PDA

View Full Version : The real reason we went to War



worldbefree
04-28-2004, 02:11 PM
So the Shrub could preserve everyone's right to have inexpensive high speed internet access. Talk about screwed up priorities.

Bush Seeks More High-Speed Internet Access, Tax Ban
Mon Apr 26, 4:08 PM ET Add Technology - Reuters to My Yahoo!


By Jeremy Pelofsky

MINNEAPOLIS (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) on Monday urged the U.S. Congress to make Internet access permanently tax free and to reduce regulations so high-speed access can be universally available by 2007.


Bush complained that the United States was ranked 10th in the deployment of broadband, or high-speed access. To help boost that rank, he signed an order for the government to make it easier for broadband facilities to be built on federal land.


"If you want broadband access throughout the society, Congress must ban taxes on access," Bush told the American Association of Community Colleges annual convention. "Clear out the underbrush of regulation and we'll get the spread of broadband technology and America will be better for it."


Bush's broadband push coincides with debate beginning in the U.S. Senate on whether to renew or make permanent a ban that bars taxes on Internet access. Lawmakers are split on whether a ban would boost innovation and the roll-out of new technologies or deprive states and local governments of much needed funds.


The campaign of Bush's Democratic challenger, Sen. John Kerry (news - web sites) of Massachusetts, criticized the president for failing to make the tax ban part of previous tax cut packages.


Further, said Kerry spokeswoman Stephanie Cutter, "The Bush broadband policies don't do anything to provide the new resources that will be needed to deploy broadband in rural and urban areas and they are not addressing the regulatory barriers that prevent deployment."


Already there are some 23.5 million high-speed Internet lines in service as of June 30, 2003, mostly serving American homes and small businesses, according to the latest government data available.


About 13.7 million consumers receive their service from cable companies, which can cost at least $40 a month, while 7.7 million customers get broadband from telephone carriers via digital subscriber lines (DSL) and pay about $30 per month.


The Federal Communications Commission (news - web sites) has tried to reduce regulations on broadband but with mixed success.


Bush also touted a plan for every American to establish an electronic medical record over the next 10 years that would be available for doctors to review wherever a person seeks medical attention.


"These old methods of keeping records are real threats to patients and their safety and are incredibly costly," Bush said. "Modern technology hasn't caught up with a major aspect of health care and we have to change that."


He pledged Americans would retain privacy of their records. (Additional reporting by Adam Entous and Andy Sullivan)

Jesus Christ
04-28-2004, 02:20 PM
The Son of Bush is guilty of many sins, but I do not see a connection between broadband cable and his occupation of Chaldea :confused:

Ally_Kat
04-28-2004, 02:41 PM
is this the new slogan -- No blood for broadband?

knuckleboner
04-28-2004, 02:54 PM
Originally posted by worldbefree
Lawmakers are split on whether a ban would boost innovation and the roll-out of new technologies or deprive states and local governments of much needed funds.




here's the entire rub, right here.

the senate bill will not only keep the moratorium against internet taxes, it'll also apply to future items, like phone service over broadband connection, and television over broadband.

which means that localities which currently collect taxes on phone service and cable franchise fees will lose revenue.

unlike the federal government, most of us can't just go into deficit when we (or somebody higher up the federalism chain) cut taxes.

without replacement sources of revenue, actions like this make it very difficult on local governments.

Ally_Kat
04-28-2004, 09:04 PM
I realized something on the train today -- wasn't Hillary for more accessible broadband internet access? So why is it now that that side is punishing Bush for supporting the idea?

cwsmith17
05-16-2004, 12:37 AM
Who cares about any of this!!! There are American soldiers dieing as we write on another. Bush's internet plan does not make him a "bad president."

Cathedral
05-17-2004, 03:53 AM
How many attacks have been launched on our soil since 9-11?

Thank You!

If not for Bush and some of the things his Administration has done there surely would have been more and probably worse than 9-11.

My point of view will be proven if Kerry wins in November, which at this point is a very likely prospect.....as Radar O'reilly said on M*A*S*H...."Wait for it"...

The Democrats think they can appease the Terrorist's....they are so very wrong on that.

knuckleboner
05-17-2004, 10:27 AM
Originally posted by cwsmith17
Who cares about any of this!!! There are American soldiers dieing as we write on another. Bush's internet plan does not make him a "bad president."

uh, dude, you realize that there are more issues in the world than just one, right?

no, i'm not indifferent to the sacrifices are troops are making/being asked to make.

but government has MANY different issues that affect our lives. because 1 is currently preeminent doesn't mean we should just ignore all the others.


and yes, if bush marshalled through an internet plan that took away revenues from all localities without replacing them, then it WOULD make him a bad president.

though, for the record, the senate bill passed with an amendment safeguarding localities current revenue options. so it's ok. for now.