PDA

View Full Version : Microsoft's Bing Puts Porn in Motion



ZahZoo
06-02-2009, 11:13 AM
Microsoft's New Search Engine Puts Porn in Motion
Tuesday, June 02, 2009
By Joseph Abrams

Your kids may get a bang out of Bing — and that's not a good thing, Internet safety experts warned on Monday.

Bing, Microsoft's new search engine (Bing (http://www.bing.com)), went live in the U.S. this weekend, aiming to challenge and possibly unseat industry titan Google.

But bloggers and Internet safety experts quickly discovered that one of Bing's "features" is that it takes only a few clicks for anyone — of any age — to view explicit pornographic videos without even leaving the search engine.

In its bid to beat Google, Microsoft has unveiled a slate of convenient features for Bing, including an "autoplay" tool that lets users preview videos simply by hovering a mouse over them.

That asset may become a liability, because users can get a taste of porn videos on Bing instead of having to go to a smutty Web site — an innovation other search engines have yet to offer.

Technology blogger Loic Le Meur noticed the issue early Monday after testing video search on Bing.

What he found was a cornucopia of pornography that he said transformed the search engine into its very own pornographic Web site.

"You are now on a porn site without leaving Bing. Amazing," Le Meur wrote on his blog.

Bing, like other major search engines, lets users set filtering preferences at one of three levels — strict, moderate or simply off.

Online safety advocates argue that search engines need to do much more to cut off underage access to pornography — because the filters can be circumvented easily with just one click.

"It's a no-brainer for any kid," said Donna Rice Hughes, president and chairwoman of Enough Is Enough, a group that works to help parents protect children from online porn.

"From the standpoint of the new state-of-the-art search engine, [the video preview] is a really neat thing of course," Hughes said. "The flipside of that is that you've got an abundance of pornography out there."

Content-filtering companies have also been reviewing Bing — and have found the same gaping problems.

With adult-content filters turned off, "Bing.com does at this point allow users to watch pornographic videos without ever leaving the site," said Forrest Collier, CEO of InternetSafety.com.

Parental filtering software such as SafeEyes, which is produced by Collier's company, can block any explicit or unwanted search results, he said.

CyberPatrol, another major safe software manufacturer, confirmed to FOXNews.com that its early tests had successfully blocked all illicit media during searches with Bing.

Hughes, the director of Enough Is Enough, said Microsoft and other search engines "need to make their filtered searches much more prominent and have an option for password protection" that parents could use to prevent kids from switching the controls around.

Microsoft said in a statement that it was up to users to turn off the filters, and provided instructions on how to toggle the settings on its blog.

"By default, Bing filters out explicit image and video results. Consumers must take action to turn off the Safe Search filter in their settings in order for explicit image or video content to appear in Bing's results," the statement read.

Other major search engines like Yahoo and Google come up with similar video and image results when electronic filters are turned off — but don't provide automatic playing of videos within the search-results page.

The abundance of pornography is something child health experts say is simply a fact of life.

"Kids can access pornography on the Internet no matter what the search engine is," Dr. David Walsh, president of the National Institute on Media and the Family, told FOXNews.com.

Walsh said it's particularly important that kids be protected from the worst excesses of pornography during their formative years.

"Because they're at the very age when they are developing their whole attitudes about sex and sexuality," he said, it's bad for them to be visiting porn sites, "where sex is basically a commodity to be bought and sold and where women are treated like objects. The attitudes that they're going to pick up there are not the attitudes we want them to have for life."

Protecting kids from pornography or other potentially harmful materials must ultimately rest with parents, Walsh added.

"I don't know that search engines can be programmed to do the job that parents need to," he said.

Seshmeister
06-02-2009, 11:32 AM
But Google images already shows pics of porn with the filters off so the difference is video?

Also another issue with this is that content providers are starting to get pissed off about these preview things and I think they will start blocking them.

Say you are a newspaper and people can preview all your articles from the search engine, they will never reach your adverts so how do you make the money to pay your writers?

kwame k
06-02-2009, 11:44 AM
Good news! Gotta love Micro$oft.

Seshmeister
06-02-2009, 12:45 PM
Seems to work well...
david lee roth - Bing Video (http://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=david+lee+roth&FORM=BVFD)

Kristy
06-02-2009, 01:37 PM
Walsh said it's particularly important that kids be protected from the worst excesses of pornography during their formative years.

"Because they're at the very age when they are developing their whole attitudes about sex and sexuality," he said, it's bad for them to be visiting porn sites, "where sex is basically a commodity to be bought and sold and where women are treated like objects. The attitudes that they're going to pick up there are not the attitudes we want them to have for life."

Protecting kids from pornography or other potentially harmful materials must ultimately rest with parents, Walsh added.

"I don't know that search engines can be programmed to do the job that parents need to," he said.

Walsh's first statement I can wholeheartedly agree with but he makes a weak argument thereafter. If sex (i.e., pornography) is basically a commodity and women are looked upon as "objects" then children really don't need to look at porn web site to see that happening. And without sounding like I'm siding with these fringe Christian right morons shows such as America's Next Top Model or The Hills or Desperate Housewives do more for the exploitation and objectifying of women than porn could ever hope to achieve. Plus, if Walsh did he homework he'd soon realize that about half of what goes on in the porn industry is owned and run by women. In fact, most women porn stars have their own agents if not lawyers who see to the business side of the industry that has made many women porn star millionaires. I'm not saying exploitation doesn't exist but porn is no longer just for the creepy dude in the trench coat in some sleazy adult book store although it seems Walsh would like to keep it that way.

And to say Micro$oft's "Bing" (Gawd, what a stupid name) is introducing their brats to porn is ridiculous. Does people like Walsh fear that if a "formative years" child sees porn via the ease of a internet search engine they'll be corrupted for life? Is that what he case is really about? Most "formative children" are already viewing porn through iPods/mp3 players on school grounds and most kids are already experimenting with sex or sexual behavior on some level by the time they are 14 years of age and if parents (I assume he is a parent) believe that their kid wouldn't do such a thing at that time of their lives than he is not only ignorant but incredibly stupid; Bing is just a scapegoat for parents who are too chickenshit to actually sit down and talk to their children about sex.

Walsh is just another example of the cloaked Christian right pointing a hollow finger at outside influences. To say that protecting children from pornography ultimately rest with the parents is great platitude because simply filtering what a child sees on the internet is not enough - they'll just find out about it elsewhere out of curiosity and most likely engaging in dangerous sexual behavior out of rebellion. No wonder the girl in my high school who was raised by ultra-Christian parents was pregnant by the time she was 16. Sex seems to be a dirty word with people like Walsh where procreation sees to be it's only intrinsic value.

As for Micro$oft. Yeah, that search engine is lame.

ZahZoo
06-02-2009, 03:53 PM
Good points Kristy.

To me there's no better way to protect your kids by teaching them to be honest and responsible people. Open communication is the key. Also the more you forbid them to do or see something the more you'll motivate them to seek it out.

My kids still do stuff I would prefer they don't... but for the most part they make good choices. Clearly by not being fanatical about things in life... it removes a heck of a lot of the thrill "getting away with something"!!

To quote my oldest shortly after turning 21... "I used to like going out and drinking. It's no fun anymore now that it's legal and I'm not getting away with something I know I shouldn't be doing. It seems dumb and boring now!"

I could only sit back and smile...

kwame k
06-02-2009, 03:58 PM
Yup and why is it the Moral Majority always wants to do everything except tell parents to STFU and be involved in your kids lives. They on the one hand want government out of their lives and on the other hand, want government to ban everything they deem immoral.

hideyoursheep
06-03-2009, 05:05 AM
Whoah!

Bing indeed!

Seshmeister
06-03-2009, 05:14 AM
To quote my oldest shortly after turning 21... "I used to like going out and drinking. It's no fun anymore now that it's legal and I'm not getting away with something I know I shouldn't be doing. It seems dumb and boring now!"


Well he's obviously not doing it properly... :)

ZahZoo
06-03-2009, 09:05 AM
Well he's obviously not doing it properly... :)


True... but since she's consumed with raising my grand daughter at the moment, that's ok. She'll have plenty of time learn the proper refinements down the road...

Nickdfresh
06-03-2009, 10:56 AM
I'd have to ask what's the difference between clicking on a shitty Micro$oft $earch engine and going to a porn site of vids to begin with?

binnie
06-03-2009, 11:12 AM
It's not like pron was hard to find :D

kwame k
06-03-2009, 11:14 AM
The hover over feature that let's you watch the video without going to the website. That's the issue. You can watch the video from the search results and you don't have to go to the website.

LoungeMachine
06-03-2009, 11:16 AM
I'd have to ask what's the difference between clicking on a shitty Micro$oft $earch engine and going to a porn site of vids to begin with?

One makes you feel dirty and cheap.....



the other has naked chicks.

:gulp:

Nickdfresh
06-04-2009, 09:44 AM
The hover over feature that let's you watch the video without going to the website. That's the issue. You can watch the video from the search results and you don't have to go to the website.


The existential question is can one wank and hover at the same time?

http://www.choylayfut.com/photos/SifuB5-05.jpg