Why not take Hati?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • standin
    Veteran
    • Apr 2009
    • 2274

    Why not take Hati?

    With Haiti's position on the map, it seems a logical acquisition.
    Haiti is in the position to give up all for any sort of stability.
    Haiti could provide a labor source would be close and inexpensive.
    It would start to close up the Gulf of Mexico to USA controlled traffic only.
    And it would lead to a natural expansion of the US of America to eventually become the US of the Americas.

    There are so many advantages to the unification of the Americas.

    Haiti can only serve to further the unification.
    Attached Files
    Last edited by standin; 01-19-2010, 07:15 PM.
    To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
    MICHAEL G. MULLEN
  • PETE'S BROTHER
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Feb 2007
    • 12678

    #2
    senor huge chavez is already throwin' a shit fit about that.
    Another one of those classic genius posts, sure to generate responses. You log on the next day to see what your witty gem has produced to find no one gets it and 2 knotheads want to stick their dicks in it... Well played, sir!!

    Comment

    • PETE'S BROTHER
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Feb 2007
      • 12678

      #3
      Brown and Joseph Guyler Delva Tom Brown And Joseph Guyler Delva – 29 mins ago
      PORT-AU-PRINCE (Reuters) – U.S. Black Hawk helicopters swooped down on Haiti's wrecked presidential palace to deploy troops and supplies on Tuesday as a huge international relief operation to help earthquake survivors gained momentum.

      The airborne troops in combat gear moved to secure Port-au-Prince's nearby General Hospital, where staff have been overwhelmed by patients seriously injured in the 7.0 magnitude that destroyed much of Haiti's capital one week ago.

      Their arrival brought crowds of quake survivors camped out in the park opposite the palace rushing to its iron railings to gawk and beg for handouts of food.

      It was one of the most visible and potentially sensitive deployments so far by the U.S. military, which is spearheading international efforts to assist millions of injured and homeless Haitians.

      At least one Latin American leader, Venezuela's socialist President Hugo Chavez, a fiery critic of what he calls U.S. "imperialism," has already accused Washington of "occupying" Haiti under the pretext of an aid operation.
      Another one of those classic genius posts, sure to generate responses. You log on the next day to see what your witty gem has produced to find no one gets it and 2 knotheads want to stick their dicks in it... Well played, sir!!

      Comment

      • standin
        Veteran
        • Apr 2009
        • 2274

        #4
        Hugo naturally would be concerned. However, the communistic agilities of his nation would be enhanced by an alliance with the development of the Americas.

        I, myself, though I love, USA would relish in living in Columbia with all her natural luxuries.
        Last edited by standin; 01-19-2010, 07:24 PM.
        To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
        MICHAEL G. MULLEN

        Comment

        • kwame k
          TOASTMASTER GENERAL
          • Feb 2008
          • 11302

          #5
          We can't even run our own country right.....why in the fuck would we want to take on another country?
          We've proven we can't occupy a country correctly either, Iraq and Afghanistan.

          When we finally do something right, like giving aid and resources to a country in need, the fucking idiots on the right say it was nothing more than political grandstanding.....and they have the fucking nerve to say stupid shit like we acted too early.

          I've always said....you can't bitch about your neighbor's lawn when your own backyard is a mess....

          Our Imperialistic designs have proven to be nothing but an epic failure.
          Originally posted by vandeleur
          E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place

          Comment

          • standin
            Veteran
            • Apr 2009
            • 2274

            #6
            And I can list at least 150 other citizens of the USA that would enjoy Columbia's natural luxuries.
            If America (north) does not suit familial needs go forth, and if America (southern) does not suit your desires, go forth.
            Last edited by standin; 01-19-2010, 07:37 PM.
            To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
            MICHAEL G. MULLEN

            Comment

            • standin
              Veteran
              • Apr 2009
              • 2274

              #7
              Originally posted by kwame k
              We can't even run our own country right.....why in the fuck would we want to take on another country?
              We've proven we can't occupy a country correctly either, Iraq and Afghanistan.

              When we finally do something right, like giving aid and resources to a country in need, the fucking idiots on the right say it was nothing more than political grandstanding.....and they have the fucking nerve to say stupid shit like we acted too early.

              I've always said....you can't bitch about your neighbor's lawn when your own backyard is a mess....

              Our Imperialistic designs have proven to be nothing but an epic failure.
              Iraq and Afghanistan.
              Are not island nations in need of reasonable trade and development.
              Nor are those countries physically connected to the Americas.
              Last edited by standin; 01-19-2010, 07:35 PM.
              To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
              MICHAEL G. MULLEN

              Comment

              • kwame k
                TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                • Feb 2008
                • 11302

                #8
                Originally posted by standin
                And I can list at least 150 other citizens of the USA that would enjoy Columbia's natural luxuries.
                What you guys can't coke in your neck of the woods?
                Originally posted by vandeleur
                E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place

                Comment

                • kwame k
                  TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 11302

                  #9
                  Originally posted by standin
                  Iraq and Afghanistan.
                  Are not island nations in need of reasonable trade and development.
                  Nor are those countries physically connected to the Americas.
                  You have entirely missed the point...we can't occupy/rebuild those countries at all. How in the fuck could we fix the island nations?
                  Originally posted by vandeleur
                  E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place

                  Comment

                  • Seshmeister
                    ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                    • Oct 2003
                    • 35157

                    #10
                    Is New Orleans even fixed yet?

                    Comment

                    • standin
                      Veteran
                      • Apr 2009
                      • 2274

                      #11
                      Originally posted by kwame k
                      What you guys can't coke in your neck of the woods?

                      Of course not!
                      Coca (tea) has only been legalized in Columbia.
                      A great opportunity for casino development!

                      But a complete deflection~
                      With the structural power that is established and customary within the Colombia society, which has been developed by the structural power of the drug cartels. The custom is a communistic mentality. The drug cartel "take care of their own". Though the cartels "take care of their own" poorly and and no regulation with the exception of a few sophisticated organizations.
                      Columbia is close to Venezuela in social structure.
                      To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
                      MICHAEL G. MULLEN

                      Comment

                      • standin
                        Veteran
                        • Apr 2009
                        • 2274

                        #12
                        Originally posted by kwame k
                        You have entirely missed the point...we can't occupy/rebuild those countries at all. How in the fuck could we fix the island nations?
                        Allowing for a hybrid. A hybred of Americas. A caplitilistic/ comunisic conjunction of the Americas.
                        To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
                        MICHAEL G. MULLEN

                        Comment

                        • standin
                          Veteran
                          • Apr 2009
                          • 2274

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Seshmeister
                          Is New Orleans even fixed yet?
                          Let the sink hole go. Some parts are salvageable, most are not.
                          Let nature have what is hers and relish her beauty.
                          To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
                          MICHAEL G. MULLEN

                          Comment

                          • kwame k
                            TOASTMASTER GENERAL
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 11302

                            #14
                            Originally posted by standin
                            Allowing for a hybrid. A hybred of Americas. A caplitilistic/ comunisic conjunction of the Americas.
                            Ah, OK
                            Originally posted by vandeleur
                            E- Jesus . Playing both sides because he didnt understand the argument in the first place

                            Comment

                            • standin
                              Veteran
                              • Apr 2009
                              • 2274

                              #15
                              The closest spelling I could find~
                              communistic
                              To put it simply, we need to worry a lot less about how to communicate our actions and much more about what our actions communicate.
                              MICHAEL G. MULLEN

                              Comment

                              Working...