PDA

View Full Version : BushCO Gets Ready For Subpoenas



LoungeMachine
01-07-2007, 10:34 AM
Bush goes on the hunt for a good lawyer

By Philip Sherwell in New York and Hans Nichols in Washington, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 12:29am GMT 07/01/2007



President George W Bush is about to unveil a new, hard-nosed White House legal counsel as his administration braces itself against a siege of subpoenas and demands for evidence from the new Democrat-controlled Congress.

Mr Bush accepted the resignation of Harriet Miers, his friend and in-house counsel, after close aides persuaded him that she was not tough enough to fend off the expected Democrat onslaught over Iraq and other sensitive issues.

The White House is expected to announce her replacement in the coming days and also intends to expand the legal office well beyond its present dozen lawyers. That is far fewer than represented Bill Clinton, Mr Bush's predecessor, in a series of showdowns with the Republican congressional majority in the late-1990s.

advertisementThe most serious challenge Mr Clinton faced was impeachment proceedings in 1998 over his affair with Monica Lewinsky. Although Democrat leaders have ruled out trying to impeach Mr Bush over Iraq, new committee chairmen have made clear that they will investigate a series of policies aggressively.

Emboldened after years in the minority, the Democrats intend to question the role of prewar intelligence in Iraq, whether politically connected companies were awarded lucrative reconstruction contracts, the policy of "renditioning" Islamist terrorist suspects to secret prisons abroad, and the domestic wire-tapping programme. They also want to investigate the role of oil companies in determining energy policy and how the White House handled Hurricane Katrina. "We're going to send them more subpoenas than they can read," vowed one senior Democrat.

A Republican strategist told The Sunday Telegraph: "For all the talk of bipartisanship… nobody in the administration doubts that the Democrats are going to go for the jugular." After Ms Miers's resignation, another adviser said: "The White House knew they needed a tough street-fighter. That's what this is about."

Mr Clinton drafted Bruce Lindsey, a lawyer and friend from his days as governor of Arkansas, on to his legal team to play the role of "captain of the defence" in the bruising battles with Kenneth Starr, independent counsel, over the so-called Whitewater scandal and the Lewinsky affair.

Justice Department lawyers have been meeting colleagues from the FBI and other agencies to discuss strategy for handling demands for documents and, perhaps most awkwardly, the appearance of administration officials for testimony. In an early sign of the conflict ahead, they have turned down a request for documents relating to secret CIA detention facilities abroad. Further clashes are expected if Democrats try to summons Mr Bush's deputy, Dick Cheney.

Ms Miers found herself at the centre of a political firestorm in 2005 when social conservatives condemned Mr Bush for nominating her to be a Supreme Court justice, saying she lacked the ideological rigour for such an influential post. She withdrew her name, allowing Mr Bush to appease his critics and choose a conservative legal jurist instead.

While Democrats boast of their intent, Republicans are drawing up their own plans to put the behaviour of the new congressional majority under scrutiny. Even as Nancy Pelosi, the new House Speaker, made ethics reform the showpiece of her party's first 100 hours in power, she was reminded that some of her own lieutenants have chequered pasts.

Last week John Conyers, a veteran black Democrat congressman, was forced to "accept responsibility" for violating House rules by requiring official staff to perform campaign-related work. Despite that, Mrs Pelosi had little choice but to elevate him to chairman of the House judiciary committee for fear of antagonising the powerful congressional black caucus.

LoungeMachine
01-07-2007, 10:35 AM
Mr Bush accepted the resignation of Harriet Miers, his friend and in-house counsel, after close aides persuaded him that she was not tough enough to fend off the expected Democrat onslaught over Iraq and other sensitive issues.

Ellyllions
01-07-2007, 10:58 AM
We need to get out of Iraq before we start this stuff.

I've got a feeling that we're in for quite an eye-opening ride. (And this is just pure speculation here)

I've got a strong feeling that the Dems aren't going to touch Iraq or Bush until the very last few months of his Presidency. And here's why I think that. Last week the announcement was made that the new Congress was going to "table" the war issue for right now. They feel that there are more pressing issues to take care of. Of course the public felt a little duped because that was the premise for the Dems getting votes.

But I think it's strategy. I think they're giving him enough rope to really hang himself, by not interfereing with the troop surge and new plan. Letting the war literally get worse just so they can bounce in at the last minute and bombast the Administration with charges....

right at the Presidential election time....

See I don't have any faith in any of our political leaders anymore. I don't think the Reps are honest, but I don't believe that the Dems are any more honest. I'm wary that we're going to get a real shock over the next couple of years when the realization hits us that the Dems don't care one iota what's going on in Iraq...they just want their moniker to be the most popular.

blueturk
01-07-2007, 11:12 AM
I don't see how the Democrats could possibly be more dishonest than the GOP. I understand your attitude though, since NC has had some damn crooked Dems in power. Jim Black, anyone?

Ellyllions
01-07-2007, 12:35 PM
yeah, no shit.

Nickdfresh
01-07-2007, 01:07 PM
http://www.hillnews.com/photos/012704/waxman-henry.gif

Subpoena time...