Originally Posted by
Shaun Ponsonby
Its funny how any members of the jury who spoke of such only spoke of such after thousand dollar book offers were made. True story. He didn't make the decision to pay anyone. Court records show that the original "pay-offs" were negotiated by his insurance company and lawyers whilst he was in rehab for painkiller addiction. These were made without his consent. He later said that he "paid people off" so as the media assault would end quickly. He did this as his people making such arrangements behind his back embarrassed him. Jordan Chandler never accused him of anything-only his father, who is on tape planning an extorion attempt. Not long after MJ died, Jordan Chandler's father committed suicide. In the past few years, Jordan Chandler has admitted (privately) that nothing ever happened. Jordan Chandler's mother testified under oath that she never believed anything ever happened.
Asexual people do have porn. Asexuality is a complex issue that I don't expect people from "down under" to understand (because, you know, most of you are thick...this is the part of the world that gave us Home and Away, Neighbours and the Minouges). It's a lack of sexual drive. Being asexual doesn't eliminate basic fantasy and what have you. Read up on it-you'll be surprised. If you can read, that is. I imagine you can at least put together sentences if you're on hear.
No it isn't on tape (to my knowledge, and I've researched this case quite heavily for an academic case study on media saturation).
Sadly, due to the fact that I specialise in English you can understand, I'm oblivious to the phrase "schilling for Wacko Jacko's cred".
And very witty with the "ShamePedoschilly". It's not quite up there with saying "yo mama", but its a close second. Contratulations on being a cock.
Once again, the definition of asexual is misunderstood by thick people who can't be arsed reading up on things before they proclaim themselves an expert in the fucking field.
I maintain Michael Jackson was mentally ill and misunderstood. In many ways, he was intellectually brilliant. In other ways, he was intellectually regressed. If he was truly paedophillic, would he say to Martin Bashir; "I allow children to sleep in my bed". Realistically, no. Is it right that children slept in his bed? Realistically, no.
One thing history has taught us is that if someone is gifted in a certain area, they are often robbed of something elsewhere...this goes right back to ancient religious figures, even through the likes of Fredrick William. If Michael Jackson wasn't a talented guy, he wouldn't have reached so many people. His price? He was stuck in a world where everything was innocent. You look at that Martin Bashir film and he's a man in his 40s still climbing trees and having water balloon fights. When Bashir says "don't you prefer making love?", he practically ignores him. When he talks of his first semi-sexual encounter, in his 20s of all times, he says he couldn't go through with it. Bashir himself said that he thinks MJ "sees sex as something people have to go through, not enjoy".
Well, Culkin is adament that nothing ever happened and they remained friends until MJ died. In fact, he was known to get quite pissed off if anyone ever suggessted that anything ever went down.
And another "kid" was called to testify at the trial for the prosecution. He instead testified for the defense and quit his job in Australia so as he could travel to America to testify for the defense. He said he continued the "sleepovers" until he was way into his 20s and only stopped because it became inpractical for him in his life and because MJ started raising his own family.
-----------
As I said earlier, if you believe MJ was a child molester absolutely nothing, including the "kids" admitting it was bullshit, will ever change your mind. Ever. It's part of the massive cynical media/celebrity bullshit we experience today. Along with the rest of them. I could sit here for hours and list all the (quite frankly fascinating) stuff that has affected the MJ story, a story that if you made up you would think was completely ridiculous and had no believable qualities whatsoever, and all the other bullshit news reportage that has saturated people's knowledge of the world for God-Knows-How-Long. But none of you really give a shit. You'll believe what you want to believe. Fair enough. People who watch MSNBC do so because they're liberal. People who watch Fox News do so because they're conservtives (and if you think Bill O'Reily talks sense, that also makes you one of the lowest forms of human). You read the news you believe in. I'll believe what I want to believe. There's really no use in arguing about it for that very reason (I've argued back here, but thats mainly because I'm drunk and because the MJ reportage was very one-sided given that everyone decided he was definitely going down for it and my beef is with news media and not with people who think MJ was a paedophile...it also interests me that many of the reporters who decided he was guilty suddenly changed their minds the minute he died, thus promoting the idea of these snivelling imbeciles being nothing other than desperate cunts who crave acceptance from a popular audience. I literally don't believe anything I read anymore...everyone has an agenda).
Reply With Quote
