PDA

View Full Version : Maddow’s Ratings Hit New Lows Following Attacks On Alex Jones



ELVIS
05-30-2013, 05:46 PM
Infowars (http://www.infowars.com/maddows-ratings-hit-new-lows-following-attacks-on-alex-jones/)

MSNBC’s ratings are in the toilet. And just when you thought they couldn’t get any worse, Rachel Maddow has hit fresh lows following a string of ill conceived attacks on Infowars and Alex Jones.

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-EZWrcoZ110/0.jpg

“Averaging 539,000 viewers in primetime and 175,000 viewers in the adults 25-54 demographic, MSNBC suffered double-digit drops from last May.” notes The Hollywood Reporter.

The network’s ratings are down around 20% in the last year. The total day average viewership for MSNBC now stands at a paltry 346,000 viewers. In the core demographic of adults aged 25-54, MSNBC only has 115,000 viewers.

Even HLN pulled in more viewers during May.

“The Rachel Maddow Show… delivered its lowest-rated month since it debuted in September 2008″ the report continues, citing Nielsen statistics.

Maddow reached 717,000 total viewers, a new low, and also posted a second lowest mark, reaching only 210,000 adults aged 25-54. The figures represent a pathetic amount for a primetime flagship show.

Maddow was trounced by both Fox News’ Sean Hannity and CNN’s Piers Morgan, whose ratings are not exactly impressive. CNN’s veiwership has been flat-lining since it hit 20 year lows last year. The network is still only reaching an average 225,000 in the core demographic at primetime.

Read the complete rankings, May 2013 versus May 2012, via Nielsen:

Total Day
FNC: 1,246,000 total viewers, up 24 percent (236,000 in 25-54, down 5 percent)
CNN: 465,000 total viewers, up 61 percent (161,000 in 25-54, up 92 percent)
MSNBC: 346,000 total viewers, down 10 percent (115,000 in 25-54, down 7 percent)
HLN: 494,000 total viewers, up 111 percent (175,000 in 25-54, up 90 percent)

Primetime
FNC: 1,973,000 total viewers, up 17 percent (308,000 in 25-54, down 6 percent)
CNN: 660,000 total viewers, up 70 percent (225,000 in 25-54, up 97 percent)
MSNBC: 539,000 total viewers, down 20 percent (175,000 in 25-54, down 19 percent)
HLN: 624,000 total viewers, up 91 percent (209,000 in 25-54, up 97 percent)

Maddow has been desperately floundering for viewers, attempting to piggy back off Alex Jones’ comparatively huge online audience by attacking the inimitable host over a range of topics across different shows.

At the end of April she devoted a large swathe of her show to attacking Infowars over its coverage of the Boston bombings, often erroneously attributing wild claims about the events to Jones.

After a rambling clusterf*ck of mocking sarcasm, Maddow eventually tried to conflate Jones and his viewership with neocons calling for a renewed war on Islam.

Maddow continued to ignorantly lump in every online conspiracy theory with Infowars material when she carried on her jihad against Jones, suggesting Alex believed the tornadoes in Oklahoma were a conspiracy.

In a short segment aimed at demonizing the thriving movement that is luring her viewers away in droves, Maddow saw no problem deceptively editing a portion of Jones’ broadcast to skew his perspective, attempting to make it seem as though he claimed the tornadoes were orchestrated by the government.

In fact, in the segment Jones was merely answering a caller who had asked if the tornadoes were possibly weather modification at work. While he said he doubted it to be the cause of the Oklahoma tornado, Jones simply mentioned that weather weapons and weather modification are no longer a thing of science fiction and have a factual basis in reality.

Infowars is leading a revolution in alternative media. Its audience is exploding, which is why White House front websites like Media Matters, Think Progress, and Raw Story attack Jones on a daily basis for shattering the left/right paradigm, waking people up to government corruption, and generally encouraging people to open their minds.

The truth is that Infowars is simply too popular for Maddow and her ilk to handle.


:elvis:

FORD
05-30-2013, 06:23 PM
As our friend in the red suit says......

Dragonshit.

Dr. Love
05-30-2013, 06:30 PM
Yeah its more likely her ratings are down cause her show has started to suck ... just like the Ed Show and hopefully Lawrence O'donnell's show (that guy is a huge windbag)

BITEYOASS
05-30-2013, 06:37 PM
An article stating that "The Rachel Maddow Show" has record-low ratings due to attacking Alex Jones, is authored by a news company run by Alex Jones?!?!

Got Bias? :lameo:

lesfunk
05-30-2013, 06:49 PM
I think the premise of this thread is flawed

FORD
05-30-2013, 07:29 PM
In his own words.....


Those articles are all fabricated bullshit...

Unfortunately.. alot of people form their decisions based on unreliable sources like this...

:rolleyes:

Well, maybe not a LOT of people, in this case. But you get the idea........

jhale667
05-30-2013, 08:36 PM
An article stating that "The Rachel Maddow Show" has record-low ratings due to attacking Alex Jones, is authored by a news company run by Alex Jones?!?!

Got Bias? :lameo:



He was SO hoping no one would point that out... :rolleyes:

ELVIS
05-30-2013, 09:10 PM
He was SO hoping no one would point that out... :rolleyes:

No, Neandertaco...

I clearly listed the link as INFOWARS...

A fine website with more real news, listeners and viewers than ANY cable TV outlet...

Hardrock69
05-30-2013, 09:36 PM
And yet you still believe the article?

Figures. Just like you believe in Santa Clause and the Tooth Fairy.

jhale667
05-30-2013, 09:42 PM
No, Neandertaco...

I clearly listed the link as INFOWARS...

A fine website with more real news, listeners and viewers than ANY cable TV outlet...


"Fine" website? Highly debatable. And it's still AJ's official mouthpiece, so what the fuck is your point, swamp-thing?

Kristy
05-30-2013, 10:43 PM
She does suck. But seeing this "info" is from Jone$ and Co. it really doesn't mean much.

tbone888
05-31-2013, 05:00 PM
You have to put the ratings of cable news shows in perspective as well. They are regularly beaten by mundane shows/channels...spongebob squarepants for example.

Matt White
05-31-2013, 05:59 PM
Shit....I'll tune in tonight & her her out!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=wzVL8PtpWm0

Unchainme
05-31-2013, 08:16 PM
Alex Jones is a fuckhead.

Maddow is right.

jhale667
05-31-2013, 08:20 PM
Alex Jones is a fuckhead.

Maddow is right.

This.

ELVIS
05-31-2013, 08:20 PM
Maddow is a corporate whore...

Jones is an independent entrepreneuer who's dominating in the ratings...

jhale667
05-31-2013, 08:22 PM
Jones is an independent entrepreneuer who's dominating in the ratings...



So was Limbaugh once. Both fuckheads regardless.

ELVIS
05-31-2013, 08:28 PM
I used to like Limbaugh...

He was really funny and creative during the Clinton years...

I've heard him maybe 10 minutes in the last year...

jhale667
05-31-2013, 08:39 PM
I used to like Limbaugh...

He was really funny and creative during the Clinton years...

I've heard him maybe 10 minutes in the last year...


Agree, used to listen to him daily in the late 80s, hardly ever agreed with him but he was hilarious... then he got twisted and bitter... hey waitaminute....

FORD
05-31-2013, 08:55 PM
I listened to Mush in the early 1990s. Not entirely by choice, but I was driving a delivery van to Aberdeen and back every afternoon, and all it had in it was a shitty AM radio that got a total of two stations. Right wing talk & country.

I chose the lesser of two evils just to stay awake on the road. Mush was full of shit with his anti-Clinton paranoia, but at least it was funny, not hateful.

I blame the oxycontin. I've seen anger and paranoia come from opiate use before, and I'm convinced it's the pills that sent him over the cliff.

Maybe that's what happened to Alex Jones? He didn't used to be as over the top either.

Unchainme
05-31-2013, 09:02 PM
Limbaugh is at least a bit charming on his show.

He's good at what he does.

Similar to Howard Stern in some aspects. Their career paths are ironically very similar, just different directions they went in terms of format. Do I agree with him? No, but I can understand his appeal.

Alex Jones is a talent less hack that relies on dumb ass half baked conspiracy theories to carry his show.

ELVIS
06-01-2013, 09:41 AM
That's bullshit...

How 'bout you actually listen for yourself...

www.infowars.com


:elvis:

knuckleboner
06-01-2013, 01:45 PM
Maddow is a corporate whore...

Jones is an independent entrepreneuer who's dominating in the ratings...

you don't think alex jones plays to an audience?

ELVIS
06-01-2013, 04:12 PM
Sure, an audience that he created on his own...

ELVIS
06-01-2013, 04:14 PM
It’s okay to be a “Conspiracy Theorist,” when Maddow instructs you, it’s okay to be one!




:elvis:

Kristy
06-01-2013, 05:08 PM
Maddow is a corporate whore...

Jones is an independent entrepreneur who's dominating in the ratings...


Sometimes, you do make me laugh.

ELVIS
06-01-2013, 07:48 PM
It’s okay to be a “Conspiracy Theorist,” when Maddow instructs you, it’s okay to be one!




:elvis:



Wrong video...:biggrin:

Unchainme
06-01-2013, 08:22 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZwURLwd8pEA

FALSE FLAG! WEATHER MACHINES! THERMITE! 9/11 WAS AN INSECT JOB!

ELVIS
06-01-2013, 08:39 PM
So what ??

He's a radio guy that spouts off a lot...

He's also honest and he knows history...

Nickdfresh
06-01-2013, 09:20 PM
He's doesn't know history from the asshole of the dead hooker buried under the slab in his basement!

jhale667
06-01-2013, 09:25 PM
He's doesn't know history from the asshole of the dead hooker buried under the slab in his basement!

http://i65.photobucket.com/albums/h217/jhale667/ThankyouInfowhore_zpsaeb03974.jpg (http://s65.photobucket.com/user/jhale667/media/ThankyouInfowhore_zpsaeb03974.jpg.html)