Is America this fucking prudish about nudity and sex...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fraroc
    Commando
    • Jun 2012
    • 1172

    Is America this fucking prudish about nudity and sex...



    Believe it or not, it happened. And the kid ended up committing suicide

    Okay, I understand that this took place in Alabama which is not the most gay-friendly or sex-friendly place in the United States, but COME THE FUCK ON. Are we that scared of nudity and sex that we are willing to make this kid a criminal and a "child molester" because he streaked a football field? First of all, despite that he was naked, he didn't do ANYTHING sexual AT ALL. He didn't fap in front of the crowd or in front of the players, he didn't touch any of the cheerleaders sexually without consent, yet it was considered a "sexual offense" JUST BECAUSE the kid was naked. And the fact that the kid was a male. Believe me, if it was a girl that streaked the field, they would have softened the blow.

    Now, I'm not defending what the kid did per-se. I personally believe that he should have been disciplined for what he did. A week of after-school detention comes to mind. Not what that asshole principal did, by threatening to contact authorities, forcing him to register as a sex offender, and essentially ending this kid's future for one stupid thing.

    I hope this principal feels really shitty now that his threat drove a FIFTEEN YEAR OLD KID, with his whole life ahead of him to kill himself.
    How do you spell pretentious? S-A-M-M-Y H-A-G-A-R
  • jhale667
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Aug 2004
    • 20929

    #2
    Unbelievable. People need to lighten the fuck up.
    Originally posted by conmee
    If anyone even thinks about deleting the Muff Thread they are banned.... no questions asked.

    That is all.

    Icon.
    Originally posted by GO-SPURS-GO
    I've seen prominent hypocrite liberal on this site Jhale667


    Originally posted by Isaac R.
    Then it's really true??:eek:

    The Muff Thread is really just GONE ???

    OMFG...who in their right mind...???
    Originally posted by eddie78
    I was wrong about you, brother. You're good.

    Comment

    • Satan
      ROTH ARMY ELITE
      • Jan 2004
      • 6664

      #3
      I'll just repeat what our friend FORD posted on YouTube.....



      This fucking principal needs to lose his job immediately. Unfortunately, I doubt he can be charged with anything in a criminal court, but I would say the dead kid's family has serious grounds for a civil lawsuit.

      Teenagers sometimes do dumb things, and what the kid did was surely dumb. But it didn't make him a goddamn sex offender, and it certainly wasn't anything he should have died for.
      Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

      Originally posted by Sockfucker
      I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

      Comment

      • fraroc
        Commando
        • Jun 2012
        • 1172

        #4
        I don't know if this has any merit to it, but supposedly the kid that was streaking was gay and was targeted by bullies before this incident happened.
        How do you spell pretentious? S-A-M-M-Y H-A-G-A-R

        Comment

        • Satan
          ROTH ARMY ELITE
          • Jan 2004
          • 6664

          #5
          Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

          Originally posted by Sockfucker
          I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

          Comment

          • fraroc
            Commando
            • Jun 2012
            • 1172

            #6
            The fucking problem with the puritanism in America is the fucking laws that come out of it. If someone dosen't like something, they want to make it illegal. "I personally don't like gay men grinding against each other wearing speedos, MAKE PRIDE PARADES ILLEGAL!!" and "I don't like it when women sunbathe naked, MAKE NUDE BEACHES ILLEGAL!!"
            How do you spell pretentious? S-A-M-M-Y H-A-G-A-R

            Comment

            • Seshmeister
              ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

              • Oct 2003
              • 35192

              #7
              Originally posted by fraroc
              The fucking problem with the puritanism in America is the fucking laws that come out of it.
              Well it is the country where over half a million people complained about a woman's breast appearing on TV for less than a second...

              Comment

              • ZahZoo
                ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                • Jan 2004
                • 8970

                #8
                You missed a few key points in all this kid... but that's ok. You gotta learn somehow.

                Simple concept... running around naked at a public school event is stupid to begin with... illegal, duh... and has nothing to do with morals, puritanism or any other bullshit concepts.

                Nudity has it's time and place... But pay attention dumbass... a high school football game is NOT the time or place!!! No one is scared of nudity or sex... football games are just not the place to engage in such activity. It's a violent contact sport... you want your junk covered and protected while on the field.

                At 15 that little idiot knew the consequences of running naked at a football game could get his ass arrested. Adding that he was previously bullied and gay... makes his moronic choice even more stupid. He knew damn well he'd be getting a ton of negative attention for doing this. Then the poor baby couldn't handle the repercussions and offs himself...

                Sorry no sympathy for him... some for his parents and family for having so suffer the loss of the selfish, troubled little bastard.

                There should be no outrage against society or morality in America over this... some spoiled brat teenager brought all that hell upon himself.
                "If you want to be a monk... you gotta cook a lot of rice...”

                Comment

                • Satan
                  ROTH ARMY ELITE
                  • Jan 2004
                  • 6664

                  #9
                  Well, this being in Alabama, you have to wonder if the principal would have been so quick to brand the kid a "sex offender" if he had been a drunken heterosexual jock, and not a gay kid.
                  Eternally Under the Authority of Satan

                  Originally posted by Sockfucker
                  I've been in several mental institutions but not in Bakersfield.

                  Comment

                  • fraroc
                    Commando
                    • Jun 2012
                    • 1172

                    #10
                    Originally posted by ZahZoo
                    You missed a few key points in all this kid... but that's ok. You gotta learn somehow.

                    Simple concept... running around naked at a public school event is stupid to begin with... illegal, duh... and has nothing to do with morals, puritanism or any other bullshit concepts.

                    Nudity has it's time and place... But pay attention dumbass... a high school football game is NOT the time or place!!! No one is scared of nudity or sex... football games are just not the place to engage in such activity. It's a violent contact sport... you want your junk covered and protected while on the field.

                    At 15 that little idiot knew the consequences of running naked at a football game could get his ass arrested. Adding that he was previously bullied and gay... makes his moronic choice even more stupid. He knew damn well he'd be getting a ton of negative attention for doing this. Then the poor baby couldn't handle the repercussions and offs himself...

                    Sorry no sympathy for him... some for his parents and family for having so suffer the loss of the selfish, troubled little bastard.

                    There should be no outrage against society or morality in America over this... some spoiled brat teenager brought all that hell upon himself.
                    Kristy.
                    How do you spell pretentious? S-A-M-M-Y H-A-G-A-R

                    Comment

                    • sonrisa salvaje
                      Veteran
                      • Jun 2005
                      • 2098

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Satan
                      Well, this being in Alabama, you have to wonder if the principal would have been so quick to brand the kid a "sex offender" if he had been a drunken heterosexual jock, and not a gay kid.
                      I can speak to this because i was born and raised here. I think the answer is no. I think the punishment would have been the same considering there were likely a lot of young children there (not that there wouldn't be at an NFL or MLB venue in another state). Maybe it has more to do with it happening in the heart of the bible belt.
                      RIDE TO LIVE, LIVE TO RIDE
                      LET `EM ROLL ONE MORE TIME

                      Comment

                      • ZahZoo
                        ROTH ARMY WEBMASTER

                        • Jan 2004
                        • 8970

                        #12
                        You bunch of fucking idiots... streaking will get you arrested in all 50 states. The same in most other countries.

                        In most cases the initial charge will be indecent exposure... there may be variations on the name of the charge or the severity based on state or local laws. But it's all the same either way.

                        How is it wrong to classify it as a "sexual offense"..?

                        If a male exposes his genitalia (junk for you morons) to a minor... that falls smack dab into the "sexual offense" realm. Doesn't matter if the idiot is from Alabama or New York city... doesn't matter if you're a flaming homo or Von Halen... 15 or 85... You run around with your tallywhacker floppin in the breeze in public... you get popped and labeled a sexual deviant.
                        "If you want to be a monk... you gotta cook a lot of rice...”

                        Comment

                        • Angel
                          ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                          • Jan 2004
                          • 7481

                          #13
                          Originally posted by ZahZoo
                          You bunch of fucking idiots... streaking will get you arrested in all 50 states. The same in most other countries.

                          In most cases the initial charge will be indecent exposure... there may be variations on the name of the charge or the severity based on state or local laws. But it's all the same either way.

                          How is it wrong to classify it as a "sexual offense"..?

                          If a male exposes his genitalia (junk for you morons) to a minor... that falls smack dab into the "sexual offense" realm. Doesn't matter if the idiot is from Alabama or New York city... doesn't matter if you're a flaming homo or Von Halen... 15 or 85... You run around with your tallywhacker floppin in the breeze in public... you get popped and labeled a sexual deviant.
                          Thank God I live in Canada...where streaking isn't considered indecent exposure and women can bare their breasts in public...
                          "Ya know what they say about angels... An angel is a supernatural being or spirit, usually humanoid in form, found in various religions and mythologies. Plus Roth fan boards..."- ZahZoo April 2013

                          Comment

                          • ELVIS
                            Banned
                            • Dec 2003
                            • 44120

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Angel
                            Thank God I live in Canada...where streaking isn't considered indecent exposure and women can bare their breasts in public...
                            Canadian Criminal Code Section 174 prohibits nudity if it offends "against public decency or order" and in view of the public...

                            Comment

                            • Angel
                              ROTH ARMY SUPREME
                              • Jan 2004
                              • 7481

                              #15
                              Originally posted by ELVIS
                              Canadian Criminal Code Section 174 prohibits nudity if it offends "against public decency or order" and in view of the public...
                              Yes, and streaking and women's breasts do not fall under that category, as determined by the Supreme Court of Canada.
                              "Ya know what they say about angels... An angel is a supernatural being or spirit, usually humanoid in form, found in various religions and mythologies. Plus Roth fan boards..."- ZahZoo April 2013

                              Comment

                              Working...