PDA

View Full Version : JACKO: Innocent or guilty?



Mr Badguy
01-18-2004, 04:17 PM
YOU are the jury!

Mr Badguy
01-18-2004, 04:20 PM
Get up on that van and DANCE!

singerman
01-18-2004, 09:44 PM
burn the creep

Little Texan
01-19-2004, 01:30 AM
Does this answer your question?

Cathedral
01-19-2004, 02:46 AM
I have no idea and don't care, lol.

I'll say slightly less guilty until i see some evidence gettin tossed aboot.

Gmoney
01-19-2004, 08:19 AM
Hang 'em high!!!

Mr Badguy
01-19-2004, 08:50 AM
He`s Bad!

Mr Badguy
01-19-2004, 08:51 AM
You know it!

High Life Man
01-19-2004, 01:04 PM
Come on!

Gmoney
01-19-2004, 07:31 PM
Originally posted by Little Texan
Does this answer your question?

Damn, he looks a lot like Liza Minelli...

Little Texan
01-19-2004, 08:06 PM
I think that was a few faces ago, but he does have a Judy Garland-Liza Minelli-Liz Taylor thing going on there.

Mr Badguy
01-20-2004, 05:04 AM
He`s your favourite plastic-faced, alleged child molesting pop star.

Try as you might, there`s just no denying it.

Sarge
01-20-2004, 08:29 AM
If he isn't guilty.. then he is sure one weird guy.

I am iinda surprized he is now Muslim..
I thought the Catholic Church would have picked him to be a priest..

Cathedral
01-20-2004, 09:01 AM
Any parent who allowed their kid to stay at his place since 1994 should be charged with child endangerment.

By the way, all child molesters are a bit off in the brain pan.

Guilty or Innocent, sleeping with children is not right, period...

Seshmeister
01-20-2004, 09:25 AM
From what age?

Mr Badguy
01-20-2004, 12:31 PM
PYT or Pretty young thing from Thriller.

Makes you wonder about his inspiration for that song.

Little Texan
01-20-2004, 03:23 PM
Originally posted by Mr Badguy
PYT or Pretty young thing from Thriller.

Makes you wonder about his inspiration for that song.

Webster?

Steve Savicki
01-21-2004, 09:27 AM
I voted "Slightly less guilty!" because we don't know if he really molested the kid or not.
He IS guilty of having the kid sleep in his bed which I understand Jacko admits to doing. That is wrong.
Still, it's the kid's parent's responsibility to be concerned for their child... "Why isn't he back home now?"
Jackson may not have actually had sex with the kid; that's up for the jury to decide.
Until then, I only accuse him of just allowing the kid to share his bed.

Like Vili Fualaau,

http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/local/71277_vili21.shtml

this could just be a family's attempt to steal Jackson's fortune.

Figs
11-15-2004, 02:59 PM
Why am I calling you by your first names? I don't even know you. I still call my boss "Mister", and I've been working for him for seven years, but all of a sudden I walk in here and I'm calling you Rick and Sheila like we're in some kind of AA meeting. . .I don't want to be your buddy, Rick. I just want some breakfast.

bueno bob
11-15-2004, 04:06 PM
If he's innocent, I don't jack off. :D

WACF
11-15-2004, 04:19 PM
Don't know if he is guilty or not.

I do know he must truly hate himself...all that surgery and he can't decide when to stop.

He is no doubt different than anyone else.
I hope he did not do it...

Switch84
11-15-2004, 06:10 PM
:( I don't know! And noone else here knows, either. So quick to judge, and you don't know SHIT!

The next time any of you are facing a conviction, think about how lucky you are not to be judged by retards on a message board that hasn't seen one iota of evidence and aren't members of your jury.

The only thing I know FOR SURE is that he doesn't make things easier on himself by making it easy to file these kind of charges against him.

Mr Badguy
11-16-2004, 02:01 PM
Originally posted by Switch84
:( I don't know! And noone else here knows, either. So quick to judge, and you don't know SHIT!

The next time any of you are facing a conviction, think about how lucky you are not to be judged by retards on a message board that hasn't seen one iota of evidence and aren't members of your jury.

The only thing I know FOR SURE is that he doesn't make things easier on himself by making it easy to file these kind of charges against him.

So do we take that as "Not guilty"?

Sorry to offend you, dude, but everyone has opinions on this kind of stuff, whether it be Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, Gary Glitter or whoever.

It`s called gossip.

Besides, one of us "retards" could be called up to be on the jury.

It`s not outside the realms of possibility.

secrets
11-16-2004, 02:06 PM
Of course he's guilty as sin. Only reason he's never been properly convicted is because of his money.

Panamark
11-19-2004, 01:57 AM
Guilty.

And I think it will come out in the wash, or some palms will
be heavily greased, yet again..

I remember seeing an interview with La Toya, not long
after the first kid he paid silence money too..
She basically said that she had warned him so many times
to stop his relationships with kids.

Now thats coming from the family !!

They all know.

The LAPD have on file, descriptions of MJ's cock
from underage boys. He had to get his cock photographed.
HELLO !!!! Any warning bells ringing yet ??????

However,

I really believe he thinks he is doing nothing wrong, and
that the children love him, no matter what he does with them.

And if its love, hey it cant be wrong ??

The dude needs help.

Switch84
11-19-2004, 07:32 PM
Originally posted by Mr Badguy
So do we take that as "Not guilty"?

Sorry to offend you, dude, but everyone has opinions on this kind of stuff, whether it be Michael Jackson, OJ Simpson, Gary Glitter or whoever.

It`s called gossip.

Besides, one of us "retards" could be called up to be on the jury.

It`s not outside the realms of possibility.

:rolleyes: This isn't 'gossip', Girlfriend. This is a real case with a real person facing some real time. The proper term is 'speculation', ya dig?

My answer is I DON'T KNOW, because I don't. I haven't seen the evidence in question, talked to any witnesses, or Mr. Jackson.

I'm sure his lawyers are skilled enough to eliminate potential 'jurors' with preconceived prejudices.