Ok, this whole WMD issue has become such a huge political issue I have some questions i would like the Liberals to answer as i make up my mind on Bush.
1) Ok, Clinton had intelligence, the same intlligence from George Tenent that Bush Sr. and Jr. both had as well. How can you say that there never were WMD in Iraq at this point?
2) If Saddam didn't have WMD then how do you explain his defiance of UN Resolutions and what is your reason for allowing him to stand in constant violation of same UN Resolutions without penalty?
3) If Saddam didn't have WMD yet refused to prove this fact to the UN and the world, why didn't you require this proof before speaking out against your own country?
4) Why do you constantly say that we went in unilaterally when we have a larger coalition than Clinton did when he bombed Iraq?
These questions have been asked repeatedly by damn near everyone on the right and not once have i heard a direct answer to them.
But, here is your chance to convince me why i shouldn't vote for George W. Bush to have a second term.
Using facts verifiable, convince me that Bush should be sent back to Crawford Tx.