Hillbot Senator Claire McAsshole BEGS Bernie Supporters To Support Her

[FORD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtqmvEI_yrs

[FORD]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=leYvLJB0uts

[Kristy]

More Jew media from slave FORD everybody. What are odds?

[Kristy]

slave FORD as a Bernie brat parent

https://youtu.be/On06GkDznOg

[FORD]

Nice try.... Hillcunt (and her daughter Chelsea the Entitled One) were both pushing bigly against legal weed, because they love the donations from the Big Pharma criminals.

[Kristy]

Way to MISS THE FUCKING POINT slave FORD


https://youtu.be/3Uo7NlXk03Q

[FORD]

There was no point. They went to the "Nader" bullshit. Nader had nothing to do with Gore losing the 2000 election, because he didn't lose it. He won the popular vote, and - when all the Florida votes were actually COUNTED - he was the rightful winner of the electoral vote as well.

The number of votes Nader got in Florida was less than the number of Jews who voted for Pat Buchanan in Palm Beach, "accidentally" due to a misleading ballot design. Let alone the number of voters purged from the voter rolls by Jeb Bush & Cruella Harris, using a fraudulent database very similar to the one used by Kristopher K. Kobach of the Kansas Koch Klan in several of the Koch/ALEC controlled states, including the three rust belt states which Cheetoo supposedly "won" by narrow margins, tipping the electoral vote in his favor.

Ralph wasn't to blame in 2000. Bernie wasn't to blame in 2016.

Hillary was partially to blame for her own loss (even though it was stolen by Kobach & the Kochs) because:


1) She did NOTHING to protect the integrity of the voting process as a Senator, despite the obvious fraud in Florida 2000, Georgia 2002, and Ohio 2004.

2) She stole the 2016 Democratic Primary and alienated half of the Democratic voters in the process. She thought she could do it without us. Tough shit.

[Terry]

Nader said something along the lines of him being one of 1,000 banana peels Gore slipped on.

The whole "Nader cost Gore the election" theory also presupposes that Nader supporters would have overwhelmingly voted for Gore had Nader not ran, rather than abstained from voting at all. I tend to doubt it, since what Nader advocated for during the campaign was so far removed from Gore's centrist stance (much of which wasn't all that distinguishable from W's in the campaign).

While a case can certainly be made that Gore did actually win Florida and the 2000 election, there is no doubt that Hillary failed to deliver in 2016. Her campaign failed to see the warning signs until it was too late, she was a far more flawed candidate than Gore ever was, and she ran basically on a theme of it being her time/turn and that she wasn't Donald Trump. Her campaign paid little heed to the momentum behind Sanders and the momentum behind Trump in terms of what that said about the mood of the voting electorate last year.

Even with the mood of the voters in mind, even with the redistricting and gerrymandering that had taken place over the last 2 decades, for Hillary to lose to Trump - to not be able to hold the Obama voters - even though she lost by a relative sliver in the states where it ended up counting, well, what does that say about Hillary and what people thought about her that they were ready to throw their lot in with someone like Donald Trump? What did it say about Hillary in 2008 when people wanted to throw their lot behind a guy as unknown and untested as Obama? Or the amount of primary support Sanders got last year?

At some point, you have to concede Hillary's losses speak more to Hillary's shortcomings than external factors.