This map proportionally represents the states by population. As you can see, it tells the truth about how thousands of square miles of "red" dust, sand, cactus, and coyotes didn't really do much to help Junior.
This map proportionally represents the states by population. As you can see, it tells the truth about how thousands of square miles of "red" dust, sand, cactus, and coyotes didn't really do much to help Junior.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
And this "map", courtesy of the US Census Dept. is taken from an actual satellite photo at night, which shows excatly where the people live in this country. Looking pretty dark in some of those "red" states.....
60,000,000 For Bush.
Bush won.
Those damn coyotes kick ass.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Kerry lost the popular vote by 3.5 million votes. That's a lot of votes.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Possibly the slimmest margin for an incumbent president ever.Originally posted by TongueNGroove
Kerry lost the popular vote by 3.5 million votes. That's a lot of votes.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Still enough, ain't it?
If that's your choice of therapy, FORD, go for it.........
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Maybe, but it is also the MOST votes ANY president EVER to run Ever received. MOST EVER! Eat it .:pOriginally posted by Nickdfresh
Possibly the slimmest margin for an incumbent president ever.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Is that pic from the same site that made a "final prediction" of a Kerry win, FORD?
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
And Kerry received the second most votes ever.Originally posted by HELLVIS
Maybe, but it is also the MOST votes ANY president EVER to run Ever received. MOST EVER! Eat it .:p
I don't know about his map, but my pic represents lady liberty forced into servitude in chains in hell because of BUSH.
BWHAHAHAHAHHAHA!!!!!!
This has got to be at least as accurate as JA's kerry/bush IQ comparison:
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Good call ODO, that's the mentality of the "flip flopper" appeal.
bunch of bums over there
I don't know what you are trying to imply by that chart there fellas.
Anytime I've ever taken an IQ test, I've gotten anywhere from 128-147, and I've voted for Bush twice.
Intelligent people have and will continue to vote Republican.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
You are just a regular super genius, aren't ya?Originally posted by Warham
I don't know what you are trying to imply by that chart there fellas.
Anytime I've ever taken an IQ test, I've gotten anywhere from 128-147, and I've voted for Bush twice.
Intelligent people have and will continue to vote Republican.
Too bad you debate like a 12 year old boy.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
Here's an accurate map:
Dude, the 12 year old boy bit was kinda creepy.Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
You are just a regular super genius, aren't ya?
Too bad you debate like a 12 year old boy.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
When I was 12, I was preaching the Scriptures in Solomon's Temple.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
No, when you were 12, you were constructing your first aluminum foil hat.
In the 1994-2002 General Social Surveys (GSS), Republicans have over 6/10ths of a year more education on average than Democrats. Republicans also have a higher final mean educational degree. Further, Republicans scored better than Democrats on two word tests in the GSS--a short vocabulary test and a modified analogies test.
If one breaks down the data by party affiliation and political orientation, the most highly educated group is conservative Republicans, who also score highest on the vocabulary and analogical reasoning tests. Liberal Democrats score only insignificantly lower than conservative Republicans. The least educated subgroups are moderate and conservative Democrats, who also score at the bottom (or very near the bottom) on vocabulary and analogy tests.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Hoax Alert: Child prodigy blogger Matthew Yglesias linked to a table purporting to show IQs by state, with Democrats doing much better in the high IQ states.
I asked the college student who posted the table where he got the data and he replied:
The statistics are from the book "IQ and the Wealth of Nations," by Richard Lynn and Tatu Vanhanen. See here for more info: http://allconsuming.net/item.cgi?isbn=027597510X
It turns out that this table is going around the liberal blogs, such as the Daily Kos. For example, the American Assembler claims:
"This chart is derived from taking the Ravens Advanced Progressive Matrices of average IQ by state (Source:IQ and the Wealth of Nations)"
This same attribution pops up verbatim on other sites.
It's a HOAX.
I own "IQ and the Wealth of Nations." I read it extremely carefully. I've written a lengthy review of the book: http://www.vdare.com/sailer/wealth_of_nations.htm. As the title suggests, it's about the average IQs of nations, not states. There's nothing in it about IQs by states.
Also, anyone familiar with the topic would quickly recognize the fallaciousness of the data. The 113 figure for Connecticut is way too high. The 87 for Utah is a joke.
Somebody probably got the idea from Lynn & Vanhanen's book and made up some numbers by starting with the income table (that's why the correlation with IQ is so high). The goal, obviously, was to make Democrats feel superior.
The funny thing is that this hoax will be the first time that any liberals will have ever heard of IQ and the Wealth of Nations, which is probably the most important book published in this century.
The numbers are clearly fallacious: for example, Utah, according to him, has an average IQ of 87, the second lowest in America. Yet, on the National Assessment of Educational Progress achievement tests, its children score above the national average on Reading, Math, and Science, and Utah trails Connecticut (purported IQ of 113) by only small amounts on every subject except Writing, where Utah does oddly bad. And Utah is ahead of New York (purported 109) in several categories.
In terms of education and party voting, there existed in 2000 a U shaped pattern, with Gore doing best with the least and most educated.
This comes from the Voter News Service exit poll of 13,000 voters.
If you weight this data on a 1 to 5 scale, with the the high school dropouts as 1, then the two candidates are almost exactly equal, with Bush edging out Gore by the meaninglessly tiny margin of 3.29 to 3.28. This means the average Bush and Gore voters both fall between "Some College" (3.0) and "College Graduate (4.0).
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
....and still lost.Originally posted by Nickdfresh
And Kerry received the second most votes ever.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
And you never read the posts before you respond to them.Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
You are just a regular super genius, aren't ya?
Too bad you debate like a 12 year old boy.
I might debate like a 12 year old, but you read like a 6 year old.
Bottom Line: BUSH WON.
Call his voters "Dunces", "Hicks", "Jesus Freaks" or whatever...
I consider myself fairly intelligent and my IQ is MUCH higher than the highest Bush state. As a matter of fact, it is higher than the highest Kerry state, but that doesn't matter. I voted for Bush.
I am not a Hick. Trust me, Atlanta, is not a "hick town" anymore. Maybe 20 or 30 years ago, but not now. It's more like Hip/Hop town now. So, that argument falls flat.
And...uh...I am an atheist not a "Jesus Freak".
So, there goes your theory.
But, I know you were playing with the "law of averages". But really? What the hell does that prove except the fact that BUSH STILL WON and you sound like a baby who lost his pacifier.
Loser says WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!
This map shows just how widespread of a problem electronic voting could be in the wrong hands. And notice that every one of the so-called "swing states" is included
You want to see some real whining, go to democraticunderground. I've had the most fun I've had in months reading this last week!
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
You should have seen the Free Republic board before they flipped the switches at Diebold.Originally posted by diamondD
You want to see some real whining, go to democraticunderground. I've had the most fun I've had in months reading this last week!
Originally posted by HELLVIS
Maybe, but it is also the MOST votes ANY president EVER to run Ever received. MOST EVER! Eat it .:p
Also it should be noted that Kerry, a (and I quote according to the Repukes and Repuke Pundits)"Liberal Senator from Massachusetts"...although I really think he is a moderate, got the SECOND MOST VOTES EVER....more than Reagan, Bush Sr, Bush Jr's stealing of 2000, Nixon, and just keep on going down the line....
Not bad, considering that the Repukes did everything in their unholy "power" they could do by lying, manipulating the facts, and slandering his character....
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
What exactly makes him a moderate, Cock?
That's not the point. The point is that Bush has no overwhelming mandate! If he tries to pursue his second term as such, he will lose!Originally posted by BigBadBrian
....and still lost.
Originally posted by FORD:
You should come see us now, sonny.You should have seen the Free Republic board before they flipped the switches at Diebold.
Pro war, pro Ariel Sharon, voted for the non-Patriotic act, etc.Originally posted by wraytw
What exactly makes him a moderate, Cock?
Originally posted by FORD
Pro war, pro Ariel Sharon, voted for the non-Patriotic act, etc.
Pro NAFTA, that's a big one....
Oh, and Kerry's voting record is about 53% against ACLU issues...and 47% for.....
He's a moderate....
1. Voting against the ACLU half the time doesn't automatically make you a moderate. lmao
2. Show me some proof of this "about 53% against."
Fuck it. Now, back to that map.....
I'd like to see that map along with a more scaled version of how the counties look vs population of the counties. Would be interesing.
Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!
I'm trying to find the link that I pulled that map from. Below it, it cited overall population, square mileage, etc.......
Here we go:
Square miles of counties won:
Bush 2.51 million
Kerry 511,700
Population (2003) of counties won:
Bush 150,9 million
Kerry 103.6 million
Counties won by less than 5 percentage points:
Bush 162
Kerry 131
Note: County election data is not reported for Alaska,
Source: the Associated Press, ESRI Inc. USATODAY analysis by Paul Overberg.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...OE=click-refer
What does it matter, Bush won by 3.5 million votes. That's it! Not a bad margin of victory, but by no-means a mandate much less a land-slide, assuming those Die Bold machines were on the level!Originally posted by Viking
Here we go:
Square miles of counties won:
Bush 2.51 million
Kerry 511,700
Population (2003) of counties won:
Bush 150,9 million
Kerry 103.6 million
Counties won by less than 5 percentage points:
Bush 162
Kerry 131
Note: County election data is not reported for Alaska,
Source: the Associated Press, ESRI Inc. USATODAY analysis by Paul Overberg.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politic...OE=click-refer
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)