Robert Reich: The Union Way Up

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • FORD
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    • Jan 2004
    • 59656

    Robert Reich: The Union Way Up

    The union way up
    America, and its faltering economy, need unions to restore prosperity to the middle class.
    By Robert B. Reich

    January 26, 2009

    Why is this recession so deep, and what can be done to reverse it?

    Hint: Go back about 50 years, when America's middle class was expanding and the economy was soaring. Paychecks were big enough to allow us to buy all the goods and services we produced. It was a virtuous circle. Good pay meant more purchases, and more purchases meant more jobs.

    At the center of this virtuous circle were unions. In 1955, more than a third of working Americans belonged to one. Unions gave them the bargaining leverage they needed to get the paychecks that kept the economy going. So many Americans were unionized that wage agreements spilled over to nonunionized workplaces as well. Employers knew they had to match union wages to compete for workers and to recruit the best ones.

    Fast forward to a new century. Now, fewer than 8% of private-sector workers are unionized. Corporate opponents argue that Americans no longer want unions. But public opinion surveys, such as a comprehensive poll that Peter D. Hart Research Associates conducted in 2006, suggest that a majority of workers would like to have a union to bargain for better wages, benefits and working conditions. So there must be some other reason for this dramatic decline.

    But put that question aside for a moment. One point is clear: Smaller numbers of unionized workers mean less bargaining power, and less bargaining power results in lower wages.

    It's no wonder middle-class incomes were dropping even before the recession. As our economy grew between 2001 and the start of 2007, most Americans didn't share in the prosperity. By the time the recession began last year, according to an Economic Policy Institute study, the median income of households headed by those under age 65 was below what it was in 2000.

    Typical families kept buying only by going into debt. This was possible as long as the housing bubble expanded. Home-equity loans and refinancing made up for declining paychecks. But that's over. American families no longer have the purchasing power to keep the economy going. Lower paychecks, or no paychecks at all, mean fewer purchases, and fewer purchases mean fewer jobs.

    The way to get the economy back on track is to boost the purchasing power of the middle class. One major way to do this is to expand the percentage of working Americans in unions.

    Tax rebates won't work because they don't permanently raise wages. Most families used the rebate last year to pay off debt -- not a bad thing, but it doesn't keep the virtuous circle running.

    Bank bailouts won't work either. Businesses won't borrow to expand without consumers to buy their goods and services. And Americans themselves can't borrow when they're losing their jobs and their incomes are dropping.

    Tax cuts for working families, as President Obama intends, can do more to help because they extend over time. But only higher wages and benefits for the middle class will have a lasting effect.

    Unions matter in this equation. According to the Department of Labor, workers in unions earn 30% higher wages -- taking home $863 a week, compared with $663 for the typical nonunion worker -- and are 59% more likely to have employer-provided health insurance than their nonunion counterparts.

    Examples abound. In 2007, nearly 12,000 janitors in Providence, R.I., New Hampshire and Boston, represented by the Service Employees International Union, won a contract that raised their wages to $16 an hour, guaranteed more work hours and provided family health insurance. In an industry typically staffed by part-time workers with a high turnover rate, a union contract provided janitors with full-time, sustainable jobs that they could count on to raise their families' -- and their communities' -- standard of living.

    In August, 65,000 Verizon workers, represented by the Communications Workers of America, won wage increases totaling nearly 11% and converted temporary jobs to full-time status. Not only did the settlement preserve fully paid healthcare premiums for all active and retired unionized employees, but Verizon also agreed to provide $2 million a year to fund a collaborative campaign with its unions to achieve meaningful national healthcare reform.

    Although America and its economy need unions, it's become nearly impossible for employees to form one. The Hart poll I cited tells us that 57 million workers would want to be in a union if they could have one. But those who try to form a union, according to researchers at MIT, have only about a 1 in 5 chance of successfully doing so.

    The reason? Most of the time, employees who want to form a union are threatened and intimidated by their employers. And all too often, if they don't heed the warnings, they're fired, even though that's illegal. I saw this when I was secretary of Labor over a decade ago. We tried to penalize employers that broke the law, but the fines are minuscule. Too many employers consider them a cost of doing business.

    This isn't right. The most important feature of the Employee Free Choice Act, which will be considered by the just-seated 111th Congress, toughens penalties against companies that violate their workers' rights. The sooner it's enacted, the better -- for U.S. workers and for the U.S. economy.

    The American middle class isn't looking for a bailout or a handout. Most people just want a chance to share in the success of the companies they help to prosper. Making it easier for all Americans to form unions would give the middle class the bargaining power it needs for better wages and benefits. And a strong and prosperous middle class is necessary if our economy is to succeed.



    Robert B. Reich, former U.S. secretary of Labor, is professor of public policy at UC Berkeley and the author, most recently, of "Supercapitalism."

    Link
    Eat Us And Smile

    Cenk For America 2024!!

    Justice Democrats


    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992
  • LoungeMachine
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Jul 2004
    • 32576

    #2
    This country was BUILT by the working middle class...

    Good wages return more to the economy than tax cuts to the rich, who will just save it in some Cayman Island Account

    Originally posted by Kristy
    Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
    Originally posted by cadaverdog
    I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

    Comment

    • GAR
      Banned
      • Jan 2004
      • 10881

      #3
      Imported illegal aliens, and imported goods have killed the Unions from greasing the industrial, vertically-integrated companies that haven't been their ideal since the mid-70's.

      I watch with glee the union roster halving itself under the Obama reign.

      Comment

      • Seshmeister
        ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

        • Oct 2003
        • 35764

        #4
        I thought the US car industry was still very unionized and it's gone down the shitter.

        Comment

        • LoungeMachine
          DIAMOND STATUS
          • Jul 2004
          • 32576

          #5
          Thanks to management hell bent on corporate jets and golden parachutes while designing SHIT cars for the US Market....and paying fat-cat Lobbyists on K Street...

          Originally posted by Kristy
          Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
          Originally posted by cadaverdog
          I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

          Comment

          • FORD
            ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

            • Jan 2004
            • 59656

            #6
            Yep. The UAW just builds the cars. They don't design them.
            Eat Us And Smile

            Cenk For America 2024!!

            Justice Democrats


            "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

            Comment

            • GAR
              Banned
              • Jan 2004
              • 10881

              #7
              Originally posted by FORD
              Yep. The UAW just builds the cars. They don't design them.
              Don't blame them for designing flabby cars, but blame them for immunizing the flabby workers from getting fired?

              Unions=Extortionists

              When I got out of college I went to the EDD for a job, and they referred me to a posting from the RTD as a bus dispatcher. I had no experience.

              They said the pay starts out at $25 (in todays dollars) but that 12 percent is deducted for Union Dues.

              I said fuck that out of principle and didn't apply for it, but hooray for what Unions can do to keep the jobs.. their brainiacs in that regards aren't they.

              Comment

              • LoungeMachine
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Jul 2004
                • 32576

                #8
                and all this time later you post from the library.....

                jobless.



                Mission Accomplished
                Originally posted by Kristy
                Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                Originally posted by cadaverdog
                I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                Comment

                • Big Train
                  Full Member Status

                  • Apr 2004
                  • 4013

                  #9
                  Imagining it is 1950 again feels nice, but it is not ever coming back. While I agree with the underlying principle that the middle class needs to get paid much more somehow, I very much disagree unions would be the right way to go about that.

                  With the advent of advanced industrial machinery, it is unlikely in most industries that there will be a lot of companies with large numbers of employees to unionize in the first place.

                  Comment

                  • Nickdfresh
                    SUPER MODERATOR

                    • Oct 2004
                    • 49570

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Big Train
                    Imagining it is 1950 again feels nice, but it is not ever coming back. While I agree with the underlying principle that the middle class needs to get paid much more somehow, I very much disagree unions would be the right way to go about that.

                    With the advent of advanced industrial machinery, it is unlikely in most industries that there will be a lot of companies with large numbers of employees to unionize in the first place.
                    Yeah, it was so nice when companies like Wal-Mart weren't simply allowed to flout worker protection laws like a defacto policy of forcing workers to put in overtime hours, but punch out first so they don't have to pay them in some states...

                    They may not do this any longer, but the practice was widespread for a while and many other stores such as "ToysRUs" also followed suit in order to maintain profitability and ensure their ownership and CEOs could maintain their multimillion/billion dollar salaries way in excess of what CEOs are paid in any other developed countries...

                    And blaming the unions for the damage to the US auto industry is at least partially bullshit. The UAW has made some big concessions. While I agree that issues like the overly generous, all or nothing, pension plans and 90% unemployment paychecks are valid discussions - it's really the fault of the US automakers that have never learned from their mistakes and essentially repeated the 1970s in the 1990s by trying to create their own market with the "build it and they will come" or marketing mentality rather than responding to the actual market of higher fuel prices and increasing quality of foreign manufacturers. An example would be the "two Fords": that is the huge differences between the profitable Ford of Europe that makes very nice, reliable cars people desire (Google Mondeo, second generation Focus), and the Ford of North America which often made tossed-off, boring lessor vehicles because they wanted to concentrate on pumping out sport utility vehicles and trucks which hurt them severally when fuel prices skyrocketed..

                    See: http://www.businessweek.com/magazine...ge_top+stories




                    Because I think I need to point out that a lot of "American cars" are now assembled in Mexico and Brazil among other places. So, obviously it's not all highly paid American union workers sapping the cash flow. It's bad business practices and a complete lack of foresight "quick buck" ideal that makes one wonder if these guys have been completely detached from reality..
                    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 01-28-2009, 11:02 AM.

                    Comment

                    • Big Train
                      Full Member Status

                      • Apr 2004
                      • 4013

                      #11
                      Worker protection doesn't have to come from the union. That is the only thing the union really does in a positive sense.

                      In this modern age, the union does more harm than good.

                      Comment

                      • LoungeMachine
                        DIAMOND STATUS
                        • Jul 2004
                        • 32576

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Big Train
                        Worker protection doesn't have to come from the union. .
                        Does the capitalist want it to come from the Government now?

                        I'm constantly amazed at what and when you guys decide to have the Government step in.

                        Originally posted by Kristy
                        Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                        Originally posted by cadaverdog
                        I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                        Comment

                        • Big Train
                          Full Member Status

                          • Apr 2004
                          • 4013

                          #13
                          I'm amazed at your general amazement of damn near anything.

                          Yes, the capitalist wants the groups in the government already paid (and paid well) to provide these protections to actually do their job. Adding another layer (with capitalist interests of their own), does not improve anything and taxes the workers even further. If they don't step in, they should be disbanded and the savings passed back to the taxpayer. I'm all for that too.

                          It's in the best interest of the workers to stand up for themselves without government or special interest groups (i.e. unions) in the way if possible, but with limited government intervention if absolutely needed.

                          Comment

                          • hideyoursheep
                            ROTH ARMY ELITE
                            • Jan 2007
                            • 6351

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Big Train
                            It's in the best interest of the workers to stand up for themselves without government or special interest groups (i.e. unions) in the way if possible, but with limited government intervention if absolutely needed.
                            It's impossible.

                            You can never "stand up" for yourself against management unless you're a fool.

                            You're labeled a "troublemaker" and any excuse to remove you will be found.

                            Hell, they don't even need a legitimate excuse in an "at will" state.

                            Comment

                            • Nickdfresh
                              SUPER MODERATOR

                              • Oct 2004
                              • 49570

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Big Train
                              Worker protection doesn't have to come from the union. That is the only thing the union really does in a positive sense.

                              In this modern age, the union does more harm than good.
                              Um, then why are so many US workers not being protected and why are companies allowed to flout labor laws, especially under Republican admins apparently?

                              There are few examples of unions doing more harm than good. In fact, the only real one is the overly generous retirement and unemployment packages of the UAW. But then, who negotiated that?

                              Comment

                              Working...