by your hero.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham
No, we don't use Clinton as a scapegoat. We just make you liberal kooks realize that many things you think Bush has done wrong were also done by your hero.

And what do you hope to achieve with that?

[Warham]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
And what do you hope to achieve with that?

The same thing you achieve here every day with your hatred and venom for Bush.

Nothing.

I come here to play, not to pontificate on issues.

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham
The same thing you achieve here every day with your hatred and venom for Bush.

Nothing.

I come here to play, not to pontificate on issues.

I hope to challenge and be challenged. I hope to offer and learn of different perspectives. I hope to make this country a better place.

Your best Bush defense is to make up stuff about Clinton? That's pathetic.

You come here just to play? Figures, you couldn't possibly take your own bullshit seriously.

[blueturk]

Originally posted by Warham
No, we don't use Clinton as a scapegoat. We just make you liberal kooks realize that many things you think Bush has done wrong were also done by your hero.

Clinton's not my hero, but I'd love to hear some of these things....

"I do support a free press strongly. I also want people to recognize that we're at war and it's just -- it's just -- I just don't understand. It just doesn't make any sense to me." George W. Bush on The Larry King Show, 7/ 07/ 06

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT



You [WarBOT] come here just to play? Figures, you couldn't possibly take your own bullshit seriously.


Trust me, no one takes WarBOT seriously.

He has become a caricature.


A FAUX KNEWS wannabe:rolleyes:

[jcook11]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
I hope to challenge and be challenged. I hope to offer and learn of different perspectives. I hope to make this country a better place.

Your best Bush defense is to make up stuff about Clinton? That's pathetic.

You come here just to play? Figures, you couldn't possibly take your own bullshit seriously.

Yous said it your self BULLSHIT

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by blueturk
Clinton's not my hero, but I'd love to hear some of these things....

"I do support a free press strongly. I also want people to recognize that we're at war and it's just -- it's just -- I just don't understand. It just doesn't make any sense to me." George W. Bush on The Larry King Show, 7/ 07/ 06

LMMFAO.

Seriously, BT....I hope this post is rhetorical.

You can't actually believe WarBOT would EVER back up a claim in here with facts.

Remember, he comes here to play :cool:

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by jcook11
Yous said it your self BULLSHIT


Jesus Christ.:rolleyes:


Would it really have killed you to go for that GED?

[blueturk]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
LMMFAO.

Seriouslt, BT....I hope this post is rhetorical.

You can't actually believe WarBOT would EVER back up a claim in here with facts.

Remember, he comes here to play :cool:

No, I don't expect Warham to come up with any facts. I just loved that Bushism so much I figured I'd use it on Warham, since he likes my quotes so much.:D

[jcook11]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Jesus Christ.:rolleyes:


Would it really have killed you to go for that GED?

Sorry my eyes get a little blurry after a couple of guiness. I'm sure all of your posts are gramatically correct....:rolleyes:

[Ellyllions]

Can anyone get proof actual case brief proof that any of those things are for damn sure true? Not some article from some news source. I'll need actual court documents with evidence that put the court without a reasonable doubt proof.

See this is what bothers me about the Democratic way of thinking..WE ARE NOT HELPLESS VICTIMS!!! The administration doesn't have so much power that they can honestly circumvent the law. THEY DON'T! Not according to our Constitution. And if it IS true and nothing is being done about it then you should go back and blame your own damn representatives for NOT enacting the correct procedures to prove this stuff is true. But this isn't how it's being done because it's all political rhetoric. Playing on the vague and symantics to cause the American people to vote Democrat next time.

It's like a battered wife not pressing charges. She'd rather walk around with a black eye and whine then actually do something about her predicament.

And the Democratic party plays on that mentality. They'll tell you how wrong things are but do nothing about the problem. Maybe because they won't but more probably because all of it is a stretch of the truth used to incite. And also there is profit in being a victim folks. Sad but true.

Have you ever thought about why it seems that the Administration keeps breaking the law and yet....they're still in power? This isn't a dictatorship and if it has become such.....you're own representatives are involved in it happening because to date they've done nothing to stop it. Just riding the train running their mouths....

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
[i]
Neocons fear taking responsibility for anything that could be perceived as a failure or mistake.

Yeah, liberals and "moderate" Democrats could give lessons on taking responsibility for fuck-ups.

:gulp:

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
...
Have you ever thought about why it seems that the Administration keeps breaking the law and yet....they're still in power? This isn't a dictatorship and if it has become such.....you're own representatives are involved in it happening because to date they've done nothing to stop it. Just riding the train running their mouths....

Those representatives are all from the same party, that's why. It's tough for the minority to investigate accusations of law-breaking when enablers have been ignoring it. But some of those enablers are beginning to catch on...

Laws are only effective if enforced...

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Yeah, liberals and "moderate" Democrats could give lessons on taking responsibility for fuck-ups.

:gulp:

Yeah, spoken by a guy that blames "liberals" for all his problems...

[scamper]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
I hope to make this country a better place.


How's that working for ya?

[Ellyllions]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Those representatives are all from the same party, that's why. It's tough for the minority to investigate accusations of law-breaking when enablers have been ignoring it. But some of those enablers are beginning to catch on...

Laws are only effective if enforced...

Are you suggesting that there are NO honest Democrats in Government right now?

[FORD]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
Are you suggesting that there are NO honest Democrats in Government right now?

Actually, I believe he was referring to Republicans, which are the majority party.

Are there any honest Republicans in governement right now? Well, certainly not in Ohio! Probably not in Florida either. Texas has one, Congressman Ron Paul. And there are a few up in the Northeast who will occasionally vote against the party line.

As far as Democrats go, there is unfortunately that wing of the party which are Democrats in name only (DINO). The DLC types. The neocon moles Lieberman, Hillary, Bayh, Biden, and so forth. And they have indeed enabled the Bush/PNAC agenda and the rampant corporatism destroying this country.

Most Republicans on this board are afraid to call out the traitors on their team, but I won't hesitate to call out the ones on my supposed side. Hell, my own senators' voting records are far from perfect, and I have no intention of supporting Maria Cantwell in the primary.

[Ellyllions]

I understand that it's hard for a minority party to get votes out. But I understood his word "enabler" to be people allowing the laws to be broken. I apologize if I missed the mark.

My statement was that if there are no Democrats willing to be honest enough to actually start the prosecution procedure then they, in effect, are enabling the laws to be broken. All they need is enough evidence to prove to a magistrate within a reasonable suspicion. Anybody can get that if there's enough evidence...

Clinton got impeached on perjury over a sex act. Do we really believe that if the Bush Administration is rampantly breaking Constitutional law that someone in DC wouldn't be taking the appropriate steps to bring them to justice?

Elizabeth Dole ain't hittin on a whole lot with me.

[Warham]

There's a simple answer as to why nobody is taking any steps to bring them to 'justice'.

None of the libs here would be able to give you the answer.

[Ellyllions]

Well, if he is guilty and no one is working to prove it...

aiding and ebetting
conspiracy
contempt
conduct unbecoming

The list goes on.

People keep talking about how we need full disclosure to the American public by the Bush Administration. We also need full disclosure to the American public why the rest of Congress hasn't put a stop to the criminal behavior they keep thumping about.

[diamondD]

Good posts. Good luck on getting a solid answer.

[BigBadBrian]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Yeah, spoken by a guy that blames "liberals" for all his problems...

Your post above makes no sense.

None.

Nada.

:gulp:

[Ellyllions]

Thanks...they'll be back in the morning to give me my reaming I'm sure. LOL!

[FORD]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
I understand that it's hard for a minority party to get votes out. But I understood his word "enabler" to be people allowing the laws to be broken. I apologize if I missed the mark.

My statement was that if there are no Democrats willing to be honest enough to actually start the prosecution procedure then they, in effect, are enabling the laws to be broken. All they need is enough evidence to prove to a magistrate within a reasonable suspicion. Anybody can get that if there's enough evidence...

Clinton got impeached on perjury over a sex act. Do we really believe that if the Bush Administration is rampantly breaking Constitutional law that someone in DC wouldn't be taking the appropriate steps to bring them to justice?

Elizabeth Dole ain't hittin on a whole lot with me.

There are many Democrats who believe there should be investigations into all sorts of matters connected with the Chimpministration.

The problem is that Republicans chair all the committees in both the house and senate, and (unlike in the 1970's) this Republican party is not going to cross party lines to call out a corrupt pResident.

That is why checks and balances must be restored in November if there is any chance of saving this country.

[Ellyllions]

You don't need a committee to go to a Magistrate and bring about charges when you've got sufficent proof.

I'm all about some checks and balances!

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
Yeah, liberals and "moderate" Democrats could give lessons on taking responsibility for fuck-ups.


Generalizations with nothing to back it up. The usual BigBland crapenzola!

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
You don't need a committee to go to a Magistrate and bring about charges when you've got sufficent proof.

I'm all about some checks and balances!

I agree. The Dems could be doing more. Although, when they do, they are often marginalized by the so-called "liberal media."

Show me a Dem that has spoken up and I will show you someone who as been smeared in the public forum.

Hell, Karl did it to McCain before the 2000 debacle.

[LoungeMachine]

Murtha

Kerry

Durbin

Feingold



All Dems who have been SLANDERED by the right for speaking up.

[Ellyllions]

DC, they don't need to "speak up". No microphones, no press, no audience necessary...just a telephone call and then a ride to the local magistrate's office. That's all it would take,

See, this is where I get off the political train with all the rhetoric and media, and bullshit rantings on news shows. According to the Constitution, the powers of the Executive branch are limited, but the punishment afforded for abuse isn't limited.

Unfortunately, we're all being played for fools. The information being gathered isn't invading our privacy as afforded in the Constitution. It's not half as invasive as "OnStar" is (think about that for a second)...otherwise, George would've already been escorted out of the White House in handcuffs. I refuse to believe that no one else in our whole government is just standing by letting the Administration actually break laws.

And if by some chance that all the press is right, and there are laws being broken....the Bush Administration aren't the only ones who'd better go down for it. Anyone and everyone who has looked the other way over the course of the passed 6 years better be charged as well. Republicans, Democrats, and Libertarians alike.

Green Day said it best in the song, "American Idiot"

"Don't want to be an American idiot.
One nation under the new media.
And can you hear the sound of hysteria?
The subliminal mindfuck America.

Welcome to a new kind of tension.
All across the alien nation.
Everything isn't meant to be okay.
Television dreams of tomorrow.
We're not the ones who're meant to follow.
Well that's enough to argue.

Well maybe I'm the faggot America.
I'm not a part of a redneck agenda.
Now everybody do the propaganda.
And sing along in the age of paranoia."

[Ellyllions]

...and one more thing....

out of the three branches of our Federal Government which branch is afforded the most power by the Constitution?



answer?
The Legislative Branch.
Congress...

For your review:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Const itution#Executive_power

I find this one part especially interesting:


The rise of the presidency was also aided by the rise of a modern media establishment. In an era of limited attention spans and shortened time for television news, it was easier for journalists to focus on the actions of one centralized, decisive figure—the President—than on the actions of a loose, decentralized, milling chamber of equals, like the Senate or House.

[Warham]

We need more posters like you Elly.

You're the best one to come around in quite some time, and you're not slanted one way or the other.

[Ellyllions]

Whoa, that's quite a compliment Warham.

Thank you!

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Warham
We need more posters like you Elly.

You're the best one to come around in quite some time, and you're not slanted one way or the other.

I do believe that Warhead is in love...

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
...and one more thing....

out of the three branches of our Federal Government which branch is afforded the most power by the Constitution?



answer?
The Legislative Branch.
Congress...

For your review:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Separation_of_powers_under_the_United_States_Const itution#Executive_power

I find this one part especially interesting:

Yes, but have we not established that this Administration does not respect the Constitution nor the rule of law?

BTW, you've still failed to note that the Legislative branch is still controlled by the same party as is the Executive branch. And only recently have partisans broken ranks with such... How are Democrats supposed to file motions or pass legislation at investigating this Presidency when they're in the minority, and everything is voted down dead on arrival???

And take Wilki with a big grain of salt, a valuable and useful site no doubt, but also one where anybody can write virtually anything. It's clear that partisans on both sides have exploited this...

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Warham
We need more posters like you Elly.

You're the best one to come around in quite some time, and you're not slanted one way or the other.

No, what we need are more people attacking freedom of speech...

[Northern Girl]

Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
I do believe that Warhead is in love...

He has great taste when it comes to women!

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Warham
We need more posters like you Elly.

You're the best one to come around in quite some time, and you're not slanted one way or the other.


Well, gee.....

Isn't it a good thing this forum wasn't axed per your suggestion.

Then Elly wouldn't have had the CHOICE to post here.

YOU wanted to DENY people the opportunity to post in this forum by asking the admins to "AXE" it, remember?

:rolleyes:

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Northern Girl
He has great taste when it comes to women!


Fortunately, the women all have too much sense to fall for a married, underemployed goofball from New Hamphire.:D

[LoungeMachine]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
No, what we need are more people attacking freedom of speech...


LMAO


Good thing Elly has ovaries or WarBOT would be calling for the demise of the forum again...:D

[Ellyllions]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Yes, but have we not established that this Administration does not respect the Constitution nor the rule of law?

I don't know that we have established anything other than the fact that the screaming Senate and House folks are just as guilty if the Administration is guilty.


BTW, you've still failed to note that the Legislative branch is still controlled by the same party as is the Executive branch. And only recently have partisans broken ranks with such... How are Democrats supposed to file motions or pass legislation at investigating this Presidency when they're in the minority, and everything is voted down dead on arrival???

Again, this isn't a dictatorship. All I'm saying is to question everything that seems to lean to any extreme. If laws were honestly being broken someone would be standing firm against it. Loudly, unabashedly, and it would be taken care of. Like I said before about Clinton...and will now introduce Nixon.



And take Wilki with a big grain of salt, a valuable and useful site no doubt, but also one where anybody can write virtually anything. It's clear that partisans on both sides have exploited this...

Oh absolutely. If it had been more than just a textbook style explanation of the division of power, I wouldn't have posted it.

I honestly think that this country should choose the next President based on whether or not they've served in this Government. I think we need some "real" new blood in the White House and not some recycled Congress-person with the same ole-same ole. Someone no-one has ever heard of to come in with their own agenda.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Ellyllions

I honestly think that this country should choose the next President based on whether or not they've served in this Government. I think we need some "real" new blood in the White House and not some recycled Congress-person with the same ole-same ole. Someone no-one has ever heard of to come in with their own agenda.

I couldn't agree more....

Vote FORD 2008! :cool:

[Ellyllions]

So you're running against me, eh?

Do you think that wise, pilgrim...?
: )

[FORD]

I believe a woman will be President of the United States one day.

But not in 2008. Not after 8 years of solid fear mongering from the BCE and the media.

The hopelessly brainwashed would consider it as a "sign of weakness" to elect a woman. Hell, it isn't even just the right wingers. Ask Sesh.

[Ellyllions]

I wouldn't vote for a female.

Besides the fact that over half of the Nations on the planet wouldn't take her seriously, ....

Now before I go on let me say this. I am a woman but I am NOT a feminist (I can barely spell it).

Women are too vindictive, emotional, and sutable for flights of fancy. Sorry to all the ladies that I possibly offend by saying that but it's my honest opinion.

[Unchainme]

I'd vote for a woman, IF SHE WASN'T HILLARY. Thats about all it is to it. I Can't stand that woman, so does the majority of people.

[diamondD]

Are you old enough to vote?


And FORD, do you think you could survive the media digging into your past? :)

If I'm reading an article or watching the news and I sense bias of any kind, my radar immediately tells me to take it with a grain of salt before taking it to heart.

[DrMaddVibe]

VRWC!!!!!!!!

[DrMaddVibe]

Originally posted by scamper
How's that working for ya?


LOL!!!!!:D

[Warham]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
Whoa, that's quite a compliment Warham.

Thank you!

Your welcome, Elly.

Pay no attention to the liberal fringe trash here.

It's people like you who will bring this forum up, not guys like Lounge or myself.

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
LMAO


Good thing Elly has ovaries or WarBOT would be calling for the demise of the forum again...:D

Bitch, bitch, bitch, Mr. I'm Going To Close Brian's Threads Because I Don't Like Them and I'm Going To Whine And Moan Until I Get My Way.

Free speech, huh?

That scab is never going to heal unless you stop picking at it.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
No, what we need are more people attacking freedom of speech...

You mean like the guys attacking Bob for posting his 'thoughts'?

[Warham]

Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Well, gee.....

Isn't it a good thing this forum wasn't axed per your suggestion.



Elly's already posted more worthwhile reading material than you've posted the last six months.

You're still harping about me 'lying' about some stupid Limbaugh quote.

[Guitar Shark]

Originally posted by diamondD
If I'm reading an article or watching the news and I sense bias of any kind, my radar immediately tells me to take it with a grain of salt before taking it to heart.

Yet you routinely watch Fox News. For the hot women, I hope. :D

[Warham]

It has nothing to do with GS's post, but I love how all the libs here stamp the cons here with watching FOX news.

I hardly watch FOX news at all. When I want true comedy, I always flip over to CNN or MSNBC.

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Warham
You mean like the guys attacking Bob for posting his 'thoughts'?

His thoughts? LOL Charles Manson has more coherent thought processes. Assuming he's not just a troll with a random text-scramble program of some kind.

And Pojo banned him for redundant post spamming (check his journal). Why don't you take it up with him next time you offer helpful suggestions in a PM.:)

[Guitar Shark]

Originally posted by Warham
It has nothing to do with GS's post, but I love how all the libs here stamp the cons here with watching FOX news.

I hardly watch FOX news at all. When I want true comedy, I always flip over to CNN or MSNBC.

I am friends with diamondD off the boards... and know for a fact that he watches Fox News regularly. There was no assumption on my part.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
His thoughts? LOL Charles Manson has more coherent thought processes. Assuming he's not just a troll with a random text-scramble program of some kind.

And Pojo banned him for redundant post spamming (check his journal). Why don't you take it up with him next time you offer helpful suggestions in a PM.:)

I'm not the bastion of free speech here.

If you guys wanted 'free speech', then you wouldn't have any problem with him.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Guitar Shark
I am friends with diamondD off the boards... and know for a fact that he watches Fox News regularly. There was no assumption on my part.

I know, that's why I said it has nothing to do with your post.

;)

[bastardog]

We should blame Bush, Clinton and the media for not having a CVH reunion because non of them have done anything to reunite them.

Clinton and Bush could had pass a law.....but did shit

and the media could put pressure........but did shit

so we have shit instead a CVH reunion...

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Warham
I'm not the bastion of free speech here.

If you guys wanted 'free speech', then you wouldn't have any problem with him.

Now you're just sounding like a bitter child grasping at straws...

If you don't like this forum War, why don't trade with Guitar Shark? Because I know for a fact that he does care...

[diamondD]

And yes, I watch it hoping to catch Kiran Chetry or one of the other ones. But I usually won't watch the Bill O'Reilly - Greta block at night unless I'm really bored.

[Warham]

Originally posted by Nickdfresh
Now you're just sounding like a bitter child grasping at straws...

If you don't like this forum War, why don't trade with Guitar Shark? Because I know for a fact that he does care...

At least I'm honest.

I got throttled by a select few here for wanting ONE thread closed because I found a 9/11 cartoon offensive, and was berated because I didn't believe in 'free speech'.

So, now we get a chump here who likes to post nonsense, and most of the same select few are fine with his 'free speech' getting canned.

Personally, I'm fine with him getting canned, because I never had any pretenses of unchecked 'free speech' being allowed here anyway.

[Nickdfresh]

Originally posted by Warham
At least I'm honest.

I got throttled by a select few here for wanting ONE thread closed because I found a 9/11 cartoon offensive, and was berated because I didn't believe in 'free speech'.

So, now we get a chump here who likes to post nonsense, and most of the same select few are fine with his 'free speech' getting canned.

Personally, I'm fine with him getting canned, because I never had any pretenses of unchecked 'free speech' being allowed here anyway.

No! You got throttled because you got pissy (in the open) when I confronted BBB with his endless Townhall spamathons and Den-like bumping to fuck up the front page and deliberately prevent discussion. You came out on some fucking freedom of speech high horse about how unfair it was.

But-

Then you had the gaul to dump a lengthy discussion thread that actually erupted after that 9/11 cartoon...

All I asked was that Brian keep the seven or eight "illegal immigration" op-eds in ONE FUCKING ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION thread, that's all...

And fucking Bobgnote rambled here for a while with redundant responses designed to spam the Army, he's no more an honest poster than is Douchebag Den... And his banning had little to do with the Frontline anyway...

But don't let actual facts interfere with your ludicrous arguments... Don't start now...

[DEMON CUNT]

Originally posted by Ellyllions
You don't need a committee to go to a Magistrate and bring about charges when you've got sufficent proof.

I'm all about some checks and balances!

You make it sound so easy. Remember Paul Wellstone, I say. (http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/w000288/)

http://espn-att.starwave.com/media/pg2/2002/1028/photo/a_wellstone_hi.jpg