PDA

View Full Version : Likud Zionfascist attack on Lebanon had NOTHING to do with kidnapped Israeli soldiers



FORD
03-08-2007, 09:11 PM
Olmert 'planned Lebanon war before soldiers' kidnap'
By Donald Macintyre in Jerusalem
Published: 09 March 2007

Ehud Olmert's decision to go to war in Lebanon in response to abductions of soldiers was taken as early as March 2006, according to a leak of his evidence to the commission investigating the war.

The report means that the military strategy was decided more than three months before it was triggered by Hizbollah's abductions of two soldiers on Israel's northern border in July. Israeli officials said this was broadly in line with what the Prime Minister has already told the cabinet.

Mr Olmert partly used his appearance two weeks ago before the Winograd Commission to defend himself against charges that the government stumbled unprepared into the five-week war.

But the report will fuel claims by some international critics of the operation that Israel, and perhaps the US, had for some time decided in favour of a military confrontation with the Lebanese group.

The report, in Haaretz, also suggests that Mr Olmert was told in May that Lebanon was ready to enforce UN resolution 1559, which prescribed the disarming of Hizbollah in return for withdrawal from Shaba Farms, the border zone occupied by Israel which is projected as a casus belli by Hizbollah, but which is also claimed by Syria. It says he passed the message to President Bush, Tony Blair and President Jacques Chirac.

According to the paper, Mr Olmert told the commission that he had held a series of meetings after becoming Prime Minister and had decided that in the event of abductions there should be air attacks, accompanied by a limited ground operation. He told the military that he wanted to decide ahead of any such event rather than make a snap decision at the time.

He also defended the much criticised expansion of the ground invasion in the last 48 hours of the war after the UN had agreed on a ceasefire-an operation, which cost the lives of 33 Israeli soldiers. He said the objective had been to influence the draft UN resolution, which he regarded as too unfavourable to Israel.

* The Israeli military said last night it was looking into a report by the Israeli human rights group B'Tselem that it used an 11-year-old girl, a 15-year-old boy and a 24-year-old man as "human shields" while searching for gunmen in its sweep of Nablus last month.


Link (http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/article2341366.ece)

BITEYOASS
03-09-2007, 11:16 AM
The Israeli Army must be pretty fucked up nowadays. That invasion of Lebanon was a total BS operation. Like they couldn't pull of a Ugandan style rescue attempt. That whole army has been a laughing stock ever since that incident in 1983 when tried to go up against some Marines over in Beirut and one Marine stopped it by running up an Israeli tank and tell em to turn around and get the F*** outta here.

Nickdfresh
03-09-2007, 07:00 PM
It's pretty clear that they were hankering for a showdown with Hezbollah.

And so the idiotic, ineffective war plan was brought to fruition, as the IDF attacked an entrenched enemy that had prepared for their attack for years, and with shitty logistics to boot...

WACF
03-09-2007, 07:12 PM
The stupid thing for any military to do is not have a plan of attack.

There was a showdown on the horizon...both sides had plans.

Nickdfresh
03-09-2007, 07:23 PM
Originally posted by WACF
The stupid thing for any military to do is not have a plan of attack.

There was a showdown on the horizon...both sides had plans.

Well, considering how things went, maybe they just should have winged it.:)

Hardrock69
03-09-2007, 11:47 PM
Kinda similar to the way Bush Sr. got permission from the Saudis to use their airbases in Desert Storm.

Got some satellite photos of the Saudi border, chop them to show some Iraqui tanks there, and then say to the Saudis:

"Saddamite is getting ready to invade your country. Can we use your airbases?"

"Certainly".


Or let's go back further...say the Gulf Of Tonkin incident?


It is always interesting to examine the public history when compared to reality.

Kinda woulda been nice if humans had evolved into sentient, yet peaceful beings....

Oh well.

Krazy world, but it is the only one we have.