https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MNrcH6vp97k
The unarmed black man was exiting a vehicle at the request of the officer with a knife in his hand... Doesn't quite add up to "unarmed". I will concede... the arresting officer who was cleared of any charges was white and the criminal he shot with warrants for his arrest for previous violent crimes and had a knife in his hand was black. Racism at work or just a law enforcement activity that didn't go well for the armed criminal..?Quote:
Originally Posted by FORD
You are claiming a 17 year old was drinking in a bar... right... he's still 3 years away from the legal age, today, to even be in a bar. Oh and other bad people, may have visited this bar. Gotcha... and the 17 year old's mother knew this bar was a place bad people visited.
Please take some time and reflect internally... do you seriously recognize how fucking misinformed and stupid your response sounds?
But....he read it on the internet. It must be true!Quote:
Originally Posted by ZahZoo
Or maybe he heard it from WikiNicki!
Just this most recent response?Quote:
Originally Posted by ZahZoo
LOL Lake Erie Boy sometimes makes me laugh.
Meanwhile...
"A Georgia jury convicted the three men charged with murdering Ahmaud Arbery of nearly all of the charges leveled against the trio on Wednesday.
Three white men—gunman Travis McMichael, his father Greg McMichael and William “Roddie” Bryan—faced a raft of charges for pursuing Arbery in the confrontation that led to the 25-year-old Black man’s death, including malice murder, four counts of felony murder, two counts of aggravated assault, one count of false imprisonment, and one count of engaging in a criminal attempt to commit a felony.
Greg McMichael was found not guilty of malice murder. Bryan was also acquitted of malice murder, one felony murder count, and an aggravated assault count. The two were still found guilty on other felony murder counts."
So eat a dick, you MAGA monkeys.
Sounds like justice was served in Georgia...
Ironic that Wisconsin is now a safer place for racist terrorism than Georgia. But it's good news that these Klan fucks were convicted.
Hey Von, I've said almost nothing in this thread, so go jerkoff to your Kid Rock poster you fucking ape mongoloid...Quote:
Originally Posted by Von Halen
JP’s best video ever!!
https://awakenwithjp.com/pages/videos
https://youtu.be/kSypu3hOzNo
Here are crib notes for libtards challenged with reading and comprehension skills, but please try…
EXPLAINER: What charges did Kyle Rittenhouse face?
By TODD RICHMOND Associated Press
COUNT 1: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESS HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This felony charge was connected to the death of Joseph Rosenbaum, the first man Rittenhouse shot. Bystander video shows Rosenbaum chasing Rittenhouse through a parking lot and throwing a plastic bag at him. Rittenhouse flees behind a car and Rosenbaum follows. Video introduced at trial showed Rittenhouse wheeling around and firing as Rosenbaum chased him. Richie McGinniss, a reporter who was trailing Rittenhouse, testified that Rosenbaum lunged for Rittenhouse's gun.
Reckless homicide differs from intentional homicide in that prosecutors weren't alleging that Rittenhouse intended to murder Rosenbaum. Instead, they were alleging that Rittenhouse caused Rosenbaum's death in circumstances showing an utter disregard for human life.
The charge was punishable by up to 60 years in prison. The dangerous weapon modifier carried an additional five years.
COUNT 2: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This felony charge was connected to the Rosenbaum shooting. McGinniss told investigators he was in the line of fire when Rittenhouse shot Rosenbaum. The charge would have been punishable by 12 1/2 years in prison. The weapons modifier carried an additional five years.
COUNT 3: FIRST-DEGREE RECKLESSLY ENDANGERING SAFETY, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
Video shows an unknown man leaping at Rittenhouse and trying to kick him seconds before Anthony Huber moves his skateboard toward him. Rittenhouse appears to fire two rounds at the man but apparently misses as the man runs away.
This charge is a felony punishable by 12 1/2 years in prison. The weapons modifier again would have added up to five more years.
COUNT 4: FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This charge was in Huber's death. Video shows Rittenhouse running down the street after shooting Rosenbaum when he falls to the street. Huber leaps at him and swings a skateboard at his head and neck and tries to grab Rittenhouse's gun before Rittenhouse fires. The criminal complaint alleged Rittenhouse aimed the weapon at Huber.
Intentional homicide means just that — a person killed someone and meant to do it. A conviction would have meant a mandatory life sentence. The weapons modifier would have added up to five years.
The jury also was given the option of second- degree intentional homicide and first-degree reckless homicide in Huber's death.
Second-degree intentional homicide would have been punishable by up to 60 years in prison.
The first-degree reckless homicide charge sought in Huber's death matched an original charge in Rosenbaum's death — it would have required jurors to decide that Rittenhouse caused Huber's death with an utter disregard for human life — and would have been punishable by up to 60 years in prison.
COUNT 5: ATTEMPTED FIRST-DEGREE INTENTIONAL HOMICIDE, USE OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON
This was the charge for Rittenhouse shooting Gaige Grosskreutz in the arm seconds after he shot Huber, and as Grosskreutz came toward him holding a pistol. Grosskreutz survived. Video shows Rittenhouse pointing his gun at Grosskreutz and firing a single round.
The charge carries a maximum sentence of 60 years. The weapons modifier would have added up to five more years.
The jury also was given the option of considering second-degree attempted intentional homicide and first-degree reckless endangerment charges.
The possible punishment for attempted second-degree intentional homicide is 30 years. Attempted first-degree reckless endangerment is punishable by up to 12 1/2 years.
COUNT 6: POSSESSION OF A DANGEROUS WEAPON BY A PERSON UNDER 18
The judge dismissed this charge on Monday.
Rittenhouse was armed with an AR-style semi- automatic rifle. He was 17 years old on the night of the shootings. Wisconsin law prohibits minors from possessing firearms except for hunting or when supervised by an adult in target practice or instruction in the proper use of a dangerous weapon. Rittenhouse’s attorneys argued that another subsection of the law, regarding short-barreled rifles, provided grounds for dismissing the charge.
Prosecutors argued the defense was misreading the statute, and Schroeder had earlier twice declined to dismiss the charge. But the judge also had said the statute was confusing. After prosecutors conceded that the rifle was not short-barreled, Schroeder dismissed the charge.
COUNT 7: FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN EMERGENCY ORDER FROM STATE OR LOCAL GOVERNMENT
Rittenhouse was charged with being out on the streets after an 8 p.m. curfew imposed by the city, a minor offense that carries a fine of up to $200. The judge dismissed this charge during the trial, saying the prosecution didn't offer enough evidence to prove it.
___
I think in most places in the world he would have been found guilty of a version of 1,2,6 and 7.
The dismissal of 6 and 7 seem to be completely nuts and to make out that driving a minor to a riot with an assault rifle to sort things out is in some way fucking normal or a good idea is fucking crazy talk.
His first point is that the guy that owned a car lot asked Rittenhouse to defend his property. That's a lie and completely illogical and even if it was true is fucking crazy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mushroom
The rest of it seems to be saying how terrible the victims previous actions were which Rittenhouse didn't know about and then a bunch of stuff about race which isn't relevant.
Were they KKK members? Clearly they are racists, Roddy looks like he would have trouble putting his hood on, “the eye holes in this thing are on the back”.Quote:
Originally Posted by FORD
And, Rittenhouse was at a bar after his release where he was serenaded by some proud boys as he flashed the “OK” sign, which in some circles apparently means “white power”. Self-defense or not, celebrating the fact you killed 2 people is a bad look.
I shot a guy with a Mini-14 because he was on my front lawn smoking. Thank God he was convicted of insider trading and fucking an underage girl when he was 22 or I'd of been fucked!
Was he black? :biggrin:
Another smoking related death, when will they learn?Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickdfresh
A jury of 12? Unanimous decision, beyond a reasonable doubt? Maybe 12 Tibetan buddhists. But we can agree to disagree Sir Sesh!Quote:
Originally Posted by Seshmeister
I support the decisions in both cases.Quote:
Originally Posted by FORD
I'm not even saying the jury made the wrong decision, my point was the law(s) were 'wrong' or at least weird compared to other countries.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mushroom
I heard a guy from the gun industry recently who has written a book about it saying that things have got strange and the NRA had overturned all the stuff traditional gun using Republicans used to stand for like safety, competence and guns being part of life not your identity.
The case of Smith and Wesson nearly being forced out of business for saying what should be common sense surely makes the point. Like in other areas things have got fucking nuts where its the people at the extremes are running the arguments.
https://www.businessinsider.com/smit...13-1?r=US&IR=T
Smith and Wesson story in a business publication - this is not weirdo pinko commie European shit. Or at least it didn't used to be.