PDA

View Full Version : Iraq Awards $1.1 Billion in Contracts to China & Iran



LoungeMachine
10-18-2007, 09:28 PM
Iraqi Contracts With Iran and China Concern U.S.




By JAMES GLANZ
Published: October 18, 2007

BAGHDAD, Oct. 17 — Iraq has agreed to award $1.1 billion in contracts to Iranian and Chinese companies to build a pair of enormous power plants, the Iraqi electricity minister said Tuesday. Word of the project prompted serious concerns among American military officials, who fear that Iranian commercial investments can mask military activities at a time of heightened tension with Iran.

The Iraqi electricity minister, Karim Wahid, said that the Iranian project would be built in Sadr City, a Shiite enclave in Baghdad that is controlled by followers of the anti-American cleric Moktada al-Sadr. He added that Iran had also agreed to provide cheap electricity from its own grid to southern Iraq, and to build a large power plant essentially free of charge in an area between the two southern Shiite holy cities of Karbala and Najaf.

The expansion of ties between Iraq and Iran comes as the United States and Iran clash on nuclear issues and about what American officials have repeatedly said is Iranian support for armed groups in Iraq. American officials have charged that Iranians, through the international military wing known as the Quds Force, are particularly active in support of elite elements of the Mahdi Army, a militia largely controlled by Mr. Sadr.

An American military official in Baghdad said that while he had no specific knowledge of the power plant contracts, any expansion of Iranian interests was a concern for the military here.

“We are of course carefully watching Iran’s overall presence here in Iraq,” the military official said. “As you know, it’s not always as it appears. Their Quds Force routinely uses the cover of a business to mask their real purpose as an intelligence operative.”

“This is a free marketplace, so there’s not much we can do about it,” the official said.

At the same time, it is possible to view Iranian and Chinese investment as giving those countries a stake in Iraqi stability. The power plants could also boost a troubled reconstruction effort in Iraq. An American Embassy spokesman said, “We welcome any efforts to help develop Iraq’s energy infrastructure.”

“These proposals reflect the ongoing business opportunities that are arising in Iraq that American firms should be competing for,” said the spokesman, who asked not to be named because of standard protocol at the embassy.

It was unclear whether any American firms had tried to win the work, although Mr. Wahid said the projects had been submitted for bids. The embassy spokesman said, “We are unaware of any violations of principles of open and fair bidding.”

The agreements between Iraq and Iran come after the American-led reconstruction effort, which relied heavily on large American contractors, has spent nearly $5 billion of United States taxpayer money on Iraq’s electricity grid. Aside from a few isolated bright spots, there was little clear impact in a nation where in many places electricity is still available only for a few hours each day. Because the power plants are in largely Shiite-controlled areas, it is possible they may not face the same sectarian violence that crippled so many American rebuilding projects.

Mr. Wahid did not say how much the plant between Karbala and Najaf would cost, but at standard international prices a plant of the scale he described would be worth roughly $200 million to $300 million.

The outlines of all three agreements were confirmed by Thamir Ghadban, an expert on energy who is also director of the committee of advisers to Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki. But Mr. Ghadban said that the granting of the huge projects to rivals of the United States was not an indication that American companies were being excluded from consideration now that Iraqi oil revenues, which provide the basis for the Iraqi government’s budget, are largely paying for the reconstruction of the grid.

“There is no preference to the Iranians,” Mr. Ghadban said, citing the most obvious potential point of sensitivity for the United States. “There is no opposition or stance from the Iraqi government to bar American or Western companies. It is the other way around,” Mr. Ghadban said, indicating that he urged American contractors to bid for work in Iraq.

Of the two new projects Iraq has agreed to finance, Mr. Wahid said, the largest is a $940 million power plant in Wasit to be built by a Chinese company, which he said was named Shanghai Heavy Industry. That project would pump some 1,300 megawatts of electricity into the Iraqi grid. For comparison, all of the plants currently connected to Iraq’s grid produce a total of roughly 5,000 megawatts.

He said that Iraq had already spent $12 million leveling the ground in preparation for the Chinese plant. The Sadr City project, which will include a small refinery, will cost $150 million and be built by an Iranian company, Sunir, Mr. Wahid said. That plant is expected to produce about 160 megawatts of electricity.

cuntinued http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/18/world/middleeast/18grid.html?em&ex=1192852800&en=01be634a5830f23b&ei=5087%0A

ELVIS
10-18-2007, 09:38 PM
Originally posted by LoungeMachine
Iraqi Contracts With Iran and China Concern U.S.

“As you know, it’s not always as it appears.”



:elvis:

LoungeMachine
10-18-2007, 09:47 PM
:rolleyes:

Nickdfresh
10-18-2007, 09:47 PM
It's good to have allies...

If they hire Blackwater for the security it'll all be good...

LoungeMachine
10-18-2007, 09:50 PM
So Iraq and Russia have no problem doing business with Iran.....
Then why are we so worried about Iran?


While they're here, maybe China wouldn't mind taking over security and "political breathing room patrol" duties so our guys can come home....

Hyman Roth
10-18-2007, 10:35 PM
"Big wheel turning and you cant slow down,
You cant let go and you cant hold on,
You cant go back and you cant stand still,
If the thunder don't get you then the lightning will."

Scary shite!

Ellyllions
10-19-2007, 07:53 AM
Cause for concern? We wouldn't know. Monday morning quarterbacking at it's finest.

Expected? Should've been. Just because Iraq is able to move forward without our personal touch doesn't mean we should be worried about our security.

It's no secret that Iran wants Iraq. But this article didn't say that to me. it said that Iraq is moving forward, which is what needs to happen to get our troops home.

Hyman Roth
10-19-2007, 08:55 AM
Hmmm....it said to me that America is at the end of that brief period in history when we were the lone superpower....and that, like it or not, from here on out we have to share power with China and Russia (based on other articles I have read...) or one or the other of them, or both, may pull the plug.

It also said to me that Iran and Iraq, prime real estate if we are going to start carving the world up again, seem to be aligning with the neo-communists (for lack of a better term...) and we are entering this new, multi-polar era of sharing the balance of global power having given plenty of reason for many other governments with nice beaches and resources to not want to hang out with us anymore...

Ellyllions
10-19-2007, 09:23 AM
You're right.

I tell ya, the only issue I've ever had with leveling the playing field (like the People's people like to talk is fair) is that the playing field would be level one day.

It has to happen.

And for some, that's not necessarily a good thing...ya know?