PDA

View Full Version : Terrorism Dropped 45% Since 2001



Viking
05-01-2004, 10:18 PM
The number of terrorist acts internationally has dropped 45 percent from the level in 2001, according to an annual report by the State Department.

There were 346 attacks in 2001, compared to 198 in 2002 and 190 in 2003, said the report, "Patterns of Global Terrorism," released by the office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism.

The figure in 2003 represents the lowest annual total of international terrorist attacks since 1969, the State Department office said.

A total of 307 persons were killed in the attacks of 2003, far fewer than the 725 killed during 2002, according to the report. A total of 1,593 persons were wounded in the attacks that occurred in 2003, down from 2,013 persons wounded the year before.

In the 2003 attacks, a total of 307 were killed, compared to the 725 killed in 2002.

Last year, 1,593 people were wounded in the attacks, down from 2,013 in 2002.

Asia suffered the highest casualty count last year, 159 dead and 951 wounded in 70 attacks.

There were 82 anti-US attacks in 2003, up slightly from the 77 attacks the previous year, a 62-percent decrease from the 219 attacks in 2001.

In 2003, 35 American citizens died in 15 international terrorist attacks.

The deadliest anti-U.S. attack occurred in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 12, when suicide bombers in booby-trapped cars filled with explosives drove into housing compounds, killing nine Americans.

Most of the attacks that have occurred during Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom do not meet the longstanding U.S. definition of international terrorism because they were directed at combatants, the State Department said.

Terrorist attacks are defined as attacks against civilians and military personnel who at the time of the incident were unarmed and/or not on duty.

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=38298

Seshmeister
05-02-2004, 09:28 AM
The biggest US initiative has been Operation Stop Giving the IRA lots of cash to kill children.

Cheers!

:gulp:

Wayne L.
05-02-2004, 12:24 PM
I think President Bush deserves some credit for this drop in terrorism after 9/11 because of his war on terrorism no matter what some of his critics might say!!!

ELVIS
05-02-2004, 01:46 PM
Of course he does!

FORD
05-02-2004, 02:11 PM
Yeah, give the stupid son of a bitch credit for allowing a terrorist attack to happen, then bragging about it when there isn't another one. Except for the Anthrax shit, of course. But that doesn't count because it only targeted Democrats and elderly black mailmen. (And the tabloid editor who posted the pictures of drunk Jenna dry humping another chick on a barroom floor)

Viking
05-02-2004, 02:51 PM
It's a unique talent to find the cloud in every silver lining.......:rolleyes:

FORD
05-02-2004, 05:54 PM
Especially when the "silver lining" is complete propaganda bullshit. How many terrorist attacks were there in the US in the 3 years before 9-11?

Yep. None.

Hmmmm... guess we need to throw away the 22nd ammendment and elect Clinton again, right?

BigBadBrian
05-02-2004, 08:03 PM
Originally posted by FORD
Especially when the "silver lining" is complete propaganda bullshit. How many terrorist attacks were there in the US in the 3 years before 9-11?

Yep. None.

Hmmmm... guess we need to throw away the 22nd ammendment and elect Clinton again, right?

Nope. US Navy warships are considered, by law, to be sovereign US soil. The COLE comes to mind. That was 2000, wasn't it? Why, yes it was!!!

Also, US Embassies, by law, are considered to be US soil. Going back more than 3 years, we have the Embassy bombings in Africa in '98 and WTC Attack #1 in '93. Also, interests were attacked when the Khobar Towers were attacked in '96. Your argument doesn't wash, FORD.

Viking
05-02-2004, 08:49 PM
Yup. And for those of you who can't seem to PULL YOUR PANTS DOWN BEFORE YOU SHIT YOURSELVES, the figures were referring to global terrorist attacks.

If you're going to tilt at windmills, at least arm yourselves first. :rolleyes:

FORD
05-02-2004, 09:44 PM
If you're talking globally, then maybe you should go with Sesh's answer. Because Ireland would be the only place where there has been less terrorism.

And it was President Clinton who brought those guys to the table :D

Everywhere else, terrorism is on the increase since the BCE's back in DC. Afghanistan, Iraq, Bali, Turkey, Africa, the Phillipines. And that's not even counting the daily carnage in Israel and Palestine, with terrorists going nuts on both sides of that.

Seshmeister
05-02-2004, 09:56 PM
I thought that any resistance to coalition forces in Iraq was called terrorism(at least by the US government) which means that this years figure is going to be up...