PDA

View Full Version : The USA -- Greatest Justice System in the Whole Wide World



Baby's On Fire
07-30-2009, 08:27 PM
July 30, 2009

Fake scent tracking dog sends man to prison for life

Posted: 06:28 PM ET

Share this on:
Mixx
Digg

Facebook

del.icio.us
reddit

StumbleUpon

MySpace
Share | Permalink | 13 Comments | Add a comment

Bill Dillon was sentenced to life in prison in 1981, at the age of 22.
Randi Kaye | Bio
AC360° Correspondent

A Florida man who was convicted of murder in part because of the work of an allegedly infallible scent-tracking dog, is free now, because the dog and the dog’s owner has been exposed as a fraud. Unfortunately for Bill Dillon he had to spend 26 years in prison before the error in his case was rectified.

Bill Dillon, was 22 when he was sentenced to life in prison in 1981, for killing a man in Canova Beach on the eastern coast of the state.

During the trial, Dillon was adamant that he had not committed the crime. But a man named John Preston testified in court that he and his scent-tracking German-Shepherd connected Dillon to the killer’s bloody t-shirt. Preston said his dog, “Harrass 2,” even tracked Dillon’s scent repeatedly in later tests.

Dillon expected to remain in prison for the rest of his life – all because of “Harrass 2,” and his handler, Preston, who billed himself around the country as a so-called scent -tracking expert.

But nearly three decades later, in 2007, DNA testing proved that Dillon’s DNA did not match the DNA on the killer’s shirt. The dog was wrong. Just eight months ago, after 26 years behind bars, Bill Dillon walked out of prison a free man.

“Supposedly the dog got my scent three times,” Dillon told CNN, “and I never saw freedom again.” Dillon also said he remembers the dog’s “huge” head from the trial and that he looked like a “bear.”


In 1981, DNA testing wasn’t used in criminal investigations so authorities relied simply on the presumed legendary nose of Preston’s German Shepherd. Preston testified that his dog had tracked Dillon’s scent to a piece of paper he had touched, and had even tracked Dillon to a room he was in at the courthouse.

Preston and his dog had a track-record – he had convinced juries more than a hundred times of his dog’s miraculous talents. In Dillon’s case, Preston even told the court his dog had the ability to track a scent under water; to actually smell below the water. CNN consulted tracking dog experts in Florida about this. They told us “no way, that’s not possible.”

In 1984, before Preston was exposed as a fraud, he told ABC News that he believed he was never wrong. Tim McGuire, a dog-tracking expert with Florida’s Volusia County Sheriff’s Department, said it was implausible that a dog could have picked up Dillon’s scent back in 1981 eight days after the murder, and just after a massive hurricane had blown through the area.

McGuire viewed videotapes of Preston’s dog, Harrass 2, at work. In the tapes, there are multiple times when the dog urinates on evidence. “The dog should work methodically.” But McGuire said he did not consider what Harrass 2 was doing, “work.”

Preston was exposed by a Florida judge in 1984, who became suspicious of Preston and set up his own test for Harrass 2. The dog failed terribly.

Documents obtained by CNN show he could not even follow a scent for one-hundred feet. The judge determined the dog could only track successfully when his handler had advance knowledge of the case.

Dillon thinks Preston and his scent-tracking dog were part of a larger conspiracy.

“Preston could lead the dog to the suspect or the evidence,” alleges Dillon, but “any cases that were weak, not good enough to go to the jury, they [the prosecution] fed Preston information, paid him good money to come and lie.”

Florida’s Attorney General told CNN it is not aware of any evidence of a conspiracy involving John Preston and his dog.

Preston and his four-legged so-called expert were discredited in 1987. But the state of Florida never reviewed cases on which he’d testified . And nobody ever told Bill Dillon – who sat in prison another 20 years before he ever knew a thing about it. It wasn’t until 2006 that he heard Preston was a fake.

Florida’s Innocence Project believes dozens of inmates around the country may have been wrongly convicted as a result of John Preston and his dog. It is calling for an investigation of those cases. Meanwhile, Preston, the dog’s handler, died last year. He was never charged with perjury or convicted of a crime.

13 Comments
More about: 360° Radar • Crime & Punishment • Randi Kaye

Coyote
07-30-2009, 08:50 PM
Anyone else ever wonder what that gold fringe around the flag means?

Dolemite!
07-30-2009, 09:04 PM
Looks like that dog is about as adept at tracking down real criminals as those in the white house.

"Atta boy, track em down!"

"Yap yap, they're in the Afghan mountains and Pak border, yap yap!"

Baby's On Fire
07-30-2009, 09:18 PM
Point is that fucking aasshole dog owner should be tortured in the worst way possible to the point of death.

He intentionally took the lives away from how many innocent people? That is the same as murder...worse actually.

But the fucked-up justice system let's him get away with it.

And every corrupt prosecutor should die also.

Everyone claims defense lawyers are scum, bit most often it's the other way around.

The Innocence Project run by Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld et al is totally not-for-profit, gratis of these so-called scum defense lawyers.

And lots of innocent people enjoy their new-found freedom to them.

Seshmeister
07-30-2009, 09:49 PM
Reason #3796 against the death penalty.

Baby's On Fire
07-30-2009, 09:57 PM
If someone is caught red-handedly (whatever the fuck that actually means), irrefutably and pre-meditatively killing people, then they should be tortured, killed, dismembered and then the corpse humiliated.

But otherwise I agree...LOTS of admitted executions of the wrong person (usually with no apology or prosecution of the conspirators), and probably many others where there is no admission by the state of wrongful execution.

And a lot of those minorities (I'm sure to Elvis' approval).

FORD
07-30-2009, 11:04 PM
Yeah, it's a problem when your main evidence comes from a dog. It's not like you can put him on the stand and question him?

So.... officer Rin Tin Tin.... are you saying that on the evening in question, you tracked the accused to the location described in Exhibit A?

WOOF!

Was that a yes or no, officer?

WOOF!

I have no further questions,Your Honor.

Baby's On Fire
07-30-2009, 11:07 PM
And f the suspect was black (dare I say "a niggar") then he was FUCKED>

Yo Onna.....the nigga is gilltyyyy. He is gillty just as so as the grits is cookin and the day is looong.

Rover said so, yo onna.