Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Isn't this a double standard?

  1. #1
    Foot Soldier

    Member No
    455
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2013 @ 12:19 AM
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    618
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts


    Rep Power
    21

    Isn't this a double standard?

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...dermott28.html



    Seems to me that the media and the Dems claim to be the champion of people's rights, but here they are once again in a double standard....
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:45 AM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,110
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,480
    Thanked 4,580 Times in 3,459 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    You mean this:

    Appeals Court rules against McDermott in taped call dispute

    By Matthew Daly

    The Associated Press

    WASHINGTON, D.C. — A federal appeals court ruled today that Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., violated federal law by turning over an illegally taped telephone call to reporters nearly a decade ago.

    In a 2-1 opinion, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that McDermott violated the rights of House Majority Leader John Boehner, who was heard on the 1996 call involving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

    The court ordered McDermott to pay Boehner more than $700,000 for leaking the taped conversation. The figure includes $60,000 in damages and more than $600,000 in legal costs.

    McDermott leaked a tape of a 1996 cell phone call involving former House Speaker Newt Gingrich to The New York Times and other news organizations.

    The call included discussion by Gingrich, R-Ga., and other House GOP leaders about a House ethics committee investigation of Gingrich. Boehner, R-Ohio, was a Gingrich lieutenant at the time and is now House majority leader.

    A lawyer for McDermott had argued that his actions were allowed under the First Amendment, and said a ruling against him would have "a huge chilling effect" on reporters and newsmakers alike.

    Lawyers for 18 news organizations — including ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, The Associated Press, The New York Times and The Washington Post — filed a brief backing McDermott.

    But Boehner's lawyers said McDermott's actions were clearly illegal.

    By leaking the tape McDermott "chilled the free speech of others," namely Boehner and Gingrich, lawyer Michael Carvin said following a court hearing in November.

    A spokesman for McDermott said today the congressman had just received the ruling and was studying it. A spokesman for Boehner could not be reached immediately.

    Copyright © 2006 The Seattle Times Company
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  3. #3
    Foot Soldier

    Member No
    455
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2013 @ 12:19 AM
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    618
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts


    Rep Power
    21
    You can't absolve McDermott can you and at the same time criticze Libby....

    What did they do differently?

    Sounds like the media may lean a little left to me....

  4. #4
    Foot Soldier

    Member No
    455
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2013 @ 12:19 AM
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    618
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts


    Rep Power
    21
    Thanks!

  5. #5
    Foot Soldier

    Member No
    455
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2013 @ 12:19 AM
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    618
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts


    Rep Power
    21
    It's a challenge just to get time to get stuff up here!!!! But thanks for your help Nick....

  6. #6
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 02:45 AM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,110
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,480
    Thanked 4,580 Times in 3,459 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by DR CHIP
    You can't absolve McDermott can you and at the same time criticze Libby....

    What did they do differently?

    Sounds like the media may lean a little left to me....
    Maybe you failed to remember that that's exactly how they got CLINTON over Lewinsky. An illegally taped phone call of Monica, by Linda (how come no one ever asks me to blow them?) TRIPP...


    BTW, Libby is in trouble for violating a law that forbids revealing covert operatives (probably on orders from Rove)...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Minneapolis Sets the standard!!!
    By NATEDOG001976 in forum Main VH/DLR Discussion
    Replies: 97
    Last Post: 11-18-2007, 11:44 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-07-2007, 02:27 PM
  3. Bush's Terror Double Standard
    By LoungeMachine in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-26-2006, 01:03 AM
  4. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-13-2005, 10:39 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •