I read an interesting piece in the WSJ yesterday that argued that the Guvernator missed his chance to become a national figure, essentially by knuckling under to his own state government.
If he had fought all the way as an unpopular reformer, when he got to this point, would he be seen as a hero cleaning up California, given the way that his reforms were batted down at the election? If he had just wielded the ax like Conan all this time, fighting the good fight?
My gut reaction is yes, but I don't know. He could just as easily be presented as ineffective.
My fellow CA voters, how say you? Would you vote for him again. How do you see him in the light of 2009?
If he had fought all the way as an unpopular reformer, when he got to this point, would he be seen as a hero cleaning up California, given the way that his reforms were batted down at the election? If he had just wielded the ax like Conan all this time, fighting the good fight?
My gut reaction is yes, but I don't know. He could just as easily be presented as ineffective.
My fellow CA voters, how say you? Would you vote for him again. How do you see him in the light of 2009?
Comment