PDA

View Full Version : Top U.S. Diplomat: Russia Has Betrayed the “New World Order”



ELVIS
04-25-2014, 05:24 PM
Paul Joseph Watson (http://www.infowars.com/top-u-s-diplomat-russia-has-betrayed-the-new-world-order/)


Moscow’s refusal to acquiesce to NATO over Ukraine signals new cold war


Top diplomat Christopher R. Hill says that Russia’s response to the Ukraine crisis means that Moscow has betrayed the “new world order” it has been a part of for the last 25 years.

In a piece for the influential Project Syndicate publication, Hill, a former US ambassador to Iraq and Korea, writes that Russia’s annexation of Crimea and “intimidation” campaign against Kiev has brought an end to a 25-year historical period, accusing Moscow of engaging in “regression, recidivism, and revanchism”.

Hill’s definition of the “new world order” is Russia’s post-Glasnost involvement in “Western institutions, a market economy, and a multi-party parliamentary democracy.”

“This new world order held for almost 25 years. Except for Russia’s brief war with Georgia in August 2008 (a conflict generally seen as instigated by reckless Georgian leadership), Russia’s acquiescence and commitment to the “new world order,” however problematic, was one of the great accomplishments of the post-Cold War era,” writes Hill.

Hill, who is an advisor with the Albright Stonebridge Group, a “global strategy company” with tentacles deep within the White House and the State Department, goes on to accuse Moscow of reviving the days of the Soviet empire, adding that, “Russia….no longer seems interested in what the West has been offering for the last 25 years: special status with NATO, a privileged relationship with the European Union, and partnership in international diplomatic endeavors.”

Arguing that western sanctions are unlikely to have any impact, Hill asserts that NATO should prepare itself for the long haul, warning that Russia “will seek to make similar trouble among former Soviet “allies,” invoking the German invasion of Poland in 1939 to suggest that Moscow may launch aggression against other eastern European nations.

Hill’s assertion that Russia has turned its back on the “new world order” illustrates how Moscow is seeking to lead an alternate BRICS-aligned faction that will pose a major threat to the unipolar future envisaged by the United States and NATO.

In other words, whether Russia wants one or not, the western elite is digging in for a new Cold War and the world may be entering the most dangerous period of history since the Cuban missile crisis.


:elvis:

Satan
04-25-2014, 06:07 PM
Poppy Bush announces the "New World Order". Notice the date of his speech.... 10 years exactly before his criminal empire pulled off their biggest crime.......



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=byxeOG_pZ1o

fraroc
04-25-2014, 06:21 PM
The only "new world order" is the fact that the US won't stop sticking their nose in other country's business.

Nitro Express
04-26-2014, 03:05 AM
The only "new world order" is the fact that the US won't stop sticking their nose in other country's business.

Do you know why? Because the US has become an oligarchy.



General Westley Clark explains the window of opportunity (No country can stop us).

The goal was to control the middle east oil and force the world to buy it in dollars. Basically the US petrodollar and US military were used in an attempt to take the world over economically. It's kind of Nazi type shit but more stealthy.

Actually Russia and the US have the same enemy. The western oligarchs. They fleeced Russia until Putin gave them the boot and they are fleecing us right now. There's no reason Russia and the US can't get along. The Ukraine situation is the result of Israel, the US, and the EU meddling in there. We blew $5 billion playing games in the Ukraine when we could have spent that money here.

We just need to go back to being a democratic republic again and control our own money through the US Treasury Department instead of being ripped off by debt instruments issued by a private oligarch owned bank.

We need to go to war with the oligarchs and not Russia or China or anyone else in asia.

ELVIS
04-26-2014, 06:17 AM
How sickeningly primitive our so called leaders are...

Seshmeister
04-26-2014, 06:36 AM
It depends what kind of New World Order you get.

Star Trek is set in a New World Order and it seems nice enough. Is a New World Disorder necessarily a good thing?

ELVIS
04-26-2014, 06:44 AM
Star Trek is set in a New World Order and it seems nice enough.

Define nice enough...

Piss would be nice enough after crawling out of a bucket of shit...

Seshmeister
04-26-2014, 07:06 AM
I have heard that the nightlife in Louisiana outside New Orleans is somewhat limited... :)

ELVIS
04-26-2014, 07:09 AM
Limited how ??

Not enough European gay orgies ??

vandeleur
04-26-2014, 08:13 AM
He's Scottish mate , their idea of gay is a bloke in long trousers :D

ELVIS
04-26-2014, 09:21 AM
What if you're wearing both...

http://www.polyvore.com/cgi/img-thing?.out=jpg&size=l&tid=55279257

Nickdfresh
04-26-2014, 01:53 PM
Limited how ??

Not enough European gay orgies ??

Hello sig! ;)

ELVIS
04-26-2014, 01:57 PM
Hello Dickforbrains !!


:biggrin:

Nickdfresh
04-26-2014, 02:25 PM
Hello Dickforbrains !!


:biggrin:

Sup, DickONbrain? ;)