PDA

View Full Version : A cordless future for electricity?



Hardrock69
09-08-2009, 12:27 PM
A cordless future for electricity? - CNN.com (http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/09/02/wireless.electricity/index.html)




(CNN) -- Electronics such as phones and laptops may start shedding their power cords within a year.
Wireless electricity may soon make tangled power cords a thing of the past.

Wireless electricity may soon make tangled power cords a thing of the past.

That's the prediction of Eric Giler, CEO of WiTricity, a company that's able to power light bulbs using wireless electricity that travels several feet from a power socket.

WiTricity's version of wireless electricity -- which converts power into a magnetic field and sends it sailing through the air at a particular frequency -- still needs to be refined a bit, he said, but should be commercially available soon.

Giler, whose company is a spinoff of a Massachusetts Institute of Technology research group, says wireless electricity has the potential to cut the need for power cords and throw-away batteries.

"Five years from now, this will seem completely normal," he said.

"The biggest effect of wireless power is attacking that huge energy wasting that goes on where people buy disposable batteries," he said. Watch Giler demonstrate the idea

It also will make electric cars more attractive to consumers, he said, because they will be able to power up their vehicles simply by driving into a garage that's fitted with a wireless power mat.

Electric cars are "absolutely gorgeous," he added, "but does anyone really want to plug them in?"


Ideas about wireless electricity have been floating around the world of technology for more than a century. Nikola Tesla started toying with the ability to send electricity through the air in the 1890s. Since then, though, making wireless electricity technology safe and cheap enough to put on the market has been an arduous task for researchers.

Engineers have developed several ways to convert electricity into something that's safe to send through the air without a wire. Some of their technologies are available on commercial scales, but they have some limits.

Low-level power

One set of researchers is able to send power over long distances but in very small amounts.

For example, in 2003, a Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, company called Powercast used radio waves to light a low-power LED bulb that was 1.5 miles from its power source, said Harry Ostaffe, spokesman for the company.

Now, Powercast's technology is used in office buildings to power temperature sensors that regulate air conditioning systems and in other low-power applications. The company also has sold wireless artificial Christmas trees strung with LED lights for about $400, Ostaffe said.

But radio waves can't transfer the larger amounts of electricity needed to power laptops or mobile phones, he said.

Power pads

Another type of wireless electricity technology can send large amounts of power over very small distances, often not more than a few centimeters.

Such technology is available today, but only in minimal ways. Think, for instance, about electric toothbrushes that sit on charging cradles but don't actually plug in.

One problem with the high-power, small-distance idea is that each device requires its own charging pad, and consumers hate that, said Menno Treffers, chairman of the steering group at the Wireless Power Consortium. The group formed in late 2008 to promote standardization of the technology.

Treffers said consumers soon should be able to buy one power pad that would charge all of their electronic devices. It might look like a placemat, and cell phones, remote controls and appliances would charge automatically when they're placed on the pad.

"The key reason to do it is convenience, because if you want to get rid of all the different power supplies, there are other ways that are cheaper," he said.

The pads, which would rely on electrical sockets as their initial sources of power, also would be more energy efficient than plugging all of the devices into power sockets directly, he said. The pads would shut off automatically when a device has finished charging and are about 70 percent to 90 percent as efficient as transferring power through a wire, he said.

Wire-free chargers for a single item are relatively cheap: about $10 to build, he said. But it's unclear how much pads that could power a living room worth of equipment would cost, he said.

'Magnetically coupled resonance'

Ultimately, Giler's group from MIT wants to combine the best of both worlds: large amounts of power sent over long distances.

Their technology is called "magnetically coupled resonance," and it basically sends a magnetic field through the air at a specific frequency that an an enabled phone or TV can pick up and turn back into electricity. It works kind of like sound. Think about how an opera singer can break a wine glass if he sings at just the right frequency.

Adding the technology to cell phones, mp3 players and other devices should not increase their cost much, he said.

Despite Giler's optimism, there are some doubts about magnetically coupled resonance.

Treffers said there may be health risks associated with the magnetic fields created in the MIT process. Giler said the technology would produce magnetic fields that are "about the same density as the earth's magnetic field."

He said wireless electricity has many environmental benefits. Companies make about 40 billion disposable batteries each year, he said, and wireless electricity could do away with that.

Nitro Express
09-08-2009, 12:48 PM
The problem with electric cars is the battery cost. You are lucky to get three years out of a laptop computer battery and then you are going to pay $100 replacement cost. That's a low power computer. A power sucking DC electric motor needs many batteries and then in three years the replacement cost will be the equivalent of buying a new engine and transmission. We have used internal combustion engines and gear driven drivetrains for a century because they are cheap compared to any alternative. Some of the first cars were electric.

As far as wireless power transmission goes, that's nothing new either. Tesla came up with that idea.

We will still be burning something in an internal combustion engine until battery technology takes a massive leap forward and battery cost comes way down.

Cost is always the great idea killer. Look at our healthcare system. We have the technology to do great things but it's become unaffordable. We can praise technology but what good is it if nobody can afford it?

BITEYOASS
09-08-2009, 12:58 PM
The major problem with wireless electrical power is that the risk of electrocution is greater.

Seshmeister
09-08-2009, 01:55 PM
I've heard that there is a new generation of batteries in the pipeline available soon which will allow phones to be charged in a couple of seconds and cars in ten minutes.

Seshmeister
09-08-2009, 01:59 PM
Ahh I knew I didn't imagine it... :)

BBC NEWS | Science & Environment | Battery that 'charges in seconds' (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7938001.stm)


Battery that 'charges in seconds'


A new manufacturing method for lithium-ion batteries could lead to smaller, lighter batteries that can be charged in just seconds.

Batteries that discharge just as quickly would be useful for electric and hybrid cars, where a quick jolt of charge is needed for acceleration.

The approach only requires simple changes to the production process of a well-known material.

The new research is reported in the scientific journal Nature.

Because of the electronic punch that they pack, gram for gram, lithium-ion batteries are the most common rechargeable batteries found in consumer electronics, such as laptops.

However, they take a long time to charge; researchers have assumed until now that there was a speed limit on the lithium ions and electrons that pass through the batteries to form an electrochemical circuit.

Gerbrand Ceder, at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), US, and his colleagues used a computer simulation to model the movements of ions and electrons in a variant of the standard lithium material known as lithium iron phosphate.

The simulation indicated that ions were moving at great speed.


"If transport of the lithium ions was so fast, something else had to be the problem," Professor Ceder said.

That problem turned out to be the way ions passed through the material.

They pass through minuscule tunnels, whose entrances are present at the surface of the material.

However, the team discovered that to get into these channels, the ions had to be positioned directly in front of the tunnel entrances - if they were not, they could not get through.

The solution, Ceder discovered, was to engineer the material such that it has a so-called "beltway" that guides the ions towards the tunnel entrances.

A prototype battery made using the new technique could be charged in less than 20 seconds - in comparison to six minutes with an untreated sample of the material.

Most commercial batteries use a material made up of lithium and cobalt, but lithium iron phosphate does not suffer from overheating - something that has affected laptop and mp3 player batteries in a number of incidents.

Even though it is cheap, lithium iron phosphate has until now received little attention because lithium cobalt batteries can store slightly more charge for a given weight.

However, the researchers found that their new material does not lose its capacity to charge over time in the way that standard lithium ion batteries do.

That means that the excess material put into standard batteries to compensate for this loss over time is not necessary, leading to smaller, lighter batteries with phenomenal charging rates.

What is more, because there are relatively few changes to the standard manufacturing process, Professor Ceder believes the new battery material could make it to market within two to three years.

chefcraig
09-08-2009, 02:07 PM
In what can only be described as a case of accidentally thinking ahead, Edward Van Halen's trademark lawyers have already filed several patents in case the notion of a cordless future should come to fruition.



http://img7.imageshack.us/img7/9278/evhdrill.jpg (http://img7.imageshack.us/i/evhdrill.jpg/)

Master Yoda
09-08-2009, 02:19 PM
These numerous magnetic fields we are subjected to... bad for the force and every life within it, it is. Hmmph.

standin
09-08-2009, 02:32 PM
Wow, it would be so nice to have a landscape with no wires impeding the picture.

Down with wires!

Lobbyist working against this will be the copper industry. :smart like that:

Nitro Express
09-08-2009, 06:55 PM
The major problem with wireless electrical power is that the risk of electrocution is greater.

Especially when that wireless electrical power is a bolt of lightning.

Nitro Express
09-08-2009, 06:57 PM
Wow, it would be so nice to have a landscape with no wires impeding the picture.

Down with wires!

Lobbyist working against this will be the copper industry. :smart like that:

Actually high tension wires are aluminum. It would cost a fortune to have copper wires.

BITEYOASS
09-08-2009, 11:09 PM
Especially when that wireless electrical power is a bolt of lightning.

That's what wireless power is in a nutshell, lightning bolts.

I wonder what is next, pipeless water?

People seem to confuse the concept of wireless communication and believe how it would apply to power. Which is a flawed theory in of itself.

Nitro Express
09-09-2009, 12:17 AM
That's what wireless power is in a nutshell, lightning bolts.

I wonder what is next, pipeless water?

People seem to confuse the concept of wireless communication and believe how it would apply to power. Which is a flawed theory in of itself.

Electrons want to ground out. If enough wattage is there, it will jump an air gap to ground. I don't think this is efficient plus having electricity zapping around like a Telsa coil and the noise would be more distracting than those pesky wires on poles.

Pipeless water would require some sort of force field that would allow it to flow in a controlled manner and be shut off and turned on at certain points. The problem is when the wireless power fails there is no containment for the water and a huge flood results. Even more brilliant, let's use this system to contain resevors and replace those ugly dams. LOL!

GAR
09-09-2009, 01:10 AM
As far as wireless power transmission goes, that's nothing new either. Tesla came up with that idea.

Yeah he did, and the reason he ditched it is because air is a better capacitor (storable charge holder) than it is a conductor.

Wireless power as a public works project for free power for everyone is a stupid idea because it wastes more electricity than is utilized due to capacitive losses - kinda like how giving away 1.2 trillion Spendulous Package dollars returns 100-150 billion in taxes.

twonabomber
09-09-2009, 06:45 AM
A power sucking DC electric motor needs many batteries and then in three years the replacement cost will be the equivalent of buying a new engine and transmission.

we have five automatic guided vehicles at work, and we buy new batteries at least once a year. not for all five...yet, but give it five more years and we will.

ZahZoo
09-09-2009, 11:59 AM
Their technology is called "magnetically coupled resonance," and it basically sends a magnetic field through the air at a specific frequency that an an enabled phone or TV can pick up and turn back into electricity. It works kind of like sound. Think about how an opera singer can break a wine glass if he sings at just the right frequency.


On the right track... just the wrong source. Want a magnetic force stronger than anything manmade can make... Look no further than the Earth itself.

Take this idea and find a way to convert that magnetic force generated by the earth into a harnessable power source... then ya gots something...

Igosplut
09-09-2009, 12:14 PM
Actually high tension wires are aluminum. It would cost a fortune to have copper wires.

Not around here. They tried to switch them over in the 80s, but the salt air corroded the wires right off the poles. Now they're back to copper.

Panamark
09-10-2009, 02:26 AM
As everyone has said, Tesla was way ahead of his time and totally
believed in this concept. I seem to recall reading about the military experimenting
with this at some point. On a different but similar tangent have any of you guys
tried out these ethernet adaptors that use your homes electrical cabling ?
They modulate the data over the AC sine wave.. I like them ! they work
very well...