Kristy
06-27-2016, 04:00 PM
http://stateofthenation2012.com/?p=12355
Did Ringo Starr Admit Paul McCartney Died In 1966, Replaced With Look-Alike?
Facebook.com Removes Original Reference To Paul’s Death On Google Which Appeared On Ringo Starr’s Personal Facebook Page
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/macca_66_67_comp.jpg
The Millennium Report
TMR Editor’s Note
Years prior to the The Millennium Report website going online one of our writers conducted exhaustive research into the “Paul McCartney is Dead” conspiracy. It is, in fact, a real conspiracy because of the number of willing participants who, by necessity, had to participate in it in order for it to be successful for almost fifty years.
However, only one element has been missing over the past 49 years. And that is a member of The BEATLES stepping forward to tell the unvarnished truth. It now appears that this little secret has been finally told by Ringo Starr. Certainly, with the death of his band mates, except ‘Paul’ of course, the burden of this secret became greater for him to carry alone as the years wore on.
The newsprint piece shown above well captures the respective roles of the four BEATLES. What it fails to point out is that Ringo Starr was not only the drummer, he was also the heartbeat of the band as all drummers are. It now appears that the true story about Paul is Ringo’s to tell or else the heartbeat would become increasingly labored by the sheer weight of the harder-to-hide truth (The internet has a way of doing that, yes?). There is no one else who has the authority, by virtue of his firsthand experience with the whole wild and crazy affair, like Ringo Starr.
The “exhaustive research” conducted over several years did produce an extraordinary amount of evidence pointing to the great likelihood that the original Paul McCartney did leave The BEATLES circa 1966. There is now a massive body of forensic proof, anecdotal testimony, scientific photograph assessment, comparative voice analysis, circumstantial evidence, etc. on the internet which supports Ringo Starr’s ‘alleged’ revelations.
The following article appears to be correct in stating all the primary facts with the exception of the very last paragraph as follows:
“The British MI5 also announced an investigation to determine if an imposter could have indeed posed for 48 years as the Member of the Order of the British Empire, Sir James Paul McCartney, during official ceremonies involving Queen Elizabeth II.”
Surely, it was MI5 which coordinated the entire coverup, since they were best positioned to ensure that the conspiracy of silence would stick for so many years.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/flaming-pie_07.jpg
As for why The BEATLES agreed to go along with the coverup scheme since 1966 — the answer, especially if you were living during the 1960s and had sisters who could sing every single BEATLES song with perfection, is quite obvious. Paul McCartney’s death would have triggered an unprecedented shock to his millions of young and often delirious female fans around the entire world.
For a much better explanation of just how traumatic such a shocking revelation would have been in 1966, the following true story is presented for the reader’s edification.
“During The BEATLES performance at Shea Stadium, which kicked off their 1965 US Tour, the massive contingent of New York City policemen who were assigned to crowd control reported “rivers of urine” which flowed from the girls and young women in attendance, they were in such genuinely altered states. They were so excited and beside themselves that they were literally ‘unconscious’ to controlling their bodily functions.”
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Beatles-female-fans-go-ecstatic.jpg
Clearly, MI5, MI6, together with the British Monarchy and Parliament had to make a very swift command decision to hide the death of Paul McCartney. The following quote from Guitar World’s article titled “Did Paul McCartney Actually Die in 1966?” reveals more of the inside story.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Screen-Shot-2015-03-01-at-5.01.10-PM.png
The Replacement Of Paul McCartney — Why? And by Whom?
The article below, as it turns out, was published by a tabloid-styled, faux-journalism website by the name of World News Daily Report. However, it contains a general narrative regarding the Paul McCartney story which could actually be true … right down to the exact dates and details.
That the real Paul McCartney left the ‘world scene’ on November 9th of 1966 is an absolute certainty for those initiated into this particular line of inquiry and investigation. Their only questions relate to why MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5) arranged for his removal. And, exactly who did they replace him with?
Their underlying theory goes like this: Paul McCartney’s 1966 death was the result of an MI5* Black Operation overseen by the Tavistock Institute. The BEATLES, it was understood, had way too much POWER AND INFLUENCE for the British Intelligence Services not to take advantage of it. How to practically harness such power and influence, however, remained a very difficult task, especially given the indomitable John Lennon and deeply spiritual George Harrison.
Did Ringo Starr Admit Paul McCartney Died In 1966, Replaced With Look-Alike?
Facebook.com Removes Original Reference To Paul’s Death On Google Which Appeared On Ringo Starr’s Personal Facebook Page
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/macca_66_67_comp.jpg
The Millennium Report
TMR Editor’s Note
Years prior to the The Millennium Report website going online one of our writers conducted exhaustive research into the “Paul McCartney is Dead” conspiracy. It is, in fact, a real conspiracy because of the number of willing participants who, by necessity, had to participate in it in order for it to be successful for almost fifty years.
However, only one element has been missing over the past 49 years. And that is a member of The BEATLES stepping forward to tell the unvarnished truth. It now appears that this little secret has been finally told by Ringo Starr. Certainly, with the death of his band mates, except ‘Paul’ of course, the burden of this secret became greater for him to carry alone as the years wore on.
The newsprint piece shown above well captures the respective roles of the four BEATLES. What it fails to point out is that Ringo Starr was not only the drummer, he was also the heartbeat of the band as all drummers are. It now appears that the true story about Paul is Ringo’s to tell or else the heartbeat would become increasingly labored by the sheer weight of the harder-to-hide truth (The internet has a way of doing that, yes?). There is no one else who has the authority, by virtue of his firsthand experience with the whole wild and crazy affair, like Ringo Starr.
The “exhaustive research” conducted over several years did produce an extraordinary amount of evidence pointing to the great likelihood that the original Paul McCartney did leave The BEATLES circa 1966. There is now a massive body of forensic proof, anecdotal testimony, scientific photograph assessment, comparative voice analysis, circumstantial evidence, etc. on the internet which supports Ringo Starr’s ‘alleged’ revelations.
The following article appears to be correct in stating all the primary facts with the exception of the very last paragraph as follows:
“The British MI5 also announced an investigation to determine if an imposter could have indeed posed for 48 years as the Member of the Order of the British Empire, Sir James Paul McCartney, during official ceremonies involving Queen Elizabeth II.”
Surely, it was MI5 which coordinated the entire coverup, since they were best positioned to ensure that the conspiracy of silence would stick for so many years.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/flaming-pie_07.jpg
As for why The BEATLES agreed to go along with the coverup scheme since 1966 — the answer, especially if you were living during the 1960s and had sisters who could sing every single BEATLES song with perfection, is quite obvious. Paul McCartney’s death would have triggered an unprecedented shock to his millions of young and often delirious female fans around the entire world.
For a much better explanation of just how traumatic such a shocking revelation would have been in 1966, the following true story is presented for the reader’s edification.
“During The BEATLES performance at Shea Stadium, which kicked off their 1965 US Tour, the massive contingent of New York City policemen who were assigned to crowd control reported “rivers of urine” which flowed from the girls and young women in attendance, they were in such genuinely altered states. They were so excited and beside themselves that they were literally ‘unconscious’ to controlling their bodily functions.”
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Beatles-female-fans-go-ecstatic.jpg
Clearly, MI5, MI6, together with the British Monarchy and Parliament had to make a very swift command decision to hide the death of Paul McCartney. The following quote from Guitar World’s article titled “Did Paul McCartney Actually Die in 1966?” reveals more of the inside story.
http://stateofthenation2012.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Screen-Shot-2015-03-01-at-5.01.10-PM.png
The Replacement Of Paul McCartney — Why? And by Whom?
The article below, as it turns out, was published by a tabloid-styled, faux-journalism website by the name of World News Daily Report. However, it contains a general narrative regarding the Paul McCartney story which could actually be true … right down to the exact dates and details.
That the real Paul McCartney left the ‘world scene’ on November 9th of 1966 is an absolute certainty for those initiated into this particular line of inquiry and investigation. Their only questions relate to why MI5 (Military Intelligence, Section 5) arranged for his removal. And, exactly who did they replace him with?
Their underlying theory goes like this: Paul McCartney’s 1966 death was the result of an MI5* Black Operation overseen by the Tavistock Institute. The BEATLES, it was understood, had way too much POWER AND INFLUENCE for the British Intelligence Services not to take advantage of it. How to practically harness such power and influence, however, remained a very difficult task, especially given the indomitable John Lennon and deeply spiritual George Harrison.