PDA

View Full Version : $5.8 BILLION for Iraqi Military and Police



LoungeMachine
02-06-2007, 05:55 PM
U.S. to pay $5.8B to expand Iraqi forces

By ROBERT BURNS
AP MILITARY WRITER

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. government will pay $5.8 billion to help Iraq expand further its army and police force, which are deemed too small for its security needs, senior Pentagon officials said Tuesday.

The expansion, announced Monday as part of President Bush's 2008 budget plan, would increase the Iraqi security forces from 328,000, which was the goal set several years ago and reached last December, to 362,000.

The Bush administration has made the development of competent Iraqi security forces a centerpiece of its strategy for eventually withdrawing U.S. military forces. But the process has been slower than planned.

Tina Jonas, the Pentagon budget chief, told a small group of reporters that Bush's 2008 budget proposal includes $3.8 billion for the expansion and that the other $2 billion is contained in his request for an additional $93.4 billion to cover overall war costs for the remainder of the current budget year, which ends Sept. 30.

The plan to expand the Iraqi army was generated last year while Donald H. Rumsfeld was defense secretary. But it took more months to work out with the Iraqi government how much it would cost and how that would be shared.

Vice Adm. Stephen Stanley, a top budget official on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Tuesday that the Iraqis are responsible for the cost of training and equipping 19,000 of the 34,000 additional troops and police. The United States would pay for the other 15,000.

Jonas also said that in the first two months of the current budget year - October through November 2006 - the Pentagon spent about $8.6 billion a month on the Iraq war and about $1.4 billion in Afghanistan. By comparison, the spending rate for Iraq alone during the 2006 budget year, which ended last Sept. 30, was about $6.8 billion per month, according to a Pentagon chart on war costs since 2001.

Stanley said the spending rate in Iraq of $8.6 billion a month so far this budget year is probably the highest since the initial invasion in March 2003.

Jonas noted that war costs usually are higher in the initial months of a budget year because more contracts for services are paid early in the year. Also, overall costs in Iraq have grown because the Pentagon is now using the war budget to pay for repairing, replacing and replenishing equipment lost or damaged in combat.

LoungeMachine
02-06-2007, 06:18 PM
Imagine another $5.8 Billion for the US military families...

or for Homeland Security

Or for US Police efforts.....

or Healthcare for that matter....

BushCO wants ANOTHER 6 BILLION for an "army" and "police force" rife with insurgents who HATE the occupying US.

Fuck you, BUSHCO

hideyoursheep
02-06-2007, 08:58 PM
Must be that " Iraqi incentive to leave home"package that we saw in the other thread.

Fuckin' 'Cons. Give 'em a checkbook and they think they have money.
Let the Iranians "reconstruct"-then BushCo won't get their back end for the next 20 years.

hideyoursheep
02-07-2007, 09:18 AM
Originally posted by LoungeMachine
U.S. to pay $5.8B to expand Iraqi forces
Vice Adm. Stephen Stanley, a top budget official on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said Tuesday that the Iraqis are responsible for the cost of training and equipping 19,000 of the 34,000 additional troops and police. The United States would pay for the other 15,000.


5.8 bil for 15,000 Iraqis?
GETTHAFUCKOUTTAHERE!

Seshmeister
02-07-2007, 09:29 AM
Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Imagine another $5.8 Billion for the US military families...

or for Homeland Security

Or for US Police efforts.....

or Healthcare for that matter....

BushCO wants ANOTHER 6 BILLION for an "army" and "police force" rife with insurgents who HATE the occupying US.

Fuck you, BUSHCO

Remember that Bush and his pals already stole $20 billion from Iraq shortly after the invasion.

Seshmeister
02-07-2007, 09:31 AM
Originally posted by hideyoursheep
5.8 bil for 15,000 Iraqis?
GETTHAFUCKOUTTAHERE!

$386 666 per soldier.

Got to love Haliburton, I wonder if that includes sales tax?

knuckleboner
02-07-2007, 09:48 AM
hey, $5.8 billion is a BARGAIN. near as i can tell, that works out to about 5 days, 19 hours, 12 minutes of U.S. presence in iraq...

hideyoursheep
02-07-2007, 10:44 AM
Originally posted by Seshmeister
$386 666 per soldier.

:uck:

$386,000 for Helliburton, 666 for Chaney. :monekyr:

Nickdfresh
02-07-2007, 07:02 PM
So, in other words --it's all going to Haliburton and Militia death squads?

hideyoursheep
02-07-2007, 07:26 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
So, in other words --it's all going to Haliburton and Militia death squads?


What?


So, you think we're PAYING INSURGENTS to fight us?:confused:

LoungeMachine
02-07-2007, 07:29 PM
Originally posted by hideyoursheep
What?


So, you think we're PAYING INSURGENTS to fight us?:confused:

Yes, we are.

We are also paying for security for the same government that wants us out.

But we need the oil contracts in place before we can leave.....hence, the "surge" :rolleyes:

hideyoursheep
02-07-2007, 09:42 PM
Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Yes, we are.

We are also paying for security for the same government that wants us out.

But we need the oil contracts in place before we can leave.....hence, the "surge" :rolleyes: :lol:


Didn't hear them say "get out" I heard,and I'm paraphrasing"we need more help before you get out."

We need the oil contracts in place-hence the surge.:lol: 'cause noone in the green zone has a pencil?C'mon.That's probably a done deal.

'Till Al-Qaida shows up again.

Or Iran?

Nickdfresh
02-07-2007, 10:31 PM
No, actually, what they are thinking is that the US military provides a nice infantry/armor/air power shield to the Shiites, against Sunni guerrillas. Therefore, the Shias do not have to negotiate or make compromises with the Sunnis, and the civil war goes on.

And militias that torture and summarily execute Sunnis in the middle of the night ARE TERRORISTS!

Semantics my friend...

hideyoursheep
02-08-2007, 04:46 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
No, actually, what they are thinking is that the US military provides a nice infantry/armor/air power shield to the Shiites, against Sunni guerrillas. Therefore, the Shias do not have to negotiate or make compromises with the Sunnis, and the civil war goes on.
And militias that torture and summarily execute Sunnis in the middle of the night ARE TERRORISTS!
Semantics my friend...

Nothing would upset the applecart more than Maliki dropping his arm and letting his good freind Al-Sadr's militia loose on the Al-Qaida linked sunnis. Not that all sunnis agree with them, it would be viewed as a preference towards shiias that militant sunnis belive already exist in the govt.What examples of shiia militias or terrorists tourturing and summarily executing random sunnis did you find?
You let this play out-we'll see where Maliki stands if the shiite's get into it with the US and he says leave 'em be. The current climate in this country will not allow anymore tolerance for that kind of BS.It all boils down to rather he's serious about security or using us as cover against the sunnis(Al-Qaida).