Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: FEINGOLD BILL TO REDEPLOY TROOPS FROM IRAQ (Surrender in 120 Days)

  1. #1
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33

    Post FEINGOLD BILL TO REDEPLOY TROOPS FROM IRAQ (Surrender in 120 Days)

    SENATE MAJORITY LEADER COSPONSORS FEINGOLD BILL TO REDEPLOY TROOPS FROM IRAQ
    April 2, 2007


    Washington D.C. -_ U.S. Senator Russ Feingold (D-WI) and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) announced today that they are introducing legislation that will effectively end the current military mission in Iraq and begin the redeployment of U.S. forces. The bill requires the President to begin safely redeploying U.S. troops from Iraq 120 days from enactment, as required by the emergency supplemental spending bill the Senate passed last week. The bill ends funding for the war, with three narrow exceptions, effective March 31, 2008.

    “I am pleased to cosponsor Senator Feingold’s important legislation,” Reid said. “I believe it is consistent with the language included in the supplemental appropriations bill passed by a bipartisan majority of the Senate. If the President vetoes the supplemental appropriations bill and continues to resist changing course in Iraq, I will work to ensure this legislation receives a vote in the Senate in the next work period.”

    “I am delighted to be working with the Majority Leader to bring our involvement in the Iraq war to an end,” Feingold said. “Congress has a responsibility to end a war that is opposed by the American people and is undermining our national security. By ending funding for the President’s failed Iraq policy, our bill requires the President to safely redeploy our troops from Iraq.”

    The language of the legislation reads:

    (a) Transition of Mission - The President shall promptly transition the mission of United States forces in Iraq to the limited purposes set forth in subsection (d).

    (b) Commencement of Safe, Phased Redeployment from Iraq - The President shall commence the safe, phased redeployment of United States forces from Iraq that are not essential to the purposes set forth in subsection (d). Such redeployment shall begin not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act.

    (c) Prohibition on Use of Funds - No funds appropriated or otherwise made available under any provision of law may be obligated or expended to continue the deployment in Iraq of members of the United States Armed Forces after March 31, 2008.

    (d) Exception for Limited Purposes - The prohibition under subsection (c) shall not apply to the obligation or expenditure of funds for the limited purposes as follows:

    (1) To conduct targeted operations, limited in duration and scope, against members of al Qaeda and other international terrorist organizations.

    (2) To provide security for United States infrastructure and personnel.

    (3) To train and equip Iraqi security services.
    Link
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    Fuck this and fuck that
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 11:23 AM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    58,746
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,396
    Thanked 6,298 Times in 4,722 Posts


    Rep Power
    144
    Looks like Feingold is right again.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  3. #3
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Feingold is a joke and a disgrace to the state of Wisconsin. If he ever faced an actual candidate for the Senate he'd have his ass handed to him.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  4. #4
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    Feingold is a joke and a disgrace to the state of Wisconsin. If he ever faced an actual candidate for the Senate he'd have his ass handed to him.
    Why don't you run, ChickenhawkSchultz?
    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 04-03-2007 at 09:20 PM.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  5. #5
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Just want to know two things BigDouchebagBrian:

    1.) Whom are we/you 'surrendering' too? (your gay urges?)

    2.) When does your son enlist?

  6. #6
    26-21
    ROTH ARMY ELITE

    Member No
    22484
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Last Online
    10-07-2020 @ 08:27 PM
    Location
    Home again
    Age
    59
    Posts
    6,351
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    800
    Thanked 665 Times in 500 Posts


    Rep Power
    31
    Brian, you're an idiot.

    "Surrender"......

    How fucking stupid are you?
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  7. #7
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Look how he "cuts and runs" from his own thread. It's because he's just reciting what he was told like a good little middle aged bitch...

  8. #8
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33
    Originally posted by hideyoursheep
    Brian, you're an idiot.

    "Surrender"......

    How fucking stupid are you?
    Piss off, boy.


  9. #9
    Frontline Voice of Reason
    TOASTMASTER GENERAL
    BigBadBrian's Avatar
    Member No
    51
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    02-09-2013 @ 06:23 AM
    Location
    Lighted Streets on Quiet Nights
    Posts
    10,620
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    276
    Thanked 193 Times in 163 Posts


    Rep Power
    33
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Look how he "cuts and runs" from his own thread. It's because he's just reciting what he was told like a good little middle aged bitch...
    Leave it to Nick to bring up "gay urges" in this thread.

    Speaking of gay urges, how are you and hideyoursheep getting along these days, Nick?


  10. #10
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Why don't you run, ChickenhawkSchultz?
    Define "chickenhawk"

  11. #11
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Look in the mirror...

  12. #12
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by BigBadBrian
    Leave it to Nick to bring up "gay urges" in this thread.


    Sorry, lowblow!

    Speaking of gay urges, how are you and hideyoursheep getting along these days, Nick?

    What makes you ask?

  13. #13
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Look in the mirror...
    That's the best you can do?

    Seriously, I want your definition (other than me of course).

  14. #14
    Veteran
    Ellyllions's Avatar
    Member No
    19348
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Last Online
    09-13-2009 @ 04:30 PM
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    2,012
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


    Rep Power
    21
    It's political rhetoric only...lip service for party reputation.

    (d) Exception for Limited Purposes - The prohibition under subsection (c) shall not apply to the obligation or expenditure of funds for the limited purposes as follows:

    (1) To conduct targeted operations, limited in duration and scope, against members of al Qaeda and other international terrorist organizations.

    (2) To provide security for United States infrastructure and personnel.

    (3) To train and equip Iraqi security services.
    This is exactly what they're supposed to be doing over there right now.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  15. #15
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    That's the best you can do?

    Seriously, I want your definition (other than me of course).
    Then fucking Google it!

  16. #16
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Then fucking Google it!
    I want YOUR definition. Doesn't have to be complicated.

  17. #17
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    I want YOUR definition. Doesn't have to be complicated.
    You know fullwell what the definition is...

    First of all, this banter is off-topic, so take it to another thread...

    Secondly, this from the guy that has no concept of the "Chicken Little" analogy...

    But since I've determined that your not the sharpest knife in the drawer, I'll post a cartoon that's easy for you to figure out hopefully. Enjoy:


  18. #18
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Apparently YOU have no idea what Chicken Little is, especially as it relates to AlBore.

    And regarding chickenhawk, since you refuse to define it, even though you throw the term around alll of the time - I'll make a guess that "chickenhawk", to you, means anyone who is not a vet being in support of American military force being used.

    So am I right, anyone who is not a Vet being in support of the U.S. military being used?

  19. #19
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    Apparently YOU have no idea what Chicken Little is, especially as it relates to AlBore.


    Wow! What a zinger! Yeah, I guess people with all them scientific degrees are all Chicken Littles, huh genius?

    Try reading "1984" sometime, and maybe, just maybe, you'll figure out what a droning idiot you sound like, and who the real predictable "bore" is...

    And regarding chickenhawk, since you refuse to define it, even though you throw the term around alll of the time - I'll make a guess that "chickenhawk", to you, means anyone who is not a vet being in support of American military force being used.

    So am I right, anyone who is not a Vet being in support of the U.S. military being used?

    LMFAO Actually, read the cartoon jackass. That's not quite it.

    But you're getting warmer...

    And if you have a point to make it quick, other than you're too much of a pussy to:

    A.) serve in the military

    B.) actually start a thread with an accepted definition provided by numerous online resources provided by Google...

    Because I've notice you are incapable of discussing Feingold's points without resorting to personal attack...
    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 04-06-2007 at 09:58 PM.

  20. #20
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Wow! What a zinger! Yeah, I guess people with all them scientific degrees are all Chicken Littles, huh genius?

    Try reading "1984" sometime, and maybe, just maybe, you'll figure out what a droning idiot you sound like, and who the real predictable "bore" is...

    LMFAO Actually, read the cartoon jackass. That's not quite it.

    But you're getting warmer...

    And if you have a point to make it quick, other than you're too much of a pussy to:

    A.) serve in the military

    B.) actually start a thread with an accepted definition provided by numerous online resources provided by Google...

    Because I've notice you are incapable of discussing Feingold's points without resorting to personal attack...
    Just about all you do is throw insults around. I insulted Gore and Feingold, but not you. It is YOU who first typed the word "chickenhawk" in this thread. I'm trying to have a discussion by asking YOU what YOUR definition of the word is because you are so fond of the term (among others such as pussy, idiot etc). But, other than saying "look it up on Google" you don't really have your own definition. Even though you started the name calling and I asked for a clarification you now have a problem with our discussion being "off topic".

    So again I'll ask you, what is YOUR definition of "chickenhawk"?

  21. #21
    Roth Army Recruit

    Member No
    23130
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Last Online
    07-24-2007 @ 04:19 AM
    Location
    England
    Posts
    13
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts


    Rep Power
    0
    Not wanting to tread on anyones toes here, but over here in England a chickenhawk" is an American neocon who advocates war but has no or little military knowledge or service.
    If i'm incorrect let me know and i'll inform the masses and put the populous straight.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  22. #22
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    Just about all you do is throw insults around. I insulted Gore and Feingold, but not you. It is YOU who first typed the word "chickenhawk" in this thread. I'm trying to have a discussion by asking YOU what YOUR definition of the word is because you are so fond of the term (among others such as pussy, idiot etc). But, other than saying "look it up on Google" you don't really have your own definition. Even though you started the name calling and I asked for a clarification you now have a problem with our discussion being "off topic".

    So again I'll ask you, what is YOUR definition of "chickenhawk"?
    No, I insult you because I find your posts to be nihilist, almost condescending crap. I find lies and liars, especially smirky ones that cannot possibly believe the horseshit that they post, to be blatantly offensive. Your supercilious demeanor, and the fact that in the past that you've actually edited articles to fit your little worldview and talking points, offends me.

    I mean, what am I supposed to think of a partisan ideologue that is such a sanctimonious self-righteous cunt, that he actually has to edit materials to support what he is saying?

    I think that you and your ilk grandstanding the whole Neoconservative/Trotskyist mentality that "a little lie for a greater truth" mentality is just all that is wrong with this country right now...

    I mean, look at your fucking avatar. Al Gore is "Chicken Little?" Dude, that's fucking rich, and beneath rebuttal, at this point...

    Remember, "War is Peace," "Freedom is Slavery!"

  23. #23
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by spitfire ace
    Not wanting to tread on anyones toes here, but over here in England a chickenhawk" is an American neocon who advocates war but has no or little military knowledge or service.
    If i'm incorrect let me know and i'll inform the masses and put the populous straight.
    Thank you! I mean, Sgt Schultz is trying to sell some utter bollocks that anyone without military experience who supports the War is a "Chickenhawk."

    I've no problem with those that want to discuss it...

    I've never said this. A Chickenhawk is a condescending douchebag, running around the interweb with attacks on what they perceive to be "commie libs" and "Jihadist sympathizers," all while blogging and posting from the comfort of their mom's basement, and trying to turn the whole thing into a partisan ass-covering for the worst pResidents in modern history, and then blame it on the Democrats. Yeah, that's a good one!

  24. #24
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    No, I insult you because I find your posts to be nihilist, almost condescending crap. I find lies and liars, especially smirky ones that cannot possibly believe the horseshit that they post, to be blatantly offensive. Your supercilious demeanor, and the fact that in the past that you've actually edited articles to fit your little worldview and talking points, offends me.
    A nihilist? Are you sure?

    I think you are confusing honest inquiry with superciliousness.

    Edited how? By posting excerpts of articles? I think you are confusing editing (which is fine) and posting excerpts from articles, with blatant manipulation of words or works to misrepresent the original intent of the work cited.

    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    I mean, what am I supposed to think of a partisan ideologue that is such a sanctimonious self-righteous cunt, that he actually has to edit materials to support what he is saying?.
    See above.

    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    I mean, look at your fucking avatar. Al Gore is "Chicken Little?" Dude, that's fucking rich, and beneath rebuttal, at this point...?.
    The comparison of Al Gore with Chicken Little fits perfectly.

    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    Sgt Schultz is trying to sell some utter bollocks that anyone without military experience who supports the War is a "Chickenhawk."

    I've no problem with those that want to discuss it...
    Really, then why always use that term? Your idea of “discussion” usually seems to be name-calling and trying to bully those you don’t agree with.

    Originally posted by Nickdfresh
    I've never said this. A Chickenhawk is a condescending douchebag, running around the interweb with attacks on what they perceive to be "commie libs" and "Jihadist sympathizers," all while blogging and posting from the comfort of their mom's basement, and trying to turn the whole thing into a partisan ass-covering for the worst pResidents in modern history, and then blame it on the Democrats. Yeah, that's a good one!
    Finally we have your definition. So one is NOT a chickenhawk as long as he refrains from using certain words and terms you find hurtful. I said Feingold was a joke, and your response was to call me a chickenhawk. Makes a lot of sense.

    Generally, when someone flings “chickenhawk” at someone else they imply that the “chickenhawk” has no business even discussing the topic; the topic here being the Iraq War. By using the term you are attempting to delegitimize anything I say no matter if it has merit.

    I searched the forums here and the only place I found the term "Jihadist sympathizers" was in this thread, posted by you. I also searched "commie libs" and there were many hits, but the term was not written by me.

    I also have no interest in “partisan ass-covering” for George Bush either.

    So, am I still a chickenhawk?

  25. #25
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    [B]A nihilist? Are you sure?

    I think you are confusing honest inquiry with superciliousness.
    Anything BUT honest, you mean...

    Edited how? By posting excerpts of articles? I think you are confusing editing (which is fine) and posting excerpts from articles, with blatant manipulation of words or works to misrepresent the original intent of the work cited.
    Bullshit. It wasn't merely "an excerpt." You presented only half of the article that suited your little agenda, then selectively edited out parts that contradicted your post, or were at all critical of the Bush admin, completely changing the article's context, liar.

    The comparison of Al Gore with Chicken Little fits perfectly.
    Yeah, only science and the facts can stop you now...


    Really, then why always use that term? Your idea of �discussion� usually seems to be name-calling and trying to bully those you don�t agree with.
    Need a tampon?

    You haven't posted here much recently, but I'm pretty sure you used to lob insults at anyone that disagreed with you, bang drum.

    Yup! Some examples of Sgt. Scheistkopf's articulate political discourse:

    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...968#post282968

    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...280#post281280

    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    [B]The crybabies continue to wet their diapers............boo hoo
    __________
    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...416#post373416

    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    The Democrat liberal conspiracy freakish left wing crybabies have their panties wedged even higher up into their bungholes. These no-brained, dim-witted, emotionally unstable, intellectual dinosaurs are STILL wetting their diapers and pooping their pantaloons about George Bush as an apparent coping mechanism to deflect bleak self examination. The inbred canon of Bushhate continues to be displayed at the latest incarnation of masturbatory megalomania.
    Get your hankies out………………………………………


    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...238#post377238

    More:

    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...176#post377176

    Sgt. Scheistkopf insults veterans:

    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...176#post377176

    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    Thanks for serving so you can tell me to shut the fuck up! I'm glad to see your service was not in vain and you protected my right to free speech. Thanks also for pointing out that I have no right to free speech unless I was in the armed forces like you were! I'm glad I paid taxes to pay you r salary and feed and clothe you so that you could then tell me to shut the fuck up becasue I didn't join and receive free health care, food, pay and clothing like you. Thanks for enlightening me.
    Sgt. Scheistkopf bristles at being called a "Chickenhawk by that raving leftist madman: Knuckleboner????

    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...019#post377019

    And to top it all off, Sgt. Scheistkopf calls me a ""loony leftwing...pacifist" that is rooting against the team and hoping that "we lose," the team he never played for but I did :
    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...019#post377019

    http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showt...019#post377019

    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    So since you won’t answer the question (don’t feel too bad, most lefties won’t answer) whether you want the U.S. to win the war or not I’ll guess that you DON’T want the U.S. to win the war. Bringing up the lame “chickenhawk” argument AGAIN I see? Fine.

    Since you are in favor of the U.S. LOSING in Iraq and I’m sure you were not in favor of the war to begin with, and since there were no wmd then you are in favor of a return of Saddam Hussein, and since you and other leftists believe that free speech (in favor of winning the war) has certain caveats then I say that YOUR free speech means that YOU should show us all how YOU want to go live in Iraq after Saddam has been put back in power.
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    Fuck off with your Internet message board language. My original post was a reaction to you stating that you are rooting for the insurgents to win in Iraq and that as German you should know better. WHich part of the Marshall Plan did the U.S. not pay for then?
    Yeah, right, go fuck yourself hypocrite pussy-bitch...

    And thank you for proving me right in what a fundamentally dishonest, smarmy cunt you are...

    [quote]http://www.rotharmy.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=282968#post282968


    Finally we have your definition. So one is NOT a chickenhawk as long as he refrains from using certain words and terms you find hurtful. I said Feingold was a joke, and your response was to call me a chickenhawk. Makes a lot of sense.

    Generally, when someone flings �chickenhawk� at someone else they imply that the �chickenhawk� has no business even discussing the topic; the topic here being the Iraq War. By using the term you are attempting to delegitimize anything I say no matter if it has merit.

    I searched the forums here and the only place I found the term "Jihadist sympathizers" was in this thread, posted by you. I also searched "commie libs" and there were many hits, but the term was not written by me.

    I also have no interest in �partisan ass-covering� for George Bush either.

    So, am I still a chickenhawk?
    See the above posts cumrag...

    And anyone can see what a fucking big-mouthed douche you are in that thread lobbing "fuck yous" like no tomorrow, and accusing people you seem to call "America's enemies," that is, Americans that disagree with you, are "rooting" for the enemy...

    Nice revision of history Chewtar bitch. Now run along and "bang drum."
    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 04-07-2007 at 01:56 PM.

  26. #26
    General Secretaty
    Commando
    Sgt Schultz's Avatar
    Member No
    2447
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Last Online
    03-29-2024 @ 10:47 AM
    Location
    Россия
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,268
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    29
    Thanked 25 Times in 17 Posts


    Rep Power
    22
    You still can't, or won't, reply with any substance. Instead, you just come back with more of the same garbage, just at a higher volume.

    Reading your posts are a waste of time.

  27. #27
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    Today @ 10:37 PM
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Online
    Thanks
    3,483
    Thanked 4,582 Times in 3,461 Posts


    Rep Power
    116
    Originally posted by Sgt Schultz
    You still can't, or won't, reply with any substance. Instead, you just come back with more of the same garbage, just at a higher volume.
    ...
    Well, I was quoting you...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 9 US Troops Killed in Iraq in 2 Days
    By Nickdfresh in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 01-10-2008, 11:43 AM
  2. Democratic Leaders Ask Bush to Redeploy Troops in Iraq
    By Nickdfresh in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 08-01-2006, 10:04 PM
  3. U.S. Troops Try Courtesy in Iraq
    By Steve Savicki in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-04-2006, 05:02 PM
  4. 20,000 troops out of Iraq over the holidays
    By DLR'sCock in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 11-05-2005, 03:13 PM
  5. 39% Say Withdraw Troops From Iraq (46% Say NO)
    By BigBadBrian in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 08-29-2005, 07:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •