Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Only 190,000 Assault Rifles Missing in Iraq

  1. #1
    Loon
    SUPER MODERATOR

    Nickdfresh's Avatar
    Member No
    8719
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Age
    53
    Posts
    49,121
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    116

    Angry Only 190,000 Assault Rifles Missing in Iraq

    Weapons given to Iraq are missing
    30 percent of arms are unaccounted for, GAO estimates

    By Glenn Kessler
    The Washington Post
    Updated: 8:22 p.m. ET Aug 5, 2007

    The Pentagon has lost track of about 190,000 AK-47 assault rifles and pistols given to Iraqi security forces in 2004 and 2005, according to a new government report, raising fears that some of those weapons have fallen into the hands of insurgents fighting U.S. forces in Iraq.

    The report from the Government Accountability Office indicates that U.S. military officials do not know what happened to 30 percent of the weapons the United States distributed to Iraqi forces from 2004 through early this year as part of an effort to train and equip the troops. The highest previous estimate of unaccounted-for weapons was 14,000, in a report issued last year by the inspector general for Iraq reconstruction.

    The United States has spent $19.2 billion trying to develop Iraqi security forces since 2003, the GAO said, including at least $2.8 billion to buy and deliver equipment. But the GAO said weapons distribution was haphazard and rushed and failed to follow established procedures, particularly from 2004 to 2005, when security training was led by Gen. David H. Petraeus, who now commands all U.S. forces in Iraq.

    The Pentagon did not dispute the GAO findings, saying it has launched its own investigation and indicating it is working to improve tracking. Although controls have been tightened since 2005, the inability of the United States to track weapons with tools such as serial numbers makes it nearly impossible for the U.S. military to know whether it is battling an enemy equipped by American taxpayers.

    ‘No idea where they are’
    "They really have no idea where they are," said Rachel Stohl, a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information who has studied small-arms trade and received Pentagon briefings on the issue. "It likely means that the United States is unintentionally providing weapons to bad actors."

    One senior Pentagon official acknowledged that some of the weapons probably were being used against U.S. forces. He cited the Iraqi brigade created at Fallujah that quickly dissolved in September 2004 and turned its weapons against the Americans.

    Stohl said that insurgents frequently use small-arms fire to force military convoys to move in a particular direction -- often toward roadside bombs that target troops and vehicles. She noted that the Bush administration frequently complains that Iran and Syria are supplying insurgents but has paid little attention to whether U.S. military errors inadvertently play a role. "We know there is seepage and very little is being done to address the problem," she said.

    Stohl noted that U.S. forces, focused on a fruitless search for weapons of mass destruction after Baghdad fell, failed to secure massive weapons caches. The failure to track small arms given to Iraqi forces repeats that pattern of neglect, she added.

    The GAO is studying the financing and weapons sources of insurgent groups, but that report will not be made public. "All of that information is classified," said Joseph A. Christoff, the GAO's director of international affairs and trade.

    In an unusual move, the train-and-equip program for Iraqi forces is being managed by the Pentagon. Normally, the traditional security assistance programs are operated by the State Department, the GAO reported. The Defense Department said this change permitted greater flexibility, but as of last month it was unable able to tell the GAO what accountability procedures, if any, apply to arms distributed to Iraqi forces, the report said.

    Iraqi security forces were virtually nonexistent in early 2004, and in June of that year Petraeus was brought in to build them up. No central record of distributed equipment was kept for a year and a half, until December 2005, and even now the records are on a spreadsheet that requires three computer screens lined up side by side to view a single row, Christoff said.

    The GAO found that the military was consistently unable to collect supporting documents to "confirm when the equipment was received, the quantities of equipment delivered, and the Iraqi units receiving the equipment." The agency also said there were "numerous mistakes due to incorrect manual entries" in the records that were maintained.

    The GAO reached the estimate of 190,000 missing arms -- 110,000 AK-47s and 80,000 pistols -- by comparing the property records of the Multi-National Security Transition Command for Iraq against records Petraeus maintained of the arms and equipment he had ordered. Petraeus's figures were compared with classified data and other records to ensure that it was accurate enough to compare against the property books.

    In all cases, the gaps between the two records were enormous. Petraeus reported that about 185,000 AK-47 rifles, 170,000 pistols, 215,000 pieces of body armor and 140,000 helmets were issued to Iraqi security forces from June 2004 through September 2005. But the property books contained records for 75,000 AK-47 rifles, 90,000 pistols, 80,000 pieces of body armor and 25,000 helmets.

    A military commander involved in the program at the time, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the report, acknowledged in an e-mail, "We did issue some items, including weapons, body armor, etc. to new Iraqi units that were literally going into battle."

    ‘Not much of a choice early on’
    But, the commander argued, "there was, frankly, not much of a choice early on: We had very little staff and could have held the weapons until every piece of the logistical and property accountability system was in place, or we could issue them, in bulk on some occasions, to the U.S. elements supporting Iraqi units who were needed in the battles of Najaf, Fallujah, Mosul, Samarra, etc."

    The GAO plans to look for similar problems in the training of Afghan security forces.

    During the Bosnian conflict, the United States provided about $100 million in defense equipment to the Bosnian Federation Army, and the GAO found no problems in accounting for those weapons.

    Much of the equipment provided to Iraqi troops, including the AK-47s, originates from countries in the former Soviet bloc. In a report last year, Amnesty International said that in 2004 and 2005 more than 350,000 AK-47 rifles and similar weapons were taken out of Bosnia and Serbia, for use in Iraq, by private contractors working for the Pentagon and with the approval of NATO and European security forces in Bosnia.
    © 2007 The Washington Post Company

    MSNBC

    Fucking ridiculous!!
    Last edited by Nickdfresh; 08-06-2007 at 10:59 AM.

  2. #2
    26-21
    ROTH ARMY ELITE

    Member No
    22484
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Home again
    Age
    59
    Posts
    6,351
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    31
    Yup.

    The 2nd amendment is in effect there moreso than right here.

    Try owning an AK.

    1 *cough* per household.

  3. #3
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,790
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    94
    An unregistered fully atomatic AK-47 would get you probably 30 years in prison in the United States.

    It makes a nice news story but the Middle East is awash in Kaloshnikovs. There are so many you can pick up a halfway decent used one for about $20. Small arms fire isn't what is killing most our troops anyways. It's the bombs and mines in the road.
    No! You can't have the keys to the wine cellar!

  4. #4
    Atomic Jerk
    ROCKSTAR

    ODShowtime's Avatar
    Member No
    5835
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    La Casa Del Showtime
    Posts
    5,812
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    26
    The GAO reached the estimate of 190,000 missing arms -- 110,000 AK-47s and 80,000 pistols -- by comparing the property records of the Multi-National Security Transition Command for Iraq against records Petraeus maintained of the arms and equipment he had ordered. Petraeus's figures were compared with classified data and other records to ensure that it was accurate enough to compare against the property books.

    In all cases, the gaps between the two records were enormous. Petraeus reported that about 185,000 AK-47 rifles, 170,000 pistols, 215,000 pieces of body armor and 140,000 helmets were issued to Iraqi security forces from June 2004 through September 2005. But the property books contained records for 75,000 AK-47 rifles, 90,000 pistols, 80,000 pieces of body armor and 25,000 helmets.
    Sure it could be the Iraqis and insurgents stealing the weapons. But judging from this information, it could have been Americans who first had their hands on this stash. I wonder who they sold them to?

    Looks like enough was missing for everyone to wet their beaks.
    gnaw on it

  5. #5
    DUMMY CONS FEAR ME!
    Crazy Ass Mofo
    DEMON CUNT's Avatar
    Member No
    9221
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Hades, USA
    Posts
    3,240
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    24
    We have been suppling Iraq with weapons for years and years.


  6. #6
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,790
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    94
    Originally posted by DEMON CUNT
    We have been suppling Iraq with weapons for years and years.

    Us and the Soviets. Saddam was sucking both cocks.

  7. #7
    DIAMOND STATUS
    Nitro Express's Avatar
    Member No
    7682
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Last Online
    @
    Location
    Jackson Hole, Wyoming
    Posts
    32,790
    Status
    Offline
    Rep Power
    94
    Originally posted by ODShowtime
    Sure it could be the Iraqis and insurgents stealing the weapons. But judging from this information, it could have been Americans who first had their hands on this stash. I wonder who they sold them to?

    Looks like enough was missing for everyone to wet their beaks.
    With the US govt. treating the US serviceman like shit can you blame them. Walter Reed, having to use scrap junk to armor Humvees, body armor shortages. Knowing when you die, you are shipped home as frieght. I wonder how many are out there that signed up for some money for college and they are delivering pizza in Iraq with a "I don't fucking care anymore" attitude.

    A wet beak is sweet revenge against Bushco.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Thousands Of US Weapons Missing In Iraq
    By LoungeMachine in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-30-2006, 01:35 PM
  2. IRAQ: 16 Sadr Loyalists Killed in Assault
    By Nickdfresh in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-27-2006, 07:04 AM
  3. Missing U.S.-Iraq History
    By Hardrock69 in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-16-2006, 10:50 AM
  4. 150,000+ U.S. Assault And Battery On Iraq
    By Phil theStalker in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 12-03-2004, 11:58 AM
  5. Hundreds of Millions Missing in Iraq
    By DLR'sCock in forum The Front Line
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-31-2004, 11:18 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •