Printable View
Philip Haney, DHS whistle blower during the Obama administration found dead by self inflicted gunshot to the head.
Self inflicted my ass. Must of had some more dirt on somebody. Probably Hillary. She's not hard to track. Leaves dead people wherever she goes. Like The Outlaw Josey Wales.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/ph...cid=spartanntp
She's the Boogeyman keeping you all awake at night, putting kittens up trees and when you drop a slice of toast she is the reason it lands butter side down. :D
Haven't you been paying any attention to the bullshit you and the other liberals post here? George W Bush was the boogeyman. Now it's Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton is the second coming of Mother Teresa. It's just a coincidence multiple people who pissed her off ended up killing themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seshmeister
Wow do you go to that site a lot, it's a bit out there.Quote:
Originally Posted by private parts
I wasn't disputing the suicide thing one way or the other BTW it was the leap from there to Clinton I was laughing at.
No I don't visit that site and it's admittedly shaky. Just pointing out that the truth has not been verified one way or the other. Yet.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seshmeister
I'm actually leaning toward he offed himself.
I also think the Clinton involvement is laughable. She hung up her guns and cyanide pills long ago :biggrin:
Wasn't much of a leap considering he was a whistleblower during the Obama administration. Even if he didn't have any dirt on Hillary , Obama does and she might of offed the guy to keep him from talking for him. If one of the bullshit news media outlets you get your brain washings from insinuated Trump had someone killed because he had dirt on him you'd believe it in a heartbeat.Quote:
Originally Posted by Seshmeister
Sure she did. That bitch is evil. She's killed or had people killed to silence them before and she'll probably do it again if she feels the need.Quote:
Originally Posted by private parts
Yeah, not sure wtf here motive would be, she had nothing to do with that whole kerfuffle...Quote:
Originally Posted by private parts
Or maybe your pulling things out of you ass, like used condoms...Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
It was a joke. The Outlaw Josey Wales quote was in my head when I saw the story on the internet and I decided to use it to poke fun at you and the rest of the TDS sufferers here. When you make some ridiculous claim about Trump I feel obligated to return the favor. If you counted up all the unsubstantiated accusations you've made about Trump and compare them to the unsubstantiated accusations people have made about Hillary here I'm sure the Trump accusations would outnumber the Clinton accusations 1000 to 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
The constant homosexual references you make against me and others here tends to make me think you're a homophobe. Why don't you just come out of the closet and admit you're a rough rider? Are you one of those "log cabin" Republicans too?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
What's gay about that?Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
Sure which outlandish claims, specifically?Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
The word is unsubstantiated not outlandish. It means unproven. You claimed Trump's not a billionaire recently. Got any proof? Nope. I'd have to reread of your posts about Trump to give you more examples but I'd rather not. I'll wait until you make some more, which shouldn't be long from now and point them out as I see them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
Yeah, Trump sued a long term researcher (long before his presidential aspirations) who said he wasn't a billionaire and lost, badly:Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/th...lawsuit-232923
https://abcnews.go.com/Business/story?id=8100467&page=1
I read both articles. Neither one said there was or is proof Trump isn't a billionaire. The judge said this: Nothing suggests that O'Brien was subjectively aware of the falsity of his source's figures or that he had actual doubts as to the information's accuracy."Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
You lose. Want to try again?
Well, now Cheeto is going to have to prove not only that he has money, but didn't get it from the Russian mob. Or else Sesh might end up owning his golf courses in Scotland.....
https://www.scotsman.com/news/politi...esorts-2001733
You're stupid. It's a factual based opinion, no one is claiming to be clairvoyant. Hey, Trump can just show us his 1040's buddy! But he doesn't, also many actual billionaires laugh at his ventures that they would never bother with.Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
If the guy was full of shit, Trump would have won! Simple as that, Trump has a horrible record in court. Can you show any court proceedings Clinton has gone through and lost?
Watch him lose his next suit against the NY Times!
It's a bullshit based opinion. Based on a bad case of TDS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
Bullshit again. The judge tossed the case because the person who made the claim wasn't aware it was bullshit when he made it. . The judge said."Nothing suggests that O'Brien was subjectively aware of the falsity of his source's figures or that he had actual doubts as to the information's accuracy."Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
What part of falsity don't you get?
Did you even bother to read the article before you made that claim? Here's what it actually says:Quote:
Originally Posted by FORD
Patrick Harvie MSP, co-leader of the Scottish Greens, said there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that the US president, or people he is connected with, “have been involved in serious crime.”
He has called on ministers to apply to the Court of Session to seek answers as to how Mr Trump’s bankrolled his multimillion acquisitions of land and property in his mother’s homeland.
Responding at First Minister’s Questions, Nicola Sturgeon stressed she was “no defender” of Mr Trump, but said any allegations of criminality were a matter for Police Scotland and the Crown Office.
Where does it say Trump has to prove anything?
That's not what happened you incomprehensible idiot!Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
They should put you on Drumpf's Coronavirus shithead Committee...
Read this Cadaverdouche: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/02/u...red-trump.html
That is what happened shit fer brains. I quoted the link you provided.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
Why? So you can say it doesn't say what it says like you did the last time? I'll pass. No sense arguing with a know it all with TDS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
What she was saying, dropout, is that it's not libelous to call someone a millionaire rather than a "billionaire". The Judge said it doesn't matter whether it's true or false, are you a fucking paralegal now? She never said anything one way or another.Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog
Trump admitted:
...that his sense of financial worth depends on his feelings day-to-day. Asked whether it was really true that his "net worth goes up and down based upon [his] own feelings," here's Trump's funny response:
"Yes, even my own feelings, as to where the world is, where the world is going, and that can change rapidly from day to day. Then you have a September 11th, and you don't feel so good about yourself and you don't feel so good about the world and you don't feel so good about New York City. Then you have a year later, and the city is as hot as a pistol. Even months after that it was a different feeling. So yeah, even my own feelings affect my value to myself."
Keep lapping that asshole!
Bullshit. I posted what the judge said twice already. Not going to do it again. It's not my fault you have shit fer brains.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
You're a moron who doesn't even understand what you selectively posted. Isn't it time wherever you live pulls your internet?Quote:
Originally Posted by cadaverdog