Kobe held to 62 points vs. Mavs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Warham
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Mar 2004
    • 14589

    Kobe held to 62 points vs. Mavs

    By Marc Stein
    ESPN.com

    You still have a problem with Kobe Bryant hoisting 30-something shots some nights?

    What's your stance on 30-point quarters?

    The only issue you could have Tuesday night is with the (apparently) joint coach/player decision that Kobe would sit for the entire fourth ... after Bryant rung up a tidy 62 points for Phil Jackson through three.

    Not me, though. I actually side with Kobe and the Zenmeister on this one.

    After Kobe went for 30 points in the third quarter alone, to put the Los Angeles Lakers up by 34 in an eventual 112-90 trouncing of the Dallas Mavericks, I wouldn't have risked No. 8 getting hurt in a game that was already over. I'd want to take every precaution to keep Kobe healthy in the hope that that this was merely the first time this season he makes a run at 70 or 80.

    A select few of us out there -- a group in which I can smugly claim membership because I've written this once or twice already -- applaud Kobe for shooting and shooting and shooting. And not just on the nights he goes for 62. Reason being: Kobe's Lakers aren't exactly teeming with outlets for his passes.

    As stated in this cyberspace more than once recently, this is the thinnest, weakest team Phil Jackson has ever coached. As well as the Lakers have played in their 9-3 December, with Kobe taking more than 24 shots only four times this month, you can expect plenty of occasions as the season unfolds where Bryant absolutely has to take 30-odd shots for L.A. to have a chance to win.

    Unless, of course, you believe in Smush Parker as a No. 3 option and consider Brian Cook to be a legit starting four-man for a playoff-caliber team.

    Right.

    To quote my dear friend Sam Smith of the Chicago Tribune, a fellow backer of Kobe Unplugged: "Right now, just enjoy the show."

    Good advice.

    The time to torch Kobe for shooting too many shots is when the Lakers have re-established a core with a real future ... and he's still firing away instead of making teammates better.

    This is a time to be grateful for spectacles like Tuesday night's at Staples Center, when an assist total of zero didn't change the fact that Kobe was wicked good. Too good for his own good, really.

    How good?

    Entering the fourth quarter, with the Lakers safely ahead by 95-61, you could read the scoreboard another way.

    Kobe 62, Dallas 61.

    It was simply too ridiculous for Phil to put Kobe back in.

    I was fortunate enough to be courtside in L.A. on April 24, 1994 when San Antonio's David Robinson, with help from a point guard named Avery Johnson, savaged the Clippers for 71 points.

    This, though, was sicker. Slicker, too.

    Robinson's eruption came on the last day of the 1993-94 regular season, with a scoring title at stake and against a 27-55 opponent that didn't want to be there. This was Kobe needing only three-quarters of a game to match Tracy McGrady's 62 points for Orlando on March 10, 2004 -- the league's two biggest individual outputs in the past decade-plus since Robinson's.

    This was Kobe, knowing that a Mavericks coach named Avery Johnson would swarm him 5-on-1 after Bryant scored 43 points in Dallas just last week, inflicting offensive destruction in a manner that could only remind you of one other guy.

    It's sacrilege to some, I know, but you can consider this another step in Bryant's bid to become the first of the NBA's many Next Jordans to actually come close to matching No. 23.

    If not?

    At the very least, let's drop the pleas for more passes to Chris Mihm and Laron Profit and admit that your appetite for watching Kobe launch has been restored.

    Marc Stein is the senior NBA writer for ESPN.com. To e-mail him, click here.
  • Warham
    DIAMOND STATUS
    • Mar 2004
    • 14589

    #2
    Score after three quarters:

    Kobe 62, Dallas 61

    LMAO!

    Comment

    • Warham
      DIAMOND STATUS
      • Mar 2004
      • 14589

      #3
      He probably could have scored 80+ last night if he wanted.

      Comment

      • Brett
        Full Member Status

        • Jan 2004
        • 3538

        #4
        Yep was pretty cool, it didn't look like he was gonna get 60 he hit a 3 with 3 seconds left in the third, that did it.

        They were up 30 after 3, you had to take him out although it would have been cool to see him break the all-time Laker record of 71, which he almost certainly would have done had he played the 4th.

        Comment

        • Brett
          Full Member Status

          • Jan 2004
          • 3538

          #5
          "At the very least, let's drop the pleas for more passes to Chris Mihm and Laron Profit and admit that your appetite for watching Kobe launch has been restored."

          Well won't have to worry about part of that anyway, Laron Profit ruptured his Achilles last night. Season over.

          Comment

          • Warham
            DIAMOND STATUS
            • Mar 2004
            • 14589

            #6
            I still think Kobe will score 70+ some day. The guy's only 27.

            Comment

            • NATEDOG001976
              Veteran
              • Apr 2004
              • 2369

              #7
              What a fucking ball hog!
              http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/8...19yc8872wu.jpg


              http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/5...0269il5.th.jpg




              Originally posted by fuckhowardstern - dude - you sounded cool as a cucumber - totally relaxed and spoke with authority - must say I was a bit surprised but you sounded really at ease - super cool-like.

              Originally posted by DavidLeeNatra - nate, you are the fucking attention whore of the day and you DESERVE it

              Originally posted by Jérôme Frenchise - BTW, bravo NATE! Soon Dave will mention the Army by himself!

              Originally posted by franksters Have you heard Nate properly, We now moved up to an ''Organisation'' Awesome man!!
              Roth army....more than an army....it's a gr8 Organization!!

              Originally posted by Northern Girl
              Nate, so cool. I'm listening to the Dallas feed, so it'll be coming up in a while. Can't wait!

              Comment

              Working...