PDA

View Full Version : Extreme N. Dakota Abortion Law Bans Some Birthcontrol & Vitro Fertiliation



Nickdfresh
03-22-2013, 06:40 PM
North Dakota becomes first state to pass extreme ‘personhood’ anti-abortion law
By Emily Mullen
Friday, March 22, 2013 17:15 EDT

North Dakota lawmakers passed a “personhood” abortion ban Friday afternoon, bestowing human rights to fertilized eggs with all the rights of U.S. citizens and effectively outlawing abortion and some forms of birth control, according to ThinkProgress.org. (http://thinkprogress.org/health/2013/03/22/1764141/north-dakota-passes-personhood/?mobile=nc)

The measure, which passed the state Senate last month, passed the House with a 57-35 vote and will be in the hands of voters come the November 2014 election. The so-called personhood ban is one of a series of anti-abortion resolutions the Republican-controlled Legislature has passed this year despite critics’ insistence that they are unconstitutional and violate the U.S. Supreme Court’s Roe v. Wade ruling, which legalized all abortions but allowed states to enact restrictions after a fetus is considered viable, which is usually at 22 to 24 weeks.

The new law could have extreme consequences that reach much further than abortion care, such as charging doctors who damage embryos with criminal negligence and potentially preventing them from performing in vitro fertilization. Some doctors throughout the state have already threatened to leave if the ban is signed into law.

It’s so extreme that some North Dakota Republican pro-lifers are against it and are planning to join a pro-choice rally in the state capital on Monday to oppose the far-right abortion restriction. “We have stepped over the line,” Republican state Rep. Kathy Hawken (R-Fargo) said of the recent push to pass personhood. “North Dakota hasn’t even passed a primary seatbelt law, but we have the most invasive attack on women’s health anywhere.”

Efforts to pass similar measures in other states have failed. In Nov. 2011, Mississippi voters turned down the state’s “Constitutional Initiative 26,” their version of the personhood that would have added an amendment to the state constitution seeking to define life “to include every human being from the moment of fertilization, cloning, or the equivalent thereof.”

The same ban has failed in Colorado three times. The North Dakota measure is the first time the personhood ban has been passed by a legislature.

Raw Story LINK (http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/22/north-dakota-becomes-first-state-to-pass-extreme-personhood-anti-abortion-law/)

ELVIS
03-22-2013, 06:44 PM
A viable fetus should have the same rights as any baby or child...

Nickdfresh
03-22-2013, 06:46 PM
A viable fetus should have the same rights as any baby or child...

What's a 'viable' fetus? One that can survive outside the womb?

ELVIS
03-22-2013, 06:50 PM
Yes...

I'd personally go farther than that, but I'm being liberally reasonable...;)

FORD
03-22-2013, 07:09 PM
The question of limiting abortions all aside, I don't see what the FUCK birth control and in vitro fertilization have to do with it.

Birth control is obviously the best way to PREVENT abortions. You cannot abort something that isn't there, right?

And considering in vitro fertilization means that somebody is going to extraordinary measures to GET pregnant, wouldn't that be the polar opposite of abortion??

If these goddamned idiots would stop dragging unrelated issues into it, then maybe there could be a reasonable discussion of when abortion should or should not be permitted.

jhale667
03-22-2013, 07:36 PM
"Personhood" laws are ridiculous. This will get shot down in the courts.