PDA

View Full Version : NM Impeachment Resolution Passed 5-1 - Floor Vote Next



Hardrock69
03-07-2007, 09:28 AM
By Leland Lehrman
3-6-7

In what may be a national first, a State-initiated impeachment resolution against the President and Vice-President of the United States has reached the floor of a State Senate. Drawing support from hundreds of supremely dedicated citizens willing to wait hours on both weekends and weekdays for the opportunity to speak, the five Democrats present on the New Mexico Senate Judiciary Committee, voted in favor without doubt or hesitation. No audience member spoke against.

Former Congresswoman Liz Holtzman's expert witness testimony appeared via videotape and was enormously influential due to her standing as a member of the Judiciary Committee that begain impeachment proceedings against Richard Nixon.

Senator Rod Adair, the sole Republican willing to answer the charges made a best effort to deny them, but was ultimately unconvincing. Predictably citing the now suspect war powers of the Executive Branch and claiming that the United States is the guardian of the free world against fascism and totalitarianism, Senator Adair used the propaganda term Islamofascists to vilify America's opponents in the Middle East and justify the ongoing wars. No Democrat attempted to refute Senator Adair's position, but the hour was late and their vote said it all.

The resolution now goes to the Senate floor where the vote is expected to be close. Majority Leader Michael Sanchez, who controls the floor schedule, voted solidly without comment for the Resolution in Judiciary and recently stated to the press that he expects the measure to pass in a party line vote. However, Democratic Senators John Arthur Smith and Shannon Robinson have declared their hesitance to vote for the measure and Senator Tim Jennings and Phil Griego remain uncommitted. There is some question as to whether or not the vote must pass with a majority of the Senate (22 yes votes) or a majority of those present. Authorities on the Rules of the New Mexico Legislature are working on the question but believe that a majority of those present will suffice.

LINK (http://www.rense.com/general75/smm.htm)

knuckleboner
03-07-2007, 09:50 AM
i hate when states/localities do stuff like this.

there are plenty of state issues for new mexico to address. if the state legislators want to individually comment on/support a presidential impeachment, great.

but it really shouldn't waste time with symbolic resolutions based on highly incomplete facts.

(and there's NO WAY the new mexico judiciary committee could've had enough evidence to determine whether impeachment was warranted. but even if they did, to do so would've taken far too much of their time.)

Warham
03-07-2007, 11:29 AM
Nice waste of taxpayer dollars.

They should impeach the State Judiciary Committee for the time wasted on crap like this.

Steve Savicki
03-07-2007, 11:38 AM
Originally posted by Warham
Nice waste of taxpayer dollars.
And the President along with his vice has made better use of taxpayer dollars?

Hardrock69
03-07-2007, 02:04 PM
Warbaby thinks so....if he could suck themonkeys cock he would be in seventh heaven....

Warham
03-07-2007, 03:37 PM
Originally posted by Steve Savicki
And the President along with his vice has made better use of taxpayer dollars?

Depends on what we are talking about, Steve.

hideyoursheep
03-07-2007, 04:35 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Depends on what we are talking about, Steve.


"Loocy, you got some 'splainin' too dooo!"


Goddam, you're funny. Sticking up for these fucksticks.

So c'mon, what have BushCo uh, "spent" money on that was worthwhile?

Lqskdiver
03-07-2007, 05:03 PM
Originally posted by hideyoursheep

So c'mon, what have BushCo uh, "spent" money on that was worthwhile?

edookashun....

hideyoursheep
03-07-2007, 05:10 PM
Originally posted by Lqskdiver
edookashun....



Tank yoo.

Nickdfresh
03-07-2007, 05:55 PM
Originally posted by Warham
Nice waste of taxpayer dollars.

They should impeach the State Judiciary Committee for the time wasted on crap like this.

Yeah, that money could have been better spent "disappearing" with a deafening sucking sound, in black hole that is Halliburton's Iraq syndicate..

Nickdfresh
03-07-2007, 05:56 PM
Originally posted by Lqskdiver
edookashun....

No, actually, they haven't...

Steve Savicki
03-07-2007, 08:56 PM
Originally posted by Lqskdiver
edookashun....
LOL, took me a moment to figger that one out.

Hardrock69
03-07-2007, 09:41 PM
Ifn yuh had gradiated the third grad, yuh cooda understooded it betur

Steve Savicki
03-07-2007, 09:55 PM
Isn't gradiating an actual activity... something scentific or something?

Hardrock69
03-07-2007, 10:19 PM
Well I dunno....I thot it ment sumthin like, get outta skule with a diplomat or something huhuhuhuhuhuh huhuhuhuh....

uhhhhh.................

knuckleboner
03-07-2007, 10:23 PM
Originally posted by Nickdfresh
No, actually, they haven't...

he's right. No Child Left Behind is a huge unfunded federal mandate.

(and i don't care if ted kennedy cosponsored it; bush touts it as part of his "education president" credentials. just too bad he forces local governments to raise taxes to fund it...)

BigBadBrian
03-08-2007, 07:01 AM
Originally posted by Hardrock69
Warbaby thinks so....if he could suck themonkeys cock he would be in seventh heaven....




In post #42 of the Michael Moore thread, you said this:



That sort of shit is irrelevant to the subject at hand, fuckstick.

Hey look! It is a new store called "IDIOTS R US!" run by some crackpot named "Warham"!

Oh? You have proven your ignorance on geo-political affairs too many times to mention. That statement only serves to make you look stupid.




With your statement above in this thread, I guess you and Warham are rowing the same boat, huh?

:cool:

hideyoursheep
03-08-2007, 10:46 AM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
In post #42 of the Michael Moore thread, you said this:

That sort of shit is irrelevant to the subject at hand, fuckstick.

Hey look! It is a new store called "IDIOTS R US!" run by some crackpot named "Warham"!

Oh? You have proven your ignorance on geo-political affairs too many times to mention. That statement only serves to make you look stupid.

With your statement above in this thread, I guess you and Warham are rowing the same boat, huh?

:cool:

It's no one's fault but yours that you don't comprehend the discussion here brian. :p

Hardrock69
03-08-2007, 12:21 PM
Amen.

I am beginning to think Warham and BigBadBrucie are the same person.

Both do not post anything relating to reality. In fact if one attempts to show them the "real world" relating to political issues, they both scream and cry about how it could not be possible.

Both only attempt to discredit or otherwise deny the realities of factual evidence, instead of contributing anything of value.

Both live in their own little NeoCon Shitbag Fantasy World.

In the above post, all LittleBradBoy can do is continue is try to insult me, without (once again) contributing anything of value.

They are the textbook definition of "Troll".