Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: The wild wild web to be tamed, or even shut down?

  1. #1
    Fretting Machine
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    Coyote's Avatar
    Member No
    58
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    10-19-2021 @ 04:00 AM
    Location
    On my tropical island
    Age
    40
    Posts
    8,185
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked 873 Times in 627 Posts


    Rep Power
    38

    The wild wild web to be tamed, or even shut down?

    Internet Doomsday Creeps Closer
    Big government pushes for total taxation and restriction on the last great outpost of free speech

    Steve Watson
    Infowars.net
    Monday, June 4, 2007





    Recent proposals in the U.S. Congress are taking a huge swipe at freedom in America once again by aiming to impose multiple different forms of crippling taxation and restriction on users of the internet.

    State and local governments this week resumed a push to lobby Congress for far-reaching changes on two different fronts: gaining the ability to impose sales taxes on Net shopping, and being able to levy new monthly taxes on DSL and other Internet-service connections. One senator is even predicting taxes on e-mail, reports CNet.

    Several bills were introduced last week that could see all manner of new forms of internet taxation become a reality before the end of the year.

    Sen. Michael Enzi, a Wyoming Republican, introduced a bill (PDF link) for mandatory sales tax collection for Internet purchases, meaning that if you buy items through online sites like eBay or Amazon.com, you might have to start paying additional sales taxes on your purchases.

    The Libertarian party has warned hat the bill represents more big government intervention and that while Enzi insists the bill "would not increase taxes," the Sales Tax Fairness and Simplification Act would open the door for states to charge sales tax on Internet sales. In contrast to his statement, the C-Net article states that Enzi warned that other taxes may zoom upward if his "mandatory sales tax collection" bill isn't passed.

    In a second and separate proposal during a House of Representatives hearing last week, politicians weighed whether to let a temporary ban on internet access taxes lapse when it expires on November 1.

    Such a move would leave open the possibility that simply using the internet would require a tax to be paid which critics suggest could sound a death knell for broadband, DSL and "always on" high speed internet.

    Rep. Hank Johnson, a Democrat from Georgia compared the move to taxing people for simply entering shopping malls or libraries. With the U.S. economy already under considerable strain, taking a huge swipe at e-commerce, one of its cornerstones, seems like the worst possible thing Congress could do.

    Furthermore, allowing taxation on internet access represents a slippery slope towards opening up the possibilities of taxing all kinds of internet based services.

    "They might say, 'We have no interest in having taxes on e-mail,' but if we allow the prohibition on Internet taxes to expire, then you open the door on cities and towns and states to tax e-mail or other aspects of Internet access," said Sen. John Sununu, a New Hampshire Republican.

    An email tax would certainly suit both the government and internet providers who would likely get a cut. Last year it was revealed that AOL is planning to charge mass-emailers a fee to avoid the ISP's spam filters and guarantee that their marketing emails arrive straight in AOL subscribers' inboxes. Yahoo! is also endorsing the scheme.

    Under such a system email considered "uncertified" would risk running through AOL and Yahoo!'s discrimination process. And as this potential profit center for the two net giants takes off, there's no incentive for either company to deliver the "free email" - and every incentive for them to get the world conditioned to paying for guaranteed delivery.

    A United Nations agency also proposed in 1999 the idea of a 1-cent-per-100-message tax, indicating that the idea has been floating around for almost a decade.


    In recent months, a chorus of propaganda intended to demonize the Internet and further lead it down a path of strict control has spewed forth from numerous establishment organs:

    - Time magazine reported last month that researchers funded by the federal government want to shut down the internet and start over, citing the fact that at the moment there are loopholes in the system whereby users cannot be tracked and traced all the time. The projects echo moves we have previously reported on to clamp down on internet neutrality and even to designate a new form of the internet known as Internet 2.

    - In a display of bi-partisanship, there have recently been calls for all out mandatory ISP snooping on all US citizens by both Democrats and Republicans alike.

    - Republican Senator John McCain recently tabled a proposal to introduce legislation that would fine blogs up to $300,000 for offensive statements, photos and videos posted by visitors on comment boards. It is well known that McCain has a distaste for his blogosphere critics, causing a definite conflict of interest where any proposal to restrict blogs on his part is concerned.

    - During an appearance with his wife Barbara on Fox News last November, George Bush senior slammed Internet bloggers for creating an "adversarial and ugly climate."

    - The White House's own recently de-classified strategy for "winning the war on terror" targets Internet conspiracy theories as a recruiting ground for terrorists and threatens to "diminish" their influence.

    - The Pentagon recently announced its effort to infiltrate the Internet and propagandize for the war on terror.

    - In a speech last October, Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff indentified the web as a "terror training camp," through which "disaffected people living in the United States" are developing "radical ideologies and potentially violent skills." His solution is "intelligence fusion centers," staffed by Homeland Security personnel which will go into operation next year.

    - The U.S. Government wants to force bloggers and online grassroots activists to register and regularly report their activities to Congress. Criminal charges including a possible jail term of up to one year could be the punishment for non-compliance.

    - A landmark legal case on behalf of the Recording Industry Association of America and other global trade organizations seeks to criminalize all Internet filetrading of any kind as copyright infringement, effectively shutting down the world wide web - and their argument is supported by the U.S. government.

    - A landmark legal ruling in Sydney goes further than ever before in setting the trap door for the destruction of the Internet as we know it and the end of alternative news websites and blogs by creating the precedent that simply linking to other websites is breach of copyright and piracy.

    - The European Union, led by former Stalinist and potential future British Prime Minister John Reid, has also vowed to shut down "terrorists" who use the Internet to spread propaganda.

    - The EU data retention bill, passed last year after much controversy and with implementation tabled for late 2007, obliges telephone operators and internet service providers to store information on who called who and who emailed who for at least six months. Under this law, investigators in any EU country, and most bizarrely even in the US, can access EU citizens' data on phone calls, sms', emails and instant messaging services.

    - The EU also recently proposed legislation that would prevent users from uploading any form of video without a license.

    - The US government is also funding research into social networking sites and how to gather and store personal data published on them, according to the New Scientist magazine "At the same time, US lawmakers are attempting to force the social networking sites themselves to control the amount and kind of information that people, particularly children, can put on the sites."


    The development of a new form of internet with new regulations is also designed to create an online caste system whereby the old internet hubs would be allowed to break down and die, forcing people to use the new taxable, censored and regulated world wide web.

    Make no mistake, the internet, one of the greatest outposts of free speech ever created is under constant attack by powerful people who cannot operate within a society where information flows freely and unhindered. Both American and European moves mimic stories we hear every week out of State Controlled Communist China, where the internet is strictly regulated and virtually exists as its own entity away from the rest of the web.

    The Internet is freedom's best friend and the bane of control freaks. Its eradication is one of the short term goals of those that seek to centralize power and subjugate their populations under a surveillance panopticon prison.


    Link
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  2. #2
    Fretting Machine
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    Coyote's Avatar
    Member No
    58
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    10-19-2021 @ 04:00 AM
    Location
    On my tropical island
    Age
    40
    Posts
    8,185
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked 873 Times in 627 Posts


    Rep Power
    38
    I can already imagine some fatass bigshot going: "The rabble knows too much! Shut it down!!"

  3. #3
    Fuck this and fuck that
    ROTH ARMY MODERATOR

    FORD's Avatar
    Member No
    32
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 10:40 PM
    Location
    Cascadia
    Posts
    58,736
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    3,396
    Thanked 6,298 Times in 4,722 Posts


    Rep Power
    144
    Without the internet, I would be stuck getting my news from the corporate whore media. I'd still know it was a lie, but I'd never get to the truth.

    And that is EXACTLY why they want to shut it down. It's the one media they haven't yet controlled.

    We must defend the internet at all costs, because if we lose it, we lose all hope of reversing the fascism in this country.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  4. #4
    ®oth A®my f®an©hise ?laya
    Full Member Status

    Steve Savicki's Avatar
    Member No
    46
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    05-18-2011 @ 11:33 AM
    Location
    definitely NOT Huntsville, Alabama
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,934
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    554
    Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    0

    Talking

    Originally posted by FORD
    We must defend the internet at all costs, because if we lose it, we lose all hope of reversing the fascism in this country.
    They would want to shut down the internet after reading The Front Line.:p
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  5. #5
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:17 PM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,783
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,438
    Thanked 4,015 Times in 3,250 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Talk is cheap. The internet is it's own animal and develops and evolves in an unpredictable way. Even industry insiders can't tell you what the internet is going to be like five years from now.

    Govt. Buerocrats and politicians would love to control, police, and tax everything we do from fucking to shitting.

    No way in hell can they do what they speak of. People won't tollerate it.
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  6. #6
    Fretting Machine
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    Coyote's Avatar
    Member No
    58
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    10-19-2021 @ 04:00 AM
    Location
    On my tropical island
    Age
    40
    Posts
    8,185
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked 873 Times in 627 Posts


    Rep Power
    38
    Originally posted by Nitro Express
    No way in hell can they do what they speak of. People won't tollerate it.
    The people might not even realize it, if it's disguised in complicated bullshit-corporate/political lingo.

  7. #7
    Fretting Machine
    ROTH ARMY SUPREME
    Coyote's Avatar
    Member No
    58
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    10-19-2021 @ 04:00 AM
    Location
    On my tropical island
    Age
    40
    Posts
    8,185
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,880
    Thanked 873 Times in 627 Posts


    Rep Power
    38
    And, of course, the net'll be turned into something "dangerous" first, requiring more and more control applications, etc.

    Y'know, to keep the kids safe...

  8. #8
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 09:17 PM
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,783
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    1,438
    Thanked 4,015 Times in 3,250 Posts


    Blog Entries
    15
    Rep Power
    94
    Originally posted by Coyote
    The people might not even realize it, if it's disguised in complicated bullshit-corporate/political lingo.
    You can hide things in ballots and you can camoflauge it in technical legal language but Bubba still feels the pain when he pays the tax, or can access his websites.

    What would happen if the govt. shut down everybodies television? They get pissed. Sure if you are a Joseph Stalin or Saddam Hussain you can but we haven't degenerated to that level yet.

  9. #9
    the juggernaut bitch
    Full Member Status

    Redballjets88's Avatar
    Member No
    12533
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Last Online
    10-04-2021 @ 11:47 PM
    Location
    Dallas
    Age
    35
    Posts
    4,453
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    43
    Thanked 46 Times in 38 Posts


    Rep Power
    24
    it would be bullshit if they shut down the internet, but the couldnt, it would fuck the conomy up too much, with things such as email etc being lost. but i am for taming it. we dont need all of the smut there is such as kiddy porn and stuff, it is sick and disgusting. it only fuels paedophiles (sp?) i mean if some child molester watches a lot of kid porn then they are more inclined to go rape a kid. other than that leave the internet alone. if you dont agree go to hell
    Hey Jackass! You need to [Register] or log in to view signatures on ROTHARMY.COM!

  10. #10
    ®oth A®my f®an©hise ?laya
    Full Member Status

    Steve Savicki's Avatar
    Member No
    46
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Last Online
    05-18-2011 @ 11:33 AM
    Location
    definitely NOT Huntsville, Alabama
    Age
    50
    Posts
    3,934
    Status
    Offline
    Thanks
    554
    Thanked 43 Times in 29 Posts


    Blog Entries
    1
    Rep Power
    0
    Agreed and Happy b-day.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. One Wild Ride
    By ALinChainz in forum Max's Non VH/DLR Related Stuff
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 06-08-2007, 05:33 PM
  2. Boys Gone Wild!!
    By FORD in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-26-2006, 03:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •