Birth control could help combat climate change - Page 3

**Big Train** · 09-22-2009, 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nickdfresh

Which conferences have you two opinionated bozos attended?

About as many as the opinionated bozo who thinks he knows what happened there..none.

**Nickdfresh** · 09-22-2009, 01:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ELVIS

Too bad Chrysler turned it into a Caliber, although the SRT-4 Caliber is pretty cool with 285 hp from the Neon DOHC engine...

Don't worry, you'll be driving Fiats in no time...

**Nickdfresh** · 09-22-2009, 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ELVIS

Where's the Runaway Warming?

By Dennis T. Avery
Hudson Institute's Center

...

Who would have a better grasp of science than a op-ed fraud operating out of a stated right wing think tank?

Hudson Institute - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

**Nickdfresh** · 09-22-2009, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seshmeister

Hudson Institute has received at least $25,000 from ExxonMobil since 1998.

1995
$unknown Exxon Corporation
Source: Hudson Institute Literature 1995

2000
$15,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
general support
Source: ExxonMobil Foundation 2000 IRS 990

2005
$10,000 ExxonMobil Foundation
Source: ExxonMobil 2005 Worldwide Giving Report

Nick is right you are gullible.

This joker is funded by the oil companies and is NOT a climatologist.

The oil companies pay these people to come up with shit like this so that they can continue to pollute. It's very very sad that it is working on you.

You've been OWNED by big oil and they are laughing at you.

The thing is that even Exxon-Mobil is too embarrassed by this asshattery and they have largely stopped funding moronic sophistry and denying the inevitable...

But it was as late as ten years ago they were funding fraudulent, pseudo-scientific research into exploring how oil comes from rocks and not dead dinosaurs (then we'd NEVER run out! Get it?)

**ELVIS** · 09-22-2009, 02:39 PM

We're not running out...

**Mushroom** · 09-22-2009, 03:13 PM

"we're not running out"

not today, but someday, as it gets too expensive to drill and process. Also read Hubbert's Peak Oil Theory. If there is any saving grace in this "Climate Change" hysteria, I believe it will be the innovation for new technology that could replace petroleum in may aspects of our daily life. "Could" is a big word, because it's going to cost $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ to change infrastructure, and we, or our children, will have to pay that $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$.

**Big Train** · 09-23-2009, 02:38 PM

Hot Air » Blog Archive » About that Arctic ice disappearance …

National Geographic in summer 2008:

Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer, report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field.

“We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history],” David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker. …

But this summer’s forecast—and unusual early melting events all around the Arctic—serve as a dire warning of how quickly the polar regions are being affected by climate change.

National Geographic this week:

This year’s cooler-than-expected summer means the Arctic probably won’t experience ice-free summers until 2030 or 2040, scientists say.

Some models had previously predicted that the Arctic could be ice free in summer by as soon as 2013, due to rising temperatures from global warming.

Scientifically, what does this tell us about the climate-change models used to make this hysterical claim?

They’re completely wrong and should be jettisoned — or,

They speak to a larger truth and should be used and heretics skeptics shunned

Which option would a real scientist choose, and which one would a political hack with interests in glomming onto big government grants choose?

**ELVIS** · 09-23-2009, 02:44 PM

LMAO!

**Mushroom** · 09-23-2009, 04:39 PM

climate models are too simple to replicate a complex universe. we can hardly explain how and why it all works environmentally, cosmically, or atmospherically. we will never be smart enough to control, fix or alter Mother Nature. it will rain when earth needs water. ice caps will stop melting when the atmosphere and the planet decide there is enough water in the oceans and it is time to allow them to recede. last weekend, my weatherman's model told me it will be overcast today, and he's 100% off base.

**Seshmeister** · 09-25-2009, 09:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ELVIS

No, I need oxygen and the plants I eat need CO2...

**ELVIS** · 09-25-2009, 10:31 AM

Give me a break...

Yeah, that 300 plus ppm of one percent is going to kill us...

When exactly did CO2 become a pollutant, when algore said so ???

**Seshmeister** · 09-25-2009, 10:57 AM

It's funny that you live in Lousiana.

You're going to be wiped out and my Summers might get nicer and you're the one in denial.

**ELVIS** · 09-25-2009, 11:00 AM

Wiped out by what, the rising waters ??

**Nickdfresh** · 09-25-2009, 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seshmeister

It's funny that you live in Lousiana.

You're going to be wiped out and my Summers might get nicer and you're the one in denial.

My summers too...

09-22-2009, 02:39 PM	#85 (permalink)
ELVIS NO ONE'S ABOVE SUSPICION ROTH ARMY MODERATOR Join Date: Dec 2003 Member Number: 14 Location: LOUISIANA Posts: 20,702 Thanks: 170 Thanked 453 Times in 354 Posts Groans: 71 Groaned at 300 Times in 193 Posts Rep Power: 31 Last Online: Today 09:08 AM	We're not running out... __________________ Roth Army Militia

09-23-2009, 02:44 PM	#88 (permalink)
ELVIS NO ONE'S ABOVE SUSPICION ROTH ARMY MODERATOR Join Date: Dec 2003 Member Number: 14 Location: LOUISIANA Posts: 20,702 Thanks: 170 Thanked 453 Times in 354 Posts Groans: 71 Groaned at 300 Times in 193 Posts Rep Power: 31 Last Online: Today 09:08 AM	LMAO! __________________ Roth Army Militia

09-25-2009, 10:31 AM	#91 (permalink)
ELVIS NO ONE'S ABOVE SUSPICION ROTH ARMY MODERATOR Join Date: Dec 2003 Member Number: 14 Location: LOUISIANA Posts: 20,702 Thanks: 170 Thanked 453 Times in 354 Posts Groans: 71 Groaned at 300 Times in 193 Posts Rep Power: 31 Last Online: Today 09:08 AM	Give me a break... Yeah, that 300 plus ppm of one percent is going to kill us... When exactly did CO2 become a pollutant, when algore said so ??? __________________ Roth Army Militia

09-25-2009, 11:00 AM	#93 (permalink)
ELVIS NO ONE'S ABOVE SUSPICION ROTH ARMY MODERATOR Join Date: Dec 2003 Member Number: 14 Location: LOUISIANA Posts: 20,702 Thanks: 170 Thanked 453 Times in 354 Posts Groans: 71 Groaned at 300 Times in 193 Posts Rep Power: 31 Last Online: Today 09:08 AM	Wiped out by what, the rising waters ?? __________________ Roth Army Militia

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

09-22-2009, 03:13 PM	#86 (permalink)
Mushroom Head Fluffer Join Date: Jul 2009 Member Number: 24813 Location: North America Posts: 222 Thanks: 12 Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts Groans: 1 Groaned at 20 Times in 12 Posts Rep Power: 1 Last Online: 03-14-2010 06:59 PM	"we're not running out" not today, but someday, as it gets too expensive to drill and process. Also read Hubbert's Peak Oil Theory. If there is any saving grace in this "Climate Change" hysteria, I believe it will be the innovation for new technology that could replace petroleum in may aspects of our daily life. "Could" is a big word, because it's going to cost $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ to change infrastructure, and we, or our children, will have to pay that $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$.

09-23-2009, 02:38 PM	#87 (permalink)
Big Train Full Member Status Join Date: Apr 2004 Member Number: 3741 Location: Los Angeles Posts: 4,011 Thanks: 63 Thanked 92 Times in 76 Posts Groans: 28 Groaned at 53 Times in 43 Posts Rep Power: 10 Last Online: 11-24-2009 10:21 PM	Hot Air » Blog Archive » About that Arctic ice disappearance … National Geographic in summer 2008: Arctic warming has become so dramatic that the North Pole may melt this summer, report scientists studying the effects of climate change in the field. “We’re actually projecting this year that the North Pole may be free of ice for the first time [in history],” David Barber, of the University of Manitoba, told National Geographic News aboard the C.C.G.S. Amundsen, a Canadian research icebreaker. … But this summer’s forecast—and unusual early melting events all around the Arctic—serve as a dire warning of how quickly the polar regions are being affected by climate change. National Geographic this week: This year’s cooler-than-expected summer means the Arctic probably won’t experience ice-free summers until 2030 or 2040, scientists say. Some models had previously predicted that the Arctic could be ice free in summer by as soon as 2013, due to rising temperatures from global warming. Scientifically, what does this tell us about the climate-change models used to make this hysterical claim? They’re completely wrong and should be jettisoned — or, They speak to a larger truth and should be used and heretics skeptics shunned Which option would a real scientist choose, and which one would a political hack with interests in glomming onto big government grants choose?

09-23-2009, 04:39 PM	#89 (permalink)
Mushroom Head Fluffer Join Date: Jul 2009 Member Number: 24813 Location: North America Posts: 222 Thanks: 12 Thanked 21 Times in 19 Posts Groans: 1 Groaned at 20 Times in 12 Posts Rep Power: 1 Last Online: 03-14-2010 06:59 PM	climate models are too simple to replicate a complex universe. we can hardly explain how and why it all works environmentally, cosmically, or atmospherically. we will never be smart enough to control, fix or alter Mother Nature. it will rain when earth needs water. ice caps will stop melting when the atmosphere and the planet decide there is enough water in the oceans and it is time to allow them to recede. last weekend, my weatherman's model told me it will be overcast today, and he's 100% off base.

09-25-2009, 10:57 AM	#92 (permalink)
Seshmeister TOASTMASTER GENERAL Join Date: Oct 2003 Member Number: 11 Location: Scotland Posts: 10,640 Thanks: 168 Thanked 996 Times in 659 Posts Groans: 82 Groaned at 88 Times in 81 Posts Rep Power: 27 Last Online: Today 09:06 AM	It's funny that you live in Lousiana. You're going to be wiped out and my Summers might get nicer and you're the one in denial.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Climate Change 'Brings Huge Cost'	Nickdfresh	The Front Line	1	10-30-2006 12:58 AM
Exxon misleads on climate change: UK Royal Society	BITEYOASS	The Front Line	1	09-22-2006 01:20 AM
BUSH Admin. Silenced Scientists on Climate Change.	Nickdfresh	The Front Line	0	01-29-2006 09:00 PM
Nobody's gonna change them... change them...	WARF	House of Music	3	12-19-2005 07:55 PM
Climate Change Poses Threat to Food Supply, Scientists Say	DLR'sCock	The Front Line	1	05-01-2005 02:37 AM