About Time....Subpoenas issued to financial firms in expanded probe

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Hardrock69
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Feb 2005
    • 21838

    About Time....Subpoenas issued to financial firms in expanded probe

    And some people say Obama doesn't do anything.....




    ReutersBy Aruna Viswanatha and James Vicini | Reuters – 4 hrs ago

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Justice Department issued civil subpoenas to 11 financial institutions as part of a new effort to investigate misconduct in the packaging and sale of home loans to investors, Attorney General Eric Holder said on Friday.

    Holder declined to provide specifics, including the names of the firms.

    "We are wasting no time in aggressively pursuing any and all leads," Holder said at a news conference announcing details of a new working group to investigate misconduct in the residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) market, "you can expect more to follow."

    President Barack Obama said he directed Holder to create the new unit in his State of the Union speech late Tuesday, saying it was needed to "help turn the page on an era of recklessness."

    On Friday a slew of federal and state officials appeared at the news conference to provide details about the new group.

    Housed within an earlier financial fraud task force that Obama created in 2009, it is expected to be staffed with around 50 attorneys, analysts and agents, officials said.

    Some skeptics have questioned whether the new group is largely a political move because the other fraud task force already exists.

    Also, the Obama administration has received heat from left-leaning activist groups that believe a separate effort to investigate misconduct in processing foreclosures and servicing home loans may not be rigorous enough to extract a meaningful settlement.

    In exchange for providing up to $25 billion in housing relief, much in the form of cutting mortgage debt for distressed borrowers, the top U.S. banks are expected to put behind them government lawsuits about lending and servicing abuses - but not securitization claims.

    The banks involved in the discussions include Bank of America, Wells Fargo & Co, JPMorgan Chase & Co, Citigroup and Ally Financial Inc.

    Those talks have dragged into their second year as some states, including California and New York, criticized the direction of the negotiations and said the proposed settlement would release the banks from too many claims.

    The deal appears to be getting closer, with last-ditch efforts to lure the hold-out states to join.

    California has said it still has reservations about the deal, but California Attorney General Kamala Harris has met in recent weeks with federal officials in Washington to discuss her concerns about the settlement, people familiar with the matter said.

    The attorney general in New York, Eric Schneiderman, was named as a co-chair of the new working group, prompting speculation that the position was partly aimed at persuading him to join the settlement.

    In an interview with Reuters, Schneiderman said: "The releases have become narrow enough so that I'm confident a full investigation can go forward." Asked if he was signing on, he said, "Not yet," because "other issues" are still outstanding.

    MULTIPLE EFFORTS

    At the news conference, U.S. Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Donovan also said that the multistate deal will not prevent the working group from pursuing its own claims about the securitization of home loans.

    "We would not be standing here today if we weren't absolutely confident that the releases that are being contemplated were quite narrow, focused on the conduct that was actually investigated," Donovan said.

    "There will be concrete actions taken in the next few weeks to confirm we're serious," Schneiderman added in the interview.

    Exactly what the new group will tackle is unclear, since the construction and sale of mortgage securities is already the subject of massive government and private lawsuits.

    "The simple fact is that this is an election year, and politics will inevitably play a role in every aspect of what is at its core a superfluous investigation," said Richard Gottlieb, who heads the financial industry group at the law firm Dykema.

    "Others have already done the leg work, the lawsuits have already been filed, and the courts will already be deciding these issues," said Gottlieb.

    The Federal Housing Finance Agency, for example, which oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, sued 17 large banks last September over losses on about $200 billion of subprime bonds and said the underlying mortgages did not meet investors' criteria.

    Speaking at the news conference, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement director Robert Khuzami said his agency has already reviewed 25 million pages of documents on related investigations.

    "To be clear, investigations into RMBS offerings have been ongoing at the SEC," Khuzami said.

    Holder said the Justice Department had discussed the subpoenas with the SEC, and said the new requests do not duplicate earlier efforts from the SEC.

    He also responded to criticism that federal enforcers have brought few marquee cases in the aftermath of the financial crisis. Holder said the department has brought around 2,100 mortgage-related cases.

    "The notion that there has been inactivity over the course of the last three years is belied by a troublesome little thing called facts," Holder said.

    Several top banks, including Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan, RBS Americas and Deutsche Bank, declined to comment when contacted by Reuters about the new working group's efforts.

    (Reporting By Aruna Viswanatha and Jim Vicini in Washington, D.C. and Karen Freifeld in New York; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Matthew Lewis)
  • Dr. Love
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    • Jan 2004
    • 7825

    #2
    about fucking time ... how coincidental that it's during election season, too...
    I've got the cure you're thinkin' of.

    http://i.imgur.com/jBw4fCu.gif

    Comment

    • gbranton
      Veteran
      • Aug 2005
      • 1847

      #3
      "Young musicians are always coming up to me and asking how do you know when you've made it. When you can spell subpoena without thinking about it, that's when you know you've made it." - David Lee Roth
      "Don't want 'em to get you goat, don't show 'em where it's hid." - David Lee Roth

      Comment

      • Nickdfresh
        SUPER MODERATOR

        • Oct 2004
        • 49136

        #4
        Originally posted by Dr. Love
        about fucking time ... how coincidental that it's during election season, too...
        What does Ron Paul think of the subpenas?

        Comment

        • Dr. Love
          ROTH ARMY SUPREME
          • Jan 2004
          • 7825

          #5
          I dunno, I didn't ask him
          I've got the cure you're thinkin' of.

          http://i.imgur.com/jBw4fCu.gif

          Comment

          • gbranton
            Veteran
            • Aug 2005
            • 1847

            #6
            "We are wasting no time in aggressively pursuing any and all leads," Holder said.............................................. ........not in 2009, not in 2010 but in 2012. Better late than never, I suppose, this shit has only been going on since Jimmy Carter.
            "Don't want 'em to get you goat, don't show 'em where it's hid." - David Lee Roth

            Comment

            • Nitro Express
              DIAMOND STATUS
              • Aug 2004
              • 32797

              #7
              Originally posted by Dr. Love
              about fucking time ... how coincidental that it's during election season, too...
              What? Politicians feeling the need to actually do something because it's an election year?
              No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

              Comment

              • LoungeMachine
                DIAMOND STATUS
                • Jul 2004
                • 32555

                #8
                Originally posted by Dr. Love
                about fucking time ... how coincidental that it's during election season, too...
                When is it not?



                spare us.....
                Originally posted by Kristy
                Dude, what in the fuck is wrong with you? I'm full of hate and I do drugs.
                Originally posted by cadaverdog
                I posted under aliases and I jerk off with a sock. Anything else to add?

                Comment

                • Warham
                  DIAMOND STATUS
                  • Mar 2004
                  • 14589

                  #9
                  Eric Holder sucks.

                  Comment

                  • Dr. Love
                    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                    • Jan 2004
                    • 7825

                    #10
                    Originally posted by LoungeMachine
                    When is it not?



                    spare us.....
                    Just answer this, then.

                    Why didn't he do this when this shit was going down when he first went into office? Why didn't he do it during the first year? Why didn't he do it when the people were demanding it (Tea Party, OWS, etc)?

                    Why did he wait until his final year in office, during election season, to do it? What's the sudden reason to do it now instead of any other time that would seem to be more appropriate?
                    I've got the cure you're thinkin' of.

                    http://i.imgur.com/jBw4fCu.gif

                    Comment

                    • FORD
                      ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

                      • Jan 2004
                      • 58754

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Warham
                      Eric Holder sucks.
                      Yeah he does.....

                      I'll believe results from that assclown when I actually see some of these criminals go to prison.

                      I still say that the "scandals" of John Edwards and Elliot Spitzer were designed to keep them out of consideration for Attorney General, because they would have actually done the job and shut this shit downin their first year of office.

                      Not that I excuse their stupidity in either case, but it's just a damn tragedy, that Diaperhead Vitter is still in the Senate, and neither of these guys is able to do what they do best (yeah, besides the ho's)
                      Eat Us And Smile

                      Cenk For America 2024!!

                      Justice Democrats


                      "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

                      Comment

                      • Nickdfresh
                        SUPER MODERATOR

                        • Oct 2004
                        • 49136

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Dr. Love
                        Just answer this, then.

                        Why didn't he do this when this shit was going down when he first went into office? Why didn't he do it during the first year? Why didn't he do it when the people were demanding it (Tea Party, OWS, etc)?

                        Why did he wait until his final year in office, during election season, to do it? What's the sudden reason to do it now instead of any other time that would seem to be more appropriate?
                        It's interesting that you hold Obama to far higher standard than your internetz crush, Paul...

                        Comment

                        • Dr. Love
                          ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 7825

                          #13
                          i expect both of them to keep their word. There is no difference in the standard I hold them to. Obama has repeatedly said one thing and done another.

                          I'd actually expect the rest of you that are supporting him to hold him to a higher standard since you believe/agree with his philosophy and positions. You guys seem to be giving him a pass when I would expect you to be pushing him to justify your continued support. It's almost like he can take you guys for granted and you're willing to let him.

                          Do you have answers to the questions I posed?
                          Last edited by Dr. Love; 01-28-2012, 06:18 PM.
                          I've got the cure you're thinkin' of.

                          http://i.imgur.com/jBw4fCu.gif

                          Comment

                          • Nickdfresh
                            SUPER MODERATOR

                            • Oct 2004
                            • 49136

                            #14
                            No. I didn't ask him...

                            Comment

                            • Dr. Love
                              ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 7825

                              #15
                              I can only take Paul at his word that he would have let the banks fail and he would have prosecuted those responsible (and pushed to end the Federal Reserve). I don't know if he's said anything publicly about the subpoenas that Obama is doing now.

                              Satisfied?
                              I've got the cure you're thinkin' of.

                              http://i.imgur.com/jBw4fCu.gif

                              Comment

                              Working...