Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: John Kerry vs. The 14th Amendment

  1. #1
    Ford's Daddy
    Veteran
    John Ashcroft's Avatar
    Member No
    56
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,127
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    23

    John Kerry vs. The 14th Amendment

    In 1971, upon returning from four months service in Vietnam and while still a Naval officer, John Kerry testified openly, publicly, before Congress, that he and everyone else serving in Vietnam had committed atrocities, that they were all war criminals.

    Kerry quickly became active and influential in the Vietnam Veterans Against the War, organizing and leading anti-war protests. Kerry wrote a book, "The New Soldier," that set out his criticism of America's war against the malignancy of communism. John Kerry went to Paris where he conducted private, illegal, diplomacy with the North Vietnamese, and returned to advocate that America surrender to North Vietnam, and on our enemies' terms. He became an advocate for America's enemy.

    The North Vietnamese seized on John Kerry's book and speeches and used them for psychological warfare, torture, against American POW's in Hanoi. Kerry's anti-war words and deeds helped turn America's military victory into a political defeat, and North Vietnam's military defeat into a political victory.

    Kerry's actions were doubtless instrumental in prolonging the war, and adding to the number of Americans wounded in action, and to those killed in action, whose names are now engraved on the Vietnam War Memorial in Washington, D.C. - The Wall.

    This is not rumor, nor speculation, nor spin. Kerry did all these things openly, publicly, proudly, intentionally, willfully, and deliberately, in the full light of day and history.

    He did these things with an obvious and express intention to impede America's war effort, and assist its enemy. It is common, public knowledge, and fully, indisputably documented. John Kerry, while an officer of the United States, knowingly, willfully, deliberately, intentionally gave aid and comfort to America's enemy in a time of war.

    The Constitution of the United States, Article 14, Section 3 (also known as Amendment 14, Section 3) states in relevant part:

    "No person shall be a senator or representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military . . . who, having previously taken an oath . . . as an officer of the United States . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof . . ."

    When John Kerry became a Naval officer, he took an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution of the United States. Afterward, upon his return from Viet Nam, he openly, publicly, and proudly, gave aid and comfort to America's enemies.

    Having given aid and comfort to America's enemy, while a Naval officer of the United States, John Kerry is clearly and unequivocally disqualified, barred, by Article 14, Section 3, of the Constitution, from serving as a Senator or as President.

    When John Kerry was elected to the Senate, he again took an oath to protect and uphold the Constitution. Having taken that oath, I believe, he is now bound by that oath to resign from the Senate, and to resign his presidential candidacy, since he is not qualified to serve in the Senate, or as President, even if he is elected.

    Raymond S. Kraft is a writer and recovering lawyer living in Northern California. He may be reached at rskraft@vfr.net.

    Link:
    here

  2. #2
    Fuck this and fuck that
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    58,754
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    144
    Al Qaeda is a subsidiary of Bush Criminal Empire Inc.

    That's no freeptard fantasy, but the reality, with proven family connections going back decades.
    Eat Us And Smile

    Cenk For America 2024!!

    Justice Democrats


    "If the American people had ever known the truth about what we (the BCE) have done to this nation, we would be chased down in the streets and lynched." - Poppy Bush, 1992

  3. #3
    Banned
    REPENT AND SINS NO MO!

    Member No
    14
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    China
    Posts
    44,120
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    0
    You're full of shit...

  4. #4
    Rice Cooker
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    knuckleboner's Avatar
    Member No
    120
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    2,927
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    25

    Re: John Kerry vs. The 14th Amendment

    Originally posted by John Ashcroft


    Raymond S. Kraft is a writer and recovering lawyer living in Northern California.


    says it all right there. not really a good lawyer...

    [quote]

    John Kerry, while an officer of the United States, knowingly, willfully, deliberately, intentionally gave aid and comfort to America's enemy in a time of war.
    [/quote



    uh...yeah, there is a TREMENDOUS amount of spin here. this assumes that kerry's motive was to give aid and comfort to the enemy.

    it's entirely possible for a vietnam vet to come back and believe that the war was wrong and that the soldiers needed to come home, rather than die in east asia.

    you know, somebody who made statements like these:

    Now we are told that the men who fought there must watch quietly while American lives are lost so that we can exercise the incredible arrogance of Vietnamizing the Vietnamese.
    and

    Well, Senator, frankly it does not appeal to me if American men have to continue to die when they don't have to
    (yes, it's from kerry's 1971 senate testimony.

    of course, i certainly don't agree with everything kerry said in the testimony. but at the same time, just because the north koreans chose to use his words and testimony against Americans doesn't mean that that's what kerry really intended.



    (and of course, mr. AG, i'm surprised at you; promoting judicial activism like this. it's clear that the framers of amendment (always known as "amenedment," never "article" 14, like this yahoo suggests) 14 were referring to civil war confederate secessionists. you'd have to interpret that amendment to get it to fit in later instances...)

  5. #5
    Ford's Daddy
    Veteran
    John Ashcroft's Avatar
    Member No
    56
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,127
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    23
    I interpret the ammendment as specifically prohibiting the "New JFK" from holding public office...

    Anyway, I'll never believe that Kerry's distortions and lies following Vietnam were fabricated with his fellow Veteran's (or America's) best interests in mind.

    You don't label Vets as War Criminals to protect them from an abusive Government. Sorry, no one will ever convince me otherwise.

  6. #6
    Rice Cooker
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    knuckleboner's Avatar
    Member No
    120
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    2,927
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    25
    Originally posted by John Ashcroft
    I interpret the ammendment as specifically prohibiting the "New JFK" from holding public office

    well...you are the top attorney in the land. i suppose that ruling stands.



    and yeah, i agree, kerry's testimony was a little over the line. no question. and yes, i think his motive of attack on the political leadership was probably just as strong as his concern for the wellbeing of the troops.

    but even his war crimes allegations were really more leveled at the higher ups, the guys who orchestrated "free fire zones."

    mind you, again, i'm not saying kerry's testimony was 100% A.OK. i understand his point. and yes, i'm sure in the 500,000 troops over there, some did commit war crimes. but i also think kerry wrongly characterized it as he did. no question.

    still i'm really not sure it's quite as bad as intentionally giving aid and comfort to the enemy...

  7. #7
    Ford's Daddy
    Veteran
    John Ashcroft's Avatar
    Member No
    56
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,127
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    23
    Well, what were his motives in your opinion?

    And if one commits aid to the enemy in the pursuit of personal ambitions, isn't it still aid to the enemy?

  8. #8
    JCOOK
    Guest
    Im' not naive enough to believe that there were not atrocities committed by both sides in Viet Nam,there have been atrocities in every war. But for Herman to make blanket statemenets about millions that served is absolutely ludicrius and wrong.He admitted that he himself had committed these atrocities,why not stand trial for YOUR OWN ACTIONS Johnny Reb?

  9. #9
    Rice Cooker
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    knuckleboner's Avatar
    Member No
    120
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    2,927
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    25
    my guess is his motives were to end the war he thought was wrong and to vilify the leaders who got us into the war. and yes, to further his own ambitions as well.


    and yes, aid to the enemy for your own ambition is still aid to the enemy.


    but i strongly doubt that kerry's goal was to help the vietcong. nor, do i think he took his actions knowing the they would be used directly against American soldiers.



    mostly, i like poking at these kind of articles were the guy goes, "this is not...spin." and then proceeds to lump a tremendous amount of spin and hyperbole.

    i definitely agree that there are plenty of valid criticisms of kerry's anti-war antics. but calling them a violation of the 14th amendment isn't really one of them...(unless the author's ann coulter)

  10. #10
    JCOOK
    Guest
    Again he himself admitted comitting these acts.He should have been punished back then in a military court.

  11. #11
    Ford's Daddy
    Veteran
    John Ashcroft's Avatar
    Member No
    56
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Age
    53
    Posts
    2,127
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    23
    Well, he certainly won't be elected President anytime soon.

    It'd be sweet if he also got the boot from his Senate seat in Taxachussets. When's the seat up?

  12. #12
    Rice Cooker
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    knuckleboner's Avatar
    Member No
    120
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Fairfax, VA
    Posts
    2,927
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    25
    2008.

    just in time to ride hillary's coattails...


    (and no, i'm not the biggest fan of hillary...)

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. John Kerry
    By Steve Savicki in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 04-26-2005, 09:20 PM
  2. John Kerry
    By Steve Savicki in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-03-2004, 08:41 PM
  3. John Kerry Must Go
    By BigBadBrian in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-28-2004, 06:35 PM
  4. Everything one needs to know about John Kerry
    By Little Texan in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 39
    Last Post: 02-17-2004, 01:21 PM
  5. Bye bye John Kerry?
    By High Life Man in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 02-16-2004, 10:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •