PDA

View Full Version : BP CEO loses job and big bucks for covering up gay relationship



FORD
05-02-2007, 04:34 AM
BP's Browne quits over lie to court about private life

http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2007/05/02/bp.jpg

Cover-up over how he met partner leads to dramatic exit and costs him £15m

Ian Cobain and Clare Dyer
Wednesday May 2, 2007

Guardian
The career of one of the titans of British industry came to a dramatic end yesterday when Lord Browne quit as chief executive of BP after lying to a court about his relationship with another man.

Following crisis talks at the company's London headquarters, BP said Lord Browne had resigned with immediate effect after losing his four-month battle to suppress newspaper reports about the relationship. In doing do, he forfeited a leaving package worth up to £15.5m.

Lord Browne went all the way to the House of Lords in his attempts to prevent Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Mail on Sunday, from disclosing details of his relationship with Jeff Chevalier, his Canadian partner between 2002 and 2006.

A series of hearings considered evidence about the pair's extravagant international lifestyle, disputed allegations that company resources were diverted for Mr Chevalier's use, and claims - firmly denied - that Lord Browne attempted to evade tax payments.

The 58-year-old, once hailed as "the Sun King of the oil industry" lost his case, in large part, because he claimed to have met his partner while jogging in a London park. They had, his close associates conceded last night, made contact through a male escort agency's website.

In a statement which marked the end of a remarkable career, including a decade during which the company he led was regarded as the country's most successful, Lord Browne said: "In my 41 years with BP I have kept my private life separate from my business life. I have always regarded my sexuality as a personal matter, to be kept private. It is a matter of deep disappointment that a newspaper group has now decided that allegations about my personal life should be made public.

"I wish to acknowledge that I did have a four-year relationship with Jeff Chevalier, who has now chosen to tell his story to Associated Newspapers. These allegations are full of misleading and erroneous claims. In particular, I deny categorically any allegations of improper conduct relating to BP."

Tony Hayward, Lord Browne's designated successor, who had been due to take over in July, was immediately appointed as chief executive.

The disclosure of the relationship follows the refusal by the House of Lords yesterday to grant Lord Browne permission to appeal against rulings made earlier this year by the high court and court of appeal.

The high court had decided to lift an injunction which covered a wide range of subjects, including alleged discussions between Lord Browne and Gordon Brown, Tony Blair and EU commissioner Peter Mandelson, and a dinner at one of Lord Browne's homes attended by himself and Mr Chevalier with Mr Mandelson and his Brazilian partner.

Another was a claim that Lord Browne bought a flat in Venice several years ago and, it was alleged, paid cash for a renovation bill which did not include VAT, and that he failed to pay his tax bill.

The court also heard that Lord Browne took steps to enable Mr Chevalier to remain in the UK when his visa was due to run out early in the relationship. This included paying for a university course from 2003, so he would acquire student status, and helping him to set up a company to trade in mobile phone ring tones.

Mr Chevalier claimed that when the relationship broke down Lord Browne had agreed that "if needed, [he] would assist in the first year of me transitioning from living in multimillion pound homes around the world, flying in private jets, five-star hotels, £2,000 suits, and so on to a less than modest life in Canada".

The judge, Mr Justice Eady, said Mr Chevalier sought further assistance towards the end of last year, backed by what he said could be interpreted as a "thinly-veiled threat". Mr Chevalier denies making any threats.

Eventually, Lord Browne's attempts to prevent reporting of these matters, and to maintain his personal privacy, collapsed after the court accepted he had lied to conceal the manner in which he met Mr Chevalier. Lord Browne had told the court on more than one occasion that they had met while running in Battersea Park, south London. In fact, associates of Lord Browne now acknowledge, they met through a website called suitedandbooted.com.

Mr Justice Eady said: "I am not prepared to make allowances for a 'white lie' told to the court in circumstances such as these - especially by a man who prays in aid of his reputation and distinction, and refers to the various honours he has received under the present government, when asking the court to prefer his account of what took place."

The judge added that Lord Browne told this lie at a time when he was also making a "wholesale attack" on Mr Chevalier's reliability, showing a "willingness casually to 'trash' the reputation" of his former partner.

The Mail on Sunday said it would make its evidence available to the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith. "Jeffrey Archer and Jonathan Aitken went to prison for lying to the courts," a spokesman said.

However, Mr Justice Eady said he had decided not to refer the matter to the attorney general, saying disclosure in the judgment of Lord Browne's behaviour was "probably sufficient punishment".

In a statement last night the Mail on Sunday said: "The story we originally sought to publish was a business story involving issues of great importance to shareholders and employers of BP. Lord Browne chose to suppress this story by arguing to the high court that, because the story was supplied to us by his former lover, Mr Chevalier, it breached his right to a private life under the Human Rights Act." In lying, the newspaper said, it was Lord Browne who had made his private life a public issue.

Guardian Unlimited © Guardian News and Media Limited 2007

BITEYOASS
05-02-2007, 11:32 AM
Those Rich elite conservatives sure do love some of that Dangerous closet homo sex. LOL

Coyote
05-02-2007, 11:41 AM
Originally posted by FORD
http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-images/Guardian/Pix/pictures/2007/05/02/bp.jpg

Is it just me, or do most of these elite rich scumbags all look alike?

FORD
05-02-2007, 06:29 PM
Originally posted by Coyote
Is it just me, or do most of these elite rich scumbags all look alike?

Probably because of inbreeding. Not that Browne himself has done any breeding, of course.....

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-02-2007, 07:21 PM
FORD, isn't thsi really the same sort of scandal as Monicagate? Someone lied about their private sex life. Because he attempted to keep his private life private (b/c if he hadn't, social norms and so-called "moralists" would've cried for his head for the crime of being gay) he's been exorcised.

If you take Clinton's side in the whole impeachment thing fror lying under oath, it would be hypocritical not to be on Browne's side here.

Lqskdiver
05-02-2007, 07:40 PM
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
FORD, isn't thsi really the same sort of scandal as Monicagate? Someone lied about their private sex life. Because he attempted to keep his private life private (b/c if he hadn't, social norms and so-called "moralists" would've cried for his head for the crime of being gay) he's been exorcised.

If you take Clinton's side in the whole impeachment thing fror lying under oath, it would be hypocritical not to be on Browne's side here.


Not the same.

One leader was sticking his sausage in the pork.

The other was getting porked by the sausage.

:D

Guitar Shark
05-02-2007, 07:44 PM
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
FORD, isn't thsi really the same sort of scandal as Monicagate? Someone lied about their private sex life. Because he attempted to keep his private life private (b/c if he hadn't, social norms and so-called "moralists" would've cried for his head for the crime of being gay) he's been exorcised.

If you take Clinton's side in the whole impeachment thing fror lying under oath, it would be hypocritical not to be on Browne's side here.

Duh. This is FORD we're talking about here.

FORD
05-02-2007, 08:14 PM
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
FORD, isn't thsi really the same sort of scandal as Monicagate? Someone lied about their private sex life. Because he attempted to keep his private life private (b/c if he hadn't, social norms and so-called "moralists" would've cried for his head for the crime of being gay) he's been exorcised.

If you take Clinton's side in the whole impeachment thing fror lying under oath, it would be hypocritical not to be on Browne's side here.

That's exactly what I'm saying.

If Browne was hetero, this wouldn't be an issue. Nobody should lose their job because they're gay. Or even because they fuck turtles, for that matter.

What did I say that would lead you to believe I think otherwise? :confused:

FORD
05-02-2007, 08:15 PM
Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Duh. This is FORD we're talking about here.

I see you didn't read either. How the Hell do you win in court if you ignore evidence?

Guitar Shark
05-02-2007, 08:17 PM
I've read enough of your posts over the years. ;)

Nickdfresh
05-02-2007, 08:51 PM
I was going to make a drilling joke, but nevermind.:)

(too crude)

BigBadBrian
05-03-2007, 10:40 AM
Originally posted by FORD
I see you didn't read either. How the Hell do you win in court if you ignore evidence?

You know ambulance chasers only have to extort the insurance companies and the little guy out of their life's earnings and rarely have to go to court.

:gulp:

Guitar Shark
05-03-2007, 12:14 PM
Originally posted by BigBadBrian
You know ambulance chasers only have to extort the insurance companies and the little guy out of their life's earnings and rarely have to go to court.

:gulp:

LMFAO... was that supposed to be a dig at me somehow?

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-03-2007, 01:15 PM
Originally posted by FORD
What did I say that would lead you to believe I think otherwise? :confused:

You're right. I did jump to conclusions. However, it's not like you said anything FAVORABLE about the guy either. n fact, you did just the reverse:


Originally posted by FORD
Probably because of inbreeding. Not that Browne himself has done any breeding, of course.....

A benign joke, but one made at Browne's expense. And considering your feelings towards oil company executives, yes, it's not too out of line to jump to a conclusion that this was a satisfying giggle for you.

That being said, what are your feeling s towards this? And how would you rate Browne as an oil exec? Robert Kennedy Jr has said on a number of occassions that he thinks BP is among the better, more environmentally conscious oil companies.

FORD
05-03-2007, 02:35 PM
Originally posted by EAT MY ASSHOLE
And how would you rate Browne as an oil exec? Robert Kennedy Jr has said on a number of occassions that he thinks BP is among the better, more environmentally conscious oil companies.

I didn't really know a lot about the guy's record, until Mike Malloy was talking about this last night. He also mentioned that Shell recently axed one of their execs who was trying to create a solar division of the company. Maybe it's possible that BP itself set Browne up for his attempts to bring their company into the 21st century.

Hey, if the oil companies don't want any part of alternative energy, that's great as far as I'm concerned. That means when the oil's gone, so are they. And that's how it should be. They don't deserve any further prosperity after all their theft and murder.

Lqskdiver
05-03-2007, 05:19 PM
Great....can't wait for the "monopoly on the sun" rants.

:rolleyes:

FORD
05-03-2007, 10:29 PM
Originally posted by Lqskdiver
Great....can't wait for the "monopoly on the sun" rants.

:rolleyes:

That's precisely why the greedy bastards have no use in solar power.

At best, they could buy out companies that make solar panels, storage batteries, etc. But all they would get out of it is a one time sale. You can't "own" sunlight, or attach a commercial value to it.

Big Train
05-04-2007, 01:42 AM
What's more obscene to you...

1.that this guy got pushed out for being gay.

2. The insane amount of money this guy has already made over the last 40 years.

3. The insane amount of money he is still walking away with , even though he was pushed out unfairly.

EAT MY ASSHOLE
05-04-2007, 10:29 AM
Originally posted by Big Train
What's more obscene to you...

1.that this guy got pushed out for being gay.

2. The insane amount of money this guy has already made over the last 40 years.

3. The insane amount of money he is still walking away with , even though he was pushed out unfairly.


You forgot to include choice 4...that this guy is gay.

FORD
05-04-2007, 11:26 AM
Originally posted by Big Train
What's more obscene to you...

1.that this guy got pushed out for being gay.

2. The insane amount of money this guy has already made over the last 40 years.

3. The insane amount of money he is still walking away with , even though he was pushed out unfairly.

Well, option #1 is why I posted the thread in the first place. NOBODY should lose their job for being gay, whether that person is an oil executive or a burger flipper at Mickey D's.

I'm already on record here with being sickened by the criminal greed of the oil industry, and how it's destroying the entire economy of this nation. And by that, I mean the REAL economy that 99% of us have to live in, not that Wall Street fairytale bullshit that the whore media talks about.

Little Texan
05-05-2007, 03:41 PM
I say that these greedy oil exec bastards deserve anything bad that happens to them! May they all burn in hell for all eternity, if there is such a thing as hell! Fuck those pricks...I haven't the least bit sympathy for any of the worthless cocksuckers!

hideyoursheep
05-05-2007, 04:51 PM
Originally posted by Little Texan
I say that these greedy oil exec bastards deserve anything bad that happens to them! May they all burn in hell for all eternity, if there is such a thing as hell! Fuck those pricks...I haven't the least bit sympathy for any of the worthless cocksuckers!


Patience LT, Patience....

It'll happen....:D