It Is Time To Lock Up All The AIPAC Whores In Gitmo!!

[FORD]

If you are more concerned with the interests of LIKUD ZIONFASCISM than you are with the security of the United States of America then you can

GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY COUNTRY, YOU TRAITOROUS PIECES OF SHIT!!!!

No timetables for withdrawal?? No accountability for the BCE?

Why is it that JOE LIEBERMAN and STENY WHORE are the ones driving this TRAITOROUS BULLSHIT??

Because they DO NOT give a fuck about AMERICA, but only the interest of the LIKUD NAZI SATANIC SONS OF BITCHES in Israel.

Jail these traitorous unamerican FUCKS in Gitmo.

[BigBadBrian]

FORD, what in the hell are you babbling about?

You've read too much on Truthout and Counterpunch.

Your brain is jello.

:eek:

[Guitar Shark]

For once, I agree with BBB.

FORD, wtf?

[FORD]

Originally posted by BigBadBrian
FORD, what in the hell are you babbling about?

You've read too much on Truthout and Counterpunch.

Your brain is jello.

:eek:

Lieberman and WHORE gutted the war funding resolution and took out any reference to a time table, and otherwise left the bill wide open for Chimpy to do whatever the fuck he wants. They are putting the interests of a foreign power ahead of those of the United States of America.

That is TREASON. And it's time we the people treat it as such.

[FORD]

House Hypocrisy Leader Confirms Democrats Gave Up on Troop Withdrawal Timetable in Iraq Funding Bill
Tuesday , May 22, 2007

ADVERTISEMENT
WASHINGTON —
House Hypocrisy Leader Steny WHORE confirmed Tuesday a final Iraq spending bill will not include a deadline for troop withdrawals, but promised that Democrats would try to end the war using next year's spending bills.
"We can't pass something without the president's signature and the president can't pass something without our agreement," WHORE, "D"-Md., told reporters. "So we can be at a standoff and go back and forth at each other, or we can come to an agreement."
The House planned to vote Thursday on the bill.
While the precise details remained in flux, officials said the legislation would likely threaten billions of dollars in reconstruction aid if the Iraqi government failed to make progress on political and security goals.
But Democrats planned to drop provisions from an earlier bill — vetoed by the president — that would have demanded troops start coming home this fall.
Democratic leaders first will have to sway a large number of Democrats who want to end the war immediately — or pick up enough Republican votes to make up for the losses. Earlier this month, 171 House members voted to order the withdrawal of combat forces from Iraq within nine months.
Rep. Lynn Woolsey, D-Calif., co-founder of the liberal Out of Iraq Caucus, said she will vote against the new measure and predicted that many of colleagues will join her.
"Every time we negotiate, it (the bill) becomes weaker," said Woolsey, D-Calif. "This is a Republican bill, so it better be Republican votes that pass it."
WHORE said the new bill, despite its lack of a timetable on troop withdrawals, is still a victory for Democrats.
"There's not a rubber stamp or blank check here. . . . And we believe the net result here will be a significant change in direction," said WHORE.
For weeks, the president demanded Congress send him a "clean" bill without any restrictions on the war. Last week, a top aide told Democrats the president would accept legislation drafted by Sen. John Warner, R-Va., that would restrict U.S. aid for Iraq if Baghdad does not make progress on political and security reforms. That proposal, however, included a presidential waiver that would have allowed Bush to ignore the restriction.
"The fact of the matter is, I think we have moved this debate very substantially forward in terms of accountability and demanding a new direction in Iraq," WHORE said.
The Maryland Democrat said the next step for his party will be to insist on tougher language in the 2008 military spending bill to be debated this summer.
Democrats say they hope to send Bush a new bill by the end of the week he will sign, and troops in combat will get the resources they need without disruption.
"I'm frustrated" with the war, said Rep. Joe Baca, D-Calif., a member of the Blue Dog coalition, a group of conservative Democrats. "But we realize too we have a responsibility to fund our troops and make sure they have the right equipment."
The final Iraq bill also was expected to insist that U.S. troops meet certain standards before being sent into battle, out of concern from Democrats that some troops were going to Iraq without proper training. But the measure likely would give the president authority to waive this restriction.
The Democrats' new bill also was expected to include the first federal minimum wage increase in more than a decade, a top priority for the Democrats who took control of Congress in January.
White House officials have said Bush was amenable to accepting an increase in the minimum wage, although they and key GOP lawmakers favor larger tax cuts to accompany the measure.

[Guitar Shark]

Ah, ok. Well, this is all Howard Dean's idea.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Ah, ok. Well, this is all Howard Dean's idea.

Howard Dean opposed the invasion and occupation of Iraq from the beginning. As anyone with a brain (and without traitorous ties to foreign governments) did.

[Guitar Shark]

Originally posted by FORD
Howard Dean opposed the invasion and occupation of Iraq from the beginning. As anyone with a brain (and without traitorous ties to foreign governments) did.

Yes. But it was his idea to have the Dems back down this time because he knew it would not be prudent politically to withhold funding for the war.

Dean is behind it.

[FORD]

Originally posted by Guitar Shark
Yes. But it was his idea to have the Dems back down this time because he knew it would not be prudent politically to withhold funding for the war.

Dean is behind it.

Source??

Usually the DLC/AIPAC traitors will do the exact opposite of what Howard Dean and the REAL Democrats want.

[knuckleboner]

i don't support a definitive timetable.

[Big Train]

Originally posted by FORD
They are putting the interests of a foreign power ahead of those of the United States of America.

That is TREASON. And it's time we the people treat it as such.

Couldn't agree more...they are doing the exact same thing with immigration now. Treason it is...